← Back to home

COUNTY OF COLUMBIA, NEW YORKLocal Government

EIN: 146002564

UEI: JDVXNBJLCLZ4

Audited by: Drescher & Malecki LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

COUNTY OF COLUMBIA, NEW YORK9 audit years6 findings
9
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$20M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,012,031 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (167 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

$22,502,290 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$19,201,127 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$15,893,708 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2023 — management decision was due September 15, 2023.

2021-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Finding 2021-002 Criteria ? The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the ?SEFA?) represents federal funding that was expended by the County in its fiscal year. Condition ? The SEFA included revenue adjustments for several programs that if not adjusted, would misstate the federal expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause ? The method used by the County to prepare the SEFA uses federal revenues as a starting point for preparing the SEFA. This method caused several revenue adjustments to impact the numbers used by the County on the SEFA. Effect ? The SEFA without adjustment would have been misstated for several programs. Recommendation ? We recommend the County review its preparation process of the SEFA to focus only on federal expenditures. Response ? The County will review policies and procedures and take appropriate action to capture SEFA expenses for the fiscal year as required. Responsible Official ? Robert Gibson, Commissioner and James Breig, Controller/Auditor

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-002 Criteria ? The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the ?SEFA?) represents federal funding that was expended by the County in its fiscal year. Condition ? The SEFA included revenue adjustments for several programs that if not adjusted, would misstate the federal expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause ? The method used by the County to prepare the SEFA uses federal revenues as a starting point for preparing the SEFA. This method caused several revenue adjustments to impact the numbers used by the County on the SEFA. Effect ? The SEFA without adjustment would have been misstated for several programs. Recommendation ? We recommend the County review its preparation process of the SEFA to focus only on federal expenditures. Response ? The County will review policies and procedures and take appropriate action to capture SEFA expenses for the fiscal year as required. Responsible Official ? Robert Gibson, Commissioner and James Breig, Controller/Auditor

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2021-002 Criteria ? The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the ?SEFA?) represents federal funding that was expended by the County in its fiscal year. Condition ? The SEFA included revenue adjustments for several programs that if not adjusted, would misstate the federal expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause ? The method used by the County to prepare the SEFA uses federal revenues as a starting point for preparing the SEFA. This method caused several revenue adjustments to impact the numbers used by the County on the SEFA. Effect ? The SEFA without adjustment would have been misstated for several programs. Recommendation ? We recommend the County review its preparation process of the SEFA to focus only on federal expenditures. Response ? The County will review policies and procedures and take appropriate action to capture SEFA expenses for the fiscal year as required.

About Other →

FY 2020-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$16,854,522 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2022 — management decision was due August 9, 2022.

2020-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding 2020-002 Criteria ? The County reviews and approves all applications for assistance from programs administered by the Columbia County Department of Social Services. Condition ? The documentation supporting the controls for one of the forty sample selections was not properly approved to document the approval process of applications for assistance in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Cause ? The required approval of one of the forty sample selections was not documented by the supervisor. Effect ? The County could process ineligible expenditures without an effective documented approval process. Recommendation ? We recommend the County review and enhance its approval procedures for assistance to properly document the required supervisor approval. Response ? The Columbia County Department of Social Services will review its processes to ensure all service authorization forms are properly completed before the commencement of services. Responsible Official ? Robert Gibson, Commissioner

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-002 Criteria ? The County reviews and approves all applications for assistance from programs administered by the Columbia County Department of Social Services. Condition ? The documentation supporting the controls for one of the forty sample selections was not properly approved to document the approval process of applications for assistance in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Cause ? The required approval of one of the forty sample selections was not documented by the supervisor. Effect ? The County could process ineligible expenditures without an effective documented approval process. Recommendation ? We recommend the County review and enhance its approval procedures for assistance to properly document the required supervisor approval. Response ? The Columbia County Department of Social Services will review its processes to ensure all service authorization forms are properly completed before the commencement of services. Responsible Official ? Robert Gibson, Commissioner

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-002 Planned Corrective Action: The Columbia County Department of Social Services will review its processes to ensure all service authorization forms are properly completed before the commencement of services. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: February 28, 2022 Name of Contact Person: Robert Gibson, Commissioner

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →

FY 2019-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$15,311,027 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2020 — management decision was due June 22, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$14,486,266 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2019 — management decision was due March 18, 2020.

2018-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$15,193,769 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 1, 2018 — management decision was due April 1, 2019.

2017-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2017-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2016-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$14,289,384 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2017 — management decision was due April 2, 2018.

2016-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.