← Back to home

Town of SaugertiesLocal Government

EIN: 146002425

UEI: KYT5JQ4UQWF5

Audited by: RBT CPAs, LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 29, 2026

Town of Saugerties8 audit years13 findings7 repeat
8
Audit Years
13
Total Findings
7
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,722,951 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 13, 2026 (75 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2024-010
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-010OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. RBT also noted that the PHA did not submit the SEMAP performance reporting. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with 24 CFR section 985.3(h), and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that appropriate audit ready information/documentation was available in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. The Executive Director was not aware of the annual SEMAP reporting requirement. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The GAAP-based unaudited and audited information and the SEMAP reporting were not filed timely. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-010. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement procedures to ensure that all required information/documentation is prepared timely such that the Town can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-010 Reporting – Compliance and Internal Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.871 – Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. RBT also noted that the PHA did not submit the SEMAP performance reporting. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with 24 CFR section 985.3(h), and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that appropriate audit ready information/documentation was available in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. The Executive Director was not aware of the annual SEMAP reporting requirement. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The GAAP-based unaudited and audited information and the SEMAP reporting were not filed timely. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-010. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement procedures to ensure that all required information/documentation is prepared timely such that the Town can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-010 -Reporting Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The town will work with the Public Housing administrator to implement a system to complete and file the unaudited fmancial information within two and a half months, and with the independent audit frrm to file within nine months. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2023-010

About Reporting →
2024-011
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-011OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution until August 2024. Criteria: PHAs are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that the agreement was obtained and available upon request. Once the Town was made aware of the requirement, they contacted their financial institution to obtain the agreement, but were unable to obtain a Depository Agreement for several months upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the PHA’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The PHA did not have a depository agreement on file for their one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-011. Recommendation: RBT noted that the Town obtained the required Depository Agreement as of August 2024. RBT recommends that the Town implement controls such that required Depository Agreements are obtained when opening accounts at new banks. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-011 Special Tests and Provisions: Depository Agreements - Compliance and Internal Control U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.871 – Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution until August 2024. Criteria: PHAs are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that the agreement was obtained and available upon request. Once the Town was made aware of the requirement, they contacted their financial institution to obtain the agreement, but were unable to obtain a Depository Agreement for several months upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the PHA’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The PHA did not have a depository agreement on file for their one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-011. Recommendation: RBT noted that the Town obtained the required Depository Agreement as of August 2024. RBT recommends that the Town implement controls such that required Depository Agreements are obtained when opening accounts at new banks. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-011 - Special Tests and Provisions: Depository Agreements Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will work with the Public Housing administrator to insure a depository agreement is in place and documentation of same is on file and readily available. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2023-011

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-012
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-012OTHER MATTERS

The Town did not submit the audit and Data Collection Form within the nine-month due date for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure timely filing of the single audit and Data Collection Form. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits 200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirements have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-012. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit completed in a timely manner. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-012 Single Audit Reporting – Compliance and Internal Control Condition: The Town did not submit the audit and Data Collection Form within the nine-month due date for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure timely filing of the single audit and Data Collection Form. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits 200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirements have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-012. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit completed in a timely manner. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-012 - Single Audit Reporting Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will work with the accounting department, fee accountant, and audit fmn to file the required reports timely. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2026 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2023-012

About Reporting →
2024-013
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-013

The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required under 48 CFR section 9.405-2(b) and the clause at 48 CFR section 52.209-6 to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-013. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-013 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment – Internal Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”) Condition: The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required under 48 CFR section 9.405-2(b) and the clause at 48 CFR section 52.209-6 to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Repeat Finding of 2023-013. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-013 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment - CSLFRF Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will review all contracts funded with CSLFRF for applicable contractors and perform verification of non suspension and non debarment. Policies will be reviewed and updated to insure adherence to this requirement. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2023-013

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-12-31

ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,758,915 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2026 — management decision was due November 13, 2026.

2023-010
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-007OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. RBT also noted that the PHA did not submit the SEMAP performance reporting. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with 24 CFR section 985.3(h), and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that appropriate audit ready information/documentation was available in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. The Executive Director was not aware of the annual SEMAP reporting requirement. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information and the SEMAP reporting were not filed timely. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2022-007. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town implement procedures to ensure that all required information/documentation is prepared timely such that the Town can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-010 Reporting – Compliance and Internal Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.871 – Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. RBT also noted that the PHA did not submit the SEMAP performance reporting. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with 24 CFR section 985.3(h), and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that appropriate audit ready information/documentation was available in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. The Executive Director was not aware of the annual SEMAP reporting requirement. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information and the SEMAP reporting were not filed timely. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2022-007. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town implement procedures to ensure that all required information/documentation is prepared timely such that the Town can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-010 - Reporting Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The town will work with the Public Housing administrator to implement a system to complete and file the unaudited financial information within two and a half months, and with the independent audit finn to file within nine months. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2022-007

About Reporting →
2023-011
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-008OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution until August 2024. Criteria: PHAs are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that the agreement was obtained and available upon request. Once the Town was made aware of the requirement, they contacted their financial institution to obtain the agreement, but were unable to obtain a Depository Agreement for several months upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the PHA’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The PHA did not have a depository agreement on file for their one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2022-008. Recommendation: RBT noted that the Town obtained the required Depository Agreement as of August 2024. RBT recommends that the Town implement controls such that required Depository Agreements are obtained when opening accounts at new banks. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-011 Special Tests and Provisions: Depository Agreements – Compliance and Internal Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.871 – Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the PHA did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution until August 2024. Criteria: PHAs are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure that the agreement was obtained and available upon request. Once the Town was made aware of the requirement, they contacted their financial institution to obtain the agreement, but were unable to obtain a Depository Agreement for several months upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the PHA’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The PHA did not have a depository agreement on file for their one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2022-008. Recommendation: RBT noted that the Town obtained the required Depository Agreement as of August 2024. RBT recommends that the Town implement controls such that required Depository Agreements are obtained when opening accounts at new banks. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-011 - Special Tests and Provisions: Depository Agreements Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will work with the Public Housing administrator to insure a depository agreement is in place and documentation of same is on file and readily available. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2022-008

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-012
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Town did not submit the audit and Data Collection Form within the nine-month due date for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure timely filing of the single audit and Data Collection Form. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirements have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit completed in a timely manner. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-012 Single Audit Reporting – Compliance and Internal Control Condition: The Town did not submit the audit and Data Collection Form within the nine-month due date for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Cause: The Town did not have controls in place to ensure timely filing of the single audit and Data Collection Form. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with OMB Circular A-133, Subpart B-Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirements have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit completed in a timely manner. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-012 - Single Audit Reporting Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will work with the accounting department, fee accountant, and audit fmn to file the required reports timely. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2026 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, T own Supervisor

About Reporting →
2023-013
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-009

The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required under 48 CFR section 9.405-2(b) and the clause at 48 CFR section 52.209-6 to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Repeating of finding 2022-009. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-013 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment – Internal Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”) Condition: The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required under 48 CFR section 9.405-2(b) and the clause at 48 CFR section 52.209-6 to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Repeating of finding 2022-009. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-013 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment - CSLFRF Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Town will review all contracts funded with CSLFRF for applicable contractors and perform verification of non suspension and non debarment. Policies will be reviewed and updated to insure adherence to this requirement. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

Prior Finding References

2022-009

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$1,777,836 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

2022-007
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the Town did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with laws, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have appropriate audit ready information/documentation in place in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The unaudited information was submitted on September 20, 2023, and the audited information has not been submitted as of October 17, 2024. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town prepare all required information/documentation to ensure that the Authority can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee's Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-007 Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance Finding Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher program, RBT noted that the Town did not submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information to HUD after year end, within two and a half months for unaudited, and nine months for audited. Criteria: As a condition of receiving federal awards, the Town agrees to comply with laws, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements and contracts, and to also maintain internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with these requirements. Cause: The Town did not have appropriate audit ready information/documentation in place in order for the unaudited FDS submission and audit to be conducted in a timely manner. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The unaudited information was submitted on September 20, 2023, and the audited information has not been submitted as of October 17, 2024. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town prepare all required information/documentation to ensure that the Authority can submit the unaudited and audited financial information to HUD timely. Auditee's Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-007 - Reporting - HCV Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Town will work with the Public Housing administrator to implement a system to complete and file the unaudited financial information within two and a half months, and with the independent audit firm to file within nine months. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

About Reporting →
2022-008
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

During review of the Housing Choice Voucher (“HCV”) program, RBT noted that the Town did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution. Criteria: HCV recipients are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the Annual Contribution Contract (“ACC”). The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town could not locate the agreement upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the Town’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The Town’s HCV money is on deposit at one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town have this agreement signed by the financial institution. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-008 Special Testing and Provisions: Depository Agreements 14.871 – Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Type of Finding: Compliance Finding Condition: During review of the Housing Choice Voucher (“HCV”) program, RBT noted that the Town did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution. Criteria: HCV recipients are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using form HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the Annual Contribution Contract (“ACC”). The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Cause: The Town could not locate the agreement upon request. Effect: Lack of safeguards could put the Town’s assets at risk. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The Town’s HCV money is on deposit at one financial institution. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town have this agreement signed by the financial institution. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-008 - Special Testing and Provisions: Depository Agreements - HCV Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Town will work with the Public Housing administrator to insure a depository agreement is in place and documentation of same is on file and readily available. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-009
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-009 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition: The Town did not have sufficient internal controls over debarment. Criteria: CSLFRF recipients are required to ensure federal funds are not used to pay contractors that are debarred. Cause: The Town did not have policies in place to review contractors for suspension and debarment. Effect: Debarment was not verified. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: None of the transactions tested were with contractors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town review its internal controls process for procurement and revise the procurement policy to include suspension and debarment procedures when spending federal funds. Auditee’s Response: The Town agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-009 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment - CSLFRF Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Town will review all contracts funded with CSLFRF for applicable contractors and perform verification of non suspension and non debarment. Policies will be reviewed and updated to insure adherence to this requirement. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-010
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The Town did not comply with the second annual Project and Expenditure report submission deadline. Criteria: Project and Expenditure reports must be submitted annually by April 30th. Cause: The Town did not have proper personnel set up as the authorized representative. Effect: The Project and Expenditures report was submitted late on May 18, 2023. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The Project and Expenditure filing occurs annually. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town ensure they have access for the authorized representative to submit the reports prior to the deadline. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-010 Reporting 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”) Type of Finding: Compliance Finding Condition: The Town did not comply with the second annual Project and Expenditure report submission deadline. Criteria: Project and Expenditure reports must be submitted annually by April 30th. Cause: The Town did not have proper personnel set up as the authorized representative. Effect: The Project and Expenditures report was submitted late on May 18, 2023. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: The Project and Expenditure filing occurs annually. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town ensure they have access for the authorized representative to submit the reports prior to the deadline. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-010 - Reporting - CSLFRF Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Town has confirmed and tested access to the filing site. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

About Reporting →
2022-011
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The Town did not report an expenditure incurred during the year. Criteria: CSLFRF expenditure reporting requirements mandate that all CSLFRF funded expenditures be reported. Cause: The expense was overlooked. Effect: All CSLFRF expenditures were not reported. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: One out of six expenditures tested were not reported. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town report all grant expenditures so that reporting is complete and accurate. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-011 Reporting 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”) Type of Finding: Compliance Finding Condition: The Town did not report an expenditure incurred during the year. Criteria: CSLFRF expenditure reporting requirements mandate that all CSLFRF funded expenditures be reported. Cause: The expense was overlooked. Effect: All CSLFRF expenditures were not reported. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: One out of six expenditures tested were not reported. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends that the Town report all grant expenditures so that reporting is complete and accurate. Auditee’s Response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-011 - Reporting - CSLFRF Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Town has reviewed CSLFRF funding and expenditure eligibility and implemented tracking to insure all expenditures are reported timely. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: January 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Fred Costello, Town Supervisor

About Reporting →

FY 2020-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$2,190,616 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2022 — management decision was due February 24, 2023.

FY 2019-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$2,011,049 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2022 — management decision was due February 24, 2023.

FY 2018-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$1,471,157 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 16, 2019 — management decision was due April 16, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$1,498,951 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2019 — management decision was due September 26, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

$1,621,827 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2017 — management decision was due March 29, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.