← Back to home

Red Hook Central School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 146001867

UEI: R4FYSHBNGNW6

Audited by: Bonadio & Co., LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Red Hook Central School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,142,164 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2026 (15 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). Condition We haphazardly sampled 40 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster program. We noted one student who received free lunch benefits who should not have received free or reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. Cause Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. Effect Without demonstrable, documented controls supporting compliance with Child Nutrition compliance standards, compliance with the requirements may not be assured. Recommendation We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. View of Responsible Officials The School District will institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are reviewed and accurate.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). Condition We haphazardly sampled 40 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster program. We noted one student who received free lunch benefits who should not have received free or reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. Cause Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. Effect Without demonstrable, documented controls supporting compliance with Child Nutrition compliance standards, compliance with the requirements may not be assured. Recommendation We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. View of Responsible Officials The School District will institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are reviewed and accurate.

Corrective Action Plan

To prevent future errors in eligibility determinations, the School District will implement a secondary review process. All eligibility applications will be reviewed by a second qualified staff member to verify household size, income calculations, and comparison to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines before final approval.

About Eligibility →
2025-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria School Food Authorities (SFAs) and sponsors must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim (7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15(c)). The State agency has an additional 30 days to submit a consolidated report to FNS via the FNS10 for NSLP/SBP and the FNS-418 for SFSP (7 CFR 210.5(d), 220.13(b)(2), 215.11(c)(2), and 225.8). Condition We sampled 4 months of reimbursement claims under the Child Nutrition Cluster of programs. We noted that two months had variances between the free and paid meals reported and the supporting documentation related to meals served. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was statistically valid. Cause Adequate oversight of the reporting process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in reporting. Effect Without demonstrable, documented controls supporting compliance with Child Nutrition compliance standards, compliance with the requirements may not be assured. Recommendation We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that reporting is completed correctly and claims for reimbursement are accurate. We also recommend that claims are reviewed prior to submission. View of Responsible Officials The School District will institute additional procedures to ensure that claim reimbursements are reviewed and accurate.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria School Food Authorities (SFAs) and sponsors must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim (7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15(c)). The State agency has an additional 30 days to submit a consolidated report to FNS via the FNS10 for NSLP/SBP and the FNS-418 for SFSP (7 CFR 210.5(d), 220.13(b)(2), 215.11(c)(2), and 225.8). Condition We sampled 4 months of reimbursement claims under the Child Nutrition Cluster of programs. We noted that two months had variances between the free and paid meals reported and the supporting documentation related to meals served. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was statistically valid. Cause Adequate oversight of the reporting process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in reporting. Effect Without demonstrable, documented controls supporting compliance with Child Nutrition compliance standards, compliance with the requirements may not be assured. Recommendation We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that reporting is completed correctly and claims for reimbursement are accurate. We also recommend that claims are reviewed prior to submission. View of Responsible Officials The School District will institute additional procedures to ensure that claim reimbursements are reviewed and accurate.

Corrective Action Plan

To prevent future errors in reporting, the School District will establish a simple monthly reconciliation procedure in which reported meal counts are compared to daily meal service records to identify and correct discrepancies before submission.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,237,900 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025 — management decision was due July 9, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,111,101 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,407,543 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,278,841 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2022 — management decision was due August 2, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$923,254 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 26, 2020 — management decision was due April 26, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$977,819 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2019 — management decision was due April 27, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,026,413 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 5, 2018 — management decision was due May 5, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$984,322 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2018 — management decision was due August 11, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$915,104 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2017 — management decision was due September 5, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.