EIN: 146001538
UEI: VNJGNHN7JV43
Audited by: Bonadio & Co., LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (24 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024 — management decision was due May 1, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2024 — management decision was due July 22, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2022 — management decision was due May 15, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 5, 2021 — management decision was due April 5, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2020 — management decision was due April 29, 2021.
Criteria: Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). Condition, Context and Effect: We haphazardly sampled 40 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster programs. We noted that one student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. Cause: Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. View of Responsible Officials: As an additional level of control, the Treasurer will compare an annual eligibility report to the student applications.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). Condition, Context and Effect: We haphazardly sampled 40 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster programs. We noted that one student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. Cause: Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. View of Responsible Officials: As an additional level of control, the Treasurer will compare an annual eligibility report to the student applications.
FEDERAL AWARDS FINDING 2020-001: Child Nutrition Cluster (CFDA 10.553, 10.555) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Eligibility CONDITION: One student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. The number of household members was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility causing an incorrect certification. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: the School District will ensure that the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Superintendent/Business Official. COMPLETION DATE: Ongoing.
FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2019 — management decision was due April 27, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2018 — management decision was due April 25, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.