← Back to home

La Red Health Center, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 141850828

UEI: PLUJWPAKX8N9

Audited by: Whisman Giordano & Associates, LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

La Red Health Center, Inc.11 audit years3 findings2 repeat
11
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$4.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$4,634,438 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 25, 2027 (175 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

$4,213,736 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2025 — management decision was due June 8, 2026.

2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-001

Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance, entities are required to submit their Data Collection Form (DCF) within nine months following the end of the fiscal year. This ensures timely reporting and compliance with regulatory requirements. Condition: Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process.

Corrective Action Plan

Calendar Controls: Add both the audit and DCF submission deadlines to our compliance calendar and set automated reminders so these dates cannot be missed. Cross-Training: Ensure at least two team members are fully trained on audit preparation and the DCF process, so the work continues smoothly even during staffing gaps or transitions. Document Access: House all required audit and financial documents in a secure, shared folder (e.g., SharePoint) that the finance team can access at any time. This should reduce the time it takes to seek files. Proactive External Support: Engage our audit firm earlier in the fiscal year to prevent last-minute bottlenecks and keep the flow of information moving. Responsible Party: CFO Monitoring: CEO will confirm timely DCF submission each year.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →
2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-001

Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that documents are readily available to multiple personnel in order to complete the audit and submit the Data Collection Form timely. Management response: La Red Health Center, Inc. acknowledges the finding and has taken steps to ensure compliance with the Data Collection Form submission in the future. Those steps are documented in our corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance, entities are required to submit their Data Collection Form (DCF) within nine months following the end of the fiscal year. This ensures timely reporting and compliance with regulatory requirements. Condition: Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that documents are readily available to multiple personnel in order to complete the audit and submit the Data Collection Form timely. Management response: La Red Health Center, Inc. acknowledges the finding and has taken steps to ensure compliance with the Data Collection Form submission in the future. Those steps are documented in our corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Calendar Controls: Add both the audit and DCF submission deadlines to our compliance calendar and set automated reminders so these dates cannot be missed. Cross-Training: Ensure at least two team members are fully trained on audit preparation and the DCF process, so the work continues smoothly even during staffing gaps or transitions. Document Access: House all required audit and financial documents in a secure, shared folder (e.g., SharePoint) that the finance team can access at any time. This should reduce the time it takes to seek files. Proactive External Support: Engage our audit firm earlier in the fiscal year to prevent last-minute bottlenecks and keep the flow of information moving. Responsible Party: CFO Monitoring: CEO will confirm timely DCF submission each year.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →
2024-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Our audit of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, federal expenditures totaling approximately $1,586,906 were omitted from the SEFA initially prepared by management. The omitted amount represented approximately 27% of total federal expenditures for the year and included activity under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN 21.027. The SEFA was subsequently adjusted to include these expenditures. Cause: The entity’s SEFA preparation process did not include sufficient procedures to ensure completeness. Specifically: • The SEFA was prepared using incomplete grant tracking reports that were not reconciled to the general ledger and grant agreements. • There was no formal secondary review by personnel independent of the preparer. • Procedures were not designed to ensure all pass-through federal awards were identified and included. Effect: The omission resulted in initially materially misstated SEFA and noncompliance with SEFA reporting requirements under 2 CFR §200.510(b). The deficiency required significant auditor proposed adjustments to correct the SEFA. This control deficiency constitutes a material weakness because it indicates that the entity’s internal controls over SEFA preparation were not effective to prevent or detect a material misstatement on a timely basis. In addition, the incomplete SEFA could lead to inaccurate reporting to oversight agencies and may affect risk assessments for program compliance. Recommendation: 1. Comprehensive Reconciliation: Reconcile federal grant activity (drawdowns, expenditures, indirect costs) to the general ledger, grant agreements, and agency/portal records. 2. Program Inventory & Certifications: Maintain a centralized inventory of all federal awards (by ALN, pass-through, award number) with program manager certifications of completeness at year-end. 3. Formal Review Workflow: Establish a documented secondary review by finance leadership independent of the preparer, with checklists covering ALNs, pass-throughs, subrecipient disclosures, notes to SEFA, and indirect cost treatment. 4. Subrecipient & Pass-Through Controls: Implement procedures to capture and verify all subrecipient amounts, pass-through activity, and required subrecipient disclosures on the SEFA. 5. Close Calendar & Training: Adopt an annual SEFA close calendar with milestones and provide training on Uniform Guidance reporting requirements to staff involved in SEFA compilation and review. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. The omission resulted from incomplete reconciliation of grant activity and insufficient review controls.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR §200.510(b) requires the auditee to prepare a complete and accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended for the period, identified by federal agency, pass-through entity (as applicable), assistance listing number (ALN), and other required elements. 2 CFR §200.303 requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Under GAGAS and Uniform Guidance, internal controls should ensure that federal expenditures are properly accumulated, reconciled, reviewed, and reported in the SEFA. Condition: Our audit of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, federal expenditures totaling approximately $1,586,906 were omitted from the SEFA initially prepared by management. The omitted amount represented approximately 27% of total federal expenditures for the year and included activity under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN 21.027. The SEFA was subsequently adjusted to include these expenditures. Cause: The entity’s SEFA preparation process did not include sufficient procedures to ensure completeness. Specifically: • The SEFA was prepared using incomplete grant tracking reports that were not reconciled to the general ledger and grant agreements. • There was no formal secondary review by personnel independent of the preparer. • Procedures were not designed to ensure all pass-through federal awards were identified and included. Effect: The omission resulted in initially materially misstated SEFA and noncompliance with SEFA reporting requirements under 2 CFR §200.510(b). The deficiency required significant auditor proposed adjustments to correct the SEFA. This control deficiency constitutes a material weakness because it indicates that the entity’s internal controls over SEFA preparation were not effective to prevent or detect a material misstatement on a timely basis. In addition, the incomplete SEFA could lead to inaccurate reporting to oversight agencies and may affect risk assessments for program compliance. Recommendation: 1. Comprehensive Reconciliation: Reconcile federal grant activity (drawdowns, expenditures, indirect costs) to the general ledger, grant agreements, and agency/portal records. 2. Program Inventory & Certifications: Maintain a centralized inventory of all federal awards (by ALN, pass-through, award number) with program manager certifications of completeness at year-end. 3. Formal Review Workflow: Establish a documented secondary review by finance leadership independent of the preparer, with checklists covering ALNs, pass-throughs, subrecipient disclosures, notes to SEFA, and indirect cost treatment. 4. Subrecipient & Pass-Through Controls: Implement procedures to capture and verify all subrecipient amounts, pass-through activity, and required subrecipient disclosures on the SEFA. 5. Close Calendar & Training: Adopt an annual SEFA close calendar with milestones and provide training on Uniform Guidance reporting requirements to staff involved in SEFA compilation and review. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. The omission resulted from incomplete reconciliation of grant activity and insufficient review controls.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Comprehensive Grant Reconciliation Process- Management will perform a formal year-end reconciliation of all federal grant expenditures to the general ledger, grant agreements, reimbursement requests, and funding agency reports prior to completion of the SEFA. 2. Centralized Federal Award Inventory- Management has established a centralized schedule of all federal awards that identifies the fed eral agency, Assistance Listing Number {ALN), passthrough entity, grant number, award period, and responsible program personnel. This inventory will be reviewed and updated throughout the year. 3. Formal SEFA Review Control -A secondary review of the completed SE FA will be performed by a member of management independent of the preparer. The review will include verification of all federal programs, ALNs, pass-through awards, expenditures, and required disclosures. 4. Year-End Program Certifications - Program and finance personnel responsible for grant administration will provide written confirmation of all federal awards and expenditures incurred during the reporting period to ensure completeness. 5. Training and Compliance Monitoring- Finance staff responsible forfederal grant accounting and reporting will receive periodic training regardi ng Uniform Guidance requirements, including SEFA preparation and reporting responsibilities.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-12-31

$5,800,642 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2026 — management decision was due February 25, 2027.

2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-001

Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance, entities are required to submit their Data Collection Form (DCF) within nine months following the end of the fiscal year. This ensures timely reporting and compliance with regulatory requirements. Condition: Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process.

Corrective Action Plan

Calendar Controls: Add both the audit and DCF submission deadlines to our compliance calendar and set automated reminders so these dates cannot be missed. Cross-Training: Ensure at least two team members are fully trained on audit preparation and the DCF process, so the work continues smoothly even during staffing gaps or transitions. Document Access: House all required audit and financial documents in a secure, shared folder (e.g., SharePoint) that the finance team can access at any time. This should reduce the time it takes to seek files. Proactive External Support: Engage our audit firm earlier in the fiscal year to prevent last-minute bottlenecks and keep the flow of information moving. Responsible Party: CFO Monitoring: CEO will confirm timely DCF submission each year.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →
2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-001

Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that documents are readily available to multiple personnel in order to complete the audit and submit the Data Collection Form timely. Management response: La Red Health Center, Inc. acknowledges the finding and has taken steps to ensure compliance with the Data Collection Form submission in the future. Those steps are documented in our corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance, entities are required to submit their Data Collection Form (DCF) within nine months following the end of the fiscal year. This ensures timely reporting and compliance with regulatory requirements. Condition: Because the December 31, 2024 audit is being issued in November 2025, the Data Collection Form will be filed approximately 2 months after the required submission deadline. Cause: The delay in completing the audit, and ultimately submitting the data collection form was caused by turnover in the accounting department. Effect: Failure to submit the Data Collection Form timely results in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can lead to potential penalties, and loss of or decreases in funding. Moreover, it affects transparency and accountability of the entity’s financial reporting process. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that documents are readily available to multiple personnel in order to complete the audit and submit the Data Collection Form timely. Management response: La Red Health Center, Inc. acknowledges the finding and has taken steps to ensure compliance with the Data Collection Form submission in the future. Those steps are documented in our corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Calendar Controls: Add both the audit and DCF submission deadlines to our compliance calendar and set automated reminders so these dates cannot be missed. Cross-Training: Ensure at least two team members are fully trained on audit preparation and the DCF process, so the work continues smoothly even during staffing gaps or transitions. Document Access: House all required audit and financial documents in a secure, shared folder (e.g., SharePoint) that the finance team can access at any time. This should reduce the time it takes to seek files. Proactive External Support: Engage our audit firm earlier in the fiscal year to prevent last-minute bottlenecks and keep the flow of information moving. Responsible Party: CFO Monitoring: CEO will confirm timely DCF submission each year.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →
2024-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Our audit of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, federal expenditures totaling approximately $1,586,906 were omitted from the SEFA initially prepared by management. The omitted amount represented approximately 27% of total federal expenditures for the year and included activity under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN 21.027. The SEFA was subsequently adjusted to include these expenditures. Cause: The entity’s SEFA preparation process did not include sufficient procedures to ensure completeness. Specifically: • The SEFA was prepared using incomplete grant tracking reports that were not reconciled to the general ledger and grant agreements. • There was no formal secondary review by personnel independent of the preparer. • Procedures were not designed to ensure all pass-through federal awards were identified and included. Effect: The omission resulted in initially materially misstated SEFA and noncompliance with SEFA reporting requirements under 2 CFR §200.510(b). The deficiency required significant auditor proposed adjustments to correct the SEFA. This control deficiency constitutes a material weakness because it indicates that the entity’s internal controls over SEFA preparation were not effective to prevent or detect a material misstatement on a timely basis. In addition, the incomplete SEFA could lead to inaccurate reporting to oversight agencies and may affect risk assessments for program compliance. Recommendation: 1. Comprehensive Reconciliation: Reconcile federal grant activity (drawdowns, expenditures, indirect costs) to the general ledger, grant agreements, and agency/portal records. 2. Program Inventory & Certifications: Maintain a centralized inventory of all federal awards (by ALN, pass-through, award number) with program manager certifications of completeness at year-end. 3. Formal Review Workflow: Establish a documented secondary review by finance leadership independent of the preparer, with checklists covering ALNs, pass-throughs, subrecipient disclosures, notes to SEFA, and indirect cost treatment. 4. Subrecipient & Pass-Through Controls: Implement procedures to capture and verify all subrecipient amounts, pass-through activity, and required subrecipient disclosures on the SEFA. 5. Close Calendar & Training: Adopt an annual SEFA close calendar with milestones and provide training on Uniform Guidance reporting requirements to staff involved in SEFA compilation and review. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. The omission resulted from incomplete reconciliation of grant activity and insufficient review controls.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR §200.510(b) requires the auditee to prepare a complete and accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended for the period, identified by federal agency, pass-through entity (as applicable), assistance listing number (ALN), and other required elements. 2 CFR §200.303 requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Under GAGAS and Uniform Guidance, internal controls should ensure that federal expenditures are properly accumulated, reconciled, reviewed, and reported in the SEFA. Condition: Our audit of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, federal expenditures totaling approximately $1,586,906 were omitted from the SEFA initially prepared by management. The omitted amount represented approximately 27% of total federal expenditures for the year and included activity under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN 21.027. The SEFA was subsequently adjusted to include these expenditures. Cause: The entity’s SEFA preparation process did not include sufficient procedures to ensure completeness. Specifically: • The SEFA was prepared using incomplete grant tracking reports that were not reconciled to the general ledger and grant agreements. • There was no formal secondary review by personnel independent of the preparer. • Procedures were not designed to ensure all pass-through federal awards were identified and included. Effect: The omission resulted in initially materially misstated SEFA and noncompliance with SEFA reporting requirements under 2 CFR §200.510(b). The deficiency required significant auditor proposed adjustments to correct the SEFA. This control deficiency constitutes a material weakness because it indicates that the entity’s internal controls over SEFA preparation were not effective to prevent or detect a material misstatement on a timely basis. In addition, the incomplete SEFA could lead to inaccurate reporting to oversight agencies and may affect risk assessments for program compliance. Recommendation: 1. Comprehensive Reconciliation: Reconcile federal grant activity (drawdowns, expenditures, indirect costs) to the general ledger, grant agreements, and agency/portal records. 2. Program Inventory & Certifications: Maintain a centralized inventory of all federal awards (by ALN, pass-through, award number) with program manager certifications of completeness at year-end. 3. Formal Review Workflow: Establish a documented secondary review by finance leadership independent of the preparer, with checklists covering ALNs, pass-throughs, subrecipient disclosures, notes to SEFA, and indirect cost treatment. 4. Subrecipient & Pass-Through Controls: Implement procedures to capture and verify all subrecipient amounts, pass-through activity, and required subrecipient disclosures on the SEFA. 5. Close Calendar & Training: Adopt an annual SEFA close calendar with milestones and provide training on Uniform Guidance reporting requirements to staff involved in SEFA compilation and review. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. The omission resulted from incomplete reconciliation of grant activity and insufficient review controls.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Comprehensive Grant Reconciliation Process- Management will perform a formal year-end reconciliation of all federal grant expenditures to the general ledger, grant agreements, reimbursement requests, and funding agency reports prior to completion of the SEFA. 2. Centralized Federal Award Inventory- Management has established a centralized schedule of all federal awards that identifies the fed eral agency, Assistance Listing Number {ALN), passthrough entity, grant number, award period, and responsible program personnel. This inventory will be reviewed and updated throughout the year. 3. Formal SEFA Review Control -A secondary review of the completed SE FA will be performed by a member of management independent of the preparer. The review will include verification of all federal programs, ALNs, pass-through awards, expenditures, and required disclosures. 4. Year-End Program Certifications - Program and finance personnel responsible for grant administration will provide written confirmation of all federal awards and expenditures incurred during the reporting period to ensure completeness. 5. Training and Compliance Monitoring- Finance staff responsible forfederal grant accounting and reporting will receive periodic training regardi ng Uniform Guidance requirements, including SEFA preparation and reporting responsibilities.

About Reporting →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,080,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2025 — management decision was due September 7, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,787,410 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 17, 2023 — management decision was due March 17, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,206,898 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2022 — management decision was due March 25, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,363,036 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 2, 2021 — management decision was due February 2, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,040,928 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2020 — management decision was due March 18, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,910,249 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2019 — management decision was due December 27, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,034,887 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2018 — management decision was due February 13, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,547,869 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Delaware

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.