← Back to home

COUNCIL MEADOWS FUND BURNT HILLS - BALLSTON LAKE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO., INC.Local Government

EIN: 141613620

UEI: RC4MU5N5GKS5

Audited by: EFPR GROUP CPA’S, PLLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

COUNCIL MEADOWS FUND BURNT HILLS - BALLSTON LAKE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO., INC.9 audit years1 findings
9
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$796.8K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$796,827 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 4, 2025 (343 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$822,186 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025 — management decision was due July 9, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$844,483 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 30, 2023 — management decision was due October 30, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$864,085 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2022 — management decision was due October 3, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$881,319 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2021 — management decision was due October 1, 2021.

2020-001
Cash Management
OTHER MATTERS

Criteria - According to the loan agreement with the United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development (RD), the Organization is required to annually deposit $12,684 in monthly installments and any RD calculated surplus funds to a reserve for replacements account. Withdrawals from this account can only be made with the prior approval of RD. Condition - The reserve for replacements account was underfunded by $7,399 at December 31, 2020. Cause - Due to the Organization?s financial institution?s unwillingness to complete RD?s Deposit Account Control Agreement (DACA), management was unable to make all of the required monthly deposits to the reserve for replacements account. Recommendation - We recommend that management make an additional deposit of $7,399 to the reserve for replacements account as soon as the DACA-related issue has been resolved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria - According to the loan agreement with the United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development (RD), the Organization is required to annually deposit $12,684 in monthly installments and any RD calculated surplus funds to a reserve for replacements account. Withdrawals from this account can only be made with the prior approval of RD. Condition - The reserve for replacements account was underfunded by $7,399 at December 31, 2020. Cause - Due to the Organization?s financial institution?s unwillingness to complete RD?s Deposit Account Control Agreement (DACA), management was unable to make all of the required monthly deposits to the reserve for replacements account. Recommendation - We recommend that management make an additional deposit of $7,399 to the reserve for replacements account as soon as the DACA-related issue has been resolved.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s Response - There are and were substantial capital expenses the Organization would normally voucher from reserve funds during 2020 which had to be paid out of general operating funds. This has put pressure on the project?s cash flow to this day, as management has not been able to access reserve funds due to the banks that were contacted being unwilling to comply with DACA requirements. Lack of ability to obtain reimbursement reserve funds for capital items such as $6,485 in flooring replacements, $1,071 for appliances and $1,277 for hot water tank replacements forced over an $8,833 shortfall in normal operating cash flow. These concerns, in addition to tenant-created water and alarm emergencies, have expended significant maintenance dollars to correct unplanned and certainly unnecessary critical issues. These shortfalls have placed the project under tremendous cash flow concerns that would not have been an issue if the project could have accessed reserve funds as needed. This was one reason the project had to rely on Board funds to pay for $1,399 in an emergency response to replace one of the project?s snowblowers. In addition, management has also held back paying management fees for over six months for 2020 (that are still due) to give the Organization a financial cushion in case an emergency were to occur and reserve funds were still not readily available to the project, or an infusion of funds were needed to pay normal operating transactions. Accrued management fees owed tally $7,898 in base fees plus $2,475 in site management fees from July through December 2020, for a total due of $10,373 still (currently) in accounts payable. These items contributed to the project?s inability to make Until funding is restored from reserves through the Depository Authorization with Key Bank, which we do not have any guarantee that Key Bank will honor that Authorization when it is put into place, the Organization will not have sufficient cash flow to pay current obligations plus 2020 accruals at the present time. In the meantime, cash flow is still tenuous until normal inflows resume. One other major handicap the Organization is facing is the extreme delays in obtaining potential applicants from the Housing Assistance program. Filling one vacancy can and has often taken up to five or six months to obtain qualified applicants from this program, which is a tremendous time delay, increasing the Organization?s vacancy rate that management has little power to affect. Losing over $3,000 in potential rents waiting for one qualified applicant for one apartment are lost forever; multiplying this by any unknown vacancy factors significantly adds up debilitating cash flow.

About Cash Management →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$801,445 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$814,770 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2019 — management decision was due September 29, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$826,489 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2018 — management decision was due September 18, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$836,796 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2017 — management decision was due September 16, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.