← Back to home

Maria CollegeHigher Education

EIN: 141463151

UEI: YAZ9VBKKN5E3

Audited by: Bonadio & Co., LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Maria College10 audit years33 findings16 repeat
10
Audit Years
33
Total Findings
16
Repeat Findings
$7.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,719,634 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 6, 2026 (3 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,789,747 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2025 — management decision was due September 18, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,023,128 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2024 — management decision was due July 29, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,680,479 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2022 — management decision was due June 14, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,091,840 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2022 — management decision was due September 13, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2020-001OTHER MATTERS

Although the College has performed an information security risk assessment during the year, it was not inclusive of additional control areas, including third-party service providers/vendor (TSP), administrative (policy and procedures), and personnel (conflict of interest, segregation of duties, privileged access, etc.) risks. . Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College agrees with the finding and is working to enhance the annual assessment.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended June 30, 2021 Criteria: Institutions participating in Title IV programs are required to comply with various laws and regulations as part of their signed Program Participation Agreement (PPA), including but not limited to, the Federal Trade Commission?s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule (Title 16, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 314). Condition: Although the College has performed an information security risk assessment during the year, it was not inclusive of additional control areas, including third-party service providers/vendor (TSP), administrative (policy and procedures), and personnel (conflict of interest, segregation of duties, privileged access, etc.) risks. . Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College agrees with the finding and is working to enhance the annual assessment.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College agrees with the finding and is working to enhance the annual assessment.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-002
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2020-002OTHER MATTERS

Within our sample of 4, there were 4 instances where the student had withdrawn from the College, but notification was not given to the NSLDS within the required 45-day time frame. Cause: The College did implement a policy based on prior year recommendations. The Clearinghouse reports withdrawals to NSLDS, the College will be updating enrollment in NSLDS directly upon conducting R2T4 calculations. However, these reporting dates still fell outside the required reporting 45-day time frame. Effect: The College is not meeting the required criteria for notification.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-002 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended June 30, 2021 Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b)(1), upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the report and return to the Sectary ?(i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary, (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. According to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide, schools are required to report campus-level enrollment for the student, which includes data related to the student?s overall enrollment, including enrollment status and effective date, anticipated completion date, and certification date. Condition: Within our sample of 4, there were 4 instances where the student had withdrawn from the College, but notification was not given to the NSLDS within the required 45-day time frame. Cause: The College did implement a policy based on prior year recommendations. The Clearinghouse reports withdrawals to NSLDS, the College will be updating enrollment in NSLDS directly upon conducting R2T4 calculations. However, these reporting dates still fell outside the required reporting 45-day time frame. Effect: The College is not meeting the required criteria for notification.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The College should work to implement an expedited process for notification of withdrawal status to the NSLDS. Response: The College agrees with the finding of notification for withdrawal students.

Prior Finding References

2020-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,854,912 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2021 — management decision was due August 2, 2021.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include employee training, information security incident response, and general security controls. Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College acknowledges that a complete risk assessment was not performed and has a planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended June 30, 2020 Criteria: Institutions participating in Title IV programs are required to comply with various laws and regulations as part of their signed Program Participation Agreement (PPA), including but not limited to, the Federal Trade Commission?s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule (Title 16, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 314). Condition: The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include employee training, information security incident response, and general security controls. Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College acknowledges that a complete risk assessment was not performed and has a planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. Response: The College acknowledges that a complete risk assessment was not performed and has a planned corrective action.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-002
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2019-001OTHER MATTERS

Within our sample of 13, there were 6 instances where the student had withdrawn from the College, but notification was not given to the NSLDS within the required 45-day time frame. Cause: The College does not have a standardized policy in place for their notification of withdrawal students to the NSLDS. Effect: The College is not meeting the required criteria for notification. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized process for notification of withdrawal status to the NSLDS. Response: The College agrees with the finding of notification for withdrawal students

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-002 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended June 30, 2020 Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b)(1), upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the report and return to the Sectary ?(i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary, (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. According to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide, schools are required to report campus-level enrollment for the student, which includes data related to the student?s overall enrollment, including enrollment status and effective date, anticipated completion date, and certification date. Condition: Within our sample of 13, there were 6 instances where the student had withdrawn from the College, but notification was not given to the NSLDS within the required 45-day time frame. Cause: The College does not have a standardized policy in place for their notification of withdrawal students to the NSLDS. Effect: The College is not meeting the required criteria for notification. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized process for notification of withdrawal status to the NSLDS. Response: The College agrees with the finding of notification for withdrawal students

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized process for notification of withdrawal status to the NSLDS. Response: The College agrees with the finding of notification for withdrawal students. Accurate reporting of data to the Federal systems is a priority for the Office of Financial Aid. The Director of Financial Aid will continue to work with the Registrar and Manager of IT to ensure that information reported is complete, accurate, and timely.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,801,405 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2019 — management decision was due May 18, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-004

Within our sample of 60 student files, there were seven (7) instances in which the student's enrollment timeline was not accurately or timely reported in NSLDS. Of these seven (7) instances, there were two (2) instances in which the students' enrollment status' were not reported within NSLDS, two (2) instances in which the students were placed on an academic leave of absence, but were administratively withdrawn from the College, and NSLDS was not updated to reflect the change in status, and three (3) instances in which the students withdrew from the College, and NSLDS was not accurately updated.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Within our sample of 60 student files, there were seven (7) instances in which the student's enrollment timeline was not accurately or timely reported in NSLDS. Of these seven (7) instances, there were two (2) instances in which the students' enrollment status' were not reported within NSLDS, two (2) instances in which the students were placed on an academic leave of absence, but were administratively withdrawn from the College, and NSLDS was not updated to reflect the change in status, and three (3) instances in which the students withdrew from the College, and NSLDS was not accurately updated.

Corrective Action Plan

Accurate reporting of data to the Federal systems is a priority for the Office of Financial Aid. The Director of Financial Aid will continue to work with the Registrar and Manager of IT to ensure that information reported is complete, accurate, and timely.

Prior Finding References

2018-004

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-005

Within our sample of 60 students, four (4) of whom were enrolled in a Gainful Employment Program, all four (4) students' Gainful Employment information was not reported within NSLDS.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Within our sample of 60 students, four (4) of whom were enrolled in a Gainful Employment Program, all four (4) students' Gainful Employment information was not reported within NSLDS.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective actions are not necessary as the College has elected to early implement new Gainful Employment Reporting Policies, effective July 1, 2019. The College will no longer be required to report certain Gainful Employment data within NSLDS.

Prior Finding References

2018-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-003
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

Within our sample of 60 students, of which 10 were withdrawal students, there was one (1) instance where the College failed to determine that the student withdrew from the College without providing notification. Had the College properly determined that the student withdrew from the College and performed the required Return of Title IV funds calculation, no funds would have been required to be returned to the U.S. Department of Education.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Within our sample of 60 students, of which 10 were withdrawal students, there was one (1) instance where the College failed to determine that the student withdrew from the College without providing notification. Had the College properly determined that the student withdrew from the College and performed the required Return of Title IV funds calculation, no funds would have been required to be returned to the U.S. Department of Education.

Corrective Action Plan

This instance of non-compliance occurred due to a student's legal name change, and an oversight by the Department of Financial Aid. The Office of Financial Aid has reviewed and improved its controls related to determining a student's withdrawal from the College without notification to ensure that all determinations are properly made in the future.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Within our audit sample of 60 students, of which 33 received Pell Grant Awards, there were three (3) instances in which the College did not correctly calculate the Pell Grant Awards. In one (1) instance the student should have been awarded $2,400 of Pell Grant funds, but was awarded $1,422, resulting in an under-award of $978. In two (2) instances, in which the student's academic programs included a summer term, the students' were collectively over-awarded $2,098 due to an incorrect calculation due to the inclusion of the required summer term.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Within our audit sample of 60 students, of which 33 received Pell Grant Awards, there were three (3) instances in which the College did not correctly calculate the Pell Grant Awards. In one (1) instance the student should have been awarded $2,400 of Pell Grant funds, but was awarded $1,422, resulting in an under-award of $978. In two (2) instances, in which the student's academic programs included a summer term, the students' were collectively over-awarded $2,098 due to an incorrect calculation due to the inclusion of the required summer term.

Corrective Action Plan

The Director of Financial Aid will work with the Financial Aid staff to ensure that the Pell Grant Awards are being calculated consistently across each program in accordance with the regulations. Furthermore, we have reviewed the 2018-19 Pell Grant Award calculations for students enrolled in a program with a required summer term and have determined that these students were over-awarded $18,270 in Pell Grant Awards. We are in the process of adjusting these students' accounts, and returning the over-awarded funds to the U.S. Department of Education.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,741,575 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2019 — management decision was due August 13, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-003
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2017-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-004
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2017-007OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-007

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-005
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-006
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2017-005OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,346,551 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2018 — management decision was due August 5, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-004
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-005
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-006
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-007
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-008
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-009
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,712,914 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2016 — management decision was due June 28, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-004
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-008

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-008

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-006
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-007
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-008
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-009
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-007

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-007

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-010
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.