EIN: 141340033
UEI: YBJ8QWMMAHL5
141340034, 141498064, 141541210, 141547366, 141578051, 141592849, 141595821, 141605850, 141679442, 141750944, 141752466, 141800768, 161189791, 161525402, 223091969, 223214335, 263101392, 263101548 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: The Bonadio Group
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (27 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Finding 2025-002 (Material Weakness and Compliance Finding - ASSISTANCE LISTINGS #16.575, #93.788, #10.557) Condition - Based on vouchers selected in our single audit testing as well as discussions throughout the audit, we noted that there is multiple cases across multiple agencies of late vouchering. Although timeliness of vouchers was specifically tested during the single audit, similar delays were observed with grants outside the single audit scope. Criteria – All grants across all agencies should be reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure timely and accurate vouchering. Cause – Vouchers were delayed for various reasons including the transition to Sage Intacct, staffing turnover and delays in receiving fully executed contracts. Effect – Late vouchering increases the risk of delayed or denied reimbursement from funders. Recommendation - As the Organization continues its transition to Sage Intacct, we recommend that monthly reconciliations be completed for all grants to strengthen and streamline the vouchering process. Additionally, all grant-related expenditures should be tracked and reconciled by grant each month to ensure that voucher preparation is efficient and minimizes delays.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-002 (Material Weakness and Compliance Finding - ASSISTANCE LISTINGS #16.575, #93.788, #10.557) Condition - Based on vouchers selected in our single audit testing as well as discussions throughout the audit, we noted that there is multiple cases across multiple agencies of late vouchering. Although timeliness of vouchers was specifically tested during the single audit, similar delays were observed with grants outside the single audit scope. Criteria – All grants across all agencies should be reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure timely and accurate vouchering. Cause – Vouchers were delayed for various reasons including the transition to Sage Intacct, staffing turnover and delays in receiving fully executed contracts. Effect – Late vouchering increases the risk of delayed or denied reimbursement from funders. Recommendation - As the Organization continues its transition to Sage Intacct, we recommend that monthly reconciliations be completed for all grants to strengthen and streamline the vouchering process. Additionally, all grant-related expenditures should be tracked and reconciled by grant each month to ensure that voucher preparation is efficient and minimizes delays.
The Administration agrees with this finding. The delays in completion of financial transactions into the software had a negative impact on the vouchering process. The training and monthly review of accounts noted in the response to Finding 2025-001, will ensure the information needed to complete timely vouchers will occur. This new process will enable the fiscal employees responsible for vouchering to complete their functions in a timely manner.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2025 — management decision was due August 12, 2025.
We noted one disbursement during our testing for this program that lacked appropirate support that the charge was directly related to this federal program for $700. Criteria: Support specific to the program should be maintained for all expenditures. Cause: Support could not be produced and was not maintained by the Agency. Effect: Expenses charged to the program may have been overstated. Recommendation: Ensure that appropriate program related documentation is maintained for all allowable expenditures.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: We noted one disbursement during our testing for this program that lacked appropirate support that the charge was directly related to this federal program for $700. Criteria: Support specific to the program should be maintained for all expenditures. Cause: Support could not be produced and was not maintained by the Agency. Effect: Expenses charged to the program may have been overstated. Recommendation: Ensure that appropriate program related documentation is maintained for all allowable expenditures.
At this time all fiscal standard and procedures are being updated. In addition, with the new GL, approvals are required for different levels of expenditures. There will be periodic review of all system expenditures with appropriate updates to procedures as needed.
There was no rent calculation worksheet present for one of the individuals tested to indicate income in order to ensure program income portions are being appropriately calculated. Criteria: All participants should have a rent calculation worksheet on file. Cause: Support could not be produced and was not maintained by the Agency. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with testing requirements and controls established. Recommendation: Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program and all support is maintained for individuals enrolled in the program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: There was no rent calculation worksheet present for one of the individuals tested to indicate income in order to ensure program income portions are being appropriately calculated. Criteria: All participants should have a rent calculation worksheet on file. Cause: Support could not be produced and was not maintained by the Agency. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with testing requirements and controls established. Recommendation: Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program and all support is maintained for individuals enrolled in the program.
At this time all fiscal standard and procedures are being updated. We will ensure documented policies exist and are being adhered to.
During our testing of the matching requirements for this program, the Agencies could not provide us with documentation of the internal controls in pace over the matching compliance requirement. Criteria: Approval and sign-offs indicating review of matching requirements should be maintained. Cause: No formal procedure in place to maintain this documentation. Effect: We could not re-perform internal control procedures for the matching compliance requirement. Recommendation: Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program and this is documented on the matching support for the program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: During our testing of the matching requirements for this program, the Agencies could not provide us with documentation of the internal controls in pace over the matching compliance requirement. Criteria: Approval and sign-offs indicating review of matching requirements should be maintained. Cause: No formal procedure in place to maintain this documentation. Effect: We could not re-perform internal control procedures for the matching compliance requirement. Recommendation: Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program and this is documented on the matching support for the program.
At this time all fiscal standard and procedures are being updated. We will ensure documented policies exist and are being adhered to.
FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2024 — management decision was due August 8, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2023 — management decision was due July 31, 2023.
Condition - There was no participant signature present in the NYWIC system for one of the individuals tested to indicate that the EBT card was provided to the individual. Criteria - Either a participant signature should be documented when benefits are provided or the file should have indication that remote benefits were issued. Cause - Information could not be produced and the individual handing out the benefits is no longer employed by the Organization. Effect - The Organization was not in compliance with testing requirements and controls established. Recommendation - Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition - There was no participant signature present in the NYWIC system for one of the individuals tested to indicate that the EBT card was provided to the individual. Criteria - Either a participant signature should be documented when benefits are provided or the file should have indication that remote benefits were issued. Cause - Information could not be produced and the individual handing out the benefits is no longer employed by the Organization. Effect - The Organization was not in compliance with testing requirements and controls established. Recommendation - Management should ensure all internal controls are functioning as designed for this program.
Staff is no longer employed by the Agency and the current program director was on leave. All controls are in place to our knowledge and functioning as designed.
FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2022 — management decision was due July 4, 2022.
The Organization did not submit certain quarterly financial reports within the required timeline noted in the contract. Criteria: Quarterly financial reports are due 30 days after the period ends. Cause: Due to difficulty with the grants management system for this grant, reports were submitted after the required time frame. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements outlined in this contract. Recommendation: Management should implement a system and control process to ensure timely reporting for this contract. Management?s Response: Staff have been reassigned to provide additional month end support to ensure timely filing of vouchers which will be reviewed by program managers.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Organization did not submit certain quarterly financial reports within the required timeline noted in the contract. Criteria: Quarterly financial reports are due 30 days after the period ends. Cause: Due to difficulty with the grants management system for this grant, reports were submitted after the required time frame. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements outlined in this contract. Recommendation: Management should implement a system and control process to ensure timely reporting for this contract. Management?s Response: Staff have been reassigned to provide additional month end support to ensure timely filing of vouchers which will be reviewed by program managers.
Management's response: Management has reassigned staff to provide additional month end support to ensure timely filing of all vouchers. Program managers will require review prior to filing.
FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2021 — management decision was due September 3, 2021.
The Organization did not update the rent roll for two individuals tested and that resulted in a larger, but immaterial, amount being vouchered to the funding source. Criteria: The appropriate amount of rent should be charged to the individual and funding source based on income and fair market value rent guidelines. Cause: Lease agreement and rent calculations were updated but that was not reflected in the documentation used to generate monthly vouchers and billings. Effect: The funding source was overcharged for an immaterial amount of rent in two cases. Recommendation: Management should ensure an additional control set is added to the process whereby the rent rolls are compared to the underlying lease and rent calculations to avoid this error from occurring in future periods.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Organization did not update the rent roll for two individuals tested and that resulted in a larger, but immaterial, amount being vouchered to the funding source. Criteria: The appropriate amount of rent should be charged to the individual and funding source based on income and fair market value rent guidelines. Cause: Lease agreement and rent calculations were updated but that was not reflected in the documentation used to generate monthly vouchers and billings. Effect: The funding source was overcharged for an immaterial amount of rent in two cases. Recommendation: Management should ensure an additional control set is added to the process whereby the rent rolls are compared to the underlying lease and rent calculations to avoid this error from occurring in future periods.
The error has been disclosed to the funding source for this grant. We have put into place an additional internal control step to prevent this from occurring in future periods.
The Organization did not submit quarterly financial reports within the required timeline noted in the contract. In addition, we could not ascertain the timeliness of the final report because it was not available for us to review. Criteria: Quarterly financial reports are due 30 days after the period ends. Cause: Due to difficulty with the grants management system for this grant, reports were submitted after the required time frame. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements outlined in this contract. Recommendation: Management should implement a system and control process to ensure timely reporting for this contract. Management?s Response: This error in timing of report submission has been discussed with funding source. We have begun implementation of a new grants management tool and will provide additional resources to ensure timely submission of all reports in future periods.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Organization did not submit quarterly financial reports within the required timeline noted in the contract. In addition, we could not ascertain the timeliness of the final report because it was not available for us to review. Criteria: Quarterly financial reports are due 30 days after the period ends. Cause: Due to difficulty with the grants management system for this grant, reports were submitted after the required time frame. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements outlined in this contract. Recommendation: Management should implement a system and control process to ensure timely reporting for this contract. Management?s Response: This error in timing of report submission has been discussed with funding source. We have begun implementation of a new grants management tool and will provide additional resources to ensure timely submission of all reports in future periods.
Management?s Response: This error in timing of report submission has been discussed with funding source. We have begun implementation of a new grants management tool and will provide additional resources to ensure timely submission of all reports in future periods.
FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2020 — management decision was due August 20, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2018 — management decision was due June 19, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2018 — management decision was due July 3, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2017 — management decision was due July 10, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.