EIN: 133974371
UEI: L674C8SKKJC7
Audited by: WITHUMSMITH+BROWN PC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 13, 2026 (49 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
The financial reporting process was not sufficiently designed to effectively detect and prevent the issuance of financial statements with cumulatively material errors in certain account balances. Context: Audit procedures over investments revealed immaterial variances with investment statements and an accounting policy selection for non-marketable securities that did not follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (?US GAAP?). Furthermore, audit procedures over debt issuance costs revealed that the accounting policy election to amortize such costs on a straight-line basis did not follow US GAAP. Cause: The Organization adopted an incorrect accounting policy for recognizing non-marketable securities on their balance sheets and an incorrect policy election to amortize debt issuance cost over the term of the related debt obligation. Effect: The fair value and cost of investments were overstated, and net assets and financial expenses were understated, in the previously issued financial statements. Recommendation: Management should strengthen procedures for selecting appropriate accounting policies for significant items impacting their balance sheets. Such policies and resulting accounting should include processes that more closely follow published authoritative guidelines for initial recognition and subsequent measurement of assets and liabilities on the books and records. Response: Management concurs with the finding and restated the prior year financial statements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding No. 2022-001 (Material Weakness): Criteria: There were errors related to accounting for non- marketable securities and amortization of debt issuance costs resulting in cumulatively material errors requiring restatement of previously issued financial statements. Condition: The financial reporting process was not sufficiently designed to effectively detect and prevent the issuance of financial statements with cumulatively material errors in certain account balances. Context: Audit procedures over investments revealed immaterial variances with investment statements and an accounting policy selection for non-marketable securities that did not follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (?US GAAP?). Furthermore, audit procedures over debt issuance costs revealed that the accounting policy election to amortize such costs on a straight-line basis did not follow US GAAP. Cause: The Organization adopted an incorrect accounting policy for recognizing non-marketable securities on their balance sheets and an incorrect policy election to amortize debt issuance cost over the term of the related debt obligation. Effect: The fair value and cost of investments were overstated, and net assets and financial expenses were understated, in the previously issued financial statements. Recommendation: Management should strengthen procedures for selecting appropriate accounting policies for significant items impacting their balance sheets. Such policies and resulting accounting should include processes that more closely follow published authoritative guidelines for initial recognition and subsequent measurement of assets and liabilities on the books and records. Response: Management concurs with the finding and restated the prior year financial statements.
Findings 2022-001 Errors related to accounting for non-marketable securities and amortization of debt issuance costs resulting in cumulatively material errors requiring restatement of previously issued financial statements Lincoln HDFC?s Response Management concurs with the findings. We have adopted the correct accounting policy for recognizing non-marketable securities on the balance sheet and to amortize debt issuance cost over the term of the related debt obligation. Name of Responsible Person: Rev. Dr. Michael J. Rouse Name of Contact: Rev. Dr. Michael J. Rouse Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/22
FAC accepted this audit on April 26, 2022 — management decision was due October 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2021 — management decision was due April 10, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2021 — management decision was due April 10, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on August 31, 2021 — management decision was due March 3, 2022.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.