← Back to home

Ryan Chelsea-Clinton Community Health Center, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 133911827

UEI: QMRBCR6KBBV4

Audited by: Bonadio & Co., LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Ryan Chelsea-Clinton Community Health Center, Inc.9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,591,546 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 7, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 7, 2026 (245 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,386,742 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2024 — management decision was due March 23, 2025.

2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2023-002 – Health Centers Cluster Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant Period – Year ended December 31, 2023 Criteria - Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. The health center must demonstrate adjustments to charges are consistent with the health center’s SFDS. Condition - We attempted to recalculate the applied discount using the Center’s policy and the patient documentation provided, noting instances where the adjustments to charges were inconsistent with the Center’s SFDS. Cause - Lack of controls to ensure that staff are obtaining required documentation and entering the information correctly. Effect - Out of our sample of 20 selections, we identified five exceptions based on the SFDS. Three of the discounts entered lacked the required slide documentation, the slide form had expired and was not updated, or the document was updated, but the data in the system was not resulting in the slide that was provided not being supported or applied incorrectly. Two of the discounts were improperly adjusted during the billing or review process based on insurance or payments received, or incorrect charges being calculated and applied to the total slide for the remaining patient balance. Recommendation - Providing the sliding fee to patients is a requirement of specific grant funds received. As such, we recommend the Center review the current procedures in place and consider additional and more frequent training for all employees involved in the process. We encourage management to consider appointing an individual at the various locations to assist the front desk staff with the sliding fee process to ensure required documentation is captured and recorded accurately in the billing system. We also encourage the Center to consider assigning a dedicated individual to regularly review the sliding fee visits to ensure compliance. This should be someone who is knowledgeable of the sliding fee requirements and the Center’s billing processes and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-002 – Health Centers Cluster Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant Period – Year ended December 31, 2023 Criteria - Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. The health center must demonstrate adjustments to charges are consistent with the health center’s SFDS. Condition - We attempted to recalculate the applied discount using the Center’s policy and the patient documentation provided, noting instances where the adjustments to charges were inconsistent with the Center’s SFDS. Cause - Lack of controls to ensure that staff are obtaining required documentation and entering the information correctly. Effect - Out of our sample of 20 selections, we identified five exceptions based on the SFDS. Three of the discounts entered lacked the required slide documentation, the slide form had expired and was not updated, or the document was updated, but the data in the system was not resulting in the slide that was provided not being supported or applied incorrectly. Two of the discounts were improperly adjusted during the billing or review process based on insurance or payments received, or incorrect charges being calculated and applied to the total slide for the remaining patient balance. Recommendation - Providing the sliding fee to patients is a requirement of specific grant funds received. As such, we recommend the Center review the current procedures in place and consider additional and more frequent training for all employees involved in the process. We encourage management to consider appointing an individual at the various locations to assist the front desk staff with the sliding fee process to ensure required documentation is captured and recorded accurately in the billing system. We also encourage the Center to consider assigning a dedicated individual to regularly review the sliding fee visits to ensure compliance. This should be someone who is knowledgeable of the sliding fee requirements and the Center’s billing processes and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Verification of income and assignment of sliding fee categories are the responsibility of the Patient Services staff. Over the last few years, we have experienced significant turnover in that area. In addition, we have implemented electronic registration , both onsite (through the use of kiosks) and offsite (using the Luma remote registration and communication platform). As a result, a significant cohort of patients conducts a self registration. This requires new workflows to ensure correct assessment and documentation. The Center has implemented an extensive training program for "front desk" staff and supervisors under the leadership of the new Chief Operating Officer and his site management team. This in person training includes pre training and post training assessments, permanent resources available online and ongoing reinforcement. In addition, reports are available in real time by site and down to the individual patient service representative level to evaluate completion of all required data points. In addition, the Center will be implementing an internal audit function by the end of the current fiscal year to monitor compliance with the sliding fee requirements. If there are any additional questions, please contact Jose J. Virella, Chief Financial Officer at jose.virella@ryanhealth.org or 212-769-7245.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,571,449 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2023 — management decision was due March 11, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,018,991 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,895,515 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2021 — management decision was due March 29, 2022.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

For 20 out of 60 self-pay patients selected, although the Center did apply a sliding fee discount, the amount of sliding fee discount applied was not appropriate based on the Center?s sliding fee discount schedule in effect. Cause: The sliding fee discount scale selected was incorrect based on patient?s income level. Effect: The Center did not comply with program requirements requiring use of the Center?s sliding fee discount schedule. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: This condition was only encountered within our testing of certain dental and vision self-pay visits. Self-pay dental and vison visits represented approximately 4% of the Center?s 2020 visits. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center provide additional training to personnel in the dental and vision departments to ensure sliding fee discounts provided to income eligible patients are in accordance with Center?s approved sliding fee schedule.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, sliding fee discounts are applied to fees for health center services provided to all individuals and families with annual incomes at or below 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (?FPG?). Fees for health center services are discounted based on gradations in family size and income for individuals and families with incomes above 100 percent and at or below 200 percent of the FPG. Condition: For 20 out of 60 self-pay patients selected, although the Center did apply a sliding fee discount, the amount of sliding fee discount applied was not appropriate based on the Center?s sliding fee discount schedule in effect. Cause: The sliding fee discount scale selected was incorrect based on patient?s income level. Effect: The Center did not comply with program requirements requiring use of the Center?s sliding fee discount schedule. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: This condition was only encountered within our testing of certain dental and vision self-pay visits. Self-pay dental and vison visits represented approximately 4% of the Center?s 2020 visits. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center provide additional training to personnel in the dental and vision departments to ensure sliding fee discounts provided to income eligible patients are in accordance with Center?s approved sliding fee schedule.

Corrective Action Plan

? Corrective Action Plan ? Finding : 2020-001: Special Tests and Provisions ? Sliding Fee Discounts ? CFDA Name and Number: Health Center Program Cluster 93.224 Health Center Program / 93.227 Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program ? Name of contact person and title: Daniel Pichinson, Executive Director ? Anticipated implementation date: Started August 2021 The Patient Service Representatives were trained on application and implementation of the sliding fee scale policy in compliance with HRSA and all other federal regulations as adopted by the Ryan Chelsea- Clinton Board. The patient services representatives misinterpreted the training curriculum in a very limited number of instances regarding patients who declined to be fee scaled. In these cases, the patient services representatives calculated and applied the fee based on patients? verbal statements that they were applying for Medicaid or had applied for Medicaid. However, documentation of the application for Medicaid at the time of the fee scale assessment was not collected. During the COVID-19 state of emergency, the NYC HRA Department and NYSDOH permitted individuals to apply for Medicaid and other benefits by telephone and in-person visits to HRA offices were suspended. Also, pre-COVID, patients were often screened by representatives of MCOs in direct line of sight with the patient service representatives. Receipt of documentation was hindered by the COVID 19 state of emergency. In response to the audit findings, the following actions were taken: ? The patient service representatives were retrained on the sliding fee scale policy (Completed) ? A manager and supervisor of the patient service representatives conduct random reviews and audits to ensure appropriate application of the fee schedule (Ongoing) ? Administration is working with the organization?s IT Department to hard code the fee schedule to the appropriate fee if the patient declines the sliding fee schedule assessment. This will prevent manual intervention in these instances. (Estimated completion: By 12/31/2021)

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,822,396 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2020 — management decision was due March 28, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,675,941 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 1, 2019 — management decision was due February 1, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,776,119 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2018 — management decision was due January 22, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,572,211 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2017 — management decision was due December 29, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.