EIN: 132731443
UEI: FA8MH2PF6YD3
Audited by: BAKER TILLY US, LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 30, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 2, 2026 (33 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2026 — management decision was due November 13, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on April 30, 2025 — management decision was due October 30, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2025 — management decision was due September 3, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on October 1, 2024 — management decision was due April 1, 2025.
Electronic submission to REAC was not submitted within nine months of year end. Cause: The financial statements were not finalized by the due date. Effect: The Project is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the electronic submission to REAC be filed as soon as possible. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged a breach in protocol and will resolve the matter as soon as possible. Prior Year Finding: No.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Electronic submission is required to be submitted to REAC within nine months of year end. Condition: Electronic submission to REAC was not submitted within nine months of year end. Cause: The financial statements were not finalized by the due date. Effect: The Project is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the electronic submission to REAC be filed as soon as possible. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged a breach in protocol and will resolve the matter as soon as possible. Prior Year Finding: No.
a. Recommendation: We recommend that the electronic submission to REAC be filed as soon as possible. b. Action(s) Taken/Planned: Oversight of the filing process is being reviewed and adjusted to ensure the electronic submission to REAC will be filed as soon as possible and on a timely basis going foward.
FAC accepted this audit on February 25, 2024 — management decision was due August 25, 2024.
The Project deposited surplus cash in excess of allowable amounts. Criteria: The Company is required to follow HUD’s guidelines and procedures for depositing surplus cash into a residual receipts account in an amount which is equal to allowable amount per surplus cash computation within 90 days after the end of the fiscal period. Cause: Internal controls at the Company are not properly designed to ensure timely calculation and deposit of surplus cash amounts. Effect: The Company was not in compliance with their Regulatory Agreement. Context: During our recalculation of management’s computation of surplus cash, we noted the residual receipts deposit was based on a preliminary calculation which resulted in excess payment to the residual receipts account of $151,275. Recommendation: The Company should design their internal controls to ensure that the calculation of surplus cash is reviewed and performed timely, to ensure they will comply with HUD guidelines, as stated above. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged a breach in protocol and deposited the current year’s surplus cash on February 5, 2021.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Project deposited surplus cash in excess of allowable amounts. Criteria: The Company is required to follow HUD’s guidelines and procedures for depositing surplus cash into a residual receipts account in an amount which is equal to allowable amount per surplus cash computation within 90 days after the end of the fiscal period. Cause: Internal controls at the Company are not properly designed to ensure timely calculation and deposit of surplus cash amounts. Effect: The Company was not in compliance with their Regulatory Agreement. Context: During our recalculation of management’s computation of surplus cash, we noted the residual receipts deposit was based on a preliminary calculation which resulted in excess payment to the residual receipts account of $151,275. Recommendation: The Company should design their internal controls to ensure that the calculation of surplus cash is reviewed and performed timely, to ensure they will comply with HUD guidelines, as stated above. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged a breach in protocol and deposited the current year’s surplus cash on February 5, 2021.
Finding 2020-003: Section 223(f), CFDA 14.155 and Section 8, CFDA 14.195 a. Recommendation: The Company should ensure their procedures require the calculation of residual receipts and the transfer occur within 90 days of year end. b. Action(s) Taken/Planned: Management has acknowledged a breach in protocol and deposited the current year's surplus cash on February 5, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2020 — management decision was due December 30, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2019 — management decision was due January 30, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2018 — management decision was due January 31, 2019.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
