← Back to home

Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim and AffiliatesNon-Profit

EIN: 116003214

UEI: CC4HHHTM66J7

Audit also covers EIN: 112131432 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: ROTH & COMPANY LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim and Affiliates10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,751,143 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 20, 2026 (45 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-08-31

$3,861,890 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.

FY 2023-08-31

$3,727,584 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2022-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,406,340 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2023 — management decision was due September 19, 2023.

2022-001
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Management implemented a financial management system that meets the specified standards for fund control and accountability, but the system failed to ensure disbursement of funds within the required timeframe. Management self-identified the issue, and self-corrected as they became aware of the requirement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Cause: Management did not accurately identify the required timeframe of disbursement for funds received under the SAIHE subprogram. A mitigating factor is the uniqueness of the SAIHE subprogram. Effect: The portion of the SAIHE funds allocated to provide financial aid grants to students was not disbursed within the required 15 calendar days of the drawdown from ED?s G5 grants system. Recommendation: Before drawing down from ED?s G5 grants system, management should familiarize themselves with the applicable terms, conditions, and requirements governing the organization?s use of the grant funds, and then implement a system of controls that will ensure compliance with those terms. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and has implemented a system to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from ED?s G5 grants system and disbursement by the organization for both institutional aid and student financial aid purposes. In addition, management has designated a responsible and capable employee to monitor the new system and to review the terms, conditions, and requirements governing any future grants to ensure the system?s compatibility. Implementation of the corrective action is further evidenced by timely disbursement of subsequent drawdowns from ED?s G5 grants system in FY22.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001: Cash Management ? Disbursement U.S. Department of Education ? Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19 Supplemental Assistance to Institutions of Higher Education Program ? ALN 84.425S Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Condition: Management implemented a financial management system that meets the specified standards for fund control and accountability, but the system failed to ensure disbursement of funds within the required timeframe. Management self-identified the issue, and self-corrected as they became aware of the requirement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Cause: Management did not accurately identify the required timeframe of disbursement for funds received under the SAIHE subprogram. A mitigating factor is the uniqueness of the SAIHE subprogram. Effect: The portion of the SAIHE funds allocated to provide financial aid grants to students was not disbursed within the required 15 calendar days of the drawdown from ED?s G5 grants system. Recommendation: Before drawing down from ED?s G5 grants system, management should familiarize themselves with the applicable terms, conditions, and requirements governing the organization?s use of the grant funds, and then implement a system of controls that will ensure compliance with those terms. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and has implemented a system to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from ED?s G5 grants system and disbursement by the organization for both institutional aid and student financial aid purposes. In addition, management has designated a responsible and capable employee to monitor the new system and to review the terms, conditions, and requirements governing any future grants to ensure the system?s compatibility. Implementation of the corrective action is further evidenced by timely disbursement of subsequent drawdowns from ED?s G5 grants system in FY22.

Corrective Action Plan

Planned Corrective Action 1. Mr. Samuel Fischer has implemented a system to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from ED?s G5 grants system and disbursement by the organization for both institutional aid and student financial aid purposes. 2. Mr. Fischer has designated Mr. Getzel Falkowitz to monitor the system and to review the terms, conditions, and requirements governing any future grants to ensure the system?s compatibility.

About Cash Management →

FY 2021-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,178,261 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2022 — management decision was due November 30, 2022.

FY 2020-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,946,705 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2021 — management decision was due May 2, 2022.

FY 2019-08-31

$1,854,362 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2020 — management decision was due November 5, 2020.

FY 2018-08-31

$1,793,099 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2019 — management decision was due November 29, 2019.

FY 2017-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,747,905 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2018 — management decision was due December 3, 2018.

FY 2016-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,613,428 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2017 — management decision was due November 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.