← Back to home

Hicksville Union Free School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 116002043

UEI: GMLFEWL2MVP2

Audited by: Cullen & Danowski, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Hicksville Union Free School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$6,780,952 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 26, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$10,227,476 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2025 — management decision was due September 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$8,200,110 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$7,230,888 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,856,041 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

2021-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Upon review of the District?s FS-10F filing, it was determined that a final expenditure reported for grant funds reimbursed was based upon an amount originally encumbered for a budgeted cost in the grant, and not for an actual expenditure incurred and recorded by the District in the general ledger. Criteria: The District is required to file certain grant documents, including final grant expenditure reports (FS-10F). This FS-10F should agree to the actual expenditures recorded in the District?s general ledger for the grant period. Cause: While preparing the FS-10F, the District incorrectly recorded an amount encumbered on a purchase order in their financial software system, instead of the actual expenditures incurred for items purchased. Effect: This resulted in the District submitting an incorrect amount of reimbursement to the New York Stated Department of Education for program expenditures on their FS-10F for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency (ESSER) Fund grant in the amount of $2,532. Recommendation: The District should contact the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course of action to resolve this overpayment received, which should include filing a revised FS-10F for the grant, as the 90-day window for adjusting the filings has not closed. Additionally, the District should review its procedures for submitting a final FS-10F report to New York State Education Department to ensure that is it properly reviewed prior to submission, and accurately reflects the final program expenditures being requested for reimbursement. Management?s Response: The District?s Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business have contacted the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course of action which has led to the subsequent filing of a revised FS-10F for the grant. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the total FS-10F expenditures, prior to final submission for reimbursement from the New York State Education Department.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Department of Education, Passed-through New York State, Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.425D Condition: Upon review of the District?s FS-10F filing, it was determined that a final expenditure reported for grant funds reimbursed was based upon an amount originally encumbered for a budgeted cost in the grant, and not for an actual expenditure incurred and recorded by the District in the general ledger. Criteria: The District is required to file certain grant documents, including final grant expenditure reports (FS-10F). This FS-10F should agree to the actual expenditures recorded in the District?s general ledger for the grant period. Cause: While preparing the FS-10F, the District incorrectly recorded an amount encumbered on a purchase order in their financial software system, instead of the actual expenditures incurred for items purchased. Effect: This resulted in the District submitting an incorrect amount of reimbursement to the New York Stated Department of Education for program expenditures on their FS-10F for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency (ESSER) Fund grant in the amount of $2,532. Recommendation: The District should contact the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course of action to resolve this overpayment received, which should include filing a revised FS-10F for the grant, as the 90-day window for adjusting the filings has not closed. Additionally, the District should review its procedures for submitting a final FS-10F report to New York State Education Department to ensure that is it properly reviewed prior to submission, and accurately reflects the final program expenditures being requested for reimbursement. Management?s Response: The District?s Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business have contacted the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course of action which has led to the subsequent filing of a revised FS-10F for the grant. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the total FS-10F expenditures, prior to final submission for reimbursement from the New York State Education Department.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-001. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.425D Condition: In the Form FS-10F final expenditure report submitted by the District, one item of expenditure reported for grant funds reimbursement was based on an amount originally encumbered for a budgeted cost in the grant instead of the actual expenditure incurred and recorded by the District in the general ledger. Another expenditure item reported for reimbursement did not reflect a $2,000 discount provided by the vendor and taken by the District. Planned Corrective Action: The Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business will contact the New York State Education Department again to determine the appropriate course of action for correcting the incorrectly-reported item. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the total FS-10F expenditures, prior to final submission for reimbursement to the New York State Education Department. Responsible Contact Person: Marcy A. Tannenbaum, Assistant Superintendent for Business. Anticipated Completion Date: October 30, 2022.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-002
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
OTHER MATTERS

Upon review of the District?s maintenance-of-effort calculation, it was determined that transportation expenditures were duplicated as both contractual and transportation cost. Criteria: The District is required to prepare a maintenance-of-effort calculation to meet both the eligibility and compliance standards to ensure that federal funds received under the Special Education Cluster are not being used to supplant local expenditures incurred to educate special education students below the level of expenditures from the previous year. The information used to prepare these calculations should be based on budgeted and actual expenditures, to meet the eligibility and compliance standards, respectively. Cause: While preparing the maintenance-of-effort calculation to meet the compliance standard, the District incorrectly reported actual transportation expenditures of $97,931 as both contractual and transportation costs. Effect: This resulted in the District submitting an incorrect maintenance-of-effort calculation to the New York State Education Department. The duplication of expenditures in the calculation did not affect the outcome as the District still maintained the appropriate level of effort to meet the requirement, Questioned Costs: N/A. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from a previous audit. Recommendation: The District should submit a revised maintenance-of-effort calculation to the New York State Education Department. Additionally, the District should review its procedures for the completion and submission of their maintenance-of-effort calculations to New York State Education Department to ensure that it has been properly reviewed by another person prior to submission, and that it accurately reflects the actual expenditures incurred by local effort. Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding. The District?s Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business will contact the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course for submitting a revised maintenance-of-effort calculation. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the expenditures reported in the calculation, and that the calculation is reviewed by another person prior to submission to the New York State Education Department.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002. Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Special Education Cluster Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.027 Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.173 Condition: Upon review of the District?s maintenance-of-effort calculation, it was determined that transportation expenditures were duplicated as both contractual and transportation cost. Criteria: The District is required to prepare a maintenance-of-effort calculation to meet both the eligibility and compliance standards to ensure that federal funds received under the Special Education Cluster are not being used to supplant local expenditures incurred to educate special education students below the level of expenditures from the previous year. The information used to prepare these calculations should be based on budgeted and actual expenditures, to meet the eligibility and compliance standards, respectively. Cause: While preparing the maintenance-of-effort calculation to meet the compliance standard, the District incorrectly reported actual transportation expenditures of $97,931 as both contractual and transportation costs. Effect: This resulted in the District submitting an incorrect maintenance-of-effort calculation to the New York State Education Department. The duplication of expenditures in the calculation did not affect the outcome as the District still maintained the appropriate level of effort to meet the requirement, Questioned Costs: N/A. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from a previous audit. Recommendation: The District should submit a revised maintenance-of-effort calculation to the New York State Education Department. Additionally, the District should review its procedures for the completion and submission of their maintenance-of-effort calculations to New York State Education Department to ensure that it has been properly reviewed by another person prior to submission, and that it accurately reflects the actual expenditures incurred by local effort. Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding. The District?s Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business will contact the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course for submitting a revised maintenance-of-effort calculation. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the expenditures reported in the calculation, and that the calculation is reviewed by another person prior to submission to the New York State Education Department.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-002. Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Special Education Cluster Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.027 Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing (CFDA) No. 84.173 Condition: Upon review of the District?s maintenance of effort calculation, it was determined that transportation expenditures were duplicated - once as a contractual cost and again as transportation costs. Planned Corrective Action: The District?s Assistant Superintendent for Business and Director of Business will contact the New York State Education Department to determine the appropriate course for submitting a revised maintenance-of-effort calculation. Additionally, the District will review its procedures to ensure that a reconciliation of actual expenditures incurred agrees to the expenditures reported in the calculation, and that the calculation is reviewed by another person prior to submission to the New York State Education Department. Responsible Contact Person: Marcy A. Tannenbaum, Assistant Superintendent for Business. Anticipated Completion Date: October 31, 2022. Contact Information: Ms. Marcy A. Tannenbaum, Assistant Superintendent for Business Hicksville Union Free School District 200 Division Avenue Hicksville, New York 11801-4800

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,879,139 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 20, 2021 — management decision was due November 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,154,087 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2020 — management decision was due October 21, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,027,588 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,126,791 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2018 — management decision was due September 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,058,825 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2017 — management decision was due September 23, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.