← Back to home

Catholic Charities of Long IslandNon-Profit

EIN: 111843801

UEI: ULA3EQ4ZMNN8

Audit also covers EIN: 510228905 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Catholic Charities of Long Island10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$10.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$10,357,332 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 18, 2026 (77 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,980,066 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2025 — management decision was due November 22, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,010,211 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2024 — management decision was due November 30, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,052,791 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2023 — management decision was due November 15, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,452,652 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2022 — management decision was due November 23, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,121,609 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2021 — management decision was due November 23, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,877,685 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2020 — management decision was due November 14, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

In our testing, there were three instances in which comparable rents for the area were not documented and maintained in the tenant files to provide documentation of compliance with the criteria. Cause: The Organization did not have an adequate control in place for the review by a supervisor of every tenant file to ensure documentation that reasonable rent was being charged was in each file. The control in place required review of a selection of tenant files. Effect: The Organization could potentially not be in compliance with the requirement to ensure that grant funds to pay rent were used for reasonable rent in relation to comparable rent in the area. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Context: A sample of 22 tenants were selected from a population of 47 tenants. The test found three errors as identified above. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement procedures for supervisor review and approval of tenant files to ensure all proper documentation to support reasonable rent is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Organization management agrees with the recommendation and will put the proper procedures in place to ensure that the grant funds to pay rent were used for reasonable rent in relation to comparable rent in the area.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that rents paid for with grant funds are reasonable in relation to rents being charged in the area for comparable space. Condition: In our testing, there were three instances in which comparable rents for the area were not documented and maintained in the tenant files to provide documentation of compliance with the criteria. Cause: The Organization did not have an adequate control in place for the review by a supervisor of every tenant file to ensure documentation that reasonable rent was being charged was in each file. The control in place required review of a selection of tenant files. Effect: The Organization could potentially not be in compliance with the requirement to ensure that grant funds to pay rent were used for reasonable rent in relation to comparable rent in the area. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Context: A sample of 22 tenants were selected from a population of 47 tenants. The test found three errors as identified above. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement procedures for supervisor review and approval of tenant files to ensure all proper documentation to support reasonable rent is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Organization management agrees with the recommendation and will put the proper procedures in place to ensure that the grant funds to pay rent were used for reasonable rent in relation to comparable rent in the area.

Corrective Action Plan

May 11, 2020 Corrective Action Plan Response to December 31, 2019 Single Audit Finding CFDA Number 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Section Ill - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2019-001: Special Tests and Provisions To Whom It May Concern, In response to the above section of our December 31, 2019 single audit, please see the following corrective action plan: Management has made a note of the internal control issue over review of comparable rents noted in the audit report. The Agency will implement procedures to enhance controls over review of comparable rents by now requiring supervisor review and approval of every tenant file instead of a selection of them. This will ensure all proper documentation to support reasonable rent is maintained. Should you have any further questions/concerns, please contact me at 516-733-7032 or by email at balcom.richard@CatholicCharities.cc. Sincerely, Richard Balcom Chief Financial Officer

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,494,135 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 20, 2019 — management decision was due November 20, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,086,078 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2018 — management decision was due November 17, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,136,329 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2017 — management decision was due November 23, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.