Town of Rocky Hill, ConnecticutLocal Government

EIN: 066002076

UEI: F21RBNVNLN83

Audit also covers 2 related EINs: 066001659, 066600165 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Town of Rocky Hill, Connecticut10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,896,091 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 7, 2026 (53 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,884,395 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2024 — management decision was due May 21, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,564,830 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2024 — management decision was due July 24, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,671,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2023 — management decision was due July 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,203,826 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2022 — management decision was due July 5, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,751,900 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2020 — management decision was due June 13, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,725,272 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

III. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding No. 2019-001 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Board of Education Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency State of Connecticut Department of Education Criteria The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The Board of Education's procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Board of Education?s major program. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

III. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding No. 2019-001 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Board of Education Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency State of Connecticut Department of Education Criteria The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The Board of Education's procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Board of Education?s major program. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

SINGLE AUDIT FINDINGS: No. 2019-001- Procurement Policy Description of Finding: The Board of Education's procurement policies did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Statement of Concurrence: Management agrees with this finding. The Board of Education was not aware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Corrective Action: The Board of Education will review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 222.326. Name of Contact Person: Charles Zettergren Projected Completion Date: January 15, 2020

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,632,608 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2019 — management decision was due July 13, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,546,088 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2018 — management decision was due July 3, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,312,745 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2017 — management decision was due July 8, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.