EIN: 066002039
UEI: QMAJADJNQ5K5
Audit also covers EIN: 066001635 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 13, 2026 (59 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Town does not have adequate controls in place to ensure supporting documentation is retained for expenditures that are charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Town could not provide documentation to support that one invoice totaling $10,975 charged to the grant was reviewed and approved as an allowable cost to the grant. Cause: The Town did not retain documentation that the expenditure was an approved cost of the grant. Effect: We noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of allowable costs, however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure all documentation is retained in accordance with the UG record retention requirements under 2 CFR 200.334. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID 19 ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery EXP Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires allowable costs to be adequately documented and records be retained for a minimum of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. Condition: The Town does not have adequate controls in place to ensure supporting documentation is retained for expenditures that are charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Town could not provide documentation to support that one invoice totaling $10,975 charged to the grant was reviewed and approved as an allowable cost to the grant. Cause: The Town did not retain documentation that the expenditure was an approved cost of the grant. Effect: We noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of allowable costs, however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure all documentation is retained in accordance with the UG record retention requirements under 2 CFR 200.334. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
COVID 19 ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery EXP – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure all documentation is retained in accordance with the Uniform Guidance record retention requirements under 2 CFR 200.334. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will implement a policy to ensure all documentation is retained in according with Uniform Guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Julie Chapman, Director of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 2025
During our testing, we noted the Town did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred for seven out of seven tested. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Town was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The Town did not retain documentation of their review that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: We noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.213. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024 – 004 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds Assistance Listing Number: 66.468 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2024-7125 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Public Health Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-DPH48770-23155, 21018-DPH48770-43805 Award Period: August 29, 2023-April 30, 2025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID 19 ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery EXP Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021-December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Town did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred for seven out of seven tested. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Town was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The Town did not retain documentation of their review that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: We noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.213. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds – Assistance Listing No. 66.468 COVID 19 ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery EXP – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend the Town design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.213. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will implement a process to review vendors prior to entering into a contract to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Julie Chapman, Director of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 2025 Any questions regarding this plan, please call Julie Chapman at (860) 848-6714.
FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2024 — management decision was due November 6, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2023 — management decision was due September 12, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 10, 2022 — management decision was due November 10, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2020 — management decision was due June 21, 2021.
Finding No. 2020-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Federal Programs Criteria The Town must comply with procurement standards as set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The Town?s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Although the Town did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Town did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Town?s major program. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The Town was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with the auditor?s recommendations. Corrective action will be taken to ensure the policy is updated and that the correct procurement procedures are followed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding No. 2020-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Federal Programs Criteria The Town must comply with procurement standards as set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The Town?s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Although the Town did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Town did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Town?s major program. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The Town was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with the auditor?s recommendations. Corrective action will be taken to ensure the policy is updated and that the correct procurement procedures are followed.
Finding 2020-002 - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment. Description of Finding - The Town must comply with procurement standards as set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. The Town's procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence - Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action - Management intends to take action to address the identified deficiency by reviewing the Town Procurement Policy with the Town Council and make necessary updates. Name of Contact Person - Terry Hart, Finance Director. Projected Completion Date - June 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2020 — management decision was due July 8, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2019 — management decision was due July 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2018 — management decision was due July 4, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2017 — management decision was due July 5, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
