EIN: 066001991
UEI: G3KQD8677487
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 4, 2027 (174 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2025 — management decision was due February 19, 2026.
During our testing, we noted the Town did not submit the Project and Expenditure report that was due by April 30, 2023. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted that the Town was not aware of the reporting requirement and had not submitted the required report by the April 30, 2023, deadline. Cause: The Town was unaware of the reporting requirement. Effect: No effect could be determined. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town implement procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements under which the Town is obligated to comply as part of its grant agreements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 06-6002031-2021 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, and Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with reporting requirements. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Town did not submit the Project and Expenditure report that was due by April 30, 2023. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted that the Town was not aware of the reporting requirement and had not submitted the required report by the April 30, 2023, deadline. Cause: The Town was unaware of the reporting requirement. Effect: No effect could be determined. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Town implement procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements under which the Town is obligated to comply as part of its grant agreements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with reporting requirements. During our testing, we noted the Town did not have submit the Project and Expenditure report, that was due by April 30, 2023. Recommendation: CLA recommends the Town implement procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements under which the Town if obligated to comply as part of their grant agreements. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action Taken in Response to Finding: Management will implement procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements under which the Town if obligated to comply as part of our grant agreements. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) responsible for Corrective Active Plan: Kevin Gervais Jr. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 2025
FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2024 — management decision was due January 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on July 18, 2023 — management decision was due January 18, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2021 — management decision was due December 27, 2021.
During the course of our engagement, we proposed significant audit adjustments that would not have been identified as a result of the Town?s existing internal controls. Context: Significant audit adjustments were recorded across multiple funds. Effect: Management does not have accurate financial information upon which to base management decisions. Cause: The cause is the lack of effective controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the Town evaluate the internal controls over financial reporting in order to design and implement effective controls. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-001 Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Criteria: Town management is responsible for financial reporting in the form of financial statements that present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position, changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows for governmental activities, business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town. Condition: During the course of our engagement, we proposed significant audit adjustments that would not have been identified as a result of the Town?s existing internal controls. Context: Significant audit adjustments were recorded across multiple funds. Effect: Management does not have accurate financial information upon which to base management decisions. Cause: The cause is the lack of effective controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the Town evaluate the internal controls over financial reporting in order to design and implement effective controls. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2020-001 Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Description of Finding: Significant audit adjustments were required that were not identified as a result of the Town?s existing internal controls. Statement of Concurrence of NonConcurrence: Management concurs with audit finding and will complete the process noted below to facilitate financial statement preparation. Corrective Action: Management will conduct a detailed review by reconciling asset and liability accounts and also by reviewing revenue and expenditure detail for each account. The review of revenue and expenditure detail for each account is to be reviewed to correct any posting errors and investigate unusual results. The revenue and expenditure reviews will be done monthly for the general fund and at least quarterly for all other funds. The asset and liability account reconciliations will be done quarterly. Name of Contact Person: Anna M. Johnson, Director of Finance Projected Completion Date: Monthly, Quarterly and Annually
The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of updating its procurement policies to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding No. 2020-002 Procurement Policy Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.553/10.555 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20508 / 12060-SDE64370-20560 / 12060-SDE64370- 29572 / 12060-SDE64370-29576 Award Period: July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of updating its procurement policies to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
2020-002 Procurement Policy Description of Finding: The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Statement of Concurrence or NonConcurrence: Management concurs with the Finding. Corrective Action: Management has drafted a policy that is in compliance with the Federal Uniform guidelines. The policy is currently being reviewed by the Board of Education Policy Committee. Name of Contact Person: Maryanna Stevens, Director of Finance Projected Completion Date: September 30, 2021
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on June 16, 2019 — management decision was due December 16, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on June 5, 2018 — management decision was due December 5, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on August 7, 2017 — management decision was due February 7, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
