← Back to home

Town of Cheshire, ConnecticutLocal Government

EIN: 066001971

UEI: Q2VQCW6J2EP3

Audit also covers EIN: 066001595 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Town of Cheshire, Connecticut10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$4.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,462,394 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2026 (19 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,424,181 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2025 — management decision was due July 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,740,807 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$9,281,918 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2023 — management decision was due September 5, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,794,610 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2022 — management decision was due October 20, 2022.

2021-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-002

The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards during FY2020 and is in the process of creating and implementing a new policy, but one has not yet gone into effect in FY2021. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2020-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2021-001: Procurement Policy Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553/10.555 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20508 / 12060-SDE64370-20560 / 12060-SDE64370- 29572 / 12060-SDE64370-29576 Award Period: July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards during FY2020 and is in the process of creating and implementing a new policy, but one has not yet gone into effect in FY2021. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2020-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The Town of Cheshire, Connecticut respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2021. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. FINDING - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT United States Department of Agriculture Passed Through the State Department of Education 2021-001 Child Nutrition Cluster ? CFDA No. 10.553/10.555 Recommendation: That management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have consulted with the Town Attorney for guidance and both the Town and Board of Education will review their purchasing policy and amend to comply with Uniform Guidance. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Greg Gibbons, Director of Fiscal Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2022

Prior Finding References

2020-002

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,204,274 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Out of the 25 payroll expenditures tested, 4 included pay to employees whose payroll was only partially allocated to IDEA. Allocations were based on budgeted time for those employees. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There are 38 employees whose pay is allocated to IDEA. Out of these 38, 4 are only partially allocated to the grant based on their activity. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause: Management was unaware that budgeted allocations were insufficient evidence under Uniform Guidance. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance, however, due to lack of controls in place to verify payroll allocations and prevent misallocations, there is a possibility that payroll may be improperly allocated to grant programs and that misallocation would go undetected. Recommendation: We recommend that management update policies to reflect Uniform Guidance and implement procedures to review payroll allocations on a more regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2020-001: Payroll Allocation Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Special Education Cluster CFDA Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/12060-SDE64370-20983 Award Period: July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance requires that payroll allocations be supported by documentation that includes verification with the employee that allocations are accurate. Condition: Out of the 25 payroll expenditures tested, 4 included pay to employees whose payroll was only partially allocated to IDEA. Allocations were based on budgeted time for those employees. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There are 38 employees whose pay is allocated to IDEA. Out of these 38, 4 are only partially allocated to the grant based on their activity. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause: Management was unaware that budgeted allocations were insufficient evidence under Uniform Guidance. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance, however, due to lack of controls in place to verify payroll allocations and prevent misallocations, there is a possibility that payroll may be improperly allocated to grant programs and that misallocation would go undetected. Recommendation: We recommend that management update policies to reflect Uniform Guidance and implement procedures to review payroll allocations on a more regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Special Education Cluster ? CFDA No. 84.027/84.173 Recommendation: That management update policies to reflect Uniform Guidance and implement procedures to review payroll allocations on a more regular basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Pupil Personnel Service Director has put together a verification form to review with employees who are partially paid from the Special Education Cluster. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Greg Gibbons, Supervisor of Fiscal and Transportation Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2021. If the Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Greg Gibbons at 203-250-2415.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2020-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2020-002: Procurement Policy Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.553/10.555 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20508 / 12060-SDE64370-20560 / 12060-SDE64370-29572 / 12060-SDE64370-29576 Award Period: July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include all the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The Board of Education does not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria. Cause: The Board of Education was unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Child Nutrition Cluster ? CFDA No. 10.553/10.555 Recommendation: That management review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Town and Board of Education will review their purchasing policy and amend to comply with Uniform Guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Greg Gibbons, Supervisor of Fiscal and Transportation Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2021. If the Department of Agriculture has questions regarding this plan, please call Greg Gibbons at 203-250-2415.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,790,794 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2020 — management decision was due July 26, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,778,402 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2019 — management decision was due August 26, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,808,504 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2018 — management decision was due August 20, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,798,146 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.