← Back to home

City of New Britain, ConnecticutLocal Government

EIN: 066001874

UEI: NKQDD7JLDF53

Audit also covers EIN: 222486319 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

City of New Britain, Connecticut10 audit years5 findings
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$45M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$44,981,177 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 24, 2026 (18 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$67,173,927 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$78,155,140 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2024 — management decision was due January 22, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$55,920,164 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2024 — management decision was due July 16, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,177,098 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2022 — management decision was due November 25, 2022.

2021-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding No. 2021-002 Reporting ? Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Assistance Listing14.218 Community Development Block Grants Transactions Subaward not Report not Subaward amount Subaward missing Tested reported timely incorrect key elements 2 - 2 - - Dollar Amount of Tested Subaward not Report not Subaward amount Subaward missing Transactions reported timely incorrect key elements $ 185,000 - $ 185,000 - - Award Period July 1, 2020 through September 1, 2027 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA subaward report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Condition For the two subawards sampled, the subawards were filed however not by the end of the month following the month in which the subgrant was awarded. Cause Department enters all subawards at the start of the grant period. Effect Reports were not filed in a timely manner. Repeat Finding No. Questioned costs None noted. Context One subaward selected was two months late and the second subaward selected was one month late. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend that procedures be strengthened to ensure each subaward is filed within one month following the award obligation date. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2021-002 Reporting ? Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Assistance Listing14.218 Community Development Block Grants Transactions Subaward not Report not Subaward amount Subaward missing Tested reported timely incorrect key elements 2 - 2 - - Dollar Amount of Tested Subaward not Report not Subaward amount Subaward missing Transactions reported timely incorrect key elements $ 185,000 - $ 185,000 - - Award Period July 1, 2020 through September 1, 2027 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA subaward report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Condition For the two subawards sampled, the subawards were filed however not by the end of the month following the month in which the subgrant was awarded. Cause Department enters all subawards at the start of the grant period. Effect Reports were not filed in a timely manner. Repeat Finding No. Questioned costs None noted. Context One subaward selected was two months late and the second subaward selected was one month late. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend that procedures be strengthened to ensure each subaward is filed within one month following the award obligation date. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding

Corrective Action Plan

State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management City of New Britain, Connecticut, respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2021. Audit period: Fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS?FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2021-002 Delayed FFATA Reporting Recommendation: Complete FFATA reporting within 30 days of contract date of sub-allocation Action taken in response to finding: An internal schedule will be developed to ensure timely completion of FFATA reporting for all sub-allocations exceeding $30,000. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Scott Williams Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 5/01/2022 If the State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management has questions regarding this plan, please call Scott Williams at 860-826-3329.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,130,066 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2021 — management decision was due July 17, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$29,511,354 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2020 — management decision was due July 26, 2020.

2019-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2019-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City and the Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City?s and Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None. Context Although the City and Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, they did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City?s major programs. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the City and Board of Education are at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The City and Board of Education were unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the City and the Board of Education review their formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City and the Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City?s and Board of Education?s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs None. Context Although the City and Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, they did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City?s major programs. Effect With the absence of a compliant policy, the City and Board of Education are at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The City and Board of Education were unaware of the details surrounding the new procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that the City and the Board of Education review their formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

To Government Officials: SINGLE AUDIT FINDINGS: Finding 2019-002 PROCUREMENT UNIFORM GUIDANCE Description of Finding: The City of New Britain?s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Management from the City of New Britain concurs with the finding and did not know a policy regarding Federal Procurement Uniform Guidance had to be implemented in Fiscal Year 2019. The City did follow the State procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City?s major programs. Corrective Action: The City will update its procurement policy to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Name of Contact Person: Lori Granato Projected Completion Date: March 31, 2020

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-06-30

$26,977,789 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2019 — management decision was due July 23, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

$22,009,721 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2018 — management decision was due July 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$23,788,645 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 11, 2017 — management decision was due November 11, 2017.

2016-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.