← Back to home

City of Middletown, ConnecticutLocal Government

EIN: 066001872

UEI: C1BGKQCVTYF8

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

City of Middletown, Connecticut10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$14.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$14,180,161 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 27, 2026 (33 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$19,346,015 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 15, 2025 — management decision was due February 15, 2026.

FY 2023-06-30

$16,872,048 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2025 — management decision was due February 14, 2026.

2023-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Board of Education procurement policies do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Client did not have adequate support for verification by management of vendor status for suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: Per review of vendor agreements during testing over suspension and debarment, there was no indication of a suspension and debarment clause or verification of vendor status by management. Cause: The significant deficiency is primarily due to inadequate internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Federal Award Identification Number: Grant Year: 2023 Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977 Award Period: June 7, 2022, through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the Board of Education plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Board of Education procurement policies do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Client did not have adequate support for verification by management of vendor status for suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: Per review of vendor agreements during testing over suspension and debarment, there was no indication of a suspension and debarment clause or verification of vendor status by management. Cause: The significant deficiency is primarily due to inadequate internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.

Corrective Action Plan

Description of Finding The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the Board of Education plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence The City Board of Education concurs. Corrective Action management will review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Name of Contact Person Natalie Forbes, Business Manager Projected Completion Date 6/30/2025

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,819,156 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2024 — management decision was due November 22, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,205,628 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2024 — management decision was due November 22, 2024.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,917,400 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2021 — management decision was due July 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,597,925 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2020 — management decision was due July 21, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,642,484 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2019 — management decision was due October 1, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,988,923 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2018 — management decision was due July 3, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,963,212 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2017 — management decision was due July 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.