← Back to home

SOUTHWESTERN AHEC, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 061615577

UEI: SDXCG2FNUGB6

Audited by: Carney, Roy and Gerrol, P.C.

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

SOUTHWESTERN AHEC, INC.4 audit years3 findings
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,110,808 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2026 (159 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cash Management / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

The Organization’s expenditure reports filed with the grantor for the cost reimbursement-based grant were overstated, and the Organization was overpaid by $182,167, of which $26,730 was received after year-end. The overpayment has not yet been refunded back to the grantor, over a year after the performance period of the grant had ended. Criteria: The Organization did not comply with 2 CFR 200.302 and 2 CFR 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance and the terms of the grant for the major program tested. Expenditure reports are required to be accurate and supported by the Organization’s financial management system, books, and records. The time between receipt of funds by the Organization and disbursement of funds by the Organization is required to be minimized. The grant agreement establishes that payments received in excess of qualifying expenditures occurred must be returned back to the grantor. Cause: The expenditure reports filed were based on estimates that later changed once more information was available. There was a weakness in controls involving the reconciliation of expenditure reports filed to the Organization’s financial management system, books, and records. Effect: The Organization was overpaid by $182,167. Recommendation: The Organization should coordinate with the grantor the return of the unspent funds. The Organization should reevaluate its grant expenditure reporting procedures to better mitigate the risk of inaccurate filing and improper reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding. See the Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization’s expenditure reports filed with the grantor for the cost reimbursement-based grant were overstated, and the Organization was overpaid by $182,167, of which $26,730 was received after year-end. The overpayment has not yet been refunded back to the grantor, over a year after the performance period of the grant had ended. Criteria: The Organization did not comply with 2 CFR 200.302 and 2 CFR 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance and the terms of the grant for the major program tested. Expenditure reports are required to be accurate and supported by the Organization’s financial management system, books, and records. The time between receipt of funds by the Organization and disbursement of funds by the Organization is required to be minimized. The grant agreement establishes that payments received in excess of qualifying expenditures occurred must be returned back to the grantor. Cause: The expenditure reports filed were based on estimates that later changed once more information was available. There was a weakness in controls involving the reconciliation of expenditure reports filed to the Organization’s financial management system, books, and records. Effect: The Organization was overpaid by $182,167. Recommendation: The Organization should coordinate with the grantor the return of the unspent funds. The Organization should reevaluate its grant expenditure reporting procedures to better mitigate the risk of inaccurate filing and improper reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding. See the Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The Organization’s expenditure reports filed with the grantor for the cost reimbursement-based grant were overstated, and the Organization was overpaid by $182,167, of which $26,730 was received after yearend. The overpayment has not yet been refunded back to the grantor, over a year after the performance period of the grant had ended. Recommendation: The Organization should coordinate with the grantor the return of the unspent funds. The Organization should reevaluate its grant expenditure reporting procedures to better mitigate the risk of inaccurate filing and improper reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding and recommendation. The anticipated completion date for the corrective action is October 30, 2025.

About Cash Management, Reporting →
2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

The Organization did not maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance, for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. The Organization also did not comply with 2 CFR 200.318 (h) and 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance including verifying that vendors for covered transactions are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. There were two vendors with covered transactions charged to the major program. The vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. However, the Organization did not perform and document the required verification. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires the Organization to maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318 (h) and 200.214 also require the Organization to verify that vendors for covered transactions are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Cause: The relevant procedures were not documented in a manner required by the Uniform Guidance. There was a weakness in controls involving compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: The Organization should draft and maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding. See the Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization did not maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance, for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. The Organization also did not comply with 2 CFR 200.318 (h) and 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance including verifying that vendors for covered transactions are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. There were two vendors with covered transactions charged to the major program. The vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. However, the Organization did not perform and document the required verification. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires the Organization to maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318 (h) and 200.214 also require the Organization to verify that vendors for covered transactions are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Cause: The relevant procedures were not documented in a manner required by the Uniform Guidance. There was a weakness in controls involving compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: The Organization should draft and maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding. See the Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The Organization did not maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance, for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. The Organization also did not comply with 2 CFR 200.318 (h) and 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance including verifying that vendors for covered transactions are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. There were two vendors with covered transactions charged to the major program. The vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. However, the Organization did not perform and document the required verification. Recommendation: The Organization should draft and maintain documented procedures, consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding and recommendation. The anticipated completion date for the corrective action is October 30, 2025.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-09-30

$1,398,531 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2024 — management decision was due December 20, 2024.

2023-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2023-001 93.137 Community Programs to Improve Minority Health Grant Program Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria Compliance requirements state the due date for the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was October 30, 2023. Condition AHEC filed the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023, on January 9, 2024. Questioned Costs None Cause AHEC did not maintain an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting to ensure the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was filed timely. Effect The Federal Financial Quarter Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was filed late. Recommendation We recommend that AHEC implement a system of internal control over financial reporting to ensure compliance with grant reporting deadlines. Management’s Response/Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action AHEC concurs with the above finding. Corrective Action: AHEC will maintain a spreadsheet which will include reporting deadlines and a reporting calendar to include due dates of all reports for each grant award. Name of Contact Person: Fernando Morales, Executive Director 203-372-5503 fernandom@swctahec.org Projected Completion Date: The above corrective action will be completed by year ending September 30, 2024.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-001 93.137 Community Programs to Improve Minority Health Grant Program Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria Compliance requirements state the due date for the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was October 30, 2023. Condition AHEC filed the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023, on January 9, 2024. Questioned Costs None Cause AHEC did not maintain an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting to ensure the Quarterly Federal Financial Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was filed timely. Effect The Federal Financial Quarter Report for the period July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 was filed late. Recommendation We recommend that AHEC implement a system of internal control over financial reporting to ensure compliance with grant reporting deadlines. Management’s Response/Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action AHEC concurs with the above finding. Corrective Action: AHEC will maintain a spreadsheet which will include reporting deadlines and a reporting calendar to include due dates of all reports for each grant award. Name of Contact Person: Fernando Morales, Executive Director 203-372-5503 fernandom@swctahec.org Projected Completion Date: The above corrective action will be completed by year ending September 30, 2024.

Corrective Action Plan

AHEC will maintain a spreadsheet which will include reporting deadlines and a reporting calendar to include due dates of all reports for each grant award.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-09-30

$1,094,381 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2023 — management decision was due November 29, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

$792,711 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.