← Back to home

Hedco, IncNon-Profit

EIN: 060919160

UEI: C686SADPJUE5

Audited by: Whittlesey PC

Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Hedco, Inc6 audit years1 findings
6
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-05-31

$1,361,545 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 1, 2026 (64 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-05-31

$1,064,509 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2024 — management decision was due April 21, 2025.

FY 2023-05-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,631,166 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2024 — management decision was due August 8, 2024.

2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

HEDCO, Inc. does not have a documented cost allocation plan and operating expenditures reported on submitted grant reports did not consistently reconcile directly back to the underlying accounting records. Context: Payroll expenses and other operating expenses (for example, occupancy) charged to federal award programs were not always supported by actual documented time and effort. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement to have a formalized cost allocation plan. In most cases, payroll and operating costs charged to grants were based on the program budget. Effect: Payroll and other operating costs that were allocated to the federal awards were made based on allocation methodologies that could not be readily traced back to the underlying accounting records. Questioned Costs: Unknown Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written cost allocation plan to allocate costs in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 which is reviewed and approved by the board of directors annually. There should also be a formal review of allocations to the federal awards to ensure that expenses are in line with the cost allocation plan. Management’s Response/View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has outlined its resulting actions in a separately issued Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2023-002: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: All Federal Program: All Assistance Listing Number: All Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 establishes cost principles for determining costs applicable to federal awards. These principles include the requirement that cost allocation methodologies be reasonable and documented and that all expenses charged to federal awards are appropriately supported. Condition: HEDCO, Inc. does not have a documented cost allocation plan and operating expenditures reported on submitted grant reports did not consistently reconcile directly back to the underlying accounting records. Context: Payroll expenses and other operating expenses (for example, occupancy) charged to federal award programs were not always supported by actual documented time and effort. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement to have a formalized cost allocation plan. In most cases, payroll and operating costs charged to grants were based on the program budget. Effect: Payroll and other operating costs that were allocated to the federal awards were made based on allocation methodologies that could not be readily traced back to the underlying accounting records. Questioned Costs: Unknown Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written cost allocation plan to allocate costs in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 which is reviewed and approved by the board of directors annually. There should also be a formal review of allocations to the federal awards to ensure that expenses are in line with the cost allocation plan. Management’s Response/View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has outlined its resulting actions in a separately issued Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023-002 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Description of Finding: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 establishes cost principles for determining costs applicable to federal awards. These principles include the requirement that cost allocation methodologies be reasonable and documented and that all expenses charged to federal awards are appropriately supported. HEDCO, Inc. does not have a documented cost allocation plan and expenditures reported on submitted grant reports did not reconcile directly back to the underlying accounting records. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Management concurs with the finding. Corrective Action: HEDCO, Inc. agrees with the audit finding and has taken this as an opportunity to improve its financial operations. HEDCO, Inc. is documenting a non-profit Cost Allocation Plan that will serve as the foundation to properly account for the use of funds received, and updating internal processes and procedures as needed. The Plan outlines the procedures and methodologies to allocate direct and indirect costs across various programs, projects, and funding sources within HEDCO, Inc. It is designed to improve and ensure transparency, compliance, and accountability in its financial operations. Name of Contact Person: Patricia R. Geronimo, CPA - Chief Financial Officer (860) 527-1301 ext. 212 patriciag@hedcoinc.com Projected Completion Date: HEDCO, Inc. anticipates preparing its Cost Allocation Plan no later than March 31 , 2024. The allocation of costs will be reviewed monthly to ensure proper accountability.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-05-31

$844,454 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2023 — management decision was due July 10, 2023.

FY 2021-05-31

$955,022 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2021 — management decision was due March 13, 2022.

FY 2020-05-31

$1,015,233 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2021 — management decision was due July 6, 2021.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.