← Back to home

Windsor Housing AuthorityNon-Profit

EIN: 060845879

UEI: L79CP2AMXGW3

Audited by: Whittlesey PC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 29, 2026

Windsor Housing Authority9 audit years8 findings4 repeat
9
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$2.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$2,205,508 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 6, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 6, 2026 (145 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

$1,862,306 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2025 — management decision was due November 14, 2025.

2023-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-003

2023-002 – ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA PHA responsibility for reexamination and verification. (1) The PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually. (2) The PHA must obtain and document in the tenant file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the tenant file why third-party verification was not available: (i) Reported family annual income; (ii) The value of assets; (iii) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (iv) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income. (24 CFR 982.516). CONDITION As a result of our audit, we identified the following exceptions in our testing: > Three (3) instances of untimely recertifications CAUSE The Authority did not properly oversee the administration of the Housing Choice Voucher and Mainstream Voucher programs. EFFECT The Authority is potentially incorrectly calculating and adjusting tenant rent and housing assistance payments. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 22 from a population of 200. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2022-003 RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. We recommend the Authority provide training for the performance of reexamination procedures. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-002 – ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA PHA responsibility for reexamination and verification. (1) The PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually. (2) The PHA must obtain and document in the tenant file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the tenant file why third-party verification was not available: (i) Reported family annual income; (ii) The value of assets; (iii) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (iv) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income. (24 CFR 982.516). CONDITION As a result of our audit, we identified the following exceptions in our testing: > Three (3) instances of untimely recertifications CAUSE The Authority did not properly oversee the administration of the Housing Choice Voucher and Mainstream Voucher programs. EFFECT The Authority is potentially incorrectly calculating and adjusting tenant rent and housing assistance payments. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 22 from a population of 200. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2022-003 RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. We recommend the Authority provide training for the performance of reexamination procedures. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-002- ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness/Noncompliance Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action We follow HUD guidelines where required and Untimely recertifications are typically not within the control of the Housing Authority. Encompassing HUD guidelines, the recertification process for tenants begins 90 days prior to the recert date, but if tenants do not provide all the requested information, the recertification will be delayed until the information is provided, tenant is converted to a market rate rent, or we begin the termination process for termination of the voucher. We will continue to follow the HUD process for the management of the Housing Choice Voucher Programs/Mainstream voucher programs. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Immediately Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Maria DeMarco, President of DeMarco Management Corporation

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Eligibility →
2023-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-004

2023-003 – REPORTING Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Financial Reports (0MB No. 2535-0107) - Financial Assessment Sub- system, FASS-PH. The Uniform Financial Reporting Standards (24 CFR section 5.801) require PHAs to submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information electronically to HUD. The FASSPH system is one of HUD's main monitoring and oversight systems for the HCVP. CONDITION The audited submission was required to be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2024. CAUSE The Authority’s internal control processes were not sufficient to ensure the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. EFFECT As a result of not submitting the FDS timely, HUD was limited in its ability to conduct monitoring and oversight of federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT The Authority submits the unaudited FDS annually. Our testing of the reporting requirement was limited to the single occurrence of the annual filing. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2022-004 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority ensure its year-end closing process is sufficient to allow for the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-003 – REPORTING Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Financial Reports (0MB No. 2535-0107) - Financial Assessment Sub- system, FASS-PH. The Uniform Financial Reporting Standards (24 CFR section 5.801) require PHAs to submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information electronically to HUD. The FASSPH system is one of HUD's main monitoring and oversight systems for the HCVP. CONDITION The audited submission was required to be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2024. CAUSE The Authority’s internal control processes were not sufficient to ensure the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. EFFECT As a result of not submitting the FDS timely, HUD was limited in its ability to conduct monitoring and oversight of federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT The Authority submits the unaudited FDS annually. Our testing of the reporting requirement was limited to the single occurrence of the annual filing. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2022-004 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority ensure its year-end closing process is sufficient to allow for the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-003- REPORTING Material Weakness/Noncompliance Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action WHA will develop written accounting policies and a deliverables calendar to eliminate late submissions moving forward. We will incorporate this into training for all staff and work with the fee accountant and Auditors to make sure deadlines are realistic, coordinated and attainable. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Immediately Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Maria DeMarco, President of DeMarco Management Corporation

Prior Finding References

2022-004

About Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

DISCLAIMER OF OPINION$1,904,002 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024 — management decision was due May 26, 2025.

2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2021-002

2022-002 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE – ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs: Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal Award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal Award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 § 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2022-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2022-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We reviewed the Authority’s internal controls over compliance with federal awards. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2021-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE – ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs: Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal Award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal Award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 § 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2022-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2022-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We reviewed the Authority’s internal controls over compliance with federal awards. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2021-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-002 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE – ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness/noncompliance Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action DeMarco has hired an in-house finance coordinator who works closely with the DeMarco finance team to make sure all the contracts and files are maintained and updated for all invoices and receivables. Expenditures are now being coded to the proper line items and properties. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Maria DeMarco, President of DeMarco Management Corporation

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2022-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2022-003 – ELIGIBILITY (CONTINUED) Material Weakness/Noncompliance CONDITION As a result of our audit, we identified the following exceptions in our testing:  Six (6) instances of missing release of information  Twelve (12) instances of missing income verifications or insufficient verifications  Thirteen (13) instances of incorrect utility allowance CAUSE The Authority did not properly oversee the administration of the Housing Choice Voucher and Mainstream Voucher programs. EFFECT The Authority is potentially incorrectly calculating and adjusting tenant rent and housing assistance payments. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 20 from a population of 200. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING This is not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. We recommend the Authority provide training for the performance of reexamination procedures. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 – ELIGIBILITY (CONTINUED) Material Weakness/Noncompliance CONDITION As a result of our audit, we identified the following exceptions in our testing:  Six (6) instances of missing release of information  Twelve (12) instances of missing income verifications or insufficient verifications  Thirteen (13) instances of incorrect utility allowance CAUSE The Authority did not properly oversee the administration of the Housing Choice Voucher and Mainstream Voucher programs. EFFECT The Authority is potentially incorrectly calculating and adjusting tenant rent and housing assistance payments. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 20 from a population of 200. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING This is not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority’s management take an active role in reviewing their policies and monitoring the Authority’s compliance with those policies. We recommend the Authority provide training for the performance of reexamination procedures. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 – ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness/noncompliance Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action The Windsor Housing Authority currently contracts with J.D. A’melia for all Housing Choice Voucher Program services. HCV staff have a broad range of duties covering activities from application, waitlist management, initial briefing for new participants, resident processing through termination of assistance. They will also perform all property activities related to compliance with WHA’s lease for all our properties and they will have extensive contact with landlords and tenants participating in the HCV programs. More specifically, HCV staff responsibilities include but are not limited to:  Lease-ups including new tenant orientation Monthly close-out  Waitlist Management Administrative & clerical functions  Inspection coordination Processing applications  Annual and interim recertification HUD reporting  Landlord services Determining eligibility  Direct deposit set-up EIV  Calculations & payment authorization to landlords & tenants admin fees calculation and payment Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Maria DeMarco, President of DeMarco Management Corporation

About Eligibility →
2022-004
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2022-004 – REPORTING Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #:14.871/ 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Financial Reports (0MB No. 2535-0107) - Financial Assessment Sub- system, FASS-PH. The Uniform Financial Reporting Standards (24 CFR section 5.801) require PHAs to submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information electronically to HUD. The FASSPH system is one of HUD's main monitoring and oversight systems for the HCVP. CONDITION The audited submission was required to be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2023. CAUSE The Authority’s internal control processes were not sufficient to ensure the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. EFFECT As a result of not submitting the FDS timely, HUD was limited in its ability to conduct monitoring and oversight of federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT The Authority submits the unaudited FDS annually. Our testing of the reporting requirement was limited to the single occurrence of the annual filing. REPEAT FINDING This is not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority ensure its year-end closing process is sufficient to allow for the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-004 – REPORTING Material Weakness/Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #:14.871/ 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Financial Reports (0MB No. 2535-0107) - Financial Assessment Sub- system, FASS-PH. The Uniform Financial Reporting Standards (24 CFR section 5.801) require PHAs to submit timely GAAP-based unaudited and audited financial information electronically to HUD. The FASSPH system is one of HUD's main monitoring and oversight systems for the HCVP. CONDITION The audited submission was required to be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2023. CAUSE The Authority’s internal control processes were not sufficient to ensure the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. EFFECT As a result of not submitting the FDS timely, HUD was limited in its ability to conduct monitoring and oversight of federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT The Authority submits the unaudited FDS annually. Our testing of the reporting requirement was limited to the single occurrence of the annual filing. REPEAT FINDING This is not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority ensure its year-end closing process is sufficient to allow for the timely filing of the unaudited FDS. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-004 – REPORTING Material Weakness/noncompliance Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action See auditee’s response to Finding 2022-001 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Maria DeMarco, President of DeMarco Management Corporation

About Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

$1,924,359 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

2021-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2020-002OTHER MATTERS

2021-002 ? INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness/ Other Matter U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 ? Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 ? 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2021-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT All expenditures of federal programs are subject to cost principles. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2020-002. RECOMMENDATION See Finding 2021-002. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002 ? INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness/ Other Matter U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 ? Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 ? 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2021-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT All expenditures of federal programs are subject to cost principles. REPEAT FINDING Repeat of finding 2020-002. RECOMMENDATION See Finding 2021-002. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Beginning in June 2021, the Windsor Housing Authority (?WHA?) Board of Commissioners engaged with the Meriden Housing Authority to immediately put in place management that has the experience and knowledge to implement a control environment. Robert Cappelletti, acting as Executive Director of the WHA has worked to ensure the compliance of daily transactions. Robert Cappelletti, acting as Executive Director of the WHA during the latter part of 2021 has worked to ensure the compliance of daily transactions. The Windsor HA Board of Commissioners is meeting monthly with posted agendas, approved meeting minutes and receiving monthly financial statements. The current staff are reviewing invoices to make certain that only those expenses related to the management of the Section 8 Program are charged as such. Person responsible for correction action: DeMarco Management Corporation, 117 Murphy Road, Hartford, CT 06114, (860) 951-9411

Prior Finding References

2020-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,509,995 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

2020-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2020-002 ? INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness/Other Matter U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 ? Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 ? 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT All expenditures of federal programs are subject to cost principles. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION See Finding 2020-001. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-002 ? INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Material Weakness/Other Matter U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871/14.879 ? Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 ? 200.403) CONDITION As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority lacked controls over the expenditure and recording of materials and supplies. As such, it is unknown whether or not these expenditures were appropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Program. CAUSE As disclosed in Finding 2020-001, the Authority did not establish an effective control environment or effective control activities over financial reporting or compliance. EFFECT Expenses may have been inappropriately charged to the Housing Voucher Cluster. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT All expenditures of federal programs are subject to cost principles. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION See Finding 2020-001. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan

Beginning in June 2021, the Windsor Housing Authority (?WHA?) Board of Commissioners engaged with the Meriden Housing Authority to immediately put in place management that has the experience and knowledge to implement a control environment. Robert Cappelletti, acting as Executive Director of the WHA has worked to ensure the compliance of daily transactions. The Windsor HA Board of Commissioners is meeting monthly with posted agendas, approved meeting minutes and receiving monthly financial statements. The WHA agrees that all staff and commission members require ethics training and will attest to an annual conflict of interest statement. The remaining staff have received varying trainings. Robert Cappelletti, acting as Executive Director of the WHA has worked to ensure the compliance of daily transactions. The current staff are reviewing invoices to make certain that only those expenses related to the management of the Section 8 Program and Rental Assistance Program are charged as such. Person responsible for correction action: Robert Cappelletti, Executive Director, rcappelletti@windsor-ha.com

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,577,254 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 3, 2020 — management decision was due June 3, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,249,182 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2019 — management decision was due February 28, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,329,117 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 12, 2018 — management decision was due February 12, 2019.

2017-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,328,624 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2017 — management decision was due February 14, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.