← Back to home

United Social and Mental Health Services, Inc. and SubsidiariesNon-Profit

EIN: 060804423

UEI: CERMNL38D2V3

Audited by: CohnReznick

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

United Social and Mental Health Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,751,475 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 29, 2026 (46 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2025.001: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102, 22MHA48ARPA, DPH20250056PSA, and SLFRPO128 - 2024 and 2025 Pass-through Entity: State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, State of Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies, Inc., State of Connecticut Department of Public Health, State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, and Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Criteria In accordance with §200.213 and §180.300, non-federal entities cannot enter into awards, subawards, or contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition There was no evidence that the Organization reviewed vendors for suspension and debarment in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to illustrate review of vendors for any suspensions or debarment. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization may procure goods and services from vendors that have been suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Questioned Costs None Context We selected a sample of seven vendors for suspension and debarment for testing. For all seven vendors tested, management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the review and approval of each vendor as to whether they have been suspended or debarred. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop a written procedure to review all vendors and individuals in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for suspension and debarment. This procedure should be reviewed with the appropriate staff to ensure compliance with the requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure vendors are being reviewed for suspension and debarment and there is evidence of a formal review being performed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025.001: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102, 22MHA48ARPA, DPH20250056PSA, and SLFRPO128 - 2024 and 2025 Pass-through Entity: State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, State of Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies, Inc., State of Connecticut Department of Public Health, State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, and Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Criteria In accordance with §200.213 and §180.300, non-federal entities cannot enter into awards, subawards, or contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition There was no evidence that the Organization reviewed vendors for suspension and debarment in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to illustrate review of vendors for any suspensions or debarment. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization may procure goods and services from vendors that have been suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Questioned Costs None Context We selected a sample of seven vendors for suspension and debarment for testing. For all seven vendors tested, management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the review and approval of each vendor as to whether they have been suspended or debarred. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop a written procedure to review all vendors and individuals in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for suspension and debarment. This procedure should be reviewed with the appropriate staff to ensure compliance with the requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure vendors are being reviewed for suspension and debarment and there is evidence of a formal review being performed.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2025.001 - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Recommendation The Organization should develop a written procedure to review all vendors and individuals in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for suspension and debarment. This procedure should be reviewed with the appropriate staff to ensure compliance with the requirement. Repeat Finding No Action Taken Business Office will verify compliance for all new vendors and conduct annual compliance review of existing vendors. Human Resources will verify compliance for all new hires and conduct annual compliance review of existing employees.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2025-002
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2025.002: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.958 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal Payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Organization's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect or Potential Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected three drawdowns for testing of cash management procedures. We noted that for all three drawdowns, there was no formal approval or evidence of review. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025.002: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.958 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal Payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Organization's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect or Potential Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected three drawdowns for testing of cash management procedures. We noted that for all three drawdowns, there was no formal approval or evidence of review. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation The Organization should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Repeat Finding No Action Taken A new federal cash draw down form has been created that will ensure all cash draw downs are reviewed and approved by the CEO. If there are any question regarding this plan, please e-mail Diane Manning at dvdlmanning@usmhs.org.

About Cash Management →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,955,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2025 — management decision was due July 16, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,364,872 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2024 — management decision was due August 6, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,928,338 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2023 — management decision was due July 31, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,525,265 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2022 — management decision was due August 2, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,748,511 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2021 — management decision was due August 21, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,851,795 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,445,908 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 6, 2018 — management decision was due May 6, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,816,160 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2017 — management decision was due May 21, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$969,858 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2016 — management decision was due June 27, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Connecticut

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.