CITY OF QUINCYLocal Government

EIN: 046001409

UEI: YBHVJNQ3NYN7

Audited by: CBIZ CPAS P.C.

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CITY OF QUINCY9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$58.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$58,712,865 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 23, 2026 (128 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Finding 2024-003: Improve Controls and Document Retention Over Allowable Costs Federal Program Information Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR § 200.430(g) requires non-Federal entities to maintain records that accurately reflect the work performed by employees whose salaries are charged, in whole or in part, to Federal awards. For employees working on a single Federal program, semi-annual certifications are required to document time and effort. Condition and Context: During testing of 40 payroll transactions for employees charged to the Special Education program, the City was unable to provide semi-annual certifications supporting that salaries and wages were properly allocated to the grant. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required time and effort certifications were retained and readily available for payroll charged to Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to maintain required time and effort documentation resulted in the questioned costs documented below. Questioned costs are reported as follows: AL Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster Questioned Costs 84.027 and 84.173 Special Education Cluster $2,572,675 Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are completed, maintained, and reviewed for all personnel whose salaries are charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-003: Improve Controls and Document Retention Over Allowable Costs Federal Program Information Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR § 200.430(g) requires non-Federal entities to maintain records that accurately reflect the work performed by employees whose salaries are charged, in whole or in part, to Federal awards. For employees working on a single Federal program, semi-annual certifications are required to document time and effort. Condition and Context: During testing of 40 payroll transactions for employees charged to the Special Education program, the City was unable to provide semi-annual certifications supporting that salaries and wages were properly allocated to the grant. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required time and effort certifications were retained and readily available for payroll charged to Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to maintain required time and effort documentation resulted in the questioned costs documented below. Questioned costs are reported as follows: AL Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster Questioned Costs 84.027 and 84.173 Special Education Cluster $2,572,675 Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are completed, maintained, and reviewed for all personnel whose salaries are charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Oversight Agency for Audit: U.S. Department of Education The City of Quincy, Massachusetts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: CBIZ CPAs P.C. 53 State Street, 17ᵗʰ Floor Boston, MA 02109 Audit period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 The finding from the June 30, 2024, schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. Financial Statement Finding Finding 2024-001: Certain Department Expenditures Exceeding Appropriated Amounts – General Fund – Significant Deficiency Condition: During 2024, it was noted that expenditures in the public safety and education functions exceeded the amounts appropriated by the City Council for the fiscal year. Criteria: Massachusetts general law prohibits the City from incurring liabilities in excess of appropriations in each department with certain specific exceptions, such as snow and ice removal costs, state and county charges, and debt service. Prudent budgetary control and monitoring are essential to ensure compliance with such requirements. Cause: The overspending of these appropriations occurred due to an inadequate internal control system to ensure timely budget amendments. Effect: Overspending appropriations in the General Fund constitutes noncompliance with state law and exposes the City to potential fiscal consequences, as the state may require the City to raise such deficits in the subsequent fiscal year. It may also indicate a weakness in the City's internal controls over budgetary compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that City management strengthen internal controls over budgetary compliance. Management should strengthen its’ procedures throughout the year to monitor budget-to-actual expenditures and ensure timely action, such as requesting formal budget amendments when actual expenditures approach or exceed authorized appropriations. Views of Responsible Officials: The Municipal Finance Office will be implementing procedures to ensure that the Municipal Finance Office and relevant department heads document reviews of budget to actual reports monthly throughout the year, with increased review intervals during June. The purpose of this increased monitoring is to ensure that potential budgetary appropriation deficits are identified in a timelier manner that will allow for any necessary budgetary amendments to be approved by the City Council. Finding 2024-002: Information Technology Controls in Financial Statements – Significant Deficiency Condition: During 2024, we noted the following deficiencies relating to information technology controls in the financial statement reporting process: • User Access Mirroring: When new users are provisioned in the accounting system, access rights are often “mirrored” from existing users without sufficient review of job responsibilities. This practice results in users receiving access to system functions beyond what is necessary for their roles and may compromise segregation of duties. • Privileged Access: A review of privileged user listings indicated access accounts with no exclusionary parameters. • Inadequate Controls Over System Upgrades: When implementing accounting system upgrades, controls over change management including testing, documentation, and approval, were not adequately designed or consistently applied. Instances were noted where upgrades were implemented without thorough pre-deployment testing and formal approval from finance or IT management. Criteria: Best practices and standards for internal control require: • Role-based access provisioning aligned with users’ responsibilities and effective segregation of duties. • The use of exclusionary parameters enhances the ability to monitor system access for unauthorized access. • Robust change management controls over system upgrades, including testing, documentation, and management approval, to ensure system integrity and minimize the risk of errors or unauthorized changes impacting financial reporting. Cause: These deficiencies appear to result from a lack of formalized policies and procedures for user access provisioning and for managing and documenting accounting system upgrades. Effect: The deficiencies increase the risk of: • Unauthorized access or inappropriate transactions due to excessive or incompatible user rights, undermining segregation of duties and accountability. • Errors, omissions, or unauthorized changes introduced during system upgrades, potentially affecting the integrity and accuracy of financial data and financial statement preparation. Recommendation: We recommend that City management: • Implement procedures to provision user access based on individual roles and responsibilities, with documented review and approval to ensure segregation of duties is maintained. This should be evidenced by written approval that is approved by Municipal Finance and Information Technology office. • Enhance the current process of implementing accounting system upgrades, including requirements for comprehensive pre-deployment testing, clear documentation, and explicit written approval from the Municipal Finance Office and the Information Technology office, prior to going “live” with the upgrade. • Periodically review system access and upgrade processes to ensure ongoing compliance with internal control standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The City will keep these recommendations in mind as it works to upgrade its already existing best practice IT control environment. Finding and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Program Audit Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR § 200.430(g) requires non- Federal entities to maintain records that accurately reflect the work performed by employees whose salaries are charged, in whole or in part, to Federal awards. For employees working on a single Federal program, semi-annual certifications are required to document time and effort. Condition and Context: During testing of 40 payroll transactions for employees charged to the Special Education program, the City was unable to provide semi-annual certifications supporting that salaries and wages were properly allocated to the grant. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required time and effort certifications were retained and readily available for payroll charged to Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to maintain required time and effort documentation resulted in the questioned costs documented below. Questioned costs are reported as follows: AL Number: 84.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Special Education Cluster Questioned Costs: $2,572,675 Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are completed, maintained, and reviewed for all personnel whose salaries are charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials: This is a questioned cost due to the School Department not having completed certain administrative paperwork, required by grant regulations. We have implemented procedures during FY2025 to address this matter. The required paperwork will be retained on file going forward.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$65,205,330 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.

2023-001
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The City is the recipient of program funds directly from Treasury as well as funds passed through Norfolk County. While reconciling total project expenditures reported to Treasury through June 30, 2023, to the City’s ledger, we noted instances where certain invoice expenditures reported to Treasury were also submitted to the County and subsequently reimbursed in fiscal year 2023. Context: The invoices that appear to have been reported to both Treasury and the County represent approximately 3.3% of total expenditures reported to Treasury. Effect: The City has reported expenditures to Treasury that should no longer be classified in this manner. Cause: Management had initially highlighted these invoices as being part of an overall use of program funds received directly from Treasury; however, the fact that the Treasury report needed to be adjusted once the invoices were reclassified to the County funding pool was overlooked. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The City should modify its’ current reconciliation methods between the ledger and program reporting to ensure that instances such as this are identified and corrected promptly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While completing our typical review of program accounting and reporting, this matter was identified by management during fiscal year 2024. Once this matter was identified, management immediately began working with the Treasury portal to make the appropriate adjustments so that cumulative obligation and expenditure reporting is accurate.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 2023-001: Reporting of Activities on Treasury Department Project and Expenditure Portal Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria or Specific Requirement: For expenditures of program funds received directly from the United States Treasury (Treasury), the City is required to submit quarterly project and expenditure reports to Treasury. Condition: The City is the recipient of program funds directly from Treasury as well as funds passed through Norfolk County. While reconciling total project expenditures reported to Treasury through June 30, 2023, to the City’s ledger, we noted instances where certain invoice expenditures reported to Treasury were also submitted to the County and subsequently reimbursed in fiscal year 2023. Context: The invoices that appear to have been reported to both Treasury and the County represent approximately 3.3% of total expenditures reported to Treasury. Effect: The City has reported expenditures to Treasury that should no longer be classified in this manner. Cause: Management had initially highlighted these invoices as being part of an overall use of program funds received directly from Treasury; however, the fact that the Treasury report needed to be adjusted once the invoices were reclassified to the County funding pool was overlooked. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The City should modify its’ current reconciliation methods between the ledger and program reporting to ensure that instances such as this are identified and corrected promptly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While completing our typical review of program accounting and reporting, this matter was identified by management during fiscal year 2024. Once this matter was identified, management immediately began working with the Treasury portal to make the appropriate adjustments so that cumulative obligation and expenditure reporting is accurate.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Oversight Agency for Audit: U.S. Department of Treasury The City of Quincy, Massachusetts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Powers & Sullivan, LLC 100 Quannapowitt Parkway, Suite 101 Wakefield, MA 01880 Audit period: July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023 The finding from the June 30, 2023, schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund – Assistance Listing #21.027 2023-001: Reporting of Activities on Treasury Department Project and Expenditure Portal Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria or Specific Requirement: For expenditures of program funds received directly from the United States Treasury (Treasury), the City is required to submit quarterly project and expenditure reports to Treasury. Condition: The City is the recipient of program funds directly from Treasury as well as funds passed through Norfolk County. While reconciling total project expenditures reported to Treasury through June 30, 2023, to the City’s ledger, we noted instances where certain invoice expenditures reported to Treasury were also submitted to the County and subsequently reimbursed in fiscal year 2023. Context: The invoices that appear to have been reported to both Treasury and the County represent approximately 3.3% of total expenditures reported to Treasury. Effect: The City has reported expenditures to Treasury that should no longer be classified in this manner. Cause: Management had initially highlighted these invoices as being part of an overall use of program funds received directly from Treasury; however, the fact that the Treasury report needed to be adjusted once the invoices were reclassified to the County funding pool was overlooked. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The City should modify its’ current reconciliation methods between the ledger and program reporting to ensure that instances such as this are identified and corrected promptly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While completing our typical review of program accounting and reporting, this matter was identified by management during fiscal year 2024. Once this matter was identified, management immediately began working with the Treasury portal to make the appropriate adjustments so that cumulative obligation and expenditure reporting is accurate. If the Oversight Agency has questions regarding this plan, please contact me at 617-376-2706. Sincerely, Eric Mason Chief Financial Officer

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$78,463,803 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2023 — management decision was due April 27, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

$55,720,914 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 11, 2022 — management decision was due April 11, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$47,086,826 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 3, 2021 — management decision was due April 3, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$44,031,157 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2020 — management decision was due November 12, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$41,831,594 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$51,901,387 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2018 — management decision was due September 29, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$39,570,098 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2017 — management decision was due September 30, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.