← Back to home

Dimock Community FoundationNon-Profit

EIN: 043487827

UEI: CCPRLHRL2AV3

Audit also covers 4 related EINs: 042103609, 043487833, 043487835, 474416361 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: AAFCPAs, Inc.

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Dimock Community Foundation10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$13M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$13,027,466 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (30 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our audit of procurement transactions charged to the Federal program, we noted that the Agency did not obtain competitive bids for a construction project funded in part with Federal award funds. The project was awarded to a contractor without evidence that competitive proposals were solicited, evaluated, or documented. Furthermore, the Agency did not maintain documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement justification or evidence of advance written approval as required by Uniform Guidance and internal policy. Cause: The condition appears to have resulted from inadequate internal controls over procurement compliance, including insufficient review of procurement documentation prior to contract execution and limited understanding of Uniform Guidance procurement requirements by personnel responsible for project oversight. Additionally, there has been turnover in senior leadership positions since receipt of the award and since the project began. Effect and Questioned Costs: The failure to follow Uniform Guidance procurement requirements increases the risk that Federal funds may not be used in a manner that ensures full and open competition, reasonableness of cost, and compliance with federal regulations. This condition exposes the Agency to potential disallowance of costs, repayment of federal funds, and increased scrutiny from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. No questioned costs were identified as a result of this finding. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year? No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency strengthen internal controls over procurement by: 1. Ensuring all construction procurements funded by Federal awards comply with the competitive procurement requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. 2. Requiring documented evidence of bid solicitation, evaluation, and selection prior to contract award. 3. Establishing procedures to ensure noncompetitive procurements are supported by written justification and receive required approvals in advance. 4. Providing periodic training to personnel involved in procurement and project management on Uniform Guidance requirements. Management Response: The procurement of construction services funded through this award was done in early 2023 and preceded Dimock’s updated procurement policy which calls for competitive bidding. It also preceded changes in procurement leadership. Subsequent procurement for services have since been subject to competitive bidding by Dimock consistent with CFR 200.318-200.326.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-001 Federal Program: Congressional Directives Assistance Listing Number: 93.493 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326 requires non-Federal entities to use documented procurement procedures that provide for full and open competition and are consistent with applicable Federal standards. Specifically, 2 CFR §200.320 requires procurement transactions for construction in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold to be conducted using competitive proposals or sealed bids, unless conditions exist to justify noncompetitive procurement. Additionally, the Agency’s internal procurement policy requires competitive bidding for construction projects exceeding established dollar thresholds unless an approved exception is documented. Condition: During our audit of procurement transactions charged to the Federal program, we noted that the Agency did not obtain competitive bids for a construction project funded in part with Federal award funds. The project was awarded to a contractor without evidence that competitive proposals were solicited, evaluated, or documented. Furthermore, the Agency did not maintain documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement justification or evidence of advance written approval as required by Uniform Guidance and internal policy. Cause: The condition appears to have resulted from inadequate internal controls over procurement compliance, including insufficient review of procurement documentation prior to contract execution and limited understanding of Uniform Guidance procurement requirements by personnel responsible for project oversight. Additionally, there has been turnover in senior leadership positions since receipt of the award and since the project began. Effect and Questioned Costs: The failure to follow Uniform Guidance procurement requirements increases the risk that Federal funds may not be used in a manner that ensures full and open competition, reasonableness of cost, and compliance with federal regulations. This condition exposes the Agency to potential disallowance of costs, repayment of federal funds, and increased scrutiny from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. No questioned costs were identified as a result of this finding. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year? No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency strengthen internal controls over procurement by: 1. Ensuring all construction procurements funded by Federal awards comply with the competitive procurement requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. 2. Requiring documented evidence of bid solicitation, evaluation, and selection prior to contract award. 3. Establishing procedures to ensure noncompetitive procurements are supported by written justification and receive required approvals in advance. 4. Providing periodic training to personnel involved in procurement and project management on Uniform Guidance requirements. Management Response: The procurement of construction services funded through this award was done in early 2023 and preceded Dimock’s updated procurement policy which calls for competitive bidding. It also preceded changes in procurement leadership. Subsequent procurement for services have since been subject to competitive bidding by Dimock consistent with CFR 200.318-200.326.

Corrective Action Plan

March, 3, 2026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dimock Community Foundation, Inc. and Affiliates respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs, Inc., 50 Washington Street, Westborough, MA 01581 Audit period: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 The findings from the June 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FEDERAL AWARD FINDING Material Instance of Non-Compliance: Finding 2025-001: Congressional Directives 2025-001 Assistance Listing Number 93.493 Community Project Funding/CDS Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency adhere to their procurement policy that aligns with the requirments set forth in 2 CFR 200.318-200.326 Action Taken: The procurement of construction services funded through this award was done in early 2023 and preceded Dimock's updated procurement policy which calls for competitive bidding. It also preceded changes in procurement leadership. Subsequent procurement for services have since been subject to competitive bidding by Dimock consistent with CFR 200.318-200.326. If the Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit has questions regarding this plan, please call Luis Rivera, CFO at 617-442-8800. Sincerely, Luis Rivera, CFO

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-06-30

$12,832,078 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 10, 2025 — management decision was due December 10, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The UDS report final submission was due on March 31, 2024; however, it was not submitted until April 18, 2024. Cause: There was oversight in tracking the submission due dates. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Health Center Program grant. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency enhance controls and monitoring procedures over Federal grant requirements to ensure future reports are submitted on time. Management Response: In 2024, the UDS submission was led by our Chief Information Officer with support from a Financial Analyst. In prior years, the submission was headed by the Director of Finance who had been with the organization for 10+ years. She left in November of 2023 and as a result the organization lost some institutional knowledge and UDS experience. In 2025, the 2024 UDS submission was managed by the Chief Financial Officer and submitted by February 15th, 2025. All follow-up requests from the reviewer were resolved prior to March 31, 2025. We don’t foresee any further issues with future submissions.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-001: Health Center Program Uniform Data System (UDS) Report This finding impacts the reporting compliance requirement for the major program, Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527 Health Center Program Cluster. Criteria: Health Center Program grant recipients are required to file a UDS report that provides standardized information about the performance and operation of health centers delivering health care services to underserved communities and vulnerable populations. The UDS report is due 45 days after the calendar year end for the initial submission, and 90 days after calendar year end for the final submission to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Condition: The UDS report final submission was due on March 31, 2024; however, it was not submitted until April 18, 2024. Cause: There was oversight in tracking the submission due dates. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Health Center Program grant. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency enhance controls and monitoring procedures over Federal grant requirements to ensure future reports are submitted on time. Management Response: In 2024, the UDS submission was led by our Chief Information Officer with support from a Financial Analyst. In prior years, the submission was headed by the Director of Finance who had been with the organization for 10+ years. She left in November of 2023 and as a result the organization lost some institutional knowledge and UDS experience. In 2025, the 2024 UDS submission was managed by the Chief Financial Officer and submitted by February 15th, 2025. All follow-up requests from the reviewer were resolved prior to March 31, 2025. We don’t foresee any further issues with future submissions.

Corrective Action Plan

June 4, 2025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dimock Community Foundation, Inc. and Affiliates respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs, Inc., 50 Washington Street, Westborough, MA 01581 Audit period: July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024 The findings from the June 30, 2024 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FEDERAL AWARD FINDING Material Instance of Non-Compliance: Finding 2024-001: Health Center Program Uniform Data System (UDS) Report 2024-001 Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency enhance controls and monitoring procedures over Federal grant requirements to ensure future reports are submitted on time Action Taken: In 2025, the 2024 UDS submission was managed by the Chief Financial Officer and submitted by February 15th, 2025. All follow-up requests from the reviewer were resolved prior to March 31, 2025. We don't foresee any further issues with future submissions. If the Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit has questions regarding this plan, please call Luis Rivera, CFO at 617-442-8800. Sincerely, Luis Rivera, CFO

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

$11,345,627 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,634,775 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2023 — management decision was due January 24, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,316,582 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 15, 2022 — management decision was due February 15, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,480,988 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2021 — management decision was due November 19, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$10,088,461 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2020 — management decision was due July 27, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,850,069 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2019 — management decision was due August 7, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$9,707,512 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2018 — management decision was due July 4, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,274,224 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2017 — management decision was due September 8, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Massachusetts

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.