EIN: 043369653
UEI: DCJGSC4LY1W4
Single Audit filed under EIN: 043369649
That audit also covers 2 related EINs: 010524384, 222789192 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: Baker Newman & Noyes LLC
Cognizant agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 23, 2026 (9 days ago).
What is a management decision? →For certain equipment purchases, the Company did not follow formal procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards. While various estimates were obtained for the budget process required for the grant, there were no formal quotes or bids obtained. Context: For one purchase in the amount of $271,597, there was no documentation to support price comparisons and estimates used in the budget process. Cause: Management transition and uncertainty regarding the application of the standard for this particular grant. Effect: Documentation was not maintained to support compliance with the standards. Questioned Costs: $271,597. Recommendation: Documentation should be maintained to support all purchases in accordance with procurement policies. Views of Responsible Parties: We concur with the finding. The absence of required procurement documentation resulted primarily from turnover within key leadership positions during the period of the purchase. The leaders responsible for procurement review, approval, and record retention transitioned out of their roles, which led to gaps in procedural continuity and oversight. As a result, standard documentation that would typically accompany procurement—such as quotes, and price comparisons—was not properly retained.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Procurement Documentation - Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services - Health Resources and Services Administration. Award Name: Community Project - HACCC Renovations. Program Year: 2025. Assistance Listing Number: 93.493. Criteria: Purchases above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold must follow formal procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards. Condition: For certain equipment purchases, the Company did not follow formal procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards. While various estimates were obtained for the budget process required for the grant, there were no formal quotes or bids obtained. Context: For one purchase in the amount of $271,597, there was no documentation to support price comparisons and estimates used in the budget process. Cause: Management transition and uncertainty regarding the application of the standard for this particular grant. Effect: Documentation was not maintained to support compliance with the standards. Questioned Costs: $271,597. Recommendation: Documentation should be maintained to support all purchases in accordance with procurement policies. Views of Responsible Parties: We concur with the finding. The absence of required procurement documentation resulted primarily from turnover within key leadership positions during the period of the purchase. The leaders responsible for procurement review, approval, and record retention transitioned out of their roles, which led to gaps in procedural continuity and oversight. As a result, standard documentation that would typically accompany procurement—such as quotes, and price comparisons—was not properly retained.
Procurement Documentation - Criteria: Purchases above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold must follow formal procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards. Condition: For certain equipment purchases, the Company did not follow formal procurement methods. While various estimates were obtained for the budget process required by the grant, there were no formal quotes or bids obtained and no documentation to support the estimates were retained. Context: For one purchase in the amount of $271,597, there was no documentation to support price comparisons and estimates used in the budget process. Cause: Management transition and uncertainty regarding the application of the procurement standard for this particular grant. Effect: Documentation was not maintained to support compliance with the standards. Questioned Costs: $271,597. Recommendation: Documentation should be maintained to support all purchases in accordance with procurement policies. Views of Responsible Parties: We concur with the finding. The absence of required procurement documentation resulted primarily from turnover within key leadership positions during the period of the purchase. The leaders responsible for procurement review, approval, and record retention transitioned out of their roles, which led to gaps in procedural continuity and oversight. As a result, standard documentation that would typically accompany procurement—such as quotes, and price comparisons—was not properly retained. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: The Supply Chain team will receive targeted training on procurement standards, including requirements for price or rate quotations for purchases over the simplified acquisition threshold and internal expectations for retention of quotes, price comparisons, and justification memos. Training will be completed by March 31, 2026, with attendance documented. Responsible Parties: Jeremy Storer, Controller. Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2025 — management decision was due August 27, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on November 16, 2023 — management decision was due May 16, 2024.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maine →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.