EIN: 042944144
UEI: SXFGGNQ2DST3
Audit also covers EIN: 843912985 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: Cohnreznick LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 7, 2024 (756 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Criteria: Tenant files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Condition and Context: For 7 of the 8 tenants selected for testing, recertifications were not completed in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Cause: Management's policies with respect to recertifications and eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: The procedures for determining tenant recertification eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that recertifications are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined, and that tenant lease file are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency will implement controls and procedures to ensure applicable compliance requirements are completed timely and accurately.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Tenant files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Condition and Context: For 7 of the 8 tenants selected for testing, recertifications were not completed in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Cause: Management's policies with respect to recertifications and eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: The procedures for determining tenant recertification eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that recertifications are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined, and that tenant lease file are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR, section 92.203 and 92.508 of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency will implement controls and procedures to ensure applicable compliance requirements are completed timely and accurately.
Peabody Properties, a property management company, was hired to serve as the Organization’s property manager in March 2022. They brought all of HCA’s tenant recertifications up to date and maintain current tenant files. The Organization now has a system in place to monitor and periodically check that recertification is in place and the files are up to date. A contract is in place with Peabody to enforce this requirement.
Criteria: Tenant files are required to be maintained and special tests, including unit inspections, determined in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Condition and Context: For 7 of the 8 tenants selected for testing, inspections were not completed in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Cause: Management's policies with respect to recertifications and the maintenance of tenant lease files, specifically unit inspections, in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: The procedures for unit inspections, were not consistently applied in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. This could result in unhabitable units being rented to tenants. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that inspections are performed on a timely basis in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency will implement controls and procedures to ensure applicable compliance requirements are completed timely and accurately.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Tenant files are required to be maintained and special tests, including unit inspections, determined in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Condition and Context: For 7 of the 8 tenants selected for testing, inspections were not completed in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Cause: Management's policies with respect to recertifications and the maintenance of tenant lease files, specifically unit inspections, in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: The procedures for unit inspections, were not consistently applied in accordance with 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. This could result in unhabitable units being rented to tenants. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that inspections are performed on a timely basis in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency will implement controls and procedures to ensure applicable compliance requirements are completed timely and accurately.
Peabody Properties, a property management company, was hired to serve as the Organization’s property manager in March 2022. As a result, tenant files are being maintained and updated on a regular basis.
Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly called "Uniform Guidance"), which requires institutions of higher education and nonprofit institutions that expend $750,000 or more in federal funds to annually conduct a detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with the established criteria. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance reporting package and the data collection form are required to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditors reports or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period of time was agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for the audit. Condition and Context: A detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with Uniform Guidance established criteria was not timely completed and submitted to OMB. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place to allow for a timely audit which resulted in delays in timely submitting the report to OMB. Effect: A detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with the established criteria was not timely completed resulting in the Agency not being in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should ensure timely completion of a Uniform Guidance audit, as required. Views of Responsible Officials: HCA's executive and property management transitions that occurred in 2021, combined with the findings listed above and the additional research and preparation they required, resulted in a severely delayed 2020 audit. We are finalizing the final draft of the 2020 audit now and have started preparing for our 2021 and 2022 audits. We have the internal capacity to prioritize and move quickly to get all audits up to date. A system has been put in place to ensure smooth and timely completion of HCA's audits and required reporting to OMB going forward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly called "Uniform Guidance"), which requires institutions of higher education and nonprofit institutions that expend $750,000 or more in federal funds to annually conduct a detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with the established criteria. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance reporting package and the data collection form are required to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditors reports or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period of time was agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for the audit. Condition and Context: A detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with Uniform Guidance established criteria was not timely completed and submitted to OMB. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place to allow for a timely audit which resulted in delays in timely submitting the report to OMB. Effect: A detailed, organization-wide audit that complies with the established criteria was not timely completed resulting in the Agency not being in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should ensure timely completion of a Uniform Guidance audit, as required. Views of Responsible Officials: HCA's executive and property management transitions that occurred in 2021, combined with the findings listed above and the additional research and preparation they required, resulted in a severely delayed 2020 audit. We are finalizing the final draft of the 2020 audit now and have started preparing for our 2021 and 2022 audits. We have the internal capacity to prioritize and move quickly to get all audits up to date. A system has been put in place to ensure smooth and timely completion of HCA's audits and required reporting to OMB going forward.
The Organization’s executive and property management transitions that occurred in 2021, combined with the findings listed above and the additional research and preparation they required, resulted in a severely delayed 2020 audit. We have the internal capacity to prioritize and move quickly to get all audits up to date. A system has been put in place to ensure smooth and timely completion of the Organization’s annual audit and required reporting to OMB going forward.
FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2021 — management decision was due October 1, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2019 — management decision was due December 23, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on August 20, 2018 — management decision was due February 20, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on August 20, 2017 — management decision was due February 20, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Massachusetts →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.