EIN: 042310082
UEI: LAGSWM1JEKV3
Audited by: CBIZ CPAS P.C.
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2026 (120 days from today).
What is a management decision? →2025-001 – ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN #: 14.871 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of audit procedures, we identified 4 instances of missing income verification, 5 instances of incorrect utility allowance provided and 5 instances of the Authority applying an incorrect payment standard. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are less than $25,000 CONTEXT We selected a sample of 10 participants from a population of 44 participants from the Housing Choice Voucher program. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2025-001 – ELIGIBILITY Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN #: 14.871 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of audit procedures, we identified 4 instances of missing income verification, 5 instances of incorrect utility allowance provided and 5 instances of the Authority applying an incorrect payment standard. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are less than $25,000 CONTEXT We selected a sample of 10 participants from a population of 44 participants from the Housing Choice Voucher program. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2025-001 – ELIGIBILITY Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action > Going forward, utility allowance will not be given for stove or refrigerator unless they are owned by the tenant. > Correct payment standards for the year of the certification will be used. 100% of payment standard only any other amount will require Reasonable Accommodation. > A Certification Checklist has been developed so that these items are addressed at any/all certifications. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Immediately Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Amanda Phillips, Executive Director
2025-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN #: 14.871 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507). CONDITION As a result of audit procedures, we identified 4 instances where the Authority did not perform rent reasonableness. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are approximately $50,000. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 10 participants from a population of 44 participants from the Housing Choice Voucher program. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2025-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN #: 14.871 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507). CONDITION As a result of audit procedures, we identified 4 instances where the Authority did not perform rent reasonableness. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are approximately $50,000. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 10 participants from a population of 44 participants from the Housing Choice Voucher program. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2025-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action > Rent Reasonable forms will be used for any/all rental increases in program. These will not be compared to the payment standards. > A Certification Checklist has been developed so that these items are addressed at any/all certifications. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Immediately Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Amanda Phillips, Executive Director
FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2025 — management decision was due December 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2024 — management decision was due December 1, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2023 — management decision was due December 4, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2022 — management decision was due December 23, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on May 26, 2021 — management decision was due November 26, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 3, 2017 — management decision was due November 3, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Massachusetts →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.