← Back to home

MARYLAND BROADBAND COOPERATIVE INCNon-Profit

EIN: 020783564

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: PKS & COMPANY, P.A.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

MARYLAND BROADBAND COOPERATIVE INC2 audit years5 findings
2
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-06-30

$1,450,759 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 1, 2022 (1493 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$7,159,715 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2022 — management decision was due July 17, 2022.

2019-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2019-002 ? Weak Control Environment over Federal Awards Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Condition ? Senior management of the Organization during the fiscal year supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking in accountability, integrity and ethical values. Management did not implement various internal controls over compliance. Cause ? Previous senior management set a tone at the top not conducive to supporting a control environment over compliance of Federal programs as demonstrated by improper use of Federal funding and lack of accountability to Federal cooperative agreement requirements. Management also improperly treated the cooperative agreement as a contract and therefore did not properly determine the need of controls surrounding compliance. Effect ? A weak control environment can lead to instances of material noncompliance and opportunities for fraud or abuse. The majority of findings below can be sourced back to this issue. Recommendation ? The Board of Directors and new senior management should review its internal control systems surrounding compliance and reestablish required personal conduct and required policies and procedures to support an Organization of integrity and ethical values. Management and related staff should be trained in understanding requirements and responsibilities of a non-Federal entity receiving Federal awards. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 ? Weak Control Environment over Federal Awards Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Condition ? Senior management of the Organization during the fiscal year supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking in accountability, integrity and ethical values. Management did not implement various internal controls over compliance. Cause ? Previous senior management set a tone at the top not conducive to supporting a control environment over compliance of Federal programs as demonstrated by improper use of Federal funding and lack of accountability to Federal cooperative agreement requirements. Management also improperly treated the cooperative agreement as a contract and therefore did not properly determine the need of controls surrounding compliance. Effect ? A weak control environment can lead to instances of material noncompliance and opportunities for fraud or abuse. The majority of findings below can be sourced back to this issue. Recommendation ? The Board of Directors and new senior management should review its internal control systems surrounding compliance and reestablish required personal conduct and required policies and procedures to support an Organization of integrity and ethical values. Management and related staff should be trained in understanding requirements and responsibilities of a non-Federal entity receiving Federal awards. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with Finding 2019-002 but notes that the condition presented because previous, not current, senior management supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking in accountability, integrity, and ethical values and that it was previous, not current, senior management that failed to implement various internal controls over compliance. MdBC has completed the following recommendations: The Board of Directors and new senior management should review its internal control systems surrounding compliance and reestablish required personal conduct and policies and procedures necessary to support an organization of integrity and ethical values. Management and related staff should be trained in understanding the requirements and responsibilities of a non-Federal entity receiving Federal awards.

About Other →
2019-003
Cash Management / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2019-003 ? Cash Management and Matching Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? The Organization may submit for interim monthly payments for reimbursement of the Government?s share of incurred costs in accordance with milestones achieved, but only so long as the Organization?s cost share contribution for costs incurred is being provided in accordance with the ratio specified in the payable milestone schedule. Condition ? It was undiscernible if the Organization properly billed for payments based on actual costs incurred or if requests were made following allowed cost share ratios. Invoices submitted for payment provided no details of required information as prescribed in the cooperative agreement and management was unable to provide supporting evidence for each individual billing. A final true up calculation was prepared and provided at the end of the project to support the required cost share from the Organization subsequent to the fiscal year ended as accepted by the Grantor, but no evidence was available to discern if this was monitored through the life of the project. Cause ? The Organization did not have controls in place to track expenditures incurred for the project and identifying related cost share requirements during the performance of the project. Effect ? Payments were received on an advanced method and therefore the Organization has a surplus of federal funds on hand which may incorrectly be expended for non-federal project expenditures if not properly tracked. Recommendation ? It is recommended the Organization review its Federal agreements for required funding provisions to determine the proper procedures for submitting for payment, including procedures to identify federal costs as well as tracking required cost sharing as per agreements through the life of the project. It is also recommended the Organization implement internal controls to assist in these cash management compliance requirements. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003 ? Cash Management and Matching Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? The Organization may submit for interim monthly payments for reimbursement of the Government?s share of incurred costs in accordance with milestones achieved, but only so long as the Organization?s cost share contribution for costs incurred is being provided in accordance with the ratio specified in the payable milestone schedule. Condition ? It was undiscernible if the Organization properly billed for payments based on actual costs incurred or if requests were made following allowed cost share ratios. Invoices submitted for payment provided no details of required information as prescribed in the cooperative agreement and management was unable to provide supporting evidence for each individual billing. A final true up calculation was prepared and provided at the end of the project to support the required cost share from the Organization subsequent to the fiscal year ended as accepted by the Grantor, but no evidence was available to discern if this was monitored through the life of the project. Cause ? The Organization did not have controls in place to track expenditures incurred for the project and identifying related cost share requirements during the performance of the project. Effect ? Payments were received on an advanced method and therefore the Organization has a surplus of federal funds on hand which may incorrectly be expended for non-federal project expenditures if not properly tracked. Recommendation ? It is recommended the Organization review its Federal agreements for required funding provisions to determine the proper procedures for submitting for payment, including procedures to identify federal costs as well as tracking required cost sharing as per agreements through the life of the project. It is also recommended the Organization implement internal controls to assist in these cash management compliance requirements. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with Finding 2019-003 but notes that the condition presented because previous, not current, senior management supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking accountability, integrity, and ethical values. Similarly, previous senior management, not current senior management, set a tone that lacked responsibilities surrounding documentation and accountability, including not providing evidence of proper use of Organization funds was acceptable. MdBC has completed the following recommendations: It is recommended that the organization review its Federal agreements for required funding provisions to determine the proper procedures for submitting for payment, including procedures to identify federal costs and track required cost-sharing as per agreements. It is also recommended the organization implement internal controls to assist in these cash management compliance requirements.

About Cash Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2019-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2019-004 ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326 require that the non-Federal entity have and use documented procurement policies. Condition ? The Organization procured and contracted Federal awards without following required procurement policies as detailed in 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326. It is also unknown if the Organization properly ascertained if vendors were suspended or debarred prior to contracting with them. We did not identify any suspended or debarred vendors during our testing. Cause ? The Organization improperly treated the cooperative agreement as a contract and therefore operated as a government contractor and did not implement Uniform Guidance requirements, including adopting a documented procurement policy. Effect ? Procurement may be improperly performed and transactions may be entered into with suspended or debarred vendors. Recommendation ? The Organization should adopt and document a procurement policy in compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-004 ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326 require that the non-Federal entity have and use documented procurement policies. Condition ? The Organization procured and contracted Federal awards without following required procurement policies as detailed in 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326. It is also unknown if the Organization properly ascertained if vendors were suspended or debarred prior to contracting with them. We did not identify any suspended or debarred vendors during our testing. Cause ? The Organization improperly treated the cooperative agreement as a contract and therefore operated as a government contractor and did not implement Uniform Guidance requirements, including adopting a documented procurement policy. Effect ? Procurement may be improperly performed and transactions may be entered into with suspended or debarred vendors. Recommendation ? The Organization should adopt and document a procurement policy in compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 ? 200.326. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Corrective Action Plan

Management notes that previous, not current senior management, treated the agreement as a procurement contract and not as a cooperative agreement. Further, previous external auditor reports treated the agreement as a procurement contract, not a cooperative agreement. MdBC has completed the following recommendations: The organization should adopt and document a procurement policy in compliance with 2 C.F.R. sections 200.318 - 200.326.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2019-005
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2019-005 ? Reporting Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? Financial Status Reports should be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Standard Form 269 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter. Condition ? Even though at the conclusion of the project a modification agreement signed removed the requirement of filing quarterly Standard Form 269 in a subsequent year, Standard Form 269 was not filed during the life of the cooperative agreement when it was a standing requirement. Cause ? The Organization did not have a process in place to ensure accurate and timely Financial Status Reports were filed. Effect ? Required reporting and filing of the Standard Form 269 with accurate information will not be performed. Recommendation ? The Organization should implement controls to be able to accurately report and file any required reports timely, based on requirements of a Federal agreement. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-005 ? Reporting Type of finding ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria ? Financial Status Reports should be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Standard Form 269 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter. Condition ? Even though at the conclusion of the project a modification agreement signed removed the requirement of filing quarterly Standard Form 269 in a subsequent year, Standard Form 269 was not filed during the life of the cooperative agreement when it was a standing requirement. Cause ? The Organization did not have a process in place to ensure accurate and timely Financial Status Reports were filed. Effect ? Required reporting and filing of the Standard Form 269 with accurate information will not be performed. Recommendation ? The Organization should implement controls to be able to accurately report and file any required reports timely, based on requirements of a Federal agreement. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with Finding 2019-005 but notes that the condition presented because previous, not current, senior management supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking accountability, integrity, and ethical values. Similarly, previous senior management, not current senior management, set a tone that lacked documentation and accountability responsibilities, including lack of proper submission of Standard Form 269. MdBC has completed the following recommendations: The organization should implement controls to be able to accurately report and file any required reports timely, based on requirements of a Federal agreement.

About Reporting →
2019-006
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

2019-006 ? Allowable Costs Type of finding ? Material Noncompliance Criteria ? All direct costs charged to a Federal cooperative agreement must be reasonable given relevant market and industry area and the nature of the good or service involved as it relates to fulfilling the cooperative agreement. Condition ? Costs charged to the program and approved by senior management was improperly expended using Federal funding. Cause ? As described in finding 2019-002, prior senior management did not always exercise ethical behavior or proper integrity in operations and therefore improperly allowed inappropriate expenses to be expended using Federal funding. Questioned Costs ? Amount of known questioned costs are $2,000. Amount of likely questioned costs extrapolated are $996. Effect ? Unallowed costs may be expended that are not considered necessary and reasonable to meet Federal award objectives. Recommendation ? The Organization should provide training to its employees concerning proper business practice, including ethical behavior. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-006 ? Allowable Costs Type of finding ? Material Noncompliance Criteria ? All direct costs charged to a Federal cooperative agreement must be reasonable given relevant market and industry area and the nature of the good or service involved as it relates to fulfilling the cooperative agreement. Condition ? Costs charged to the program and approved by senior management was improperly expended using Federal funding. Cause ? As described in finding 2019-002, prior senior management did not always exercise ethical behavior or proper integrity in operations and therefore improperly allowed inappropriate expenses to be expended using Federal funding. Questioned Costs ? Amount of known questioned costs are $2,000. Amount of likely questioned costs extrapolated are $996. Effect ? Unallowed costs may be expended that are not considered necessary and reasonable to meet Federal award objectives. Recommendation ? The Organization should provide training to its employees concerning proper business practice, including ethical behavior. Management response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the Organization?s response on their letterhead attached.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with Finding 2019-006 but notes that the condition presented because previous, not current, senior management supported a weak control environment of organizational oversight that promoted an environment lacking accountability, integrity, and ethical values. Similarly, previous senior management, not current senior management, set a tone that lacked responsibilities surrounding documentation and accountability, including lack of evidence of proper use of Organization funds was acceptable. The condition presented because previous, not current, senior management approved payment of costs improperly paid with Federal funding. MdBC has completed the following recommendations: The organization should provide training to its employees concerning proper Business practice, including ethical behavior. 2. Actions Completed A. Overview MdBC has addressed Auditor Recommendations and has developed or improved its internal controls beyond Auditor Recommendations to provide reasonable assurance that it is managing compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its agreements as well as to promote an organizational culture of accountability, integrity, and ethical decision-making. Given that laws and regulations require organizations to have an ethics and compliance program suitable to the size of the organization, for an organization of its size, Md BC has made an extraordinary financial and human capital commitment to promptly and effectively institute corrective measures and to enhance its controls B. Review of Internal Controls MdBC C.E.O. and Board, in conjunction with legal counsel, reviewed its internal control environment through an attorney-client privileged internal investigation and a review of its policies and procedures to identify needed controls improvement. Md BC retained experienced defense counsel and forensic auditors to conduct its internal investigation, including witness interviews and document review. Md BC retained experienced federal government contracting counsel to conduct a review of its policies and procedures and its P.A.X. agreement to determine needed controls improvement. MdBC management, in conjunction with legal counsel and collaboration with the Board of directors, reviewed Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, employee handbooks, and prior accounting policies and procedures. Upon completing the review of documents, Md BC revised, modified, or sunset policies and procedures. In addition, as needed, new policies and procedures were created. C. Governance and Management First, Md BC Board and senior management undertook governance and management actions that have improved its control environment and fostered a tone from leadership that it would hold the organization, its employees, and business partners accountable for complying with laws, regulations, and contractual terms and that it will conduct business with integrity. The Board and MdBC's current C.E.0. meet regularly with outside counsel to develop and improve its internal controls. MdBC has engaged experienced and knowledgeable federal government contracting legal counsel and experienced and knowledgeable business legal counsel to provide both the Board and its current C.E.0. counsel on matters related to legal compliance, regulatory compliance, and ethical decision making. As part of this, MdBC terminated its former C.E.O. Md BC promoted an internal candidate to C.E.O. who regularly seeks legal counsel from external lawyers on legal and regulatory compliance and ethical decision-making. The C.E.0. provides more regular and more detailed reports to the Board. MdBC has retained a C.F.O. on a contract basis with knowledge and experience in federal government contracting. This C.F.O. has devoted a significant portion oftime to working with auditors and developing internal controls in conjunction with the leadership team and outside counsel. MdBC ended its relationship with its previous external auditors and has engaged a new audit firm for its external audits. Similarly, Md BC has implemented human resource improvements, including a new employee handbook, written annual review process and goal setting for all employees, regular training on ethics, compliance, and reporting concerns. Further, MdBC has posted notices as required by the federal government and regularly messages to employees to raise concerns to management, the Board, legal counsel, or the government. D. Financial Controls MdBC's Board and C.E.O. have been educated on and appreciate the requirements to complete financial and progress reports when performing a government contract. Further, MdBC has implemented controls that will facilitate its compliance with reporting requirements in the future. Based on the enhancements to its control environment, its change in leadership, its retention of professionals with federal government contracting knowledge - including new auditors - Md BC is now prepared to comply with these requirements in the future. MdBC has developed the following internal controls to address its financial reporting, cash management, and matching contribution requirements: ? Developed an indirect rate that it will submit for approval for use on future government work; ? Developed financial policies and financial controls to assure detailed, supported invoices; ? Developed controls requiring that detailed books and records must be maintained; ? Upgraded it accounting platform to QuickBooks Enterprise to better support detailed cost accounting allocation by project for time, materials and equipment; ? Instituted an electronic timekeeping system that is consistent with regulations; ? MdBC's Board, C.E.O., and employees have all been educated on invoicing and accounting requirements. E. Policies and Procedures MdBC has updated existing policies and procedures and developed and implemented new policies and procedures. MdBC has also updated its I.T. infrastructure. For policies, procedures, and controls that MdBC is still in the process of executing, MdBC's C.E.0. is responsible for working with the Board and with legal counsel to identify and develop policies and procedures F. Training and Communication In May of 2019, MdBC's external federal government contracts attorney delivered training to MdBC's employees on working with the federal government. All MdBC employees attended this training, as did an MdBC Board member, MdBC legal counsel, and MdBC's C.E.O., to voice the organization's commitment to compliance with laws and ethical decision making. Additionally, for most of the updated or new policies, the Board met with MdBC's new C.E.O., its legal counsel, to discuss in detail the legal mandates for the policies. MdBC's C.E.O. emailed the new policies to explain the policies to Board members and employees. Further, MdBC employees are assigned to present a select new policy to other employees at MdBC's employee meetings. Md BC intends to conduct another training on working with the federal government, highlighting its new policies. G. Managing Third Parties Md BC has enhanced the oversight of its third parties. First, Md BC has a newly created master service agreement template that includes terms, conditions, and regulatory flow downs that make it clear to its subcontractors that they are expected to comply with applicable laws and regulations and perform their work with MdBC integrity. Second, MdBC has adopted policies and procedures for conducting and documenting due diligence on third parties. The policies and procedures also include requirements for competitive selection of its third parties and C.E.O., Board, and legal counsel review and approval of third parties.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maryland

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.