EIN: 016000724
UEI: RNDNN4KZ3NH7
Audited by: Baker Newman & Noyes LLC
Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 12, 2026 (9 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Finding 2025-004: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Award Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Year: 2025 Federal Award Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding Criteria: In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, schools must report changes in a student’s enrollment status (for example, less than half-time, graduated, or withdrawn) to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days (60 days for roster file) of becoming aware of the change. Condition and context: During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted eleven students in our sample selected where the change in enrollment status was not completed timely. This finding was reported in the prior year under finding number 2024-001. Cause: Insufficient review of student data in the NSLDS. Effect or potential effect: The Academy did not report student enrollment changes within the timeframe outlined by the Department of Education. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data regarding changes in enrollment status is reported timely. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-004: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Award Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Year: 2025 Federal Award Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding Criteria: In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, schools must report changes in a student’s enrollment status (for example, less than half-time, graduated, or withdrawn) to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days (60 days for roster file) of becoming aware of the change. Condition and context: During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted eleven students in our sample selected where the change in enrollment status was not completed timely. This finding was reported in the prior year under finding number 2024-001. Cause: Insufficient review of student data in the NSLDS. Effect or potential effect: The Academy did not report student enrollment changes within the timeframe outlined by the Department of Education. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data regarding changes in enrollment status is reported timely. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Identifying Number: 2025-004 Finding: The Academy did not report student enrollment changes within the timeframe outlined by the Department of Education. Name of Contact Person: Alice Herrick, Director of Fiscal Operations; Ryan French, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Root Causes Analysis: Upon internal review, several key factors contributing to this deficiency were identified: a. Clearinghouse Processing Gaps: Enrollment reporting at the Academy is managed through the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), which transmits enrollment updates to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). A review of discrepancies highlighted cases where: o Student withdrawals were not consistently updated within the mandated timeframe. b. Quality Control Mechanism: o There is currently no established process to cross-check NSC submission data with NSLDS and Student Information System (SIS) records to confirm that all changes were processed correctly. Corrective Measures: To address this deficiency, the Academy will implement the following corrective actions: a. Enhanced Collaboration & Process Review (Owner: FA/IT/Registrar, Deadline: April 30, 2025): o The Financial Aid Office will collaborate with the Registrar’s Office and IT to conduct a thorough review of the NSC reporting process. o IT will analyze report generation to determine if student records that should be included in NSC updates are being omitted due to system logic or timing of data extraction. b. Quality Control Implementation (Owner: FA/IT, Deadline: May 15, 2025): o A monthly QC report will be developed to identify students with the NSLDS status “Z – No Record Found” and verify that their enrollment data has been appropriately updated in NSLDS. o A secondary review of withdrawals, LOAs, and “no-shows” will be completed to confirm their enrollment status changes were transmitted correctly to NSLDS. c. Manual NSLDS Updates for Withdrawals (Owner: FA, Deadline: Immediate): o As a temporary solution, the Financial Aid Office will manually update student enrollment statuses in NSLDS following an R2T4 calculation. o This manual review will act as a safeguard to catch the majority of unreported status changes while a more automated verification process is developed. Future Process Improvements & Next Steps a. Automated Data Integrity Checks (Owner: IT, Deadline: June 30, 2025): o IT will determine whether a custom “NSLDS Status” flag can be implemented in the Academy’s SIS to help identify students whose records do not agree with NSLDS or the NSC report. b. Ongoing Compliance Monitoring (Owner: FA/IT/Registrar, Deadline: July 30, 2025): o Academy staff from the Registrar’s Office, Financial Aid, and IT will meet to discuss and document NSC reporting best practices – Internal Procedures, Operational Workflow, Compliance and QC Measures. o A bi-annual audit of enrollment reporting timeliness will be conducted to ensure continued compliance. Conclusion: Maine Maritime Academy is committed to ensuring compliance with U.S. Department of Education regulations and providing accurate and appropriate financial aid awards to students. The corrective actions outlined in this plan address the deficiencies identified in the Uniform Guidance audit and aim to prevent similar issues in the future. The corrective action above for student enrollment was underway during the fiscal year 2025 period under audit. We appreciate the audit findings and remain dedicated to continuous improvement in our financial aid procedures.
2024-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.
2024-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria – In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, schools must report changes in a student’s enrollment status (for example, less than half-time, graduated, or withdrawn) to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days (60 days for roster file) of becoming aware of the change. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted eleven students in our sample selected where the change in enrollment status was not completed timely. Cause – Insufficient review of student data in the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not report student enrollment changes within the timeframe outlined by the Department of Education. Questioned Costs - None. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data regarding changes in enrollment status is reported timely. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria – In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, schools must report changes in a student’s enrollment status (for example, less than half-time, graduated, or withdrawn) to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days (60 days for roster file) of becoming aware of the change. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted eleven students in our sample selected where the change in enrollment status was not completed timely. Cause – Insufficient review of student data in the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not report student enrollment changes within the timeframe outlined by the Department of Education. Questioned Costs - None. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data regarding changes in enrollment status is reported timely. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards: Finding 2024-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Name of Contact Person: Alice Herrick, Director of Fiscal Operations; Ryan French, Director of Financial Aid Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Root Causes Analysis: Upon internal review, several key factors contributing to this deficiency were identified: a. Clearinghouse Processing Gaps: Enrollment reporting at the Academy is managed through the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), which transmits enrollment updates to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). A review of discrepancies highlighted cases where: o Student withdrawals were not consistently updated within the mandated timeframe. o In at least one case, a student was initially listed in NSLDS as “Z – No Record Found” on September 21, 2023, suggesting that NSC added the student to the Academy’s roster. The student withdrew after Fall 2023, but no enrollment update was submitted to NSLDS. b. Quality Control Mechanism: o There is currently no established process to cross-check NSC submission data with NSLDS and Student Information System (SIS) records to confirm that all changes were processed correctly. Corrective Measures: To address this deficiency, the Academy will implement the following corrective actions: a. Enhanced Collaboration & Process Review (Owner: FA/IT/Registrar, Deadline: April 30, 2025): o The Financial Aid Office will collaborate with the Registrar’s Office and IT to conduct a thorough review of the NSC reporting process. o IT will analyze report generation to determine if student records that should be included in NSC updates are being omitted due to system logic or timing of data extraction.b. Quality Control Implementation (Owner: FA/IT, Deadline: May 15, 2025): o A monthly QC report will be developed to identify students with the NSLDS status “Z – No Record Found” and verify that their enrollment data has been appropriately updated in NSLDS. o A secondary review of withdrawals, LOAs, and “no-shows” will be completed to confirm their enrollment status changes were transmitted correctly to NSLDS. c. Manual NSLDS Updates for Withdrawals (Owner: FA, Deadline: Immediate): o As a temporary solution, the Financial Aid Office will manually update student enrollment statuses in NSLDS following an R2T4 calculation. o This manual review will act as a safeguard to catch the majority of unreported status changes while a more automated verification process is developed. Future Process Improvements & Next Steps a. Automated Data Integrity Checks (Owner: IT, Deadline: June 30, 2025): o IT will determine whether a custom “NSLDS Status” flag can be implemented in the Academy’s SIS to help identify students whose records do not agree with NSLDS or the NSC report. b. Ongoing Compliance Monitoring (Owner: FA/IT/Registrar, Deadline: July 30, 2025): o Academy staff from the Registrar’s Office, Financial Aid, and IT will meet to discuss and document NSC reporting best practices – Internal Procedures, Operational Workflow, Compliance and QC Measures. o A bi-annual audit of enrollment reporting timeliness will be conducted to ensure continued compliance. Conclusion: Maine Maritime Academy is committed to ensuring compliance with U.S. Department of Education regulations and providing accurate and appropriate financial aid awards to students. The corrective actions outlined in this plan address the deficiencies identified in the Uniform Guidance audit and aim to prevent similar issues in the future. We appreciate the audit findings and remain dedicated to continuous improvement in our financial aid procedures.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.
2023-001: Student Financial Assitance Cluster – Eligibility – Award Limits Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Awards Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria - In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, students can receive Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, with the loan amounts based on the student’s year in school and their status as an independent or a dependent. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted two students in our sample selected who were each awarded $1,000 less than they were eligible for based on their year in school. We noted one student who was awarded $1,000 more than they were eligible for based on their year in school. The sample selected was a statistically valid sample. Cause – Insufficient review of student data prior to loan approval. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not award Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans in accordance with Department of Education criteria. Questioned Costs - $1,000. Questioned costs were determined based on the loan more than the allowable amount. Questioned costs related to assistance listing number 84.248. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data is sufficiently reviewed prior to loan disbursements being made. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.Criteria - In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, students can receive Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, with the loan amounts based on the student’s year in school and their status as an independent or a dependent. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted two students in our sample selected who were each awarded $1,000 less than they were eligible for based on their year in school. We noted one student who was awarded $1,000 more than they were eligible for based on their year in school. The sample selected was a statistically valid sample. Cause – Insufficient review of student data prior to loan approval. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not award Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans in accordance with Department of Education criteria. Questioned Costs - $1,000. Questioned costs were determined based on the loan more than the allowable amount. Questioned costs related to assistance listing number 84.248. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data is sufficiently reviewed prior to loan disbursements being made. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-001: Student Financial Assitance Cluster – Eligibility – Award Limits Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster; Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Awards Identification Number: P268K161537 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria - In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, students can receive Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, with the loan amounts based on the student’s year in school and their status as an independent or a dependent. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted two students in our sample selected who were each awarded $1,000 less than they were eligible for based on their year in school. We noted one student who was awarded $1,000 more than they were eligible for based on their year in school. The sample selected was a statistically valid sample. Cause – Insufficient review of student data prior to loan approval. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not award Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans in accordance with Department of Education criteria. Questioned Costs - $1,000. Questioned costs were determined based on the loan more than the allowable amount. Questioned costs related to assistance listing number 84.248. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data is sufficiently reviewed prior to loan disbursements being made. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.Criteria - In accordance with limits set by the Department of Education, students can receive Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, with the loan amounts based on the student’s year in school and their status as an independent or a dependent. Condition and context – During our test work over Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans, we noted two students in our sample selected who were each awarded $1,000 less than they were eligible for based on their year in school. We noted one student who was awarded $1,000 more than they were eligible for based on their year in school. The sample selected was a statistically valid sample. Cause – Insufficient review of student data prior to loan approval. Effect or Potential Effect – The Academy did not award Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans in accordance with Department of Education criteria. Questioned Costs - $1,000. Questioned costs were determined based on the loan more than the allowable amount. Questioned costs related to assistance listing number 84.248. Recommendations – We recommend that management enhance control procedures to ensure that student data is sufficiently reviewed prior to loan disbursements being made. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan – Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Finding 2023-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Eligibility – Award Limits Name of Contact Person: Alice Herrick, Director of Fiscal Operations; Ryan French, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Plan Introduction: This Corrective Action Plan addresses the significant deficiency identified in the audit regarding the review of student enrollment data prior to loan approval. The deficiency resulted in one noted student receiving a federal loan disbursement above their annual eligibility limit, and two students who each received a federal loan disbursement below their annual eligibility limit. We acknowledge the issue and have implemented immediate corrective measures to rectify the situation and prevent recurrence. Root Causes Analysis: The deficiency stemmed from two main factors: a. Limitations of PowerFAIDS: The software lacks automated quality control mechanisms to prevent overawarding or overdisbursement. Additionally, the software’s database design poses a challenge due to the “one-to-many” relationship of Periods of Enrollment (POE), making automated packaging algorithms which address this deficiency impossible. b. Staff Awareness: Financial aid staff were unaware of PowerFAIDS' limitations and lacked clear guidance on necessary quality control procedures. Immediate Corrective Actions Implemented: In response to the deficiency, the following actions have been taken: a. Manual Quality Control Procedure: A manual review process has been established prior to each semester's disbursement date. This process includes verifying student enrollment data and identifying discrepancies between self-reported class levels (PF: "F-YR-SCHOOL") and official class progression (PC: "academic_class_level", PF: "POE-YR-SCHL"). b. Repackaging and Communication: Students with verified discrepancies in class levels are repackaged accordingly and updated financial aid offer letters/emails are sent to notify students of changes and request their consideration. Confirmation of Effectiveness: A thorough review of the 2023-2024 academic year data confirms that no current students have been awarded or disbursed above their annual eligibility limit, validating the effectiveness of the implemented quality control procedure. Future Mitigation Strategies: To further mitigate the risk of noncompliance and reduce manual review time, the following strategies will be implemented: a. Dynamic Custom Field in PowerFAIDS: Proposing the creation of a dynamic custom field (e.g., “PC_ACL_Progression”) that updates student class levels via API integration with PowerCampus. b. Automated Packaging Rule: Developing an automated packaging rule within PowerFAIDS based on the dynamic custom field to identify Year In School (YIS) mismatches and trigger necessary repackaging. This rule will incorporate the YIS Mismatch quality control function and algorithm, reducing the time commitment necessary for manual review. Timeline for Implementation: While a current manual process is in place, the proposed future mitigation is forthcoming. a. Manual Quality Control Procedure: This procedure was put into effect by Financial Aid staff on November 16th, 2023, and was successfully implemented prior to Spring 2024 disbursement. All current disbursements of Federal TitleIV aid have been made in accordance with U.S. Department of Education criteria. b. Future Mitigation: The proposed dynamic custom field and automated packaging rule will be developed and implemented within the next academic year to streamline the quality control process and enhance compliance measures. Conclusion: Maine Maritime Academy is committed to ensuring compliance with U.S. Department of Education regulations and providing accurate and appropriate financial aid awards to students. The corrective actions outlined in this plan address the deficiencies identified in the Uniform Guidance audit and aim to prevent similar issues in the future. We appreciate the audit findings and remain dedicated to continuous improvement in our financial aid procedures. Name of Contact Person: Alice Herrick, Director of Fiscal Operations; Ryan French, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Plan: The Academy will review current procedures related to awarding Unsubsidized and Subsidized loans and implement additional review procedures to ensure awards to students are appropriately within limits set by the Department of Education. Planned Completion Date: June 2024
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023 — management decision was due September 27, 2023.
2022-002: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion ? Earmarking Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund; COVID-19 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Identification Number: P425F204862 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria ?The Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) III Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) outlined that the American Rescue Plan (ARP) added two new required uses of HEERF III institutional portion grant funds for public and private nonprofit institutions. Namely, a portion of their institutional funds must: (a) Implement evidence-based practices to monitor and suppress coronavirus in accordance with public health guidelines; and (b) Conduct direct outreach to financial aid applicants about the opportunity to receive a financial aid adjustment due to the recent unemployment of a family member or independent student, or other circumstances, described in section 479A of the Higher Education Act. Condition and context ? The Academy used the institutional portion of HEERF III funds to offset lost revenue, which is allowed, but did not document amounts to be earmarked or used, if any, for the criteria outlined above. FAQ 28, as per below, prescribes that the amount to be earmarked or used for such activities is discretionary: Congress did not prescribe any specific practices, strategies, or methods that institutions must use to implement this required activity, and institutions have flexibility to carry out activities tailored to their unique needs and circumstances that are evidence-based and in accordance with public health guidelines. Congress also did not set a specific threshold or amount of an institution?s ARP (a)(1) Institutional Portion funds that must be used to implement this provision. Cause ? Management was not aware of the additional criteria, as it was only part of an FAQ release. Possible Asserted Effect ? The Academy may need to reallocate a portion of the grant funds used to demonstrate that they were used in accordance with the criteria above. Questioned Costs - None. Recommendations ? We recommend that management document how they addressed the aforementioned required criteria and follow-up with the Department of Education to ascertain whether their documentation is satisfactory and if any grant money will require reallocation. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan ? Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-002: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion ? Earmarking Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund; COVID-19 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Federal Award Identification Number: P425F204862 Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Criteria ?The Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) III Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) outlined that the American Rescue Plan (ARP) added two new required uses of HEERF III institutional portion grant funds for public and private nonprofit institutions. Namely, a portion of their institutional funds must: (a) Implement evidence-based practices to monitor and suppress coronavirus in accordance with public health guidelines; and (b) Conduct direct outreach to financial aid applicants about the opportunity to receive a financial aid adjustment due to the recent unemployment of a family member or independent student, or other circumstances, described in section 479A of the Higher Education Act. Condition and context ? The Academy used the institutional portion of HEERF III funds to offset lost revenue, which is allowed, but did not document amounts to be earmarked or used, if any, for the criteria outlined above. FAQ 28, as per below, prescribes that the amount to be earmarked or used for such activities is discretionary: Congress did not prescribe any specific practices, strategies, or methods that institutions must use to implement this required activity, and institutions have flexibility to carry out activities tailored to their unique needs and circumstances that are evidence-based and in accordance with public health guidelines. Congress also did not set a specific threshold or amount of an institution?s ARP (a)(1) Institutional Portion funds that must be used to implement this provision. Cause ? Management was not aware of the additional criteria, as it was only part of an FAQ release. Possible Asserted Effect ? The Academy may need to reallocate a portion of the grant funds used to demonstrate that they were used in accordance with the criteria above. Questioned Costs - None. Recommendations ? We recommend that management document how they addressed the aforementioned required criteria and follow-up with the Department of Education to ascertain whether their documentation is satisfactory and if any grant money will require reallocation. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan ? Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings.
Finding 2022-002: Education Stabilization Fund, COVID-19 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Institutional Portion ? Earmarking Name of Contact Person: Richard Rosen, Vice President for Financial and Institutional Services Corrective Action Plan: The Academy will review the earmarking requirements, document the Academy?s reasoning for allocation of the funds, and follow-up with the U.S. Department of Education to ensure that the Academy is complying with the applicable provisions of the award. Planned Completion Date: September 2023
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2021 — management decision was due September 8, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2019 — management decision was due April 17, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on October 14, 2018 — management decision was due April 14, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2017 — management decision was due June 4, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2016 — management decision was due June 6, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maine →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
