EIN: 016000037
UEI: N6XNR399LKS5
Audited by: NICHOLSON MICHAUD AND NADEAU
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 1, 2025 (303 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.
Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed on certain contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. Effect: Contracted employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates, which could jeopardize grant funding. Cause: For contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit, the School Department did not include language in its construction contracts that included wage rate requirements and did not obtain certified payroll information from contractors. Recommendations: Management should carefully review all contracts related to grants to ensure they include the required language. In addition, management should ensure that contractors submit the required certified payrolls. Questioned Costs: None
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, Assistance Listing #84.425C, #84.425D and #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed on certain contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. Effect: Contracted employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates, which could jeopardize grant funding. Cause: For contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit, the School Department did not include language in its construction contracts that included wage rate requirements and did not obtain certified payroll information from contractors. Recommendations: Management should carefully review all contracts related to grants to ensure they include the required language. In addition, management should ensure that contractors submit the required certified payrolls. Questioned Costs: None
We agree with the finding and have alreadyimplemented the recommendations accordingly. For contracts entered into during the year ended June 30, 2023, the School Department included wage rate requirements in its construction contracts and certified payroll information from contractors was being received and reviewed. During the audit for the year ended June 30, 2023, the School Department provided documentary evidence in the form of signed contracts and copies of certified payrolls to the auditor to verify that the recommendations have been implemented.
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
2022-001 ? U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, Assistance Listing #84.425D, #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001 ? U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, Assistance Listing #84.425D, #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund
We agree with the finding and will be reviewing and implementing the recommendations accordingly. In addition, School Department personnel will perform a retrospective review of weekly payrolls for all contractors and subcontractors to ensure wages paid were in accordance with prevailing wage rates for the locality of the projects. The results of the review will be documented for subsequent monitoring.
FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2022 — management decision was due November 17, 2022.
Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Highway Planning and Construction - Assistance Listing #20.205 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Highway Planning and Construction grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Highway Planning and Construction - Assistance Listing #20.205 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Highway Planning and Construction grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.
Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. Subsequent to year end, the existing policy will be reviewed and will be modified to bring it in compliance with current standards. Date of Implementation: This corrective action plan will be implemented by June 30, 2022. Responsible Party: Stephen Daly, City Manager, (207) 680-4200
2020-001
FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.
Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Assistance to Firefighters Grant CFDA #97.044 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Assistance to Firefighters Grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Assistance to Firefighters Grant CFDA #97.044 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Assistance to Firefighters Grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.
Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. Subsequent to year end, the existing policy will be reviewed and will be modified to bring it in compliance with current standards. Date of Implementation: This corrective action plan will be implemented by June 30, 2021. Responsible Party: Aaron Berls, Finance Director, (207) 680-4240
FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2020 — management decision was due September 23, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2019 — management decision was due September 11, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2018 — management decision was due August 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maine →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.