← Back to home

CITY OF WATERVILLE, MELocal Government

EIN: 016000037

UEI: N6XNR399LKS5

Audited by: NICHOLSON MICHAUD AND NADEAU

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CITY OF WATERVILLE, ME9 audit years4 findings2 repeat
9
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$8.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$8,938,116 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 1, 2025 (303 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-06-30

$11,085,314 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-001

Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed on certain contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. Effect: Contracted employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates, which could jeopardize grant funding. Cause: For contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit, the School Department did not include language in its construction contracts that included wage rate requirements and did not obtain certified payroll information from contractors. Recommendations: Management should carefully review all contracts related to grants to ensure they include the required language. In addition, management should ensure that contractors submit the required certified payrolls. Questioned Costs: None

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, Assistance Listing #84.425C, #84.425D and #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed on certain contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. Effect: Contracted employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates, which could jeopardize grant funding. Cause: For contracts entered into during the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 but not completed until the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the current period under audit, the School Department did not include language in its construction contracts that included wage rate requirements and did not obtain certified payroll information from contractors. Recommendations: Management should carefully review all contracts related to grants to ensure they include the required language. In addition, management should ensure that contractors submit the required certified payrolls. Questioned Costs: None

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the finding and have alreadyimplemented the recommendations accordingly. For contracts entered into during the year ended June 30, 2023, the School Department included wage rate requirements in its construction contracts and certified payroll information from contractors was being received and reviewed. During the audit for the year ended June 30, 2023, the School Department provided documentary evidence in the form of signed contracts and copies of certified payrolls to the auditor to verify that the recommendations have been implemented.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,495,345 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

2022-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINION

2022-001 ? U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, Assistance Listing #84.425D, #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 ? U.S. Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, Assistance Listing #84.425D, #84.425U Education Stabilization Fund

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the finding and will be reviewing and implementing the recommendations accordingly. In addition, School Department personnel will perform a retrospective review of weekly payrolls for all contractors and subcontractors to ensure wages paid were in accordance with prevailing wage rates for the locality of the projects. The results of the review will be documented for subsequent monitoring.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,389,588 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2022 — management decision was due November 17, 2022.

2021-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-001

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Highway Planning and Construction - Assistance Listing #20.205 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Highway Planning and Construction grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Highway Planning and Construction - Assistance Listing #20.205 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Highway Planning and Construction grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.

Corrective Action Plan

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. Subsequent to year end, the existing policy will be reviewed and will be modified to bring it in compliance with current standards. Date of Implementation: This corrective action plan will be implemented by June 30, 2022. Responsible Party: Stephen Daly, City Manager, (207) 680-4200

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,595,446 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

2020-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Assistance to Firefighters Grant CFDA #97.044 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Assistance to Firefighters Grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Program Assistance to Firefighters Grant CFDA #97.044 Criteria Procurement activity is required to be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Condition We noted that the City?s procurement policy has not been reviewed, compared and updated as necessary to ensure full compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Context Expenditures incurred under the City?s Assistance to Firefighters Grant required bid procedures. The City conducted the bid procedures as required and we noted that the bid procedures were performed and documented in accordance with the City?s current procurement policy. The City?s current procurement policy was last amended in 2010. Uniform Guidance procurement standards were required to be implemented effective July 1, 2018. Cause and Effect City management has determined that a lack of defined controls and procedures prevented the City from comparing its current procurement policy against the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and making necessary modifications. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its procurement policies and procedures to be compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. We also recommend that any proposed changes to the procurement policy be formally reviewed and approved by the City Council.

Corrective Action Plan

Procurement Policy (Significant Deficiency) Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. Subsequent to year end, the existing policy will be reviewed and will be modified to bring it in compliance with current standards. Date of Implementation: This corrective action plan will be implemented by June 30, 2021. Responsible Party: Aaron Berls, Finance Director, (207) 680-4240

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,480,198 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2020 — management decision was due September 23, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,757,683 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2019 — management decision was due September 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,871,987 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2018 — management decision was due August 11, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,876,314 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maine

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.