THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG VILLAGE I, INCNon-Profit

Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted the following deficiencies: - Two out of three new tenants tested did not have EIV in file. - One out of three new tenants tested did not include correct income on 50059 form. - One out of 10 existing tenants tested did not include medical deductions as part of the income calculation on the 50059 form. Cause Management's policies with respect to the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect The procedures for determining tenant security deposits and eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies paid by HUD. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Views of Responsible Officials FG Companies has a procedure in place that requires all tenant files to be reviewed by the compliance team that is in line with the community’s tenant selection plan that outlines the tenant eligibility requirements. All annual certifications are submitted and reviewed by compliance in accordance with the requirements of the HUD Handbook4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. FG Companies has also implemented a bi-weekly file audit system that will continue to be completed by the Regional Manager. This system is to ensure all files are current with certifications and all required state and local forms are completed and filed accordingly. Finding Resolution Status: Resolved

Criteria Management fee payments are limited to amounts determined in accordance with the terms of the HUD-approved management agreement. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2025, the Project paid management fees of $6,475 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. Cause The prior management company did not apply cash received prior to June 30, 2024 to individual tenant subledgers and when the new management company made those entries during the year ended June 30, 2025, the cash receipts were inadvertently counted again as part of cash receipts when computing management fee. Effect or Potential Effect The overpaid amount is an unauthorized distribution and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding. Recommendation The management company should reimburse the Project for overpaid management fee in the amount of $6,475 and implement procedures to ensure that the management fee paid does not exceed the amount determined in accordance with the HUD-approved management agreement. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and is working with ownership on reimbursement to the property. Management will collect in accordance with HUD going forward. Finding Resolution Status: In process

Criteria Loans are not permitted to be made from project cash without prior authorization from HUD. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2024, the Project paid expenses in the amount of $3,896 on behalf of an affiliate from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due to the Project as of June 30, 2024 is $3,896. Cause Procedures were not in place to ensure that cash disbursements of project funds were limited to project operating costs. Effect or Potential Effect Use of project funds for unauthorized loans may result in shortage of cash and default on Project's own obligations. Questioned Costs The payments of $3,896 were unauthorized loans and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should immediately reimburse the amount due to the Project and establish procedures to ensure payments of this nature are not made in the future. Auditor Noncompliance Code: G. Unauthorized loans from project assets. Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendation and has reviewed the HUD requirement for loans. Funds have been transferred and loans will not be permitted based on HUD requirements going forward.

Criteria In accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs, HUD projects are required to establish and maintain at all times a fully funded separate bank account for tenant security deposits collected. Condition As of June 30, 2024, management has not fully funded the tenant security deposits cash account. The tenant security deposits cash account was underfunded by $3,268. Cause The tenant security deposits liability exceeds the tenant security deposits cash account by $3,268 as of June 30, 2024. Effect or Potential Effect Management commingled tenant security deposits with its operating cash and did not have sufficient cash balance in the tenant security deposits cash account to cover the tenant security deposits liability as of June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs N/A Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendations Management should transfer $3,268 from the operating account in order to fully fund the tenant security deposits account. Auditor Noncompliance Code: M. Security deposits Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. View of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendation and has reviewed the HUD requirement for security funding. Funds have been transferred and will be maintained based on HUD requirements in a separate account from operating funds.

Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Condition In connection with our lease file review, we noted the following deficiencies: 1 out of 1 new tenant tested had EIVs that were not performed in the correct period and that were not performed outside of 90-day EIV window. Cause Management's policies with respect to the determination of eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect The procedures for eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies paid by HUD. Questioned Costs N/A Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendations Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Auditor Noncompliance Code: R. Section 8 program administration Finding Resolutions Status: Resolved. View of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendation and has reviewed the HUD requirement for security funding. Funds have been transferred and will be maintained based on HUD requirements in a separate account from operating funds. Move in EIVs - All move in files will be sent to our in house compliance department and Franklin Group has an EIV specialist how follows and tracks all moves for accuracy for all move files and the EIV specialist also sends out the 90 day reminders for all move in. Existing Tenant EIV - It is the policy that all existing tenant EIV and 120-day reports are run per the 4350 guidelines. The Community Manager for Renaissance Gardens has been provided the HUD Trainings and have noted on her daily task reminder from One Site to pull all reports as required. The RM is required during monthly visits to spot check at least 5 existing tenants. Gross Rent Change and Medical Reporting - The policy states that all Gross Rent Changes are to be completed as approved by the new rent schedule - The Community Manager is required to scheduled appointments with all residents to sign the effective gross rent change and file in tenants files, it is also required that residents 50059s are signed and in the file, the Community Manager has taken the latest HUD training with our in house HUD Compliance Manager- The Regional Manager will also spot check files to be certain that all Gross Rent Changes are in its 6 part file folders. Medical reporting records were discussed in our HUD Compliance Training and all expenses must be in the 6-part file folder. Again, the RM will continue to spot check files during the monthly required inspections. All HUD Communities were required to participate in the HUD Training as a reminder tool. Security Deposit - Franklin Companies has a policy that all security deposit refunds must be submitted within the 3 days move out period. This situation was due to the changeover in Management.

Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Management is responsible for timely submission of audited financial statements to Federal Audit Clearinghouse ("FAC"). Condition The accounting records required numerous material adjustments to be proposed and recorded in order for the financial statements to be fairly presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Single Audit reports are required to be submitted to the FAC pursuant to the audit requirement of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Submission of June 30, 2023 financial statements was not completed within the specified time frame. Cause Management did not have sufficient controls over financial reporting. Effect or Potential Effect Condition 1 may lead to inaccurate financial reporting and potential misstatement of the financial statements such that they are not in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Condition 2 results in auditee being designated as not a low-risk auditee, which may have an effect on future federal grants and program eligibility. Questioned Costs N/A Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should undertake a review of internal controls over financial reporting and ensure that financial data is properly recorded in the books and records of the Project to prevent misstatements from occurring in the future. Management should implement procedures to ensure that required filing is completed timely. Auditor Noncompliance Code: S. Internal control deficiencies Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendation and had implemented reviews of the financial statements by senior management prior to closing books to ensure accuracy of information. Management agrees with the finding and recommendation and will ensure required filing is completed timely.

Criteria In accordance with HUD Handbook 4530.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs, management must review and update the Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan at least every five years. Condition The property does not have a current Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan. Cause Procedures were not in place to ensure proper documentation was maintained upon the change of management. Effect or Potential Effect Absent these written documents, the Project could open itself up to mistakes in marketing and leasing activity that could put their PRAC contract at risk upon renewal. Questioned Costs N/A Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should maintain an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan and update it every five years. Auditor Noncompliance Code: Z. Other Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. View of Responsible Officials Management has submitted their Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan with an effective date of September 27, 2024.

Criteria Management fee payments are limited to amounts determined in accordance with the terms of the HUD-approved management agreement. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2024, the Project paid management fees of $16,298 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. Cause There were two different management agreements and management did not follow the HUD-approved management agreement when paying management fees from operations. Effect or Potential Effect The overpaid amount is an unauthorized distribution and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Questioned Costs $16,298 Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation The management company should reimburse the Project for overpaid management fee in the amount of $16,298 and implement procedures to ensure that the management fee paid does not exceed the amount determined in accordance with the HUD-approved management agreement. Auditor Noncompliance Code: J. Unauthorized management fees Finding Resolution Status: In process. View of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and is working with ownership on reimbursements to the property. Management will collect in accordance with HUD going forward.

Criteria Residual receipts reserve deposits should be made within 90 days of year end. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2024, management did not make the required residual receipts deposit in the amount of $2,566 within 90 days of year end, as required by HUD. Cause Controls are not in place to ensure that required residual receipts reserve deposits are made timely. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization is not in compliance with the requirements of the regulatory agreement. Questioned Costs $2,566 Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should establish internal controls and procedures to ensure that required residual receipts reserve deposits are made timely. Auditor Noncompliance Code: B. Failure to make required residual receipts deposits. Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. View of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and has transferred the residual receipts.

Finding No. 2022-001; Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly, Assistance Listing 14.157 Criteria Residual receipts reserve deposits should be made within 90 days of year end. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2022, management did not make the required residual receipts reserve deposit in the amount of $38,268 within 90 days of year end, as required by HUD. The residual receipts amount was deposited on May 9, 2022. Cause Controls are not in place to ensure that required residual receipts reserve deposits are made timely. Effect or Potential Effect The Company is not in compliance with the requirements of the regulatory agreement. Questioned Costs $38,268. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should establish internal controls and procedures to ensure that required residual receipts reserve deposits are made timely. Auditor Noncompliance Code: B - Failure to make required residual receipts deposits. Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. Views of Responsible Officials The residual receipts deposit was not made timely due to a turnover in staff. Management has trained all accounting staff on this process and the controller has implemented tracking procedures to ensure timely deposits.

A. Summary of Auditor's Results 1. The auditor's report expresses an unmodified opinion on whether the financial statements of The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Village I, Inc. were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 2. No significant deficiencies related to the audit of the financial statements were reported in the Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards. No material weaknesses were reported. 3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements of The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Village I, Inc., which would be required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, were disclosed during the audit. 4. A significant deficiency in internal control over the major federal awards program was disclosed during the audit and reported in the Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for the Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance Required by the Uniform Guidance. No material weaknesses were reported. 5. The auditor's report on compliance for the major federal award program for The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Village I, Inc. expresses a qualified opinion on the major federal program. 6. There is one audit finding required to be reported in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.516(a) in the Schedule. 7. The program tested as a major program was: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for the Elderly CFDA No.14.157 8. The threshold for distinguishing between Type A and B programs was $750,000. 9. The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Village I, Inc. was not determined to be a low-risk auditee. B. Findings - Financial Statements Audit None C. Findings and Questioned Costs - Major Federal Award Program Audit Department of Housing and Urban Development Finding No. 2021-001; Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly, CFDA 14.157 Statement of Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted the following deficiencies: 1 out of 8 tenants tested did not have documentation in their lease that their income was verified using EIV. Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Questioned Costs NA Effect The procedures for determining tenant eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies paid by HUD. Cause Management?s policies with respect to the determination of tenant eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs were not consistently followed. Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to insure that tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Auditor Noncompliance Code: R ? Section 8 administration Finding Resolution Status: Resolved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation have been implemented.