COASTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSINGNon-Profit

EIN: 010504306

UEI: KYHCWEFZ5ZE9

Audited by: OTIS ATWELL

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COASTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING9 audit years7 findings5 repeat
9
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,976,026 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 11, 2026 (171 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

$1,973,798 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2024 — management decision was due March 16, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$1,988,058 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2023 — management decision was due March 18, 2024.

2022-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-002

A significant audit adjustment related to accounts receivable and operating expense was needed in order to present the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Criteria: Management is responsible for maintaining its accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Inadequate controls over financial closing procedures. Effect or Potential Affect: As a result of the condition, the Organization?s accounting records were initially misstated by amounts significant to the consolidated financial statements. Recommendations: We recommend that control systems are put in place to ensure there is proper training and review over monthly and annual financial closing procedures to eliminate errors in the future. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: While policies and procedures were fundamentally sound, deficiencies existed in the oversight and review of significant transactions over accounts receivable and operating expenses during financial closing procedures. Therefore, the following action will be implemented by December 31, 2023: ? Conduct internal training over monthly and annual financial closing procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2022-001: Questioned Costs: N/A. Information on Universe and Population Size: N/A Sample Size Information: N/A Noncompliance Information: No instances of noncompliance identified.Statement of Condition: A significant audit adjustment related to accounts receivable and operating expense was needed in order to present the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Criteria: Management is responsible for maintaining its accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Inadequate controls over financial closing procedures. Effect or Potential Affect: As a result of the condition, the Organization?s accounting records were initially misstated by amounts significant to the consolidated financial statements. Recommendations: We recommend that control systems are put in place to ensure there is proper training and review over monthly and annual financial closing procedures to eliminate errors in the future. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: While policies and procedures were fundamentally sound, deficiencies existed in the oversight and review of significant transactions over accounts receivable and operating expenses during financial closing procedures. Therefore, the following action will be implemented by December 31, 2023: ? Conduct internal training over monthly and annual financial closing procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Current Finding on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs: 1. Finding 2022-001: a. Comments on the Finding: We concur that a significant audit adjustment related to accounts receivable and operating expense was needed in order to present the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and are in agreement with the recommendations to implement training for the monthly and annual closing and financial reporting review procedures. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding: We have posted the adjustment recommended by the auditors and will implement the following control by December 31, 2023: ? Conduct internal training over monthly and annual financial closing procedures.

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Other →

FY 2021-12-31

$2,014,988 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2022 — management decision was due March 27, 2023.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During our consideration of internal controls over cash disbursements, we noted that the accounts payable clerk has the capability within QuickBooks to create and print signed checks. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section F ?Cash Disbursements? of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?All disbursements from the regular operating account must be supported by approved invoices, bills, or other supporting documentation. Project funds should only be used to pay for mortgage payments, required deposits to the reserve for replacement fund, reasonable expenses necessary for the operation and maintenance of the project, distributions, as permitted, and repayment of owner advances or as authorized by RD.? Cause: Lack of segregation of duties over check generation function. Effect or Potential Effect: Use of project funds for unallowable costs. Recommendations: We recommend that a mitigating control be implemented whereby a management member reviews the operating cash account activity on a routine basis throughout each month. The review should include scanning disbursement activity for potential unauthorized vendors and unauthorized payments. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree in principle with the finding and acknowledge that while it is the practice to have the accounting manager review the checks before they are sent out by the accounts payable clerk, and no instances of noncompliance were identified, there remains a reasonable possibility of material noncompliance. We have since implemented the recommended mitigating control.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: During our consideration of internal controls over cash disbursements, we noted that the accounts payable clerk has the capability within QuickBooks to create and print signed checks. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section F ?Cash Disbursements? of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?All disbursements from the regular operating account must be supported by approved invoices, bills, or other supporting documentation. Project funds should only be used to pay for mortgage payments, required deposits to the reserve for replacement fund, reasonable expenses necessary for the operation and maintenance of the project, distributions, as permitted, and repayment of owner advances or as authorized by RD.? Cause: Lack of segregation of duties over check generation function. Effect or Potential Effect: Use of project funds for unallowable costs. Recommendations: We recommend that a mitigating control be implemented whereby a management member reviews the operating cash account activity on a routine basis throughout each month. The review should include scanning disbursement activity for potential unauthorized vendors and unauthorized payments. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree in principle with the finding and acknowledge that while it is the practice to have the accounting manager review the checks before they are sent out by the accounts payable clerk, and no instances of noncompliance were identified, there remains a reasonable possibility of material noncompliance. We have since implemented the recommended mitigating control.

Corrective Action Plan

a. Comments on the Finding: We concur with the recommendation; we have implemented a mitigating control whereby management members are detail reviewing the operating cash account activity on a routine basis throughout each month. The review procedures include scanning disbursement activity for potential unauthorized vendors and unauthorized payments. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding: We have implemented the recommended mitigating control whereby management members are detail reviewing the operating cash account activity on a routine basis throughout each month. The review procedures include scanning disbursement activity for potential unauthorized vendors and unauthorized payments. c. Completed Date: Completed as of January 3, 2022.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-12-31

$2,043,218 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 11, 2021 — management decision was due April 11, 2022.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-001

During our consideration of internal controls over cash disbursements, we noted that the accounts payable clerk has the capability within QuickBooks to create and print signed checks. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section F ?Cash Disbursements? of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?All disbursements from the regular operating account must be supported by approved invoices, bills, or other supporting documentation. Project funds should only be used to pay for mortgage payments, required deposits to the reserve for replacement fund, reasonable expenses necessary for the operation and maintenance of the project, distributions, as permitted, and repayment of owner advances or as authorized by RD.? Cause: Lack of segregation of duties over check generation function. Effect or Potential Effect: Use of project funds for unallowable costs. Recommendations: We recommend that controls be implemented to segregate the generation and signing of check functions and that the check register report be reviewed monthly by the CFO. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: We agree in principle with the finding and acknowledge that while it is the practice to have the accounting manager review the checks before they are sent out by the accounts payable clerk, and no instances of noncompliance were identified, there remains a reasonable possibility of material noncompliance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: During our consideration of internal controls over cash disbursements, we noted that the accounts payable clerk has the capability within QuickBooks to create and print signed checks. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section F ?Cash Disbursements? of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?All disbursements from the regular operating account must be supported by approved invoices, bills, or other supporting documentation. Project funds should only be used to pay for mortgage payments, required deposits to the reserve for replacement fund, reasonable expenses necessary for the operation and maintenance of the project, distributions, as permitted, and repayment of owner advances or as authorized by RD.? Cause: Lack of segregation of duties over check generation function. Effect or Potential Effect: Use of project funds for unallowable costs. Recommendations: We recommend that controls be implemented to segregate the generation and signing of check functions and that the check register report be reviewed monthly by the CFO. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: We agree in principle with the finding and acknowledge that while it is the practice to have the accounting manager review the checks before they are sent out by the accounts payable clerk, and no instances of noncompliance were identified, there remains a reasonable possibility of material noncompliance.

Corrective Action Plan

Comments on the Finding: We concur with the recommendation, a segregation of duties control using QuickBooks system authority levels whereby the accounts payable clerk will not have the ability to create and generate checks will be implemented prior to September 30, 2021. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding: We will implement a segregation of duties control using QuickBooks system authority levels whereby the accounts payable clerk will not have the ability to create and generate checks prior to September 30, 2021. Additionally, the accounting manager or property manager will select and approve the invoices for check generation by the accounts payable clerk.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,080,951 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2020 — management decision was due June 9, 2021.

2019-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2018-002

The Organization holds a majority of its cash balances with Camden National Bank. The total cash balance includes operating cash accounts, tenant security deposit accounts, tax and insurance escrow accounts, and replacement reserve accounts at USDA, Rural Development financed projects. $163,456 of the total cash held at Camden National Bank is uninsured as of December 31, 2019. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section E "Cash Receipts" of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?all cash receipts, including those collected by a management agent, must be deposited into an account in the name of the project at an institution in which deposits are federally insured.? Cause: The Organization?s projects are managed by different management agents. The total cash was not reviewed during the year to ensure all project accounts held at Camden National Bank were covered by FDIC insurance or other collateral. Effect or Potential Effect: Financial loss of the uninsured balance in the event of bank insolvency. Recommendations: We recommend that management review bank balances during the year to ensure that the balances at one financial institution do not exceed the FDIC insurance limit. If necessary, excess funds should be collateralized or funds should be moved to additional financial institutions in order to gain full insurance coverage. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: All properties are now being managed by one management agent in 2020. We plan to monitor financial institution balances for each project during the year to ensure the total amount held at each financial institution does not exceed the FDIC insurance limit.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2019-003 Questioned Costs: $163,456 Information on Universe and Population Size: N/A Sample Size Information: N/A. Noncompliance Information: There is cash in a financial institution that is materially in excess of the FDIC insured limit with no additional insurance or collateral to cover the excess. Condition: The Organization holds a majority of its cash balances with Camden National Bank. The total cash balance includes operating cash accounts, tenant security deposit accounts, tax and insurance escrow accounts, and replacement reserve accounts at USDA, Rural Development financed projects. $163,456 of the total cash held at Camden National Bank is uninsured as of December 31, 2019. Criteria: Attachment 4-J Section E "Cash Receipts" of the Consolidated Audit Guide for the Audits of RD Programs requires that ?all cash receipts, including those collected by a management agent, must be deposited into an account in the name of the project at an institution in which deposits are federally insured.? Cause: The Organization?s projects are managed by different management agents. The total cash was not reviewed during the year to ensure all project accounts held at Camden National Bank were covered by FDIC insurance or other collateral. Effect or Potential Effect: Financial loss of the uninsured balance in the event of bank insolvency. Recommendations: We recommend that management review bank balances during the year to ensure that the balances at one financial institution do not exceed the FDIC insurance limit. If necessary, excess funds should be collateralized or funds should be moved to additional financial institutions in order to gain full insurance coverage. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: All properties are now being managed by one management agent in 2020. We plan to monitor financial institution balances for each project during the year to ensure the total amount held at each financial institution does not exceed the FDIC insurance limit.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-003 Recommendation: Management review of bank balances during the year to ensure that balances at each financial institution do not exceed the FDIC insurance limit. If necessary, excess funds should be collateralized or funds should be moved to alternate financial institutions for full insurance. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation, all properties are now being managed by the same management agent and financial institution balances for all properties are being managed to ensure the collective amount in each financial institution does not exceed the FDIC insurance limit. Contact Person: Bill Pearse, Controller

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-12-31

$2,119,857 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2019 — management decision was due February 13, 2020.

2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-12-31

$2,141,994 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2018 — management decision was due February 14, 2019.

2017-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2016-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-12-31

$1,933,903 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2017 — management decision was due March 25, 2018.

2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.