KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHNon-Profit

EIN: 010265559

UEI: UMVJGD2K9YN8

Audited by: ONE RIVER CPAS

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,342,037 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 24, 2026 (5 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,790,966 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2024 — management decision was due June 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$4,492,562 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2023 — management decision was due June 20, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,440,928 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2022 — management decision was due June 27, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2022-001 Noncompliance with Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Standard ? 93.829 Criteria ? 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.320 (a)(2)(i) requires that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-federal entity for purchases over $50,000. Kennebec Behavioral Health?s internal policy is to obtain bids and document an analysis for all purchases at a lower threshold of $25,001. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred under covered transactions. Condition and Context ? Audit procedures revealed that there was not a competitive bid process before entering into a consulting agreement that was over the Uniform Administrative Requirement?s, as well as the Organization?s thresholds. In addition, there was not a process in place to formally document the review of that contracting entity for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the agreement. Cause ? The Organization does not have a formal form to document bids, suspension, and debarment. The documentation of these processes was left to manager discretion. There were time constraints for budget submission that lead to the manager determining that there was not sufficient time to solicit bids. Though no additional attempts to solicit bids were documented, the manager reported that she relied on recommendations from peer Organizations who had gone through a bidding process for similar contracts. No analysis was formally documented in writing prior to entering into the agreement, though it was clear that the manager thoughtfully considered the Organization?s options and determined that the contractor was the best suited for the agreement. Effect ? The Organization was not in compliance with procurement standards for bids on the consulting agreement tested. The Organization did not formally document its initial review of suspension and debarment for this agreement, though the contractor was found to not be on prohibited lists at annual review. Questioned Costs ? None Recommendations ? Management should strengthen their processes, controls, and review over procurement, suspension, and debarment processes and ensure compliance with Uniform Administrative Requirements, as well as their own procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Senior management has formally reminded and reviewed KBH?s policies for procurement and sanction screening for exclusion/suspension/debarment with the full management team and Business Operations group. To assist with the process, a checklist for large purchases and/or service contracts will be developed and required to be attached to any new purchases and/or contracts. KBH?s Policy 1520, Procurement Bidding Requirements, has been revised to include the checklist requirement. As specifically related to the contract noted above, KBH developed an RFP and reissued solicitations for Evaluator work for CCBHC, effective 10/31/22.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Noncompliance with Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Standard ? 93.829 Criteria ? 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.320 (a)(2)(i) requires that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-federal entity for purchases over $50,000. Kennebec Behavioral Health?s internal policy is to obtain bids and document an analysis for all purchases at a lower threshold of $25,001. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred under covered transactions. Condition and Context ? Audit procedures revealed that there was not a competitive bid process before entering into a consulting agreement that was over the Uniform Administrative Requirement?s, as well as the Organization?s thresholds. In addition, there was not a process in place to formally document the review of that contracting entity for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the agreement. Cause ? The Organization does not have a formal form to document bids, suspension, and debarment. The documentation of these processes was left to manager discretion. There were time constraints for budget submission that lead to the manager determining that there was not sufficient time to solicit bids. Though no additional attempts to solicit bids were documented, the manager reported that she relied on recommendations from peer Organizations who had gone through a bidding process for similar contracts. No analysis was formally documented in writing prior to entering into the agreement, though it was clear that the manager thoughtfully considered the Organization?s options and determined that the contractor was the best suited for the agreement. Effect ? The Organization was not in compliance with procurement standards for bids on the consulting agreement tested. The Organization did not formally document its initial review of suspension and debarment for this agreement, though the contractor was found to not be on prohibited lists at annual review. Questioned Costs ? None Recommendations ? Management should strengthen their processes, controls, and review over procurement, suspension, and debarment processes and ensure compliance with Uniform Administrative Requirements, as well as their own procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Senior management has formally reminded and reviewed KBH?s policies for procurement and sanction screening for exclusion/suspension/debarment with the full management team and Business Operations group. To assist with the process, a checklist for large purchases and/or service contracts will be developed and required to be attached to any new purchases and/or contracts. KBH?s Policy 1520, Procurement Bidding Requirements, has been revised to include the checklist requirement. As specifically related to the contract noted above, KBH developed an RFP and reissued solicitations for Evaluator work for CCBHC, effective 10/31/22.

Corrective Action Plan

December 19, 2022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Kennebec Behavioral Health respectfully submits the following corrective action plan of the year ended June 30, 2022. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: One River CPAs 46 FirstPark Drive, Oakland, ME 04963 FINDING ? FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT None FINDING ? FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 - 93.829 Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services; 1-1-H79SM085158-01 Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency: The Organization did not follow guidelines and their policies for competitive bids on small purchases and for the documentation of verification of suspension and debarment for one transaction tested. Recommendation: Management should strengthen their processes, controls, and review over procurement, suspension, and debarment processes and ensure compliance with Uniform Administrative Requirements, as well as their own procurement policies. Responsible Person for Corrective Action: Josee L. Shelley, CPA Corrective Action to be Taken: Senior management has formally reminded and reviewed KBH?s policies for procurement and sanction screening for exclusion/suspension/debarment with the full management team and Business Operations group. To assist with the process, a checklist for large purchases and/or service contracts will be developed and required to be attached to any appropriate purchases and/or contracts. KBH?s Policy 1520, Procurement Bidding Requirements, has been revised to include the checklist requirement. As specifically related to the contract noted above, KBH developed an RFP and reissued solicitations for Evaluator effective 10/31/22. The anticipated completion date for this corrective action is December 31, 2022. If the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has questions regarding this plan, please contact Josee L. Shelley, CPA at 207-873-2136 or jshelley@kbhmaine.org. Sincerely, Thomas J. McAdam, Chief Executive Officer

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,335,768 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,360,386 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2021 — management decision was due September 29, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,423,234 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,466,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$978,739 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2018 — management decision was due September 29, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,219,089 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2017 — management decision was due August 21, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.