State of Hawaii, Department of Accounting and General Services

EIN: 990252020

UEI: HKK5YY1DWYM3

Data as of August 20, 2026

10
Audit Years
93
Total Findings
30
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (40 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-005
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-005: Cash Management (Material Weakness) State Agency: Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture AL Number and Title: 10.179 – Micro-Grants for Food Security Program Award Number and Award Year: AM200100XXXXG132 2020 21MGFSPHI1003-00 2021 AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 2022 23MGFSPHI1011-00 2023 24MGFSPHI1016-00 2024 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we noted that the department only requested two drawdowns of federal awards that were used to pay expenditures in 2025. For one of the drawdowns, we noted one instance totaling approximately $32,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal award and the disbursement was 583 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it did not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible. Criteria 31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State’s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State’s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. The State Department of Budget and Finance determined it is administratively feasible to disburse cash in 25 days after receipt from the federal government. Effect Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal cash management requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department has taken actions to reduce the lag since the issue was identified and communicated in the prior year audit. The lag has been significantly reduced during this year. However, due to the timing of the corrective actions, the finding remains applicable for the year ended June 30, 2025. Recommendation The State department should continue to refine controls over monitoring cash management timeliness requirements, ensure program personnel are aware of all federal program requirements, and ensure there is adequate staffing for the program to comply with federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-005 ALN No. 10.179 Program Title: Micro-Grants Food Security Program Grant Award No.: AM200100XXXG132 21MGFSPHI1003-00 AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 23MGFSPHI1011-00 24MGFSPHI1016-00 Condition An elapsed time of 583 days between the drawdown and disbursement date of funds for the program and that the check date of 01/24/2025 occurred after the grant period expiration of 09/29/2024. Indicating that cash management controls were not operating to minimize time between transfer and disbursement and that the period of performance was unauthorized to be extended past the budget date. Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Hawaii Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity (DAB) will change administrative procedures for drawdown and disbursement of federal funds under the Micro-Grants Food Security Program. DAB will process the grant contracts and payments in batches of about 100 micro-grants per month, and federal drawdown will not occur until about a batch of 100 contracts have been executed. Additional staff hired for grant processing will expedite the payment process to ensure conformity with the 25-day disbursement timeline. Person Responsible Brendan Akamu, Market Development Branch Manager Anticipated Date of Completion Corrective action plan will be implemented in April 2026.

Prior Finding References

2024-005

About Cash Management →
2025-006
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-006: Cash Management (Material Weakness) State Agency: Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Federal Agency: Department of Commerce AL Number and Title: 11.419 – Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards Award Number and Award Year: NA22NOS4190022 2022 NA22NOS4190065 2022 NA23NOS4190139 2023 NA24NOSX419C0023 2024 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified 12 instances totaling approximately $600,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of the federal cash draw and the disbursement to vendor were greater than 25 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the master grant agreement, the State did not disburse these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible. Criteria 31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State’s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State’s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. The State Department of Budget and Finance determined it is administratively feasible to disburse cash in 25 days after receipt from the federal government. Effect Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal cash management requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The delays were attributed to the draw down of federal funds based on the expected expenditures submitted by vendors and subrecipients prior to the completion of review and approval of the vendors and subrecipients’ submissions. Recommendation The State department should design and implement controls over monitoring cash management timeliness requirements, ensure program personnel are aware of all federal program requirements, and ensure there is adequate staffing for the program to comply with federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-006 ALN No. 11.419 Program Title: Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Program Grant Award No.: NA22NOS4190022 NA23NOS4190139 NA24NOSX419C0023 NA22NOS4190065 Condition Accuity noted that for various samples, the time between drawdown and disbursement of federal funds was up to 266 days elapsed. Indicating that cash management controls were not operating to minimize the time between transfer and disbursement. Corrective Action Plan OPSD DBEDT will ensure that program personnel are familiar with all federal requirements, including ensuring that funds are disbursed timely. Person Responsible Mary Alice Evans, Director of Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Anticipated Date of Completion April 1, 2026

About Cash Management →
2025-007
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-007: FFATA Reporting (Material Weakness) State Agency: Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Federal Agency: Department of Commerce AL Number and Title: 11.419 – Coastal Zone Management Administration Award Number and Award Year: NA22NOS4190022 2022 NA22NOS4190065 2022 NA23NOS4190139 2023 NA24NOSX419C0023 2024 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non-statistical sample of two subawards and found that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) was not completed. Criteria In accordance with the FFATA and the requirements of 2 CFR Part 170, Appendix A, prime recipients of federal grants are required to report each subaward of greater than or equal to $30,000. Each subaward must be reported to the SAM.gov (formerly FSRS.gov) no later than the end of the following month in which the subaward was made. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 170. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel incorrectly classified the subawards as vendor contracts. Recommendation We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over subaward identification and reporting. This includes mandatory training for staff involved in federal grant administration and a management-level review of all subawards to ensure FFATA reporting is complete and timely.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-007 ALN No. 11.419 Program Title: Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Program Grant Award No.: NA22NOS4190022 NA23NOS4190139 NA24NOSX419C0023 NA22NOS4190065 Condition Accuity noted that the State did not submit FFATA reports for most of the active grant agreements open for the program. Corrective Action Plan DBEDT OPSD will strengthen internal controls over subaward identification and reporting. This will include hiring and training staff to support federal grant administration and management-level review of all subawards to ensure FFATA reporting is complete and timely. Person Responsible Mary Alice Evans, Director of Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Anticipated Date of Completion April 1, 2026

About Reporting →
2025-008
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-008: Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) State Agency: Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Federal Agency: Department of Commerce AL Number and Title: 11.419 – Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards Award Number and Award Year: NA22NOS4190022 2022 NA22NOS4190065 2022 NA23NOS4190139 2023 NA24NOSX419C0023 2024 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non-statistical sample of two subawards and found that the State did not communicate the following award information required under 2 CFR 200.332:  Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier;  Federal Award Date;  Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date;  Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date;  Assistance Listing title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listing Number at the time of disbursement;  Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development; and  Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used in accordance with 200.414). Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(a) requires the State to clearly identify certain information to subrecipients at the time of the subaward, including the information specified above. Effect By not including the required information in the subaward, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel incorrectly classified subawards as vendor contracts. Recommendation We recommend that the management strengthen internal controls over subaward identification and monitoring subrecipients to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements are met.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-008 ALN No. 11.419 Program Title: Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Program Grant Award No.: NA22NOS4190022 NA23NOS4190139 NA24NOSX419C0023 NA22NOS4190065 Condition Accuity noted that State did not communicate the following award information required under 2 CFR 200.332: • Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; • Federal Award Date; • Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development; and • Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used in accordance with 200.414). Corrective Action Plan DBEDT OPSD will strengthen internal controls over subaward identification and monitoring subrecipients to ensure that subrecipient monitoring requirements are met. The Program will communicate with the subrecipient to record their UEI. Program will supply the subrecipient with the date of the federal award, the indirect cost rate for the Federal award per CFR 200.414, and information on whether the award is for research and development. The Program will continue to supply subrecipient with Period of Performance Start and End Date, Budget Period Start and End Date, and the Assistance Listing number. Person Responsible Mary Alice Evans, Director of Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Anticipated Date of Completion April 1, 2026

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2025-009
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-009: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) State Agency: Department of Labor and Industrial Relations Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: 25-A55-UI-000105 2025 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum case requirements were not met for paid claims for the year ended June 30, 2025. Criteria Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases per year. Effect Failure to meet minimum case requirements results in noncompliance and prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department is experiencing a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases. Recommendation We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop policies and procedures to handle unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-009 ALN No. 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Grant Award No.: 25-A55-UI-000105 Condition Based on our analysis of the claims processing data, the State is not in compliance with the BAM State Operations Guidance Part 602, as the minimum number of cases for paid claims was not met. Corrective Action Plan Concur. 1. The BAM unit continues to have vacancies and remain understaffed. 2. The unit is in the process of filling a vacancy with an experienced adjudicator. Once the position is filled, the new staff member will be trained in BAM methodology. At this time, the BAM supervisor continues to help the unit toward achieving its BAM requirements. 3. The unit anticipates increasing the number of cases for paid claims beginning June 2026. Person Responsible Sheryl-Lynn Ozaki, UI Quality Control Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion June 2027 In response to the finding State of Hawaii – Single Audit 2025 finding, the DLIR offers the following: The auditor’s recommendation for the DLIR to develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims fails to recognize the true source of the deficiency. The shortcoming is a direct result of staffing shortages. A key requirement of the BAM program is for the unit to be staffed with a sufficient number of knowledgeable and skilled investigators to ensure prompt and in-depth investigations. The investigator should be knowledgeable about and trained in the application of federal and state unemployment insurance laws, regulations/rules, and official policies; able to interpret and apply laws and official policies to each claimant's situation; proficient in fact-finding and determination procedures, including the process of interviewing interested parties and providing the opportunity for fair hearings and rebuttals; use independent judgment to develop and analyze evidentiary facts, assess credibility, weigh the evidence obtained, and decide when information is sufficient to issue legally binding decisions; determine appropriate administrative actions required; authorized to change computerized records as needed to pay or stop payment of benefits; prepare timely written decisions to deny or allow benefits which clearly communicate the facts, conclusions and reasoning used to support the decisions; be knowledgeable of the methods to effectively deal with claimants/customers, employers, or others who are under stress, experiencing negative emotions, etc. including handling and controlling conflict; knowledgeable about and skilled in the navigation of the state’s benefit, employment service, and tax systems; and knowledgeable about and compliant with BAM methodology and coding instructions. Regardless of new policies and procedures, the shortcoming is a direct result of the lack of available skilled investigators with the required skills to conduct prompt and in-depth investigations in the BAM program.

Prior Finding References

2024-007

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-010
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $ – Finding No. 2025-010: Equipment (Material Weakness) State Agency: Department of Land and Natural Resources Federal Agency: Department of Defense AL Number and Title: 12.107 – Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Award Number and Award Year: N62742-22-2-0002 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined all 16 acquisitions of equipment and real property in the current year. Of the 16 acquisitions, 15 were not properly entered into the State’s Fixed Asset Inventory System (FAIS). Criteria Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.313(b), the State must use, manage and dispose of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures. The State’s procedures require division-designated individuals to be knowledgeable about submitting Form 17A – Detail Inventory of Property along with supporting evidence, such as purchase orders with proper approvals and final billings and invoices to the State Procurement Office to enter into FAIS in the quarter the asset is placed in service. Effect Failure to record equipment properly reflects noncompliance with State procedures and Federal requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department did not submit Form 17A timely due to delays and errors in preparation of the forms. Recommendation We recommend that the State department develop internal control procedures to ensure that items are entered into the FAIS accurately and in the proper period.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2025-010 ALN No. 12.017 Program Title: Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Grant Award No.: N62742-22-2-0002 Condition No controls in place to ensure that 17A reports are prepared and reviewed in a timely manner to ensure that all fixed assets are included in the FAIS. Corrective Action Plan Management concurs with the finding. The delay in recording equipment acquisitions in FAIS resulted in noncompliance with established equipment control policies. Management acknowledges the importance of timely and accurate asset recording to ensure compliance and maintain effective internal controls. The Department will implement strengthened internal control procedures to ensure equipment is recorded in FAIS accurately and in the proper reporting period. Actions include: • Updating departmental written procedures, outlining the required timeline and documentation for recording equipment acquisitions in FAIS. Procedures will clearly define roles and responsibilities for program staff and fiscal personnel. • Issuing written procedures establishing clear roles, responsibilities, and required timelines for FAIS entries and reporting requirements within the division. • Requiring equipment to be recorded within a defined timeframe following receipt, acceptance and placed in service. • Implementing a tracking mechanism to monitor and conduct monthly reconciliations between procurement records, payment records, and FAIS entries. • Conducting supervisory review and periodic monitoring to ensure compliance. These corrective measures will be incorporated into ongoing internal control monitoring processes to prevent recurrence. Person Responsible Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer Michelle B. Del Rosario, DOFAW Program Specialist V Anticipated Date of Completion June 30, 2026

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 28, 2025, which was (327 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-005
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2024‐005: Cash Management (Material Weakness) State Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture AL Number and Title: 10.179 – Micro-Grants for Food Security Program Award Number and Award Year: AM200100XXXXG132 2020 21MGFSPHI1003-00 2021 AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 2022 23MGFSPHI1011-00 2023 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected drawdowns and identified 25 instances totaling approximately $55,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal award and the disbursement was greater than 25 days, ranging from 48 to 137 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it does not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible. Criteria 31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State’s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State’s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Based on our testing, we determined 25 days to be a reasonable period of time to disburse cash after receipt from the federal government. Effect Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lag in disbursing funds was due to the limited personnel assigned to this program in comparison to the volume of disbursements to beneficiaries. Recommendation The State department should design and implement controls over monitoring cash management timeliness requirements, ensure program personnel are aware of all federal program requirements, and ensure there is adequate staffing for the program to comply with federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No: 2024 005 ALN No.: 10.179 Program Title: Micro Grants for Food Security Program Grant Award No.: AM200100XXXXG132 2020 21MGFSPHI1003-00 2021 AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 2022 23MGFSPHI1011-00 2023 Condition The audit identified 25 instances totaling $55,000 where grantee disbursements were not made as soon as administratively possible after the drawdown of Federal Funds. Audit staff determined 25 days to be a reasonable period to disburse cash after drawdown from the Federal Government. Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA) will change administrative procedures for disbursement of Federal funds under the Micro Grants for Food Security Program. Going forward, HDOA will process the grant contracts and payments in batches of roughly 100 micro grants per month. Federal Drawdown will not occur until the full batch of 100 contracts have been executed. HDOA fiscal staff will then expedite the payment process to ensure conformity with the 25 day disbursement timeline. Person Responsible Brendan Akamu, Market Development Branch Manager Anticipated Date of Completion The updated work process will be implemented in April 2025. The first batch of grant contracts and payments for the 2023 Fiscal year awards are scheduled for April 2025.

About Cash Management →
2024-006
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2024‐006: Cash Management (Material Weakness) State Agency: Hawaii Technology Development Corporation (HTDC) Federal Agency: Department of Defense AL Number and Title: 12.400 – Military Construction, National Guard Award Number and Award Year: W912J6-23-2-2102 2023 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined four haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified an instance totaling approximately $60,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of the federal cash draw and the disbursement to vendor was greater than 45 days. For this instance, the time elapsed was 229 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the master cooperative agreement, the State did not disburse these federal advances within National Guard Bureau requirements. Criteria National Guard Regulations 5-1, National Guard Grants and Cooperative Agreements Chapter 11-5: Advance Payment Method, requires the State to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the federal government and its disbursement to no more than 45 days. Effect The delay in disbursing advances of federal funding results in the State not complying with federal cash management requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The delay was attributed to the draw down of federal funds by the State Department of Defense and transferring the funds to HTDC for disbursement to contractors. Recommendation We recommend that HTDC design and implement internal controls over the monitoring of cash management and ensure personnel are aware of cash management requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No: 2024-006 ALN No.: 12.400 Program Title: Military Construction, National Guard Grant Award No.: W912J6-23-2-2101 2023 Condition During our audit, we examined four haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified an instance totaling approximately $60,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of the federal cash draw and the disbursement to vendor was greater than 45 days. For this instance, the time elapsed was 229 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the master cooperative agreement, the State did not disburse these federal advances within National Guard Bureau requirements. Corrective Action Plan HCATT will continue in the management, validation, and process of invoices in close coordination with the 154th Wing, United States Property and Fiscal Office, and contractors as directed by NGR 5-1. HCATT had previously established internal procedures which included regularly scheduled meetings with the 154th Wing in which all parties ensured invoiced tasks were completed per contract, that disbursements were made from the appropriate agreement, and federal cash management process were initiated. We will continue with those procedures. As mentioned in the finding, the draw was done by the State Department of Defense and then transferred to HTDC. HCATT will work with the State Department of Defense on synchronizing our efforts with the National Guard Bureau. Person Responsible David Molinaro, HCATT Manager Anticipated Date of Completion March 17, 2025

About Cash Management →
2024-007
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2024‐007: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: 24‐55‐A‐55-UI-000068 2024 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases requirements were not met for paid claims. Criteria Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases. Effect Failure to meet minimum case requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No: 2024-007 ALN No.: 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Grant Award No.: 24-A-55-UI-000068 2024 Condition The minimum number of cases for paid were not met. Corrective Action Plan Concur. 1. The BAM unit was short staffed an investigator from July 2023 and a second investigator from February 2024. The 2 vacancies remain unstaffed. 2. The unit is in the process of filling a vacancy with an experienced adjudicator. Once the position is filled, the new staff member will be trained in BAM methodology. At this time, the BAM supervisor continues to help the unit toward achieving its BAM requirements. 3. The unit anticipates increasing the number of cases for paid beginning July 2025. Person Responsible Sheryl-Lynn Ozaki, UI Quality Control Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion June 2026 NOTE: In response to the finding State of Hawaii – Single Audit 2024 finding, the DLIR offers the following: The auditor’s recommendation the DLIR develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims fails to recognize the true source of the deficiency. The shortcoming is a direct result of staffing shortages. A key requirement of the BAM program is the unit must be staffed with a sufficient number of knowledgeable and skilled investigators to ensure prompt and in-depth investigations. The investigator should be knowledgeable about and trained in the application of federal and state unemployment insurance law, regulation/rules, and official policy, able to interpret and apply law and official policy to each individual claimant's situation. Proficient in factfinding and determination procedures including the process of interviewing interested parties and providing the opportunity for fair hearing, rebuttal. Use independent judgment to develop and analyze evidentiary facts, assess credibility, weigh the evidence obtained, and decide when information is sufficient to issue legally binding decisions, determine appropriate administrative action required, authorized to change computerized records as needed to pay or stop payment of benefits, prepare a timely written decision to deny or allow benefits which clearly communicate the facts, conclusions and reasoning used to support the decision. Be knowledgeable of the methods to effectively deal with claimants/customers, employers, or others, who are under stress, experiencing negative emotions, etc. including handling and controlling conflict. Knowledgeable about and skilled in the navigation of the state’s benefit, employment service, and tax systems; and knowledgeable about and compliant with BAM methodology and coding instructions. Regardless of new policies and procedures, the shortcoming is a direct result of the lack of available skilled investigators with the required skills to conduct prompt and in-depth investigations in the BAM program.

Prior Finding References

2023-010

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-008
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
REPEAT
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022 AA347645P0 2022 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. Criteria According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. Effect Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award. Recommendation We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No: 2024-008 ALN No.: 17.258 Program Title: WIOA Adult Program 17.259 Program Title: WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 Program Title: WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Grant Award No.: AA347643L0 2022 AA347645P0 2022 Condition During the audit, it was noted that an excess 0.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. The lead WIOA accountant who completed the close-out report at issue is no longer employed by DLIR. Corrective Action Plan Following the departure of the lead WIOA accountant who completed the subject closeout report, the Administrative Services Office (ASO) has heightened fiscal training and internal controls among its two new WIOA accountants to ensure that the federal award is managed in compliance with all terms and conditions of the award, including requirements pertaining to subrecipient earmarking, so no more than 15% of funds are expended towards the administrative costs category for the WIOA Title I Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth Programs. The Workforce Development Council (WDC) is also in the process of contracting with a selected vendor to develop in-depth, in-person fiscal training to be held in June 2025 that will support fiscal staff, including local areas’ fiscal staff, to better understand and navigate the financial management and budgeting for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) services. Person Responsible Lynn Araki-Regan Anticipated Date of Completion June 30, 2025

Prior Finding References

2023-011

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 28, 2024, which was (692 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-005
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐005: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: Department of Land and Natural Resources (“DLNR”) Federal Agency: Department of Interior AL Number and Title: 15.615 – Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Award Number and Award Year: F22AP03217 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence indicating that program personnel verified whether any of the contractors were federally suspended or debarred. Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.214, regulations restrict awards, subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, ineligible from, or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Therefore, verification is required by checking the System for Award Management (SAM), an official website for the U.S. Government, obtaining a certification from the contractor, or adding a clause or condition to the contract. Effect Without evaluating the contractors’ status on the SAM before executing agreements, the State may contract with suspended or debarred entities. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel responsible for procurement indicated that a review for the federal SAM website was performed prior to the execution of the contract, however, no formal documentation of the review was retained. Recommendation We recommend that program management retain evidence of the suspension and debarment review, including who performed the procedure and the date performed, prior to entering into the agreement.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐005 – Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Land and Natural Resources AL Number: 15.615 Program Title: Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Condition The auditing firm tested a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence indicating that program personnel verified whether any of the contractors were federally suspended or debarred. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLNR Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DLNR DOFAW) has implemented procedures to ensure that a SAM.gov verification is performed for all subrecipients, and that documentation is printed out from SAM.gov and retained with the subrecipient file folder. Person Responsible Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer David Smith, DOFAW Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion Completed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-006
Reporting
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐006: Reporting (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of Interior AL Number and Title: 15.615 – Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Award Number and Award Year: F22AP03217 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non‐statistical sample of one subaward and found that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (“FFATA”) was not completed timely. [TABLE] Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally‐awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to file the report in a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that program personnel ensure that required FFATA reports are filed timely.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐006 – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Land and Natural Resources AL Number: 15.615 Program Title: Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Condition A prime recipient of a federal award is required to file a Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) by a specific period for any subaward greater than or equal to $30,000. The auditing firm haphazardly tested the one subaward executed in FY 2023 and noted FFATA report was not completed timely. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLNR has procedures in place for the submission of FFATA reports and will ensure that the reports are filed timely. Person Responsible Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer Anticipated Date of Completion Completed.

About Reporting →
2023-007
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐007: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of Interior AL Number and Title: 15.634 – State Wildlife Grants (R&D Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: F21AP00578 F22AP03438 2022 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence indicating that program personnel verified whether the contractors were federally suspended or debarred. Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.214, regulations restrict awards, subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, ineligible from, or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Therefore, verification is required by checking the SAM, an official website for the U.S. Government, obtaining a certification from the contractor, or adding a clause or condition to the contract. Effect Without evaluating the contractors’ status on the SAM before executing agreements, the State may contract with suspended or debarred entities. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel responsible for procurement indicated that a review for the federal SAM website was performed prior to the execution of the contract, however, no formal documentation of the review was retained. Recommendation We recommend that program management retain evidence of the suspension and debarment review, including who performed the procedure and the date performed, prior to entering into the agreement.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐007 – Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Land and Natural Resources AL Number: 15.634 Program Title: State Wildlife Grants (R&D Cluster) Condition The auditing firm tested a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence indicating that program personnel verified whether any of the contractors were federally suspended or debarred. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLNR DOFAW has implemented procedures to ensure that a SAM.gov verification is performed for all subrecipients, and that documentation is printed out from SAM.gov and retained with the subrecipient file folder. Person Responsible Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer David Smith, DOFAW Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion Completed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-008
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐008: Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of Interior AL Number and Title: 15.634 – State Wildlife Grants (R&D Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: F21AP00578 F22AP03438 2022 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and noted the following instances of noncompliance: -Subaward agreements did not include certain required federal award information. -No evidence of pass‐through entity verifying that subrecipients are audited as required by 2 CFR Section 200, Subpart F. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(a) requires subawards to clearly identify information, such as Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D, period of performance, and indirect costs. 2 CFR Section 200.332(f) requires a pass‐through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Section 200, Subpart F, when it is expected that the subrecipient’s expenditures exceed applicable thresholds. Effect By not including the required information in the subaward and verifying whether the subrecipient is audited, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel responsible indicated that subaward information was provided and verification of audit was performed, however, no formal documentation of the review was retained. Recommendation We recommend that program management retain evidence of process, including who performed the procedure and the date performed.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐008 – Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Land and Natural Resources AL Number: 15.634 Program Title: State Wildlife Grants (R&D Cluster) Condition The auditing firm examined a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and noted the following instances of noncompliance: -Subaward agreements did not include certain required federal award information. -No evidence of pass‐through entity verifying that subrecipients are audited as required by 2 CFR Section 200, Subpart F. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLNR DOFAW does provide subaward information to subrecipients and will ensure to include all required federal award information. DLNR DOFAW will ensure that documentation is retained when performing verification that subrecipients are audited as required by 2 CFR Section 200, Subpart F. Person Responsible Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer David Smith, DOFAW Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion Completed.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2023-009
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

Questioned Cost $1,643 Finding No. 2023‐009: Eligibility (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: Department of Labor and Industrial Relations ("DLIR") Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance COVID‐19 – 17.225 – COVID‐19 – Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: UI‐39318‐23‐55‐A‐15 2023 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we selected a non‐statistical sample of sixty benefit payments made during the year and identified two payments where the recipients did not make the minimum number of work search contacts. Criteria Pursuant to State Handbook of Unemployment Benefits, the following requirements must be met to become eligible for benefit payments: 1) Be totally or partially unemployed; 2) File an application to establish an unemployment insurance claim; 3) File a claim certification on a weekly or bi‐weekly basis to request payment of benefits; 4) Register for work with the State Workforce Development Division; 5) Participate in re‐employment services; 6) Be physically and mentally able to work; 7) Be ready and willing to seek and accept work by making three or more work search contacts every week; 8) Serve a one‐week waiting period; and 9) Report for interviews. Effect Failure to comply with the eligibility requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and may result in recapture of funds by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to investigate cases within a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that the State department follow the policies and procedures established to comply with eligibility requirements. Furthermore, we recommend that the department formalize any modifications to the work search requirements used in practice as allowed under HRS Section 12‐5‐34.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐009 – Eligibility (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Number: 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Condition The audit identified two payments where the recipients did not make the minimum number of work search contacts. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. Hawaii UI issued a memo, dated September 22, 2023, reminding the local offices of the minimum work search requirements under Administrative Rule 12‐5‐35(c) and for the adjudication unit to conduct a fact‐finding as to the reasons for the claimant’s non‐compliance. Hawaii UI is currently working on a project to enhance the work search process and requirements using a grant awarded to UI by US Department of Labor. The project will allow expansion to the work search reporting requirement on the front‐end of the online weekly claim certification process to include employer job search details. The process entails the use of Behavioral Insight techniques to encourage accurate reporting of the work search requirement and provide a log of their work search efforts. These enhancements will help claimants better understand UI program requirements including: -What claimants should report and why, -The reporting expectations at various decision points throughout the certification process while they still have time to meet the requirements, -Convey the consequences of intentionally providing false information or making mistakes during reporting, and -Imposing a denial of benefits for weeks in which the claimant does not meet the work search eligibility requirement. Person Responsible Sheryl Maligro, UI Program Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion The enhancements to the Work Search Process are anticipated to be completed in June 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-005

About Eligibility →
2023-010
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐010: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance COVID‐19 – 17.225 – COVID‐19 – Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: UI‐39318‐23‐55‐A‐15 2023 Repeat Finding? Yes Condition During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases and timeliness requirements were not met for paid and denied claims. Criteria Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The required number of cases and the timeliness percentages for completing paid and denied claims are as follows: Paid Claims -Minimum cases: 480 paid cases -Timeliness percentages: Complete 70% within 60 days, 95% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Denied Claims -Minimum cases: 450 denied cases (150 cases for each category: monetary, separation and non‐separation) -Timeliness percentages: Complete 60% within 60 days, 85% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Effect Failure to meet timeliness requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐010 – Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Number: 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Condition Both and/or either the minimum number of cases and timeliness percentages for paid and denied claims including monetary, separation, and nonseparation, were not met. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. -The BAM unit was short staffed an investigator from March 2022. The vacancy was filled on January 17, 2023. -The number of paid and denied claims were increased and the BAM supervisor was assigned denied cases. -The unit anticipates to meet the minimum number of 480 paid and 450 denied cases effective FY 23‐24 which began in July 2023. -The unit has made great strides and is currently meeting the denied timeliness requirements. -The unit has brought on an experienced adjudicator to fill a vacancy and learn BAM methodology. He is in the probationary period and is expected to continue to progress to the level where he will be able to function independently on simple to difficult and complex cases. The unit has worked cohesively to assist colleagues with investigative tasks. The TPS individual contributes to this effort by assisting with the assembly of new case files for the BAM investigators. This collective effort allows the unit to make progress to our goals. The BAM supervisor continues to help and monitor case completion and timeliness to ensure the unit works toward achieving the BAM requirements. Person Responsible Sheryl Maligro, UI Program Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion June 2025

Prior Finding References

2022-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-011
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐011: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: AA‐33225‐15‐55A‐15 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we noted the following instances of noncompliance: -A total of 15.61% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. -A total of 74.60% of funds were allocated for services to out of school youth. Criteria According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. According to Section 129(c) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not less than 75% of funds allocated to the local area, except for local area administrative costs, shall be used to provide out of school youth. Effect Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award. Recommendation We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023‐011 – Earmarking (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Numbers and Program Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Condition The auditing firm noted the following instances of noncompliance: -A total of 15.61% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers. -A total of 74.60% of funds were allocated for services to out of school youth. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. -Administrative Services Office (ASO) has communicated with Workforce Development Division (WDD) that no more than 15% of funds shall be allocated to provide employment training activities for Adults and Dislocated Workers. If there are recaptured funds to spend from the local areas for the program year, ASO and WDD will make sure that recaptured funds will not exceed the maximum requirements of 15%. -WDD shall monitor the progress of subrecipients to meet the minimum 75% expenditure for out of school youth. If necessary, a monthly or bi‐monthly meeting with subrecipients shall be scheduled to monitor the progress and take pro‐active recommendations and action to meet the requirements. Person Responsible Maricar Pilotin‐Freitas, Workforce Development Division Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion March 2024

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2023-012
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐012: Reporting (Material Weakness) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: AA‐38525‐22‐55‐A‐15 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non‐statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA was completed. [TABLE] Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally‐awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to changes in program personnel, there was miscommunication between the parties responsible for filing the FFATA reports. Recommendation We recommend that program personnel ensure that required FFATA reports are filed timely.

Corrective Action Plan

2023‐012 – Reporting (Material Weakness) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Numbers and Program Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Condition Reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA was not completed. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. -Due to changes in program personnel, there was miscommunication between the parties responsible for filing the FFATA reports. -Previous ASO left abruptly in 2023 with limited to no cross‐training. Other positions vacated in 2023 as well. The ASO and Accountant VI vacancies were filled on December 1, 2023 and February 1, 2024, respectively. -The ASO will come up with a checklist of pertinent reports that are due for WIOA programs including FFTA reporting and have the responsible staffs (Accountant and Supervisor) report to ASO Officer and WDD Administrator monthly for verification. Person Responsible Lynn Araki‐Regan, Administrative Services Officer Anticipated Date of Completion March 15, 2024

About Reporting →
2023-013
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐013: Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: AA‐38525‐22‐55‐A‐15 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non‐statistical sample of three subawards and noted the following instances of noncompliance: -No evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients’ risk of noncompliance at the time of the subawards. -No evidence of on‐site monitoring procedures of the subrecipients. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass‐through entity to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. 2 CFR Section 200.332(d) requires a pass‐through entity to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in accordance with federal statutes and regulations. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not provide the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to resource constraints, program personnel were unable to perform the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance and on‐going monitoring procedures. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200, which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department’s responsibilities as a pass‐through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: -The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; -The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; -Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and -The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring

Corrective Action Plan

2023‐013 – Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Numbers and Program Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program 17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities 17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant (WIOA Cluster) Condition No evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients’ risk of noncompliance at the time of the subawards, and no evidence of on‐site monitoring procedures of the subrecipients. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. -The ASO will come up with a checklist of pertinent reports that are due for WIOA programs including but not limited to Risk Assessment Report to include the following information: - Subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards. - Results of previous Single Audit of the same or similar program that has been audited as major program. - New and Departing Personnel Record. - Systems Changes/Update. - Completion of Subrecipient Monitoring Report. - A formal analysis of each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements shall be performed at the time of the subaward. - In‐person, onsite monitoring of the activities of the subrecipient shall take place annually to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in accordance with federal statute and regulations. Person Responsible Ferdinand Casabay, Accountant VI Anticipated Date of Completion May 31, 2024

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2023-014
Reporting
Condition

Questioned Cost $- Finding No. 2023‐014: Reporting (Significant Deficiency) State Agency: Department of Defense Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security AL Number and Title: 97.067 – Homeland Security Grant Program Award Number and Award Year: EMW‐2022‐SS‐0036 2022 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non‐statistical sample of three subawards and found that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA were not filed timely. [TABLE] Critera Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally‐awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Effect Failure to file required reports timely reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to changes in program personnel, there was miscommunication between the parties responsible for filing the FFATA reports. Recommendation We recommend that program personnel ensure that required FFATA reports are filed timely.

Corrective Action Plan

2023‐014 – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Defense AL Number: 97.067 Program Title: Homeland Security Grant Program Condition The auditing firm selected three subawards that were executed between July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023, noting that FFATA reports for the selected subawards were not filed timely. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. It is our commitment to address this issue promptly and implement necessary measures to prevent its recurrence. We understand the importance of accurate and timely data entry in the FFATA portal for federal awards and sub awards. In response to this issue, we have developed a corrective action plan to address the root causes and prevent similar occurrences in the future: -Review of Process: We will conduct a thorough review of our current process for entering funding amounts into the FFATA portal to identify any inefficiencies or gaps in the process. -Training and Awareness: We will provide additional training to other personnel in the grant section to ensure that there is continuity in the tasks. This will include reinforcing the importance of adhering to established deadlines and protocols. -Implement Reminders: We will implement automated reminders and notifications to alert grant staff members via shared Microsoft Outlook Calendar of impending deadlines for entering new federal award into the FFATA portal. These reminders will serve as a proactive measure to prevent delays and ensure timely completion of tasks. Lastly, reminder indicators such as; receiving the official grant award and executing a memorandum of agreement with sub recipients will be an indicator for action to process FFATA reporting. The FFATA information and process already exists in our Homeland Security Procedural Manual (Page 49) that we maintain annually. We will continue to maintain and make any necessary revisions if there are any changes. Person Responsible Glen Badua, Grants Manager Anticipated Date of Completion February 20, 2024

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 23, 2023, which was (1063 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-005
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we selected a non statistical sample of fifty benefit payments made during the year and identified three payments where the recipients did not make the minimum number of work search contacts. Criteria Pursuant to State Handbook of Unemployment Benefits, the following requirements must be met to become eligible for benefit payments: 1) Be totally or partially unemployed; 2) File an application to establish an unemployment insurance claim; 3) File a claim certification on a weekly or bi-weekly basis to request payment of benefits; 4) Register for work with the State Workforce Development Division; 5) Participate in re employment services; 6) Be physically and mentally able to work; 7) Be ready and willing to seek and accept work by making three or more work search contacts every week; 8) Serve a one week waiting period; and 9) Report for interviews. Effect Failure to comply with the eligibility requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and may result in recapture of funds by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to investigate cases within a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that the State department follow the policies and procedures established to comply with eligibility requirements. Furthermore, we recommend that the department formalize any modifications to the work search requirements used in practice as allowed under HRS Section 12 5 34.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2022-005 ? Eligibility (Significant Deficiency) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Number: 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Direct Award from: UI 3644 21 55 A 15, UI 3590 20 60 A 15, UI 35700 21 55 A 15, UI 37219 22 55 A 15 Condition Per Administrative Rule 12-5-35(c), an individual may be considered available for work for any week if they make a minimum of three work search contacts each week, unless the individual is exempt from the work search requirements or be subject to a modified work search requirement consistent with and reflective of local area policies and local labor market opportunities. Findings identified three claimants who did not comply with the above requirements and were improperly paid. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. Hawaii will resend our revised written procedures regarding Administrative Rule 12 5 35(c) dated January 16, 2020, to ensure staff is aware and compliant with our Work Search requirements to ensure proper payment of benefits in the future. To address the modified work search requirements for specific islands or locality, Hawaii will provide staff with a written policy regarding this matter. Person Responsible Sheryl Maligro, UI Program Specialist Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion June 30, 2023

About Eligibility →
2022-006
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified minimum cases and timeliness requirements were not met regarding paid and denied claims. Criteria Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The required number of cases and the timeliness percentages for completing paid and denied claims are as follows: Paid Claims Minimum cases: 480 paid cases Timeliness percentages: Complete 70% within 60 days, 95% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Denied Claims Minimum cases: 450 denied cases (150 cases for each category: monetary, separation and non separation) Timeliness percentages: Complete 60% within 60 days, 85% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Effect Failure to meet timeliness requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, the department was significantly impacted with an increase in unemployment claims. Furthermore, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that the State department develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2022-006 ?Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations AL Number: 17.225 Program Title: Unemployment Insurance Direct Award from: UI-37219-22-55-A-15 Condition Both and/or either the minimum number of cases and timeliness percentages for paid and denied claims including monetary, separation, and non-separation, were not met. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. 1. The BAM unit was short staffed an investigator from March 2022. The vacancy was filled on January 17, 2023. 2. The number of paid and denied claims was increased and the BAM supervisor was assigned denied cases. 3. The unit anticipates to meet the minimum number of 480 paid and 450 denied cases effective FY 23-24 which begins in July 2023. 4. The unit has made great strides and is currently meeting the denied timeliness requirements and 60 day paid timeliness requirement. 5. The unit has brought on an experienced adjudicator to fill a vacancy and learn BAM methodology. The unit has worked cohesively to assist colleagues with investigative tasks. Other areas contribute to this effort by assisting with the assembly of new case files for the BAM investigators. This collective effort allows the unit to make progress to our goals. The BAM supervisor continues to help and monitors case completion and timeliness to ensure the unit works toward achieving the BAM requirements. Person Responsible Sheryl Ozaki, UI Quality Control Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion June 2024

Prior Finding References

2021-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-007
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of three subawards and noted untimely evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance for two subawards. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to resource constraints in Office of Federal Awards Management (OFAM), the program personnel were unable to perform the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance in a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2022-007 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.023 Program Title: Emergency Rental Assistance Program Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. The auditing firm selected three subawards and noted untimely evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance for two subawards. The auditing firm noted that one assessment was performed 2 days after a subaward was made, and for the second subaward, an assessment was performed 172 days after the subaward was made. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel are familiar with federal program requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.331(b) which requires an evaluation of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

Prior Finding References

2021-008

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-008
Cash Management
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined three haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified two instances totaling approximately $15,500,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal award and the disbursement was greater than 25 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it does not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible. Criteria 31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State?s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State?s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Based on our testing, we determined 25 days to be a reasonable period of time to disburse cash after receipt from the federal government. Effect Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lag in disbursing the funds was attributed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury providing the State an upfront lump sum advance to administer the program. Recommendation As the exceptions were caused by a lump sum advance provided from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, we recommend that program management contact the awarding agency to obtain best practices for cash management.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-008 ? Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.026 Program Title: Homeowner Assistance Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition Per 31 CFR Part 205, the State must minimize the time between the drawdown of Federal funds from the Federal government and subsequent disbursement for Federal program purposes. The auditing firm haphazardly tested 3 expenditures of the 7 transactions that occurred in fiscal year 2022 and found that the time between drawdown and disbursement of Federal funds by the State was not minimized. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. The U.S. Treasury wired Homeowner Assistance Funds (HAF) as a lump sum payment thus B&F did not have to submit a drawdown request to obtain the funds. Since B&F did not have control over the timing of the receipt of the funds, it is unclear how B&F could have complied with the requirement of 31 CFR Part 205 to minimize the timing of the disbursement of the funds. B&F had consulted with the U.S. Treasury on how to best comply with this requirement but has not received a response thus far. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Cash Management →
2022-009
Reporting
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we tested a non statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (?FFATA?) was completed. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally-awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel were unable to file the FFATA reports due to the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) not being available on the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS), a federal government website. Recommendation As the error appears to be caused by the FSRS, we recommend that program management continue to monitor the status of the FSRS and file the necessary FFATA reports when enabled.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-009 ? Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.026 Program Title: Homeowner Assistance Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition A prime recipient of a federal award is required to file a Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) by a specific period for any subaward greater than or equal to $30,000. The auditing firm haphazardly tested the two subawards executed in FY 2022 and noted that B&F was unable to file FFATA reports on FSRS.gov. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. The HAF award is not listed on the pre populated Worklist in FSRS thus subaward reports could not be filed for the award. The U.S. Treasury is aware that recipients are unable to report subawards in FSRS due to this unresolved technical issue between Treasury and FSRS. B&F will monitor the FSRS website and file the necessary FFATA reports if/when possible. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Reporting →
2022-010
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subawards. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to resource constraints in OFAM, the program personnel were unable to perform the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance in a timely manner. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-010 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.026 Program Title: Homeowner Assistance Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring for the subaward. The auditing firm selected a sample of two subawards that were executed in FY 2022. The auditing firm noted that program management did not evaluate the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance prior to the execution of the subawards. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel are familiar with Federal program requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) which requires an evaluation of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-011
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we tested a non statistical sample of seven subawards and found no evidence indicating that program personnel verified whether any of the contractors were not federally suspended or debarred. Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.214, regulations restrict awards, subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, ineligible from, or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Therefore, verification is required that either checks the System for Award Management (SAM), an official website for the U.S. Government, collects a certification from the contractor, or adds a clause or condition to the contract. Effect Without evaluating the contractors? status on the SAM before executing agreements, the State may pass through federal funding to ineligible entities. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel responsible for procurement indicated that a review for the federal SAM website was performed prior to the execution of the contract, however, no formal documentation of the review was retained. Recommendation We recommend that program management retain evidence of the suspension and debarment review, including who performed the procedure and the date performed, prior to entering into the agreement.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-011 ? Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.027 Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non federal entities to comply with non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The auditing firm selected a sample of subawards that were open in FY 2022. There was no evidence of a suspension or debarment review for 100% (7 out of 7) of the sample of subawards tested. The auditing firm was unable to verify that the State had checked whether the entities were federally suspended or debarred on the SAM.gov website prior to executing the subawards. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will modify its procedures to check for debarment or suspension on SAM.gov prior to issuing a subaward to an entity and retain evidence of the verification including who performed the check and the date performed. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-012
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of seven subawards and found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward for one of the subawards tested. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to resource constraints within OFAM, program personnel were unable to perform the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance in a timely matter. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200, which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-012 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 21.027 Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Treasury Condition 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. The auditing firm selected a sample of 7 subawards active in FY 2022. The auditing firm noted that program management did not evaluate the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward for one of the subawards tested. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel are familiar with federal program requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) which requires an evaluation of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-013
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we tested a non statistical sample of four subawards and found no evidence that the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA was completed for three subawards and one instance of untimely submission. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally-awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to changes in program personnel, there was miscommunication between the parties responsible for filing the FFATA reports. Recommendation We recommend that program personnel ensure that required FFATA reports are filed timely.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-013 ? Reporting (Material Weakness) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 84.425C Program Title: COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Education Condition A prime recipient of a Federal award is required to file a Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) by a specific period for any award to a subrecipient greater than or equal to $30,000. The State awarded Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) I and II funds to the Research Corporation of the University of Hawaii (RCUH). At the time of award, RCUH was improperly designated as a subrecipient rather than a grants management contractor. RCUH?s role was to disburse GEER funds in the form of innovation grants to various public/private schools and non profit organizations. Innovation grants were awarded to 31 organizations. B&F did not file FFATA reports for the recipients of the 31 innovation grants. B&F did file a FFATA report for RCUH. Subsequently, the U.S. Department of Education (US DOE) provided additional guidance to B&F and suggested that the FFATA reports be amended to remove RCUH as a subrecipient and for B&F to submit a FFATA report to FSRS for the organizations that received innovation grants. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 for the determination of subrecipients and FFATA reporting requirements. In addition, B&F will work with U.S. DOE to take appropriate action to address the lack of FFATA reports for the recipients of GEER innovation grants. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Reporting →
2022-014
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence that evaluations of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance and applicable federal award information was communicated to the subrecipients at the time of the subawards. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.332(a) requires subawards to clearly identify information, such as the FAIN, identification of whether the award is R&D, period of performance, and indirect cost. 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related the subaward. Effect By not including the required information in the subaward, subrecipients may have trouble complying with federal grant requirements. Furthermore, without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel improperly determined first-tier subrecipients resulting in applicable federal award information not being communicated in the subawards and not assessing the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance not being performed. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including providing subrecipients all applicable federal award information and performing a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. The risk evaluation may include consideration of the following factors: The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-014 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 84.425C Program Title: COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Education Condition 2 CFR Section 200.332(a) requires a pass-through entity to ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and provide specific Federal award information to subrecipients at the time of the subaward. 2 CFR Section 200.332(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Due to the improper determination of the Research Corporation of the University of Hawai`i as a subrecipient rather than a grants contractor, State program management did not ensure Federal award information was included in the subawards to the entities ultimately determined to be first tier subrecipients. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements including compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.332 (a) and (b) which requires the reporting of specific Federal award information to subrecipients and performing an evaluation of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-015
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of two subawards and found no evidence of consultation with private school officials. Criteria Section 1117(a)(4)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act requires that a recipient must provide equitable services to students and teachers in private schools as determined in consultation with private school officials. Effect Without evidence of program personnel?s consultation with private school officials, the State is unable to support its assertion of compliance with federal requirements. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program personnel indicated a consultation meeting took place; however, no formal documentation was retained. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements and retain necessary documentation to comply with federal program requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-015 ? Special Tests and Provisions (Significant Deficiency) Governor?s Office care of State Department of Budget and Finance AL Number: 84.425C Program Title: COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund Direct Award from: U.S. Department of Education Condition A local education agency that receives funds under the Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER I) Fund program must provide equitable services to students and teachers in private schools. During the audit, B&F was unable to locate documentation to verify that timely consultation with private school officials occurred. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. B&F will ensure that program personnel maintain evidence of compliance with all grant requirements. Person Responsible Mark K. Anderson, Office of Federal Awards Management, Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion July 1, 2023

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-016
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition During our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of six subawards and found no evidence of evaluation of any of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward. Furthermore, the most recent Single Audit report for one of the subrecipients selected for testing was not reviewed by program personnel for any potential findings. Criteria Per 2 CFR Section 200.332(b), a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures related to the subaward. Per 2 CFR Section 200.332(d), a pass-through entity is required to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Monitoring must include a review of financial performance reports, following up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies, issuing management decision for applicable audit findings, resolving audit findings, and verifying that each subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200, Subpart F. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to changes in personnel responsibilities, there was miscommunication between the parties responsible for evaluating the risk of noncompliance. Furthermore, the Single Audit report for one of the subrecipients was not reviewed due to oversight as the program personnel was unaware that the subrecipient is separately audited. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a single audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward was audited as a major program; Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency).

Corrective Action Plan

2022-016 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Department of Defense AL Number: 97.036 Program Title: Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance Direct Award from: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Condition The requirement to evaluate each subrecipients? risk of noncompliance was not being conducted during the audit timeframe of the awards that were audited. There was internal miscommunication as to who in the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HIEMA) is responsible for performing the risk assessments. Current Status of Corrective Action Plan Concur. HIEMA has implemented a Risk Assessment Policy to ensure the assessments are completed at the beginning of the grant process and conducted annually to ensure continued compliance with all grant requirements. Resilience and the Grants teams will continue to work together to ensure this process is adhered to. Person Responsible Brian Fisher ? Hawaii Emergency Management Agency ? Disaster Assistance Project Manager Lauren Mark ? Hawaii Emergency Management Agency ? Grants Program Manager Anticipated Date of Completion The Risk Assessment Policy was implemented on February 8, 2023 and outlines steps to be taken by all Grants Team members and Resilience Branch Point of Contacts to ensure compliance.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2021-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2022, which was (1421 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-005
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified minimum cases and timeliness requirements were not met regarding paid and denied claims.CriteriaPursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The required number of cases and the timeliness percentages for completing paid and denied claims are as follows:Paid Claims? Minimum cases: 480 paid cases? Timeliness percentages: Complete 70% within 60 days, 95% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 daysDenied Claims? Minimum cases: 450 denied cases (150 cases for each category: monetary, separation and non separation)? Timeliness percentages: Complete 60% within 60 days, 85% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 daysEffectFailure to meet timeliness requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsDue to the COVID 19 pandemic, the department was significantly impacted with an increase in unemployment claims. Employees were also hindered from working for a substantial amount of time due to government-mandated shutdowns and other restrictions.RecommendationWe recommend that the State department develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-005 ? Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness)State Department of Labor and Industrial RelationsAL No. 12.225 ? Unemployment InsuranceCOVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment InsuranceDirect award from the U.S. Department of Labor: UI-35644-21-55-A-15, UI-35940-20-60-A-15, UI-35700-21-55-A-15Condition1) Did not meet minimum cases for PAID (PCA) of 480 and Denied (DCA) of 4502) Did not meet timeliness for PCA 95% within 90 days and 98% within 120 dayCorrective Action PlanConcur1) The required minimum cases for PCA-480 and DCA-450 were reinstated July 2021.2) BAM staff who were previously assigned to other duties to address the huge workload increase due to the Pandemic were rededicated to performing only BAM related work beginning September 2020. The unit has brought on two experienced adjudicators to fill vacancies and learn BAM methodology. They continue to progress to the level where they will be able to function independently on simple to difficult and complex cases. The unit has worked cohesively to assist colleagues with investigative tasks. The TPS individual contributes to this effort by assisting with the assembly of new case files for the BAM investigators. This collective effort allows the unit to make progress to our goals. The BAM supervisor continues to help and monitors case completion and timeliness to ensure the unit works toward achieving the BAM requirements.Person ResponsibleSheryl Ozaki, UI Quality Control SupervisorAnticipated Date of Completion1) Completed2) July 2023

Prior Finding References

2020-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-006
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we selected a non-statistical sample of two quarterly performance reports to examine and identified two instances where there was no available evidence to verify the reports were prepared.CriteriaThe Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 8 20 requires performance reports to be submitted by the twentieth day of the second month after the end of each quarter.EffectThe failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds hindering monitoring by the awarding agency.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsDue to vacancies within the department, program personnel were reassigned which resulted in the reports not being prepared.RecommendationWe recommend that the State department implement adequate review of reports and ensure that individuals responsible for preparing and reviewing reports have adequate knowledge of applicable reporting requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-006 ? Special Tests and Provisions (Significant Deficiency)State Department of Labor and Industrial RelationsAL No. 12.225 ? Unemployment InsuranceCOVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment InsuranceDirect award from the U.S. Department of Labor: UI-35644-21-55-A-15, UI-35940-20-60-A-15, UI-35700-21-55-A-15ConditionNon-compliance of RESEA ETA-9129 quarterly report submittal.Corrective Action PlanConcur. DLIR will assign 2 people (lead/alternate) to be responsible for the timely filings of the ETA quarterly reports and will mandate that the reports be reviewed by a supervisor prior to submission.DLIR is also working with ETS to provide PDF versions of the HI RESEA quarterly production reports in a secured document folder on our share drive to guarantee data securement.Person Responsible: Arthur Barba, DLIR-UI Acting AdministratorAnticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2022

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-007
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of 25 payroll expenditures and identified an underpayment for one employee selected for testing.CriteriaIn accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(a), compensation for personal services includes all remuneration, paid currently or accrued, for services of employees rendered during the period of performance under the Federal award, including but not necessarily limited to wages and salaries.EffectThe underpayment of compensation affects the accuracy and transparency of program costs used by management and reported to the federal awarding agency.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsAn input error for a retrospective pay adjustment was made when processing payroll resulting in the improper payment to an employee that does not work on the Unemployment Insurance program of the $2,505 retrospective adjustment of an employee that works on the program. The compensation for the employees in question were corrected by the department subsequent to identification of the error as part of our audit testing in fiscal year 2022.RecommendationWe recommend that management ensure proper procedures and controls are in place to meet all requirements for compensation of employees in accordance with grant awards and procedures issued by the U.S. Department of Labor.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-007 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed (Significant Deficiency)State Department of Labor and Industrial RelationsAL No. 12.225 ? Unemployment InsuranceCOVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment InsuranceDirect award from the U.S. Department of Labor: UI-35644-21-55-A-15, UI-35940-20-60-A-15, UI-35700-21-55-A-15ConditionAn UI employee?s payroll retroactive pay in the amount of $2,505 was mistakenly paid to an employee who does not work on the UI program. It was not corrected during fiscal year 2021 but upon discovery subsequent to fiscal year end.Corrective Action PlanNon-concur: The amount of retroactive pay $2,505 was paid out from UI funds, recorded in UI fund ledger in April 2021. Therefore, it does not affect the accuracy and transparency of program cost used by management and reported to the federal awarding agency.The correction of the UI employee?s retroactive pay was made on pay day 12/03/2021; the other employee?s on 12/03/2021 and 12/20/2021. All corrections were recorded on UI funds. Consequently, it is a wash on the UI payroll expenses in December 2021; it only affects the mentioned employees? pay.Person Responsible: Vyhien Peyton, Administrative Services OfficerAnticipated Date of Completion: December 20, 2021

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-008
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of two subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward.Criteria2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward.EffectWithout evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsDue to vacancies within the department, program personnel were unable to perform the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance in a timely matter. However, subawards were only provided to State departments that regularly receive federal funding and are familiar with federal requirements.RecommendationWe recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200, which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following:? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards;? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program;? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and? The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-008 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency)Governor?s OfficeAL No. COVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental AssistanceDirect award from the United States Treasury (Award no. Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021ConditionA risk assessment was not performed by the Office of Federal Awards Management at the time a sub-award was made to a subrecipient.Corrective Action PlanConcur.A risk assessment has been completed for all Emergency Rental Assistance (?ERA?) subrecipients.Please note that all ERA subrecipients were required and did attend a weekly ERA subrecipient meeting. A weekly subrecipient meeting is the highest level of subrecipient oversight that can be provided.Person ResponsibleMark Anderson, Administrator, Office of Federal Awards Management, Department of Budget and FinanceAnticipated Date of CompletionCorrective action was taken in May 2021.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2021-009
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we tested a non statistical sample of three subawards and determined that in all instances the State department did not provide certain required federal award information in the subaward agreements.Criteria2 CFR Section 200.332(a) requires subawards to clearly identify information, such as the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D, period of performance, and indirect cost.EffectBy not including the required information in the subaward, subrecipients may have trouble complying with federal grant requirements.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsProgram management was unaware of the requirement to communicate the FAIN to subrecipients. However, subawards were only provided to subrecipients that regularly receive federal funding and are familiar with federal requirements.RecommendationWe recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-009 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency)AL No. 93.569 ? Community Services Block GrantDirect Award from: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Award no. 75-20-1536 and 75-21-1536)ConditionDuring the audit, three sample subaward agreements were examined but found that the subaward agreements (nor any subsequent documents provided to the subrecipients) did not include communication of the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN). In accordance with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.331(a) requires a pass-through entity to provide subrecipients award information. Although it was noted noncompliance among the total samples, the subrecipients are recurring Community Action Agencies (CAAs) who are familiar with the CSBG program and how to properly use federal funds. Each CAA is also required to furnish an audit report to the State annually, which the State reviews. Program management was unaware of the requirement to communicate the FAIN to subrecipients.Corrective Action PlanConcur. By June 30, 2022, OCS Program and Evaluation Administrator will send the notices of award with allocation letters to each subrecipient going forward. Each notice of award states the Award Number, Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), Statutory Authority, the Assistance Listing (AL) Number, and other information related to the federal award. By attaching the notice of award with each allocation letter, the State will ensure that the subrecipients are aware of the award information.Person ResponsibleCourtney Ho, Program and Evaluation AdministratorJovanie Domingo Dela Cruz, Executive DirectorAnticipated Date of CompletionJune 30, 2022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2021-010
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. ConditionDuring our audit, we examined a non statistical sample of two subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward.Criteria2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward.EffectWithout evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients.Cause and View of Responsible OfficialsDue to lack of formal procedures at the inception of the program in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, program management was unaware of the requirement to formally assess each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. However, in fiscal years 2020 and 2021, subawards were only provided to other state agencies and county governments within the State that regularly receive federal funding and are familiar with federal requirements.RecommendationWe recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following:? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards;? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program;? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and? The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-010 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency)Governor?s OfficeAL No. COVID-19 ? 21.019 ? COVID-19 ? Coronavirus Relief FundDirect award from the United States Treasury (Award no. Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act 2020Condition2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Auditor examined a non-statistical sample of six subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward.Corrective Action PlanConcurThe Office of Federal Award Management (OFAM) will ensure that program personnel are familiar with federal assistance requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires pass-through entities to communicate all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and perform risk assessments of subrecipients. OFAM will develop and/or enhance procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following:1) The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards;2) The results of previous audits including whether the subrecipient requires a single audit in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program;3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems;4) The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency).Person ResponsibleMark Anderson, Administrator, Office of Federal Awards Management, State Department of Budget and FinanceAnticipated Date of CompletionJune 30, 2022

Prior Finding References

2020-007

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2020-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 28, 2021, which was (1788 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-005
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Finding No. 2020-005: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DLIR) Federal Agency: Department of Labor CFDA Number and Title: 17.225 ? Unemployment Insurance COVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: UI-34054-20-55-A-15 2020 UI-34160-20-55-A-15 2020 UI-34492-20-60-A-15 2020 UI-34711-20-55-A-15 2020 UIPL No. 13-20 2020 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified minimum cases and timeliness requirements were not met regarding paid and denied claims. Criteria Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The required number of cases and the timeliness percentages for completing paid and denied claims are as follows: Paid Claims ? Minimum cases: 480 paid cases ? Timeliness percentages: Complete 70% within 60 days, 95% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Denied Claims ? Minimum cases: 450 denied cases (150 cases for each category: monetary, separation and non separation) ? Timeliness percentages: Complete 60% within 60 days, 85% within 90 days, and 98% within 120 days Effect Failure to meet timeliness requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, the department was significantly impacted with an increase in unemployment claims. Employees were also hindered from working for a substantial amount of time due to government-mandated shutdowns and other restrictions. Recommendation We recommend that the State department develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-005 ? Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness) (Page 29) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations CFDA No. 12.225 ? Unemployment Insurance COVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Direct award from the U.S. Department of Labor (Award nos. UI-34054-2055-A-15, UI-34160-20-55-A-15, UI-34492-20-60-A-15, UI-34711-20-55-A-15 and UIPL No. 13-20; all grants ? 2020) Corrective Action Plan Concur. Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) minimum cases and timeliness requirements were not met for paid claims and denied claims for the fiscal year 2020. Effective July 1, 2019, Hawaii became a large state with a minimum case load increase from 360 to 480. The Quality Control unit is tasked with performing BAM. The unit was not staffed to perform 480 cases, additionally, a seasoned investigator retired. The COVID-19 Pandemic caused an overwhelming demand for claims filing services, all QC staff were re-assigned to provide support for claims taking functions beginning March 18, 2020. USDOL approved exemptions of paid cases from April to June 2020) and denied cases from 202011 to 202113 (March 16, 2020 to March 2021). QC staff have been reassigned back to their job. Hired 1 investigator. Recruiting at least 1 more staff. QC supervisor is monitoring each investigator?s caseload and meeting with individual investigators weekly to discuss cases. Discussed with QC staff the importance of meeting the minimum cases and timeliness requirements Person Responsible: Sheryl Ozaki, Quality Control Supervisor Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2021

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-006
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

Finding No. 2020-006: Eligibility (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: "See Effect" State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Labor CFDA Number and Title: COVID 19 ? 17.225 ? COVID 19 ? Unemployment Insurance Award Number and Award Year: UI-34711-20-55-A-15 2020 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we were informed by DLIR management that there were inappropriate benefit payments made to ineligible claimants under the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program. Criteria The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Section 2102 contains eligibility requirements for the PUA program. Effect Failure to comply with the eligibility requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and may result in recapture of funds by the awarding agency. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.516(a)(6), the questioned cost is not required to be disclosed as releasing such information could compromise current investigative proceedings. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, the department was significantly impacted with an increase in unemployment claims, resulting in management initially prioritizing the processing and payment of claims over ensuring claimants were fully eligible to receive PUA benefits. However, we noted existing detective controls subsequently identified the ineligible payments. Management subsequently implemented additional preventive controls to ensure eligibility of claims and is pursuing recovery of ineligible payments. Employees were also hindered from working for a substantial amount of time due to government-mandated shutdowns and other restrictions. Recommendation We recommend that the State department develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with eligibility requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-006 ? Eligibility (Significant Deficiency) (Page 31) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations CFDA No. COVID-19 ? 17.225 ? COVIC-19 Unemployment Insurance Direct award from the U.S. Department of Labor (Award no. UI-34711-20-55-A-15 2020) Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLIR management identified four areas of improper payment during the audit as described below: 1) Improper payment due to incorrect deductible earnings calculation on the PUA benefit system. Due to the urgency of the State to provide PUA, the Department had minimal opportunity for testing prior to implementation. The error in the deductible earnings calculation was identified approximately 1 month after the first PUA payments were processed. The correction to the calculation was put into production on June 3, 2020, however it resulted in overpayments to some weeks claims. 2) Improper payments due to fraud/identity theft. The Department took what was believed, at the time, to be reasonable security measures to identify potential fraud claims. The fraud detection system used credit score data matching and a fraud scoring system to identify fraud. As attacks began to increase and more analytic data became available, the fraud detection system was enhanced to identify suspicious banks, email addresses, IP addresses and other suspicious behavior to identify suspected ID theft. The Department implemented new ID verification processes to look back on already paid claims resulting in retroactive denials. To adequately address the widespread fraud, as of January 21, 2021, all claimants are required to provide ID verification documentation which includes a government issued ID, Social Security Card and a photo of themselves holding their government issued ID. 3) Improper payment because the claimant did not meet one of the acceptable COVID-19 eligibility reasons. Per guidance from the USDOL in UIPL 16-20 Change 1, ?An individual must self-certify that he or she is unemployed, partially unemployed, or unable or unavailable to work because of a COVID-19 related reason listed in section 2102(a)(3)(A)(ii)(I) of the CARES Act. Unlike DUA, an individual filing for PUA does not need to provide proof of employment or self-employment to qualify, nor does PUA take into account the individual?s principal source of income as part of the self-certification process.? Based on this guidance, claims were initially paid based on self-certifications alone. As it became more apparent that the program was susceptible to fraud, the following guidance was subsequently provided to States in UIPL 16-20 change 2. ?While Section 2102 of the CARES Act relies on self-certification to verify that an individual is covered under the PUA program, the state has authority to request supporting documentation when investigating the potential for fraud and improper payments.? In response to this guidance, the agency began reviewing claims that were suspicious in nature, resulting in retroactive denials when it was determined that claimants did not meet the COVID-19 eligibility requirements. The Department continues to review claims to ensure they meet the eligibility requirements in section 2102(a)(3)(A)(ii)(I) of the CARES Act. 4) Improper payment because the claimant was eligible or potentially eligible for regular UI or extended benefits. PUA is not payable to individuals who are eligible for regular UI or EB under State or Federal law. Due to the urgency of the State to provide PUA, the Department did not have sufficient time to implement a crossmatch between the PUA benefit system and the Hawaii Unemployment Insurance (HUI) benefit system prior to payment. Initial payments were made out of the PUA benefits system on May 15, 2020 while the Department was in the process of programming a crossmatch with the regular UI system and UI wage records to identify eligible or potentially eligible UI claim. The crossmatch went into production on June 22, 2020, which identified a significant number of claims potentially eligible for regular UI. Implementation of this crossmatch has substantially decreased the number of improperly paid claims due to UI eligibility. Person Responsible: Michelle Hamilton, UI Program Specialist/Federal Program Coordinator Anticipated Date of Completion: Completed

About Eligibility →
2020-007
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

Finding No. 2020-007: Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: Governor?s Office Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury CFDA Number and Title: COVID 19 ? 21.019 ? COVID 19 ? Coronavirus Relief Fund Award Number and Award Year: CARES Act 2020 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non-statistical sample of two subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to lack of formal procedures at the inception of the program in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, program management was unaware of the requirement to formally assess each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. However, in fiscal year 2020, subawards were only provided to county governments within the State that regularly receive federal funding and are familiar with federal requirements. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a pass-through entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-007 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) (Page 32) Governor?s Office CFDA No. COVID-19 ? 21.019 ? COVID-19 ? Coronavirus Relief Fund Direct award from the United States Treasury (Award no. Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act 2020 Corrective Action Plan Concur. Subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was addressed in the Coronavirus Relief Fund State-County Handbook. However, risk of noncompliance was not differentiated by county as all counties receiving subawards were deemed to have equal experience in the management of federal funds. To address this finding, staff from the Department of Budget and Finance, Office of Federal Awards Management will conduct a formal evaluation of a subrecipient?s risk of non-compliance, sufficient to meet the requirements of 2 CRF Part 200.331 (b), before a subaward is made. Person Responsible: Mark Anderson, Administrator, Office of Federal Awards Management, State Department of Budget and Finance Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2019-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2020. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2020, which was (2151 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2019-005
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

Finding No. 2019-005: Allowable Costs (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $3,617,688 State Agency: Department of Defense (DOD) Federal Agency: Department of Defense CFDA Number and Title: 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Award Number and Award Year: W912-12J6-18-2-4001 2019 W912-12J6-18-2-400K 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non-statistical sample of 15 payroll expenditures and identified there were no certifications for any of the 15 employees selected for testing. Criteria In accordance to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, when employees work on a single Federal award or cost objective, the entity is required to provide at least semi-annually certifications that employees worked solely on the assigned program. Certifications must be signed by the employee or supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Effect Failure to obtain certifications or other equivalent employee compensation support resulted in noncompliance with federal grant requirements. Without such support, it is unclear whether the employees worked solely on the federal program. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to an unexpected change in program personnel and lack of training, program management was unaware that payroll expenditures are required to be supported by certifications. Recommendation We recommend that management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including the requirements in OMB Circular A-87. Management should develop procedures to ensure payroll expenditures charged to federal awards are adequately supported.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-005 ? Allowable Costs (Material Weakness) (Page 28) State Department of Defense CFDA No. 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Direct award from the U.S. Department of Defense (Award nos. W912-12J6-18-2-4001 2019 and W912-12J6-18-2-400K 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Youth Challenge Program, going forward, will be including the required instructions and processes of the Federal Staff Payroll Certification in the Program?s amended Financial Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). Beyond such, no further corrective action plan may be required as the responsible program staff member, Budget Officer, has completed an up-to-date current certification for State fiscal year 2020 and will ensure such required certification is completed and provided going forward. Person Responsible: Ariel Matsumoto, Hawaii Youth Challenge Academy Budget Officer Anticipated Date of: Completion Completed

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-006
Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Finding No. 2019-006: Period of Performance (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DOD Federal Agency: Department of Defense CFDA Number and Title: 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Award Number and Award Year: W912-12J6-16-2-4001 2017 W912-12J6-16-2-400K 2017 W912-12J6-17-2-4001 2018 W912-12J6-17-2-400K 2018 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we noted four instances where there was no available evidence to verify the award closeout reports were prepared. While there were no expenditures under the awards during fiscal year 2019, it does not appear the State closed the awards in a timely matter. Criteria National Guard Regulation (NGR) 5-1, Section 11-10 requires final accounting and settlement within 90 days after the end of the Federal fiscal year, or upon termination or closeout of an award, whichever is earlier. Effect Failure to submit reports on a timely basis prevents the granting agency from timely assessing the status and activities of the program. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to an unexpected change in program personnel and lack of training, program management was unaware of the period of performance requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the State department follow the policies and procedures established to comply with period of performance requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-006 ? Period of Performance (Material Weakness) (Page 29) State Department of Defense CFDA No. 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Direct award from the U.S. Department of Defense (Award nos. W912-12J6-16-2-4001 2017, W912-12J6-16-2400K 2017, W912-12J6-17-2-4001 2018 and W912-12J6-17-2-400K 2018) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Youth Challenge Program, going forward, will be including the required instructions and processes of the required National Guard Bureau, closeout procedures and deadlines, in the Program?s amended Financial Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). Grant years 2017 and 2018 are being currently addressed for closing between the program?s Budget Officer and the federal Grants Officer Representative (GOR). Apart from the lack of instructions and guidelines originally provided for closing said years and the sudden, unforeseen change of the program?s Budget Officer, the program has been unable to close out said grants due to Federal cashflow related discrepancies and suspense issues. The YCA federal funds (cashflow) are awarded to the program as monthly pre-approved advances. The National Guard Bureau has thus far and continues to be inconsistent on providing the programs advances in an adequate and timely manner. Due to this, the program has on-going issues sustaining sufficient cash funds to pay its current obligated expenditures. Insufficiency has left the program unable to process a timely and proper close out. Program is actively collaborating with its federal contacts at the United States Property and Fiscal Office of Hawaii to correct cashflow discrepancies and closeout said grant years. Person Responsible: Ariel Matsumoto, Hawaii Youth Challenge Academy Budget Officer Anticipated Date of Completion: March 30, 2020

About Period of Performance →
2019-007
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Finding No. 2019-007: Reporting (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DOD Federal Agency: Department of Defense CFDA Number and Title: 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Award Number and Award Year: W912-12J6-18-2-4001 2019 W912-12J6-18-2-400K 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we selected a non-statistical sample of four Quarterly Budget Summary Reports to examine and identified three instances where there was no available evidence to verify the reports were prepared. Criteria The National Guard Master Youth Program Cooperative Agreement requires Quarterly Budget Summary Reports to be submitted within 30 days after the end of each quarter. Effect The failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds hindering monitoring by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to an unexpected change in program personnel and lack of training, program management was unaware of the reporting requirements. Recommendation We recommend the State department implement adequate review of reports and ensure that individuals responsible for preparing and reviewing reports have adequate knowledge of reporting requirements

Corrective Action Plan

2019-007 ? Reporting (Material Weakness) (Page 30) State Department of Defense CFDA No. 12.404 ? National Guard ChalleNGe Program Direct award from the U.S. Department of Defense (Award nos. W912-12J6-18-2-4001 2019 and W912-12J6-18-2-400K 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Youth Challenge Program, going forward, will be including the required instructions and processes of the required National Guard Bureau, Quarterly Reports, in the Program?s amended Financial Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). Beyond such, no further corrective action plan may be required as the responsible program staff member, Budget Officer, has been creating and submitting the correlating Quarterly Reports for State fiscal year 2020 and will ensure such required reports are completed and submitted going forward. Person Responsible: Ariel Matsumoto, Hawaii Youth Challenge Academy Budget Officer Anticipated Date of Completion: Completed

About Reporting →
2019-008
Cash Management
REPEAT
Condition

Finding No. 2019-008: Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Federal Agency: Department of the Interior CFDA Number and Title: 15.615 ? Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (R&D Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: F17AF01091 2017 Repeat Finding? Yes, Finding No. 2018-009 Condition During our audit, we examined 14 haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified two instances totaling approximately $52,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal cash draws and the disbursement payment to vendors was greater than 25 days. For these two instances, the time elapsed was 26 and 74 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it does not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible. Criteria U.S. Department of the Treasury Regulations 31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State?s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State?s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Based on our testing, we determined 25 days to be a reasonable period of time to disburse cash after receipt from the federal government. Effect The delay in disbursing advances from federal funding prevents the use of those funds for more urgent purposes by the federal government. This could also result in the State losing future federal funding or the granting agency requiring funding on a reimbursable basis. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lag in disbursing the funds was attributed to the State?s manual deposit and payment process that requires all State departments to process deposits through Department of Budget and Finance (B&F) and payments through DAGS resulting in processing delays. Recommendation The State department should design and implement internal controls over monitoring of cash management timeliness requirements, work with DAGS and B&F to ensure timely disbursement of federal funds, and ensure personnel have adequate knowledge of cash management requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-008 ? Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) (Page 31) State Department of Land and Natural Resources CFDA No.15.615 ? Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (R&D Cluster) Direct award from the U.S. Department of the Interior (Award no. F17AF01091 2017) Corrective Action Plan Concur. DLNR has implemented stronger internal controls and is working on improving additional processes to be compliant with cash management requirements. Person Responsible: Cynthia C. Gomez, Fiscal Management Officer Anticipated Date of Completion: Completed

Prior Finding References

2018-009

About Cash Management →
2019-009
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
REPEAT
Condition

Finding No. 2019-009: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost:$0 State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of the Interior CFDA Number and Title: 15.615 ? Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (R&D Cluster) Award Number and Award Year: F18AF01203 2019 Repeat Finding? Yes, Finding No. 2018-010 Condition During our audit, we examined one contract executed in fiscal year 2019 but found no evidence indicating that DLNR verified whether the contractor was not federally suspended or debarred. We verified that the vendor was not suspended or debarred in the SAM. Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.213, regulations restrict awards, subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, ineligible from, or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Therefore, verification is required that either checks the SAM, collects a certification from the contractor, or adds a clause or condition to the contract. Effect Without performing a verification as noted in the above criteria, there is a possibility the contractor is suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds which could result in the State losing future federal funding. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The personnel responsible for procurement indicated that a review of SAM.gov was performed prior to the execution of the contract extension; however, no formal documentation of the review was retained in the contract file. Recommendation The State department should ensure that responsible individuals have the proper knowledge of the State?s policies and procedures for procurement of contracts, including requirements to ensure that vendors for federally funded contracts are checked against the federal SAM website to ensure the contractor is not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Evidence of verification checks should also be maintained in the contract file and reviewed by the responsible person(s)

Corrective Action Plan

2019-009 ? Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) (Page 32) State Department of Land and Natural Resources CFDA No.15.615 ? Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (R&D Cluster) Direct award from the U.S. Department of the Interior (Award no. F18AF01203 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. DOFAW will make sure that documentation is printed out from SAM.gov and is filed with the contract folder. Also, all contract encumbrances will be checked by Program Specialist before sending it to Administrative Services Office for processing. Person Responsible: Michelle del Rosario, Program Specialist Anticipated Date of Completion: Completed

Prior Finding References

2018-010

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2019-010
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Finding No. 2019-010: Earmarking (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of the Interior CFDA Number and Title: 15.904 ? Historic Preservation Fund Grants-In-Aid Award Number and Award Year: P17AF00042 2017 P18AF00101 2018 Repeat Finding? Yes, Finding No. 2018-012 Condition During our audit, we noted 10% of federal funds awarded were not obligated to certified local governments (CLGs) within the first year of the award P18AF00101, and 10% of the federal funds were not expended for transfers to local governments by the end of the second year for award P17AF00042. Criteria Recipients are required to pass through at least 10% of each year?s award as subgrants to CLGs or they will be recaptured by the National Park Service (NPS). According to paragraph (4) of Section 3029-02(c) of the National Historic Preservation Act, not less than 10% of the annual apportionment shall be transferred by the State to CLGs for historic preservation projects or programs of the CLGs. Effect Failure to comply with the awards earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and may result in the recapture of funds by the awarding agency. Cause and View of Responsible Officials NPS funding of the Historic Preservation Fund Grants-in-Aid program to the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) was not awarded until late in the grant years. Award P18AF00101, with a grant period of October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2020, was issued on August 26, 2019, after the end of the first year of the award. In addition, the second and final modification to Award P17AF00042 extended the grant through September 30, 2018 and included the final increment of federal funds but was not received until August 15, 2018, which left only one month left in the grant period. Recommendation The State department should continue to work with the federal awarding agency and seek guidance on how it can meet earmarking requirements when there are delays in the awarding of the federal grants.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-010 ? Earmarking (Material Weakness) (Page 33) State Department of Land and Natural Resources CFDA No.15.904 ? Historic Preservation Fund Grants-In-Aid Direct award from the U.S. Department of the Interior (Award nos. P17AF00042 2017 and P18AF00101 2018) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The Division concurs with the finding and the statement of cause. However, with regard to it being a repeat finding of PY No. 2018-012, it must be noted that the funding for both grant awards were delayed for a considerable period of time by NPS which resulted in the Division?s inability to issue the required 10% pass through to the CLG participants during the term of the grants. The Division will continue to work with NPS to improve the communication for funding. Resolution of this finding is dependent on NPS releasing funds in a timely manner. Person Responsible: Alan S. Downer, Ph.D., SHPD Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-012

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2019-011
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

Finding No. 2019-011: Special Tests and Provisions (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DLNR Federal Agency: Department of the Interior CFDA Number and Title: 15.904 ? Historic Preservation Fund Grants-In-Aid Award Number and Award Year: P17AF00042 2017 P17AF00003 2016 Repeat Finding? Yes, Finding No. 2018-013 Condition During our audit, we examined six National Register property nominations and noted there was no available evidence to verify that SHPD entered into a memorandum of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations in assessing the cultural significance of the nominated properties. Criteria Pursuant to Section 101(d), subsection (6)(c) of the National Historic Preservation Act, the State must enter into a memorandum of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations for the assessment of the cultural significance of any property in determining whether to nominate such property to the National Register, and to carry out the cultural component of such preservation program or plan. Effect Failure to enter into memorandums of agreement or understanding with Native Hawaiian organizations in determining the cultural significance of nominated properties could lead to a preservation plan that does not adequately address the property?s cultural significance. A lack of an agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations may result in SHPD losing its Federal funding. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Program management believes the objectives of the memorandums of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations were met through alternative means. Recommendation The State department should either clarify with the federal awarding agency whether the memorandums of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations are required, or develop procedures and controls to ensure that the memorandums are executed. For award year 2018, memorandums of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations in assessing the cultural significance of the nominated properties is no longer a grant requirement.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-011 ? Special Tests and Provisions (Significant Deficiency) (Page 34) State Department of Land and Natural Resources CFDA No.15.904 ? Historic Preservation Fund Grants-In-Aid Direct award from the U.S. Department of the Interior (Award nos. P17AF00042 2017 and P17AF00003 2016) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The SHPD will continue to work to ensure that the proper procedures and controls are in place to meet all requirements for consulting Native Hawaiian organizations in accordance with grant award and Section 101(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act. The SHPD will continue to negotiate a memorandum of agreement with a Native Hawaiian organization and will also work with the National Park Service to obtain clarification on questions to specific requirements. Person Responsible: Alan S. Downer, Ph.D., SHPD Administrator Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-013

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-012
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

Finding No. 2019-012: Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DLIR Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services CFDA Number and Title: 93.569 ? Community Services Block Grant Award Number and Award Year: 75-17-1536 2017 75-18-1536 2018 75-19-1536 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non-statistical sample of three subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State department may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The failure to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance at the time of subaward was due to a change in program personnel at the time of the subrecipient contract?s execution. As such, program personnel were unaware of the risk assessment requirement. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should work with the federal agency to develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a passthrough entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: ?The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ?The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ?Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ?The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-012 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) (Page 35) State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations CFDA No. 93.569 ? Community Services Block Grant Direct award from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Award nos. 75-17-1536 2017, 75-18-1536 2018 and 75-19-1536 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. The issue resulted from staff turnover at the time of the subrecipient?s contract execution, and program personnel did not notate the date on which the risk assessment was conducted prior to contracting. The OCS Program and Evaluation Administrator will resolve this issue by notating the date that each risk assessment is conducted. Risk assessments will continue to be conducted annually, prior to each CSBG subrecipient?s contract execution. Person Responsible: Courtney Ho, Program and Evaluation Administrator Jovanie Domingo Dela Cruz, Executive Director Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2020

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2019-013
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

Finding No. 2019-013: Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agency: DOD Federal Agency: Department of Defense CFDA Number and Title: 97.036 ? Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance (Presidential Declared Disasters) Award Number and Award Year: FEMA-4365-DR-HI 2019 FEMA-4366-DR-HI 2019 FEMA-4282-DR-HI 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we examined a non-statistical sample of four subawards but found no evidence of evaluation of the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State department may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to lack of personnel training, program management was unaware of the subrecipient monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should work with the federal agency to develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a passthrough entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: ?The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ?The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ?Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ?The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. Starting award year 2020, program management will utilize a formal risk assessment form when determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward

Corrective Action Plan

2019-013 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Significant Deficiency) (Page 36) State Department of Defense CFDA No. 97.036 ? Disaster Grants-Public Assistance (Presidential Declared Disasters) Direct award from the U.S. Department of Defense (Award nos. FEMA-4365-DR-HI 2019, FEMA- 4366-DR-HI 2019 and FEMA-4282-DR-HI 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. A Risk Assessment Form was internally developed by staff, addressing the applicant?s experience with the FEMA Public Assistance Program, including the most recent experience in the past 5 years. Person Responsible: Lorinda Wong-Lau, Disaster Assistance Section Chief Anticipated Date of Completion: Completed

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2019-014
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Finding No. 2019-014: Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) Questioned Cost: $0 State Agencies: DOD Federal Agency: Department of Defense CFDA Number and Title: 97.042 ? Emergency Management Performance Grants Award Number and Award Year: EMF-2018-EP-00006-S-01 2019 Repeat Finding? No Condition During our audit, we tested a non-statistical sample of three subawards for two subrecipients and determined that in all three instances the State department did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements: The State department did not provide all required federal award information in the subaward contracts. The State department also did not evaluate the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance at the time of the subaward. Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) requires subawards to clearly identify information, such as the Federal Award Identification Number, identification of whether the award is R&D, and indirect cost rate. 2 CFR Section 200.331(b) requires a pass-through entity to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Effect By not including the required information in the subaward, subrecipients may have trouble complying with federal grant requirements. Without evaluating the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance and determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures necessary, the State department may not be providing the appropriate level of monitoring over its subrecipients. Cause and View of Responsible Officials Due to lack of personnel training, program management was unaware of the monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend that program management ensure that program personnel are familiar with all grant requirements, including compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 which requires the reporting of all necessary federal award information to subrecipients and risk assessments of subrecipients. Management should work with the federal agency to develop procedures that ensure the State department?s responsibilities as a passthrough entity are fulfilled, including a formal analysis of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with each of the respective subaward requirements. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors as the following: ?The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ?The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ?Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ?The extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-014 ? Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) (Page 37) State Department of Defense CFDA No. 97.042 ? Emergency Management Performance Grants Direct award from the U.S. Department of Defense (Award no. EMF-2018-EP-00006-S-01 2019) Corrective Action Plan Concur. HI-EMA revised the Subrecipient Grant Agreement Articles and Special Conditions for all Hawaii counties for the FY 2019 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) grant. This new document includes all required federal information. This was completed in the fall of 2019 as part of an improvement to document processes and procedures to support the management and administration of the EMPG program. HI-EMA also conducted technical assistance site visits in the fall of 2019 with each county?s emergency management leadership and grants management staff to discuss changes in programmatic and financial processes to be implemented with the FY2019 EMPG award. HI-EMA began to document process and procedures in a ?HI-EMA Business Function Guide ? Grants?, dated November 2019 and is being used in conjunction with the Hawaii Office of Homeland Security?s 2018 Homeland Security Grant Program Procedural Manual to support the management and administration of EMPG program. For the FY2019 EMPG Award, HI-EMA is leveraging the Hawaii Office of Homeland Security business process for evaluation of subrecipients? risk of non-compliance. Risk assessments were conducted for each county and the information was shared with HI-EMA. Moving forward for FY2020 EMPG, HI-EMA will be standardizing a process for a common risk assessment form for the multiple federal grant funds that are managed and administered. Person Responsible: Luke Meyers, Executive Officer Anticipated Date of Completion: May 31, 2020

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2018-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2019, which was (2520 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2018-005
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-005

About Cash Management →
2018-006
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2018-007
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-008
Equipment & Real Property
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2018-009
Cash Management
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-011

About Cash Management →
2018-010
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-011
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-012
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-012

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2018-013
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-013

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-014
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-014

About Cash Management →
2018-015
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2018-016
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2018-017
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2017-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2018. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2018, which was (2893 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2017-005
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2017-006
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2017-007
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-007

About Cash Management →
2017-008
Cost Allowability
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-009
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-008

About Cash Management →
2017-010
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2017-011
Cash Management
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-010

About Cash Management →
2017-012
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2017-013
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-014
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-011

About Cash Management →
2017-015
Eligibility
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2017-016
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2017-017
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-018
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2017. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 16, 2017, which was (3261 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2016-005
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-006
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2016-007
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-005

About Cash Management →
2016-008
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-008

About Cash Management →
2016-009
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-012

About Reporting →
2016-010
Cash Management
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-013

About Cash Management →
2016-011
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-018

About Cash Management →
2016-012
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-013
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-014
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-015
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-016
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2016-017
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-018
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-021

About Cash Management →
2016-019
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.