EIN: 956006621
UEI: V82KKZVBQA53
Data as of August 22, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2021 (1787 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The District's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $5,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. No issues were noted as a result of testing only that the policies have not been updated for the Uniform Guidance. The District did not have the above written policies. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Not applicable - lack of required written policies and procedures. Cause: The District was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The District was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures and some purchases could have been made without the required number of quotes and corresponding documentation. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: Procurement - ($3,500 or less) may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations, (b) small purchases ($3,500 to $150,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, and (c) sealed bids required for purchases in excess of $150,000. The Uniform Guidance has various requirements for written policies and procedures. Section 200.318 of the Uniform Guidance requires written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Section 200.430 of the Uniform Guidance requires established written policies regarding compensation. Condition: The District's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $5,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. No issues were noted as a result of testing only that the policies have not been updated for the Uniform Guidance. The District did not have the above written policies. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Not applicable - lack of required written policies and procedures. Cause: The District was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The District was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures and some purchases could have been made without the required number of quotes and corresponding documentation. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
2020-001 Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse ? CFDA No. 15.504 Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District has a procurement policy in place and will adjust it to make sure it complies with the uniform guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Karen Jassoy. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: During fiscal year ending June 30, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.