EIN: 956000705
UEI: CLB3ME1BNL19
Data as of August 20, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 20, 2027 (153 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Finding No. SA 2025-001 – Noncompliance with FFATA Subaward Reporting Requirements Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Title: Community Development Block Grants/ Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Period: Fiscal year 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), direct recipients of grants and cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the System for Award Management (SAM) within the prescribed reporting timeframe. Condition: The City did not report required first‑tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the System for Award Management (SAM) in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Cause: The City did not establish formalized policies and procedures to identify programs subject to FFATA reporting requirements and to ensure timely collection, review, and submission of first‑tier subaward data to SAM. In addition, responsibilities for FFATA compliance were not clearly assigned, and there was no monitoring control in place to verify that required subaward information was reported accurately and within the prescribed reporting timelines. Effect: Failure to timely submit FFATA subaward reports constitutes noncompliance with federal transparency and reporting requirements and may result in sanctions, including fines and penalties, as well as the suspension or termination of federal awards. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Summary Schedule or Prior Year Audit Findings (SA 2024-001). Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish and implement formal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, including timely identification and reporting of first‑tier subawards to the System for Award Management (SAM). Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Housing Manager and Management Analyst/Grant Writer are collaboratively working to ensure FFATA reports are completed prior to disbursing funds to subawardees. Personnel responsible for implementation Vanessa Sedano, Housing Manager Completion Date: June 30, 2026
The Housing Manager and Management Analyst/Grant Writer are collaboratively working to ensure FFATA reports are completed prior to disbursing funds to subawardees. Personnel responsible for implementation Vanessa Sedano, Housing Manager Completion Date: June 30, 2026
2024-001
Finding No. SA 2025-002 – Noncompliance with CSLFRF Period of Performance Requirements Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: Fiscal year 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and Compliance and Reporting Guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, no new obligations or costs may be incurred during the period beginning January 1, 2025 and ending on December 31, 2026. During this two-year period from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2026, recipients are only permitted to expend funds to satisfy obligations incurred or CSLFRF funds obligated by December 31, 2024. Condition: The City incurred and reported expenditures totaling $10,764 during the period from January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025, which were not related to CSLFRF funds obligated on or before December 31, 2024. Cause: The City did not have adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures in place to monitor compliance with the CSLFRF period of performance requirements. Effect: Expenditures incurred after the allowable obligation period constitute noncompliance with CSLFRF program requirements and may result in questioned costs, repayment of funds, or other sanctions, including fines, penalties, or the suspension or termination of federal awards. Questioned Costs: $10,764 Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen controls over monitoring the period of performance for CSLFRF funds to ensure that expenditures are incurred only in accordance with U.S. Department of the Treasury requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Finance Department staff will review all items prior to completing the report. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
The Finance Department staff will review all items prior to completing the report. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Finding No. SA 2025-003 – Untimely Submission of Project and Expenditure Report Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: Fiscal year 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and Compliance and Reporting Guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) program, the Project and Expenditure Reports should be submitted on the last day of the month after the end of each quarter. Condition: The City did not submit the Project and Expenditure Report within the required reporting timeframe for the following quarter: Quarter Months Deadline Date Submitted Lag in Days 2024-3 July 1 - September 30, 2025 10/31/2024 11/1/2024 1 Cause: Due to the transition of the City’s Finance Director, the Accounting Manager did not have timely access to the CSLFRF reporting portal and was working with program administrators to obtain the required access, resulting in a delay in report submission. Effect: Late submission of the Project and Expenditure Report constitutes noncompliance with CSLFRF reporting requirements and may result in sanctions imposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, including fines, penalties, or the suspension or termination of federal award funding. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: Yes. See Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings (SA 2024-003). Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen procedures to ensure continuity of reporting access and strictly adhere to reporting deadlines established by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Accounting Manager assumed responsibility for the quarterly Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) reporting process following the unexpected departure of the former Finance Director. Due to the abrupt transition and issues associated with obtaining access to the portal, the entity experienced a delay in submitting the Q1 2025 Project and Expenditure Report by the required deadline. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions (Continued): Management acknowledges the importance of timely compliance with federal reporting requirements. Since access to the Treasury reporting portal was established, all subsequent Project and Expenditure Reports have been submitted timely. Personnel responsible for implementation: Veronica Alvarez, Deputy Finance Director Completion Date: June 30, 2026
The Accounting Manager assumed responsibility for the quarterly Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) reporting process following the unexpected departure of the former Finance Director. Due to the abrupt transition and issues associated with obtaining access to the portal, the entity experienced a delay in submitting the Q1 2025 Project and Expenditure Report by the required deadline. Management acknowledges the importance of timely compliance with federal reporting requirements. Since access to the Treasury reporting portal was established, all subsequent Project and Expenditure Reports have been submitted timely. Personnel responsible for implementation: Veronica Alvarez, Deputy Finance Director Completion Date: June 30, 2026
2024-003
Finding No. SA 2025-004 – Inaccurate and Unreconciled Reporting of Project and Expenditure Reports Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: Fiscal year 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Pursuant to 2 CFR §200.1, internal controls for non Federal entities are defined as processes designed and implemented to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: (1) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (2) reliability of reporting for internal and external use, and (3) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Accounting Manager is responsible for reviewing the completeness and accuracy of the quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports (PERs) submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury and ensuring that reported amounts agree with the City’s financial records, including the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Condition: During our review of the quarterly reports, we identified unreconciled differences totaling $1,865 between amounts reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and the quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Cause: Incorrect adjustments were recorded during the preparation of the quarterly reports, and reconciliation procedures were not sufficient to identify and resolve these differences prior to submission. Effect: The Project and Expenditure Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury were not fully accurate or complete. Inaccurate reporting may result in noncompliance with federal requirements and could lead to fines, penalties, or the suspension or termination of federal awards. Questioned Costs: $1,865 Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City enhance review and reconciliation procedures over the preparation of Project and Expenditure Reports to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete, and fully reconciled to the City’s financial records, including the SEFA, prior to submission. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Finance Staff will perform quarterly reconciliations of expenditures to ensure accurate reporting of amounts. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
The Finance Staff will perform quarterly reconciliations of expenditures to ensure accurate reporting of amounts. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Finding No. SA 2025-005 – Inclusion of Anticipated Equitable Sharing Funds in the Adopted Budget Federal Assistance Listing Number: 16.922 Federal Program Title: Equitable Sharing Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Justice Award Period: Fiscal year 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Per the OMB Compliance Supplement and guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Justice for the Equitable Sharing Program, agencies are permitted to earmark in their budgets only Equitable Sharing funds that have been awarded and received and are currently on hand. Agencies may not budget or commit anticipated or future Equitable Sharing funds that have not yet been awarded or received. Condition: The City’s adopted budget included anticipated Equitable Sharing funds that had not yet been awarded or received. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that only awarded and received Equitable Sharing funds were included in the adopted budget. Effect: Including anticipated funds in the adopted budget may result in noncompliance with Equitable Sharing Program requirements and could lead to sanctions such as suspension or permanent exclusion from the program, denial or extinguishment of future sharing requests, or the requirement to return previously disbursed funds. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen procedures over budget preparation related to the Equitable Sharing Program to ensure that only Equitable Sharing funds that have been awarded and received are included in the adopted budget. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Finance Staff will collaborate with Police Department Staff during the budgeting process to ensure that revenue is not inappropriately budgeted. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
The Finance Staff will collaborate with Police Department Staff during the budgeting process to ensure that revenue is not inappropriately budgeted. Personnel responsible for implementation: Carmen Tsui, Grant Accountant Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 2, 2026, which was (171 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding No. SA 2024-001 – Reporting Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Title: Community Development Block Grants/ Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Period: Fiscal year 2024 Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and Compliance and the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition: The City was unable to report the first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the FSRS. Cause: No sufficient internal controls, policies, and procedures were in place to ensure that the timely submission of FFATA reports was completed for the first-tier subawards. Effect: Delayed/late and non-submission of the report is considered non-compliance with the program requirements and may result in fines and penalties as well as suspension or termination of the federal awards. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strictly follow the deadline for reporting submission set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Department has been informed and will implement a procedure to ensure that the FFATA reporting is completed before the sub-award is given to the subrecipient. The department will complete the corrective action plan by June 30, 2025.
The Department has been informed and will implement a procedure to ensure that the FFATA reporting is completed before the sub-award is given to the subrecipient. The department will complete the corrective action plan by June 30, 2025.
Finding No. SA 2024-002 – Suspension and Debarment Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: Fiscal year 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The City was unable to provide evidence that the suspension and debarment status of vendors was checked prior to entering into purchasing contracts. Cause: Procedures were not in place to retain evidence of the debarment status check, as the transaction was exempt from the bidding process as per the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures. Effect: The City is unable to prove that debarment checks took place prior to entering into purchasing Contracts, which may lead to non-compliance with the program requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: Yes, see Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings 2023-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management review its procedures for retaining evidence of debarment status checked prior to entering into purchase agreements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Per the City’s Purchasing Policy & Procedures page 29, “Subscriptions” are listed as a type of purchase that is purchase order exempt. The City’s AP invoice requirements do not reference or specify the requirement of attaching a Suspension and Debarment report to invoice backup. However, moving forward, the new procurement policy for the City has addressed this by including an excerpt specifically for this issue. The Finance Department continuously encourages the departments and staff to attach a copy of the SAM.GOV report for federally funded invoices, even if no PO is needed.
Per the City’s Purchasing Policy & Procedures page 29, “Subscriptions” are listed as a type of purchase that is purchase order exempt. The City’s AP invoice requirements do not reference or specify the requirement of attaching a Suspension and Debarment report to invoice backup. However, moving forward, the new procurement policy for the City has addressed this by including an excerpt specifically for this issue. The Finance Department continuously encourages the departments and staff to attach a copy of the SAM.GOV report for federally funded invoices, even if no PO is needed.
2023-003
Finding No. SA 2024-003 – Reporting Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: Fiscal year 2024 Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and Compliance and Reporting Guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the Project and Expenditure Reports should be submitted on the last day of the month after the end of each quarter. Condition: The City was unable to meet the Project and Expenditure Report Timeline of the following report: Quarter Months Deadline Date Submitted Lag in Days 2024-2 April 1-June 30, 2024 7/31/2024 8/2/2024 2 Cause: With the transition of the Finance Director of the City, the Accounting Manager did not have reporting access and was working with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SFLFR) to grant access. Effect: Delayed/late and non-submission of the report is considered non-compliance with the program requirements and may result in fines and penalties as well as suspension or termination of the federal awards. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strictly follow the deadline for reporting submission set forth by the U.S. Department of Treasury. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Accounting Manager took over quarterly reporting responsibilities after the former Finance Director unexpectedly left the City. However, due to the abruptness, it took some time for the Accounting Manager to gain access to the agency portal, resulting in the Q2 2024 report being submitted past the deadline. Since gaining access to the reporting portal, all reports have been submitted in a timely manner.
The Accounting Manager took over quarterly reporting responsibilities after the former Finance Director unexpectedly left the City. However, due to the abruptness, it took some time for the Accounting Manager to gain access to the agency portal, resulting in the Q2 2024 report being submitted past the deadline. Since gaining access to the reporting portal, all reports have been submitted in a timely manner.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 31, 2025, which was (385 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Title: Community Development Block Grants/ Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria: Per OMB Compliance Supplement and Compliance and Reporting Guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, the Quarterly Report submission deadlines are as follows: PR29 - IDIS Cash on Hand Quarterly Report - Due on or before the 30th of the month following the end of each quarter. Quarterly Performance Report - Due within 10 days of the quarter ending date. Condition: The City was unable to meet the Quarterly Report Timeline of the following reports: Required Report Frequency Period End Due Date Date Submitted Lag in Days Housing Rights Center Quarterly September 30, 2022 10/10/2022 11/10/2022 31 Housing Rights Center Quarterly December 31, 2022 1/10/2023 8/17/2023 219 Housing Rights Center Quarterly March 31, 2023 4/10/2023 8/17/2023 129 Housing Rights Center Quarterly June 30, 2023 7/10/2023 8/17/2023 38 Cause: The vendors were late in submitting reports and invoices. Effect: Delayed/late and non-submission of the report is considered non-compliance with the program requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strictly follow the deadline for reporting submission set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The City hired an additional accountant on July 1, 2023, to oversee all of the Economic Development grants. This accountant is responsible for the review of all reporting and submission.
The City hired an additional accountant on July 1, 2023, to oversee all of the Economic Development grants. This accountant is responsible for the review of all reporting and submission.
Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award require that Contracts be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered. Condition: Based on our review of subjective scoring sheets completed by members of a selection panel for one request for qualifications (RFQ) process, we noted that the project was awarded to the consultant with the lower cumulative score. Additionally, upon review of the staff report for the project, we noted that the staff report indicated there were 4 members on the selection panel, yet we were provided with 5 scoring sheets. Upon inquiry of why the consultant with the lower score was selected and why fewer members of the selection committee were indicated on the staff report than what was expected (based on the number of scoring sheets provided), we were informed that one scoring sheet was excluded from the staff report because it was considered to be an outlier. The exclusion of this scoring sheet resulted in the consultant selected having a higher cumulative score. We were subsequently informed by management that this is the same contract mentioned in finding 2022-005 in the 2022 Single Audit report. This finding is repeated this year as there were disbursements made from the said contract during the FY 2022-2023. We selected four additional scoring sheets to test and noted that the number of members of the selection panel agrees with the number of scoring sheets provided. Cause: The scoring sheet of one selection panel member was excluded from the RFQ results presented to the City Council. Effect: Incomplete information was presented to the City Council for the selection of the consultant for the project. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: Yes, see Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend that unaltered results of RFQ procedures be presented to the City Council. If staff believes there are reasons why a consultant, other than the one with the highest cumulative score should be selected, they may present their recommendation to select the consultant with a lower score to City Council. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: This has been corrected. The Contracts and Procurement Manager reviews all RFPs and RFQs and is present during the evaluation review.
This has been corrected. The Contracts and Procurement Manager reviews all RFPs and RFQs and is present during the evaluation review.
2022-005
Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award require compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The City was unable to provide evidence that the suspension and debarment status of vendors was checked prior to entering into purchasing contracts. Cause: Procedures were not in place to retain evidence of debarment status checks. Effect: The City is unable to prove that debarment checks took place prior to entering into purchasing contracts. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: Yes, see Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings 2022-006. Recommendation: We recommend that management review its procedures for retaining evidence of debarment status checked prior to entering into purchase agreements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: As it pertains to purchases supported by Federal funding, each department is required to obtain supporting documentation that the vendor has not been suspended or disbarred prior to the purchase of the product or service.
As it pertains to purchases supported by Federal funding, each department is required to obtain supporting documentation that the vendor has not been suspended or disbarred prior to the purchase of the product or service.
2022-006
Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria: As a best practice, a supervisory-level person, other than the preparer of a report, should review reports to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data and information in the reports. Condition: Program reports were prepared and reviewed by the same individual. Cause: Controls were not properly designed to assign someone other than the preparer of the reports to review them. Effect: Errors in reporting could go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: Yes, see Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings 2022-007. Recommendation: We recommend that reports be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the reports. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: New procedures have been established to ensure the separation of duties and responsibilities between the individuals who prepare grant reporting and the individuals who review the reports starting FY2024. The accounting manager gathers the data and prepares the grant reporting and then the Finance Director reviews and approves the reporting before it is submitted.
New procedures have been established to ensure the separation of duties and responsibilities between the individuals who prepare grant reporting and the individuals who review the reports starting FY2024. The accounting manager gathers the data and prepares the grant reporting and then the Finance Director reviews and approves the reporting before it is submitted.
2022-007
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 16, 2024, which was (673 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires that Contracts be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered. Condition: Based on our review of subjective scoring sheets completed by members of a selection panel for one request for qualifications (RFQ) process, we noted that the project was awarded to the consultant with the lower cumulative score. Additionally, upon review of the staff report for the project, we noted that the staff report indicated there were 4 members on the selection panel, yet we were provided with 5 scoring sheets. Upon inquiry of why the consultant with the lower score was selected and why fewer members of the selection committee were indicated on the staff report than what was expected (based on the number of scoring sheets provided), we were informed that one scoring sheet was excluded from the staff report because it was considered to be an outlier. The exclusion of this scoring sheet resulted in the consultant selected having a higher cumulative score. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This was the only procurement where these conditions were noted. Cause: The scoring sheet of one selection panel member was excluded from RFQ results presented to City Council. Effect: Incomplete information was presented to City Council for the selection of the consultant for the project. Recommendation: We recommend that unaltered results of RFQ procedures be presented to City Council. If staff believes there are reasons why a consultant, other than the one with the highest cumulative score should be selected, they may present their recommendation to select the consultant with a lower score to City Council.
To help standardize the solicitation of RFP and RFQ the new Contracts and Procurement Manager has drafted revisions and improvements to strengthen current procurement policies. The Contract and Procurement Manager shall be a part of the solicitation process from development of the RFP and RFQ through the rating and selection process to provide oversight and adherence to the adopted purchasing policy. Updated policy language has been proposed that designates the Contract and Procurement Manager to control the flow of evaluation score sheets ensuring a more fair and equitable treatment of bids. As of February 2024, the updated purchasing policy is pending review by the City Attorney’s Office.
Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Titles: Equitable Sharing Program & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.922 & 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The City was unable to provide evidence that suspension and debarment status of vendors was checked prior to entering into purchasing contracts. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 5 of 5 samples for the Equitable Sharing Program and 1 of 5 samples for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program. Cause: Procedures were not in place to retain evidence of debarment status check. Effect: The city is unable to prove that debarment checks took place prior to entering into purchasing contracts. Recommendation: We recommend that management review its procedures for retaining evidence of debarment status checked prior to entering into purchase agreements.
As it pertains to purchases supported by Federal funding, each department is required to obtain supporting documentation that the vendor has not been suspended or disbarred prior to the purchase of the product or service.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria or Specific Requirement: As a best practice, a supervisory-level person, other than the preparer of a report, should review reports to ensure accuracy and completeness of data and information in the reports. Condition: Program reports were prepared and reviewed by the same individual. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 4 reports tested. Cause: Controls were not properly designed to assign someone other than the preparer of the reports to review them. Effect: Errors in reporting could go undetected. Recommendation: We recommend that reports be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the reports.
New procedures have been established to ensure the separation of duties and responsibility between the individuals who prepare grant reporting and the individuals who review the reports. Grant reports will be prepared by one individual and reviewed by supervisory-level staff personnel prior to the submission of the report.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 12, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 12, 2022, which was (1408 days ago).
What is a management decision? →F2021-001: Special Tests and Provisions ? Payment to Subrecipients Federal Catalog Number: 14.231 Federal Program Name: Emergency Shelter Grant Program Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: Volunteers of America of Los Angeles Federal Award Number and Award Year: E-20-MC-06-0517 ? FY 20-21 Criteria: The recipient must pay each subrecipient for allowable costs within 30 days after receiving the subrecipient?s complete payment request. This requirement also applies to each subrecipient that is a unit of general-purpose local government (24 CFR Section 576.203). Condition During our tests of controls and compliance over special tests and provisions pertaining to payments to subrecipients, we noted that 4 out of 7 subrecipient reimbursement requests tested were paid beyond the 30 days requirement. Cause The Housing Division of the City was experiencing a staff shortage due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The division did not have adequate monitoring controls in place to ensure that the payments to subrecipients were processed timely. Effect The City is not paying its subrecipients on a timely basis and is not in compliance with laws and regulations related to special tests and provisions ? payment to subrecipients. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its controls and provide appropriate training to the staff to ensure that payments to subrecipients are made timely and in accordance with the federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Due to the staff turnover in the Housing Division and VOALA as well as the negative impacts of Covid-19 these invoices were not processed timely. Moving forward, the Housing Division will ensure that complete subrecipient invoices will be paid within 30 days of receipt, as per 24 CFR Section 576.203.
Due to the staff turnover in the Housing Division and VOALA as well as the negative impacts of Covid-19 these invoices were not processed timely. Moving forward, the Housing Division will ensure that complete subrecipient invoices will be paid within 30 days of receipt, as per 24 CFR Section 576.203. Corrective Action Plan: The Department will process invoices timely. Responsible Party: Economic Development Director Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2022
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2020. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 4, 2020, which was (2176 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding F 2019-001 ? Lack of Updated Written Policies and Procedures Federal Program Information Federal Catalog Number: 16.922 Federal Program Name: Equitable Sharing Program - Federal Asset Forfeiture Federal Agency: Department of Justice Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: CA019220 - FY18-19 Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures or standards of conduct for the following sections: ? Financial management (200.302) ? Payment (200.305) ? General procurement standards (200.318) ? Competition (200.319) ? Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) ? Compensation ? personal services (200.430) ? Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) ? Relocation costs of employees (200.464) ? Travel costs (200.474) In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to maintain effective internal controls over federal awards. The focus of these policies and procedures should be to ensure that those in the organization who carry out the objectives of the award understand: ? The federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award ? How to evaluate and properly monitor compliance ? The steps to take if noncompliance is identified Condition The City has existing written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct in place that needs to be updated to comply with the Federal awards as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), Subparts D (Post Federal Award Requirements) and E (Costs Principles). Cause The City lacks qualified staff to update its existing written policies, procedures or standards of conduct to ensure that they met the current requirements of the Federal regulations. Effect Failure to establish these policies, procedures or standards puts the City in noncompliance with current Federal regulations and increases the likelihood of fraud, waste, and abuse of Federal funds. It also may increase the likelihood of findings in subsequent Single Audits due to lack of inadequate internal controls. Also, lack of updated written policies and procedures might result to inconsistent practices among employees and/or departments, processing errors due to a lack of knowledge, inability to enforce employee accountability, and noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the City review and update its policies and procedures that assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials Subsequent to the year-end closing, the City started the process of updating its policies and procedures to follow the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Identifying Number: F 2019-001 Audit Finding: The City has existing written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct in place that needs to be updated to comply with the Federal awards as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), Subparts D (Post Federal Award Requirements) and E (Costs Principles). Contact person responsible: Marilyn Toledo, Accounting Manager Subsequent to the FY18-19 year-end closing, the City started the process of updating its policies and procedures to follow the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2020
Finding F 2019-002 ? Equipment Management Federal Program Information Federal Catalog Number: 16.922 Federal Program Name: Equitable Sharing Program - Federal Asset Forfeiture Federal Agency: Department of Justice Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: CA019220 - FY18-19 Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200 require property records to be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal Participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property. In addition, a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Also, effective control and accountability must be maintained for all property and equipment. The City must be able to account for all pieces and equipment purchased from federal funds. The property and equipment listings associated with federal grants should be reviewed periodically by knowledgeable officers to ensure completeness and accuracy. Condition As of June 30, 2019, the City was in the process of completing its physical inventory of equipment, reconciling the inventory to the property records listing and general ledger and updating its property records to ensure that the appropriate details such as: description (including who holds title, use, and condition of the property) as required by the Uniform Guidance are included. Also, we noted the City lacks internal control procedures over properties. The City did not have a complete list of properties. It did not capitalize one of the properties purchased over $5,000 during the year. The City completed the physical inventory count for the Federal Asset Forfeiture program on November 7, 2019 and updated the schedule of capital assets funded by the Federal Asset Forfeiture program with the necessary information required by the uniform Guidance on December 19, 2019. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding. See Finding F2018-004. Cause The City lacks manpower to complete the physical inventory of capital assets by June 30, 2019. Effect The City may not identify equipment that is missing, idle or needs repair. The City also may not be able to track equipment or capital assets that are owned by federal agency. Questioned Costs $5,000 Recommendation While the City was able to comply with the requirements after year-end. To ensure that the City continue to be in compliance with the requirements, we recommend that City strengthen its internal controls over the equipment related transactions. Procedures should be in place to ensure that all newly purchased equipment is added promptly to the inventory system and the information on the schedule of capital assets is complete. Views of Responsible Officials The City completed the physical inventory of capital assets funded by Federal Asset Forfeiture on November 7, 2019. The City also completed the schedule of capital assets funded by Federal Asset Forfeiture with all the requirements by Uniform Guidance on December 19, 2019. Furthermore, the City implemented additional procedures over capital assets.
Identifying Number: F 2019-002 Audit Finding: As of June 30, 2019, the City was in the process of completing its physical inventory of equipment, reconciling the inventory to the property records listing and general ledger and updating its property records to ensure that the appropriate details such as: description (including who holds title, use, and condition of the property) as required by the Uniform Guidance are included. Also, we noted the City lacks internal control procedures over properties. The City did not have a complete list of properties. It did not capitalize one of the properties purchased over $5,000 during the year. The City completed the physical inventory count for the Federal Asset Forfeiture program on November 7, 2019 and updated the schedule of capital assets funded by the Federal Asset Forfeiture program with the necessary information required by the uniform Guidance on December 19, 2019. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Contact person responsible: Marilyn Toledo, Accounting Manager The City completed the physical inventory of capital assets funded by Federal Asset Forfeiture on November 7, 2019. The City also completed the schedule of capital assets funded by Federal Asset Forfeiture with all the requirements by Uniform Guidance on December 19, 2019. Furthermore, the City implemented additional procedures over capital assets. Anticipated completion date: Complete
2018-004
Finding F 2019-003 ? Allowable Cost/Cost Principle Federal Program Information Federal Catalog Number: 16.922 Federal Program Name: Equitable Sharing Program - Federal Asset Forfeiture Federal Agency: Department of Justice Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: CA019220 - FY18-19 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR Part 225 Appendix A, Paragraph C.1 (j), to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must meet the following general criteria: (j) be adequately documented. Per A-102 Common Rule, Nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition During our testwork, we selected 1 payroll transaction for review and we noted that the regular hours on the timesheet did not agree to the regular hours on the payroll register. The employee was still paid correctly. Cause The employee shift in the Eden system (used for payroll register) was not updated with the actual shift of the employee for that particular pay period. Effect Without adequate monitoring procedures, there is an increased risk that Federal awards could be used for unallowable costs. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that employee shift in the payroll system be updated based on the actual shift. Views of Responsible Officials The City updated the employee shift in the payroll system based on the most current shift schedule provided by its department. The City will continue to update the payroll system for any changes in the employee shift to ensure regular hours between payroll register and timesheet will match.
Identifying Number: F 2019-003 Audit Finding: During our testwork, we selected 1 payroll transaction for review and we noted that the regular hours on the timesheet did not agree to the regular hours on the payroll register. The employee was still paid correctly. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Contact person responsible: Marilyn Toledo, Accounting Manager The City updated the employee shift in the payroll system based on the most current shift schedule provided by its department. The City will continue to update the payroll system for any changes in the employee shift to ensure regular hours between payroll register and timesheet will match. Anticipated completion date: January 2020; June 30, 2020
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2019, which was (2519 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-002
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-003
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2018. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 21, 2018, which was (2890 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-002
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-003
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2017. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 16, 2017, which was (3291 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-003
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-002
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.