TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

EIN: 952829821

UEI: CKVTB5K26L74

Data as of August 26, 2026

TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2020-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 18, 2021 (1804 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTS

During our testing we noted that the District had applied an indirect cost rate of 3.93% which totaled $37,642.83 towards the program. This is the first year of CRF funding so there were no prior year findings. Questioned Costs: $37,642.83 Effect: The District charged unallowable indirect costs to the program. Cause: At the time the District was closing their books, guidance for the Coronavirus Relief Fund was not available. The District applied the Indirect Costs to the federal funds only to find out after closing that indirect costs were an unallowable charge. Recommendation: We recommend that the District transfer the costs of the indirect charges from the Coronavirus Relief Fund. Views of Responsible Officials: In compliance with the updated Federal Uniform Guidance, the District has transferred the funds back to the Coronavirus Relief Fund program resource in 2020-21.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-001: Unallowable Indirect Cost Charges to a Federal Program (50000) Program Identification: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: COVID-19: Coronavirus Relief Fund (CFDA 21.019) Criteria: 2 C.F.R. Part 200 subpart E ?200.412-419 sets the standards and terms for indirect charges allowed to be applied to federally funded programs by Federal Agency. However, the criteria are clarified in the publication Coronavirus Relief Fund, Guidance for State, Territorial, Local, and Tribal Governments (Updated September 2, 2020), published by the Treasury. According to this guidance, ?Payments from the Fund are not administered as part of a traditional grant program and the provisions of the Uniform Guidance, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, that are applicable to indirect costs do not apply. Recipients may not apply their indirect costs rates to payments received from the fund.? Condition: During our testing we noted that the District had applied an indirect cost rate of 3.93% which totaled $37,642.83 towards the program. This is the first year of CRF funding so there were no prior year findings. Questioned Costs: $37,642.83 Effect: The District charged unallowable indirect costs to the program. Cause: At the time the District was closing their books, guidance for the Coronavirus Relief Fund was not available. The District applied the Indirect Costs to the federal funds only to find out after closing that indirect costs were an unallowable charge. Recommendation: We recommend that the District transfer the costs of the indirect charges from the Coronavirus Relief Fund. Views of Responsible Officials: In compliance with the updated Federal Uniform Guidance, the District has transferred the funds back to the Coronavirus Relief Fund program resource in 2020-21.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-001: Unallowable Indirect Cost Charges to Federal Program At the time the District was closing the books for the 2019/2020 school year, the guidance for the Coronavirus Relief Funds was not available. The District applied the Indirect Cost to the federal funds only to discover after the closing of the 2019/20 financials that indirect cost was an unallowable expense. In compliance with the Federal Publication Guidance, on November 13, 2021, the district completed a restatement of the beginning balance to the Coronavirus Relief Funds accounts that had been charged indirect cost in error. This involved increasing the beginning balance to these funds, thus adding the funds back into the Coronavirus Relief Fund from the District?s General fund.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2017-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2017 — management decision was due June 22, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.