Town of Lakeview

EIN: 936002198

UEI: M74ZJHKLPPW3

Data as of August 26, 2026

Town of Lakeview2 audit years2 findings
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 31, 2027 (158 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2024-004
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During the audit, we noted that the SEFA prepared by the organization was incomplete, and inaccu-rate. Specifically, federal revenue amounts were shown instead of expenditures, and not all Federal awards were listed and amounts shown were not reconciled to the underlying accounting records. In addition, Grant funds were drawn (requested and received) for the same underlying expenditures in two different fiscal years, resulting in du-plicate reimbursement. Cause: The inaccuracies appear to be due to inadequate procedures and controls over the identification, tracking, and reporting of federal awards. Management did not implement a formal process to compile and review SEFA information for completeness and accuracy. Effect: An inaccurate or incomplete SEFA increases the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and may result in misreporting of major programs, affecting the audit process. It also increases the risk of missed audit coverage for major programs. Questioned Cost: None noted. Context: The auditee did not provide a complete and accurate SEFA that included all federal expenditures that reconciled to the general ledger for Federal Awards, and did not list all federal awards. Specifically: • Management did not initially provide a SEFA for the audit period, it was not provided until late in the au-dit process. • During the audit procedures, the auditor identified additional federal expenditures that were not provided by the client, and not included in the original SEFA. • The SEFA submitted by management contained material errors, including incorrect expenditures amounts (revenues instead of expenditures), and inconsistencies with the general ledger (grant revenues from prior year expenditures included as expenditures again). • The SEFA required multiple revisions and significant auditor assistance due to incomplete data and report-ing errors. This condition demonstrates that management did not have sufficient processes in place to identify, accumulate, and report federal expenditures, and did not provide accurate information for the SEFA preparation. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, prior year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that The Town of Lakeview establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on the SEFA. Internal controls should be designed to pre-vent, detect, or correct errors in a timely manner by performing periodic reconciliations of the SEFA information to the general ledger throughout the fiscal year. The Town of Lakeview should provide appropriate training to staff who are assigned to prepare and review the SEFA. Client's Response: The Town of Lakeview concurs with the recommendation and will work through the Correc-tive Action Plan to improve or solve the deficiency. Corrective Action Plan: __________________To be developed by Town of Lakeview. Planned Implementation Date: In progress. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-004 – Inadequate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Material Weakness) Federal Program: 21.027 American Rescue Plan - ARPA Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities Criteria: CFR §200.508, CFR Part 200.510, requires that the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Fed-eral Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the entity’s financial statements. The SEFA must include, at a min-imum, the total Federal awards expended by Federal agency, pass-through entity, Assistance Listing (AL) number, and other required identifying information. The SEFA must be complete, accurate, and reconcile to the underlying accounting records. Condition: During the audit, we noted that the SEFA prepared by the organization was incomplete, and inaccu-rate. Specifically, federal revenue amounts were shown instead of expenditures, and not all Federal awards were listed and amounts shown were not reconciled to the underlying accounting records. In addition, Grant funds were drawn (requested and received) for the same underlying expenditures in two different fiscal years, resulting in du-plicate reimbursement. Cause: The inaccuracies appear to be due to inadequate procedures and controls over the identification, tracking, and reporting of federal awards. Management did not implement a formal process to compile and review SEFA information for completeness and accuracy. Effect: An inaccurate or incomplete SEFA increases the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and may result in misreporting of major programs, affecting the audit process. It also increases the risk of missed audit coverage for major programs. Questioned Cost: None noted. Context: The auditee did not provide a complete and accurate SEFA that included all federal expenditures that reconciled to the general ledger for Federal Awards, and did not list all federal awards. Specifically: • Management did not initially provide a SEFA for the audit period, it was not provided until late in the au-dit process. • During the audit procedures, the auditor identified additional federal expenditures that were not provided by the client, and not included in the original SEFA. • The SEFA submitted by management contained material errors, including incorrect expenditures amounts (revenues instead of expenditures), and inconsistencies with the general ledger (grant revenues from prior year expenditures included as expenditures again). • The SEFA required multiple revisions and significant auditor assistance due to incomplete data and report-ing errors. This condition demonstrates that management did not have sufficient processes in place to identify, accumulate, and report federal expenditures, and did not provide accurate information for the SEFA preparation. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, prior year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that The Town of Lakeview establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on the SEFA. Internal controls should be designed to pre-vent, detect, or correct errors in a timely manner by performing periodic reconciliations of the SEFA information to the general ledger throughout the fiscal year. The Town of Lakeview should provide appropriate training to staff who are assigned to prepare and review the SEFA. Client's Response: The Town of Lakeview concurs with the recommendation and will work through the Correc-tive Action Plan to improve or solve the deficiency. Corrective Action Plan: __________________To be developed by Town of Lakeview. Planned Implementation Date: In progress. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

Corrective Action Plan

525 North 1st Street, Lakeview, Oregon 97630 | (541) 947-2020 | www.townoflakeview.org Finding 2024-004 – Inadequate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Material Weakness) Condition: During the audit, we noted that the SEFA prepared by the organization was incomplete, and inaccurate. Specifically, federal revenue amounts were shown instead of expenditures, and not all Federal awards were listed and amounts shown were not reconciled to the underlying accounting records. In addition, Grant funds were drawn (requested and received) for the same underlying expenditures in two different fiscal years, resulting in duplicate reimbursement. Cause: The inaccuracies appear to be due to inadequate procedures and controls over the identification, tracking, and reporting of federal awards. Management did not implement a formal process to compile and review SEFA information for completeness and accuracy. Context: The auditee did not provide a complete and accurate SEFA that included all federal expenditures that reconciled to the general ledger for Federal Awards, and did not list all federal awards. Specifically: • Management did not initially provide a SEFA for the audit period, it was not provided until late in the audit process. • During the audit procedures, the auditor identified additional federal expenditures that were not provided by the client, and not included in the original SEFA. • The SEFA submitted by management contained material errors, including incorrect expenditures amounts (revenues instead of expenditures), and inconsistencies with the general ledger (grant revenues from prior year expenditures included as expenditures again). • The SEFA required multiple revisions and significant auditor assistance due to incomplete data and reporting errors. This condition demonstrates that management did not have sufficient processes in place to identify, accumulate, and report federal expenditures, and did not provide accurate information for the SEFA preparation. Recommendation: We recommend that The Town of Lakeview establish policies and procedures to ensure that all Federal awards are identified and reported accurately on the SEFA. Internal controls should be designed to prevent, detect, or correct errors in a timely manner by performing periodic reconciliations of the SEFA information to the general ledger throughout the fiscal year. The Town of Lakeview should provide appropriate training to staff who are assigned to prepare and review the SEFA. Client's Response: The Town of Lakeview concurs with the recommendation and will work through the Corrective Action Plan to improve or solve the deficiency. Corrective Action Plan: The Town of Lakeview has taken significant organizational and procedural steps to strengthen its administration of federal awards and ensure future compliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements. Corrective actions implemented include: • The Town has hired a Finance Director with substantial experience in state and federal grant administration and financial reporting. The Finance Director is responsible for oversight of all federal financial reporting, including preparation and review of the annual Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. 525 North 1st Street, Lakeview, Oregon 97630 | (541) 947-2020 | www.townoflakeview.org • The Town has hired a new Town Manager who has established improved financial oversight and accountability throughout the organization. The Town Manager will work closely with the Finance Director to monitor compliance with federal grant requirements and ensure adequate internal controls are maintained. • The Town Council has established a Citizen Finance Advisory Committee to provide independent oversight and review of the Town’s financial management practices. The committee will review financial reports, budget performance, and federal grant administration processes, providing recommendations to improve accountability and transparency. • The Town has developed and implemented formal policies and procedures governing the administration of federal awards including: o Identification and tracking of awards o Documentation of expenditures charged to federal programs o Procedures for maintaining grant files o Reconciliation of grant expenditures to the general ledger o Annual preparation and supervisory review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards • Prior to completion of the annual financial statements and Single Audit, the Finance Director will perform a comprehensive reconciliation of all federal expenditures to the accounting records and grant documentation. The completed SEFA will undergo management review and approval by the Town Manager before being provided to the external auditors. Planned Implementation Date: The corrective actions described above have been implemented. The Town will continue to monitor compliance throughout the fiscal year, and the revised procedures will be fully incorporated into the preparation of the next annual SEFA. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

About Reporting →
2024-005
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

During our testing of expenditures and reimbursement requests for the above-referenced federal pro-gram, we identified that certain expenditures were submitted for reimbursement twice across two-separate fiscal years. While the underlying expenditures were incurred only once, and not paid twice by the entity, they were in-cluded in reimbursement requests in two different periods, resulting in The Town receiving duplicate reimburse-ments for the same costs Cause: The duplication likely occurred due to changes in financial staffing for The Town. Specifically: • Turnover in personnel resulted in a loss of institutional knowledge regarding prior reimbursement and submissions. • Inadequate review controls allowed previously reimbursed expenditures to be re-submitted in a subsequent period. • Initial reimbursement requests appear to have used an alternate methodology for reimbursement requests. Effect: As a result, the entity received duplicate reimbursement for certain expenditures, creating a potential liabil-ity to the federal awarding agency. This increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with federal cost principles. • Overstatement of allowable program expenditures. • Required repayment of funds and possible additional scrutiny from oversight agencies. Questioned Cost: Yes, $189,468 received more than allowable amounts due to duplicate submission of expendi-tures. Context: The Town administers multiple federal awards and is responsible for preparing and submitting reim-bursement requests based on incurred allowable expenditures. During the audit period, The Town experienced staff turnover and changes in key financial and grant management roles. These changes affected the continuity of over-sight and the tracking of cumulative expenditures and prior reimbursement requests. As a result, controls over the review and reconciliation of reimbursement submissions were not consistently applied, contributing to the resub-mission of previously reimbursed expenditures in a subsequent year. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, prior year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the entity: • Reconcile all reimbursement requests to the underlying expenditures and prior submissions to identify and quantify any additional duplication. • Re-pay any overpayments to the federal awarding agency in a timely manner. • Strengthen internal controls by: o Implementing a centralized tracking system for all reimbursement requests and cumulative ex-penditures. o Establishing a formal review and approval process to verify that costs have not been previously re-imbursed. o Clearly document roles and responsibilities, especially during staffing transitions. • Provide training to staff involved in grant management to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Client's Response: The Town of Lakeview concurs with the recommendation and will work through the Correc-tive Action Plan to improve or solve the deficiency. Corrective Action Plan: __________________To be developed by Town of Lakeview. Planned Implementation Date: In progress. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-005 – Duplicate Reimbursement Request for Federal Award Expenditures (Material Weak-ness) Federal Program: 21.027 American Rescue Plan - ARPA Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities Criteria: CFR §200.403 and related provisions, costs charged to federal awards must be accurate, allowable, and not charged or reimbursed more than once. Additionally, reimbursement requests must be supported by complete and accurate records to ensure compliance with federal requirements and prevent improper payments. Condition: During our testing of expenditures and reimbursement requests for the above-referenced federal pro-gram, we identified that certain expenditures were submitted for reimbursement twice across two-separate fiscal years. While the underlying expenditures were incurred only once, and not paid twice by the entity, they were in-cluded in reimbursement requests in two different periods, resulting in The Town receiving duplicate reimburse-ments for the same costs Cause: The duplication likely occurred due to changes in financial staffing for The Town. Specifically: • Turnover in personnel resulted in a loss of institutional knowledge regarding prior reimbursement and submissions. • Inadequate review controls allowed previously reimbursed expenditures to be re-submitted in a subsequent period. • Initial reimbursement requests appear to have used an alternate methodology for reimbursement requests. Effect: As a result, the entity received duplicate reimbursement for certain expenditures, creating a potential liabil-ity to the federal awarding agency. This increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with federal cost principles. • Overstatement of allowable program expenditures. • Required repayment of funds and possible additional scrutiny from oversight agencies. Questioned Cost: Yes, $189,468 received more than allowable amounts due to duplicate submission of expendi-tures. Context: The Town administers multiple federal awards and is responsible for preparing and submitting reim-bursement requests based on incurred allowable expenditures. During the audit period, The Town experienced staff turnover and changes in key financial and grant management roles. These changes affected the continuity of over-sight and the tracking of cumulative expenditures and prior reimbursement requests. As a result, controls over the review and reconciliation of reimbursement submissions were not consistently applied, contributing to the resub-mission of previously reimbursed expenditures in a subsequent year. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, prior year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the entity: • Reconcile all reimbursement requests to the underlying expenditures and prior submissions to identify and quantify any additional duplication. • Re-pay any overpayments to the federal awarding agency in a timely manner. • Strengthen internal controls by: o Implementing a centralized tracking system for all reimbursement requests and cumulative ex-penditures. o Establishing a formal review and approval process to verify that costs have not been previously re-imbursed. o Clearly document roles and responsibilities, especially during staffing transitions. • Provide training to staff involved in grant management to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Client's Response: The Town of Lakeview concurs with the recommendation and will work through the Correc-tive Action Plan to improve or solve the deficiency. Corrective Action Plan: __________________To be developed by Town of Lakeview. Planned Implementation Date: In progress. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-005 – Duplicate Reimbursement Request for Federal Award Expenditures (Material Weakness) Criteria: CFR §200.403 and related provisions, costs charged to federal awards must be accurate, allowable, and not charged or reimbursed more than once. Additionally, reimbursement requests must be supported by complete and accurate records to ensure compliance with federal requirements and prevent improper payments. Condition: During our testing of expenditures and reimbursement requests for the above-referenced federal program, we identified that certain expenditures were submitted for reimbursement twice across twoseparate fiscal years. While the underlying expenditures were incurred only once, and not paid twice by the entity, they were included in reimbursement requests in two different periods, resulting in The Town receiving duplicate reimbursements for the same costs Cause: The duplication likely occurred due to changes in financial staffing for The Town. Specifically: • Turnover in personnel resulted in a loss of institutional knowledge regarding prior reimbursement and submissions. • Inadequate review controls allowed previously reimbursed expenditures to be re-submitted in a subsequent period. • Initial reimbursement requests appear to have used an alternate methodology for reimbursement requests. Context: The Town administers multiple federal awards and is responsible for preparing and submitting reimbursement requests based on incurred allowable expenditures. During the audit period, The Town experienced staff turnover and changes in key financial and grant management roles. These changes affected the continuity of oversight and the tracking of cumulative expenditures and prior reimbursement requests. As a result, controls over the review and reconciliation of reimbursement submissions were not consistently applied, contributing to the resubmission of previously reimbursed expenditures in a subsequent year. Recommendation: We recommend that the entity: • Reconcile all reimbursement requests to the underlying expenditures and prior submissions to identify and quantify any additional duplication. • Re-pay any overpayments to the federal awarding agency in a timely manner. • Strengthen internal controls by: o Implementing a centralized tracking system for all reimbursement requests and cumulative expenditures. o Establishing a formal review and approval process to verify that costs have not been previously reimbursed. o Clearly document roles and responsibilities, especially during staffing transitions. • Provide training to staff involved in grant management to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Corrective Action Plan: The Town of Lakeview has taken significant organizational and procedural steps to strengthen its administration of federal awards and ensure future compliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements. Corrective actions implemented include: • The Town has hired a Finance Director with substantial experience in state and federal grant administration and financial reporting. The Finance Director is responsible for oversight of all federal financial reporting, including review of expenditures and preparation of disbursement requests. • The Town has hired a new Town Manager who has established improved financial oversight and accountability throughout the organization. The Town Manager will work closely with the Finance Director to monitor compliance with federal grant requirements and review expenditures and disbursement requests. • The Town Council has established a Citizen Finance Advisory Committee to provide independent oversight and review of the Town’s financial management practices. The committee will review financial reports, budget performance, and federal grant administration processes, providing recommendations to improve accountability and transparency. • The Town has developed and implemented formal policies and procedures governing the administration of federal awards including: o Identification and tracking of awards o Documentation of expenditures charged to federal programso Procedures for maintaining grant files o Reconciliation of grant expenditures to the general ledger o Annual preparation and supervisory review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards • The Finance Director will prepare disbursement requests, and they will be reviewed and signed by Council members prior to submittal. A ll disbursement requests and associated expenditures will be maintained in an electronic file system. Hard copies of disbursement requests and expenditure documentation will also be maintained in a standardized fi le system. Planned Implementation Date: The corrective actions described above have been implemented. The Town will continue to monitor compliance throughout the fiscal year, and the revised procedures will be fully incorporated into the preparation of the next annual SEFA. Responsible Person: Town of Lakeview Mayor.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.