HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC

EIN: 920014079

UEI: F9Q7GMMEJDF5

Data as of August 22, 2026

HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC1 audit years2 findings
1
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 18, 2026 (88 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting

The Association did not have proper review procedures in place to document that an individual other than the one who prepared the reports are reviewing them. Cause: There was a lack of documentation to evidence the reports were reviewed prior to submission. Effect: The absence of proper review procedures increases the risk of errors, inaccuracies, or omissions in submitted reports. Without independent oversight, reporting discrepancies may go undetected, potentially leading to compliance issues, misstatements, or operational inefficiencies. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Association develop internal control processes and procedures to ensure there is proper documentation to evidence reports are reviewed prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials: Management of the Cooperative concurs with the auditors’ finding related to documentation of independent review over federal grant reporting. Reports submitted under the Community Wildfire Defense Grants program included a required certification signature by an authorized official; however, the state-provided reporting form did not include a separate preparer signature line. As a result, while management review and approval occurred prior to submission, documentation distinguishing report preparation from certification was not evident on the submitted forms. Management recognizes the importance of clearly documenting segregation of preparation and review responsibilities to evidence effective internal controls. To address this matter, the Cooperative will revise its grant reporting process to include documented identification of both the preparer and reviewer for all federal grant reports. When state-provided forms do not include a preparer acknowledgment, the Cooperative will supplement the form with an internal preparer certification or signature line that is retained with the grant file. Management believes these actions will strengthen documentation of internal controls over reporting while continuing to comply with state and federal reporting requirements. The Cooperative remains committed to responsible oversight and stewardship of federal grant funds for the benefit of its members. This change was implemented beginning with the first quarterly reporting period under the Grant Agreement in 2026.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Identification of the Federal Program: 10.720 – Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Community Wildfire Defense Grants Criteria: Proper oversight, review procedures and controls should be established to ensure the reports submitted are prepared and reviewed by more than one individual. Condition: The Association did not have proper review procedures in place to document that an individual other than the one who prepared the reports are reviewing them. Cause: There was a lack of documentation to evidence the reports were reviewed prior to submission. Effect: The absence of proper review procedures increases the risk of errors, inaccuracies, or omissions in submitted reports. Without independent oversight, reporting discrepancies may go undetected, potentially leading to compliance issues, misstatements, or operational inefficiencies. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Association develop internal control processes and procedures to ensure there is proper documentation to evidence reports are reviewed prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials: Management of the Cooperative concurs with the auditors’ finding related to documentation of independent review over federal grant reporting. Reports submitted under the Community Wildfire Defense Grants program included a required certification signature by an authorized official; however, the state-provided reporting form did not include a separate preparer signature line. As a result, while management review and approval occurred prior to submission, documentation distinguishing report preparation from certification was not evident on the submitted forms. Management recognizes the importance of clearly documenting segregation of preparation and review responsibilities to evidence effective internal controls. To address this matter, the Cooperative will revise its grant reporting process to include documented identification of both the preparer and reviewer for all federal grant reports. When state-provided forms do not include a preparer acknowledgment, the Cooperative will supplement the form with an internal preparer certification or signature line that is retained with the grant file. Management believes these actions will strengthen documentation of internal controls over reporting while continuing to comply with state and federal reporting requirements. The Cooperative remains committed to responsible oversight and stewardship of federal grant funds for the benefit of its members. This change was implemented beginning with the first quarterly reporting period under the Grant Agreement in 2026.

Corrective Action Plan

Description of Finding: The Association did not have proper review procedures in place to document that an individual other than the one who prepared the reports are reviewing them. Management Response: Management of the Cooperative concurs with the auditors’ finding related to documentation of independent review over federal grant reporting. Corrective Action: Reports submitted under the Community Wildfire Defense Grants program included a required certification signature by an authorized official; however, the state-provided reporting form did not include a separate preparer signature line. As a result, while management review and approval occurred prior to submission, documentation distinguishing report preparation from certification was not evident on the submitted forms. Management recognizes the importance of clearly documenting segregation of preparation and review responsibilities to evidence effective internal controls. To address this matter, the Cooperative will revise its grant reporting process to include documented identification of both the preparer and reviewer for all federal grant reports. When state-provided forms do not include a preparer acknowledgment, the Cooperative will supplement the form with an internal preparer certification or signature line that is retained with the grant file. Management believes these actions will strengthen documentation of internal controls over reporting while continuing to comply with state and federal reporting requirements. The Cooperative remains committed to responsible oversight and stewardship of federal grant funds for the benefit of its members. This change was implemented beginning with the first quarterly reporting period under the Grant Agreement in 2026. Projected Completion: A second signature line for the preparer was added to the Community Wildfire Defense Financial Progress Reports to document HEA’s review procedure. This was instituted with the First Quarterly Report submitted on 4/15/26. Responsible Official(s): Chief Financial Officer

About Reporting →
2025-002
Cost Allowability

Homer Electric Association, Inc. has not developed written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Cause: Management did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Management should develop written procedures as required by 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7). Views of Responsible Officials: Management of Homer Electric Association, Inc. concurs with the auditors’ finding regarding the absence of written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7). While Homer Electric Association, Inc. applies applicable federal cost principles when administering grant-funded activities and no unallowable costs were identified, these practices were not formally documented in written procedures during the audit period. Management acknowledges that written procedures are required to ensure consistency, continuity, and clear guidance for personnel involved in federal grant administration. To address this matter, management will develop and implement written procedures for determining the allowability of costs charged to federal programs. These procedures will reference applicable Uniform Guidance cost principles and outline review and approval responsibilities to ensure compliance prior to costs being charged to federal awards. The procedures will be communicated to appropriate staff and incorporated into Homer Electric Association, Inc.’s grant administration practices. Management believes these corrective actions will strengthen internal controls over federal financial management and support continued responsible stewardship of grant funds for the benefit of Homer Electric Association, Inc.’s members.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Identification of the Federal Program: 10.720 – Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Community Wildfire Defense Grants Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7) requires the financial management system to include written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Condition: Homer Electric Association, Inc. has not developed written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Cause: Management did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Management should develop written procedures as required by 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7). Views of Responsible Officials: Management of Homer Electric Association, Inc. concurs with the auditors’ finding regarding the absence of written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7). While Homer Electric Association, Inc. applies applicable federal cost principles when administering grant-funded activities and no unallowable costs were identified, these practices were not formally documented in written procedures during the audit period. Management acknowledges that written procedures are required to ensure consistency, continuity, and clear guidance for personnel involved in federal grant administration. To address this matter, management will develop and implement written procedures for determining the allowability of costs charged to federal programs. These procedures will reference applicable Uniform Guidance cost principles and outline review and approval responsibilities to ensure compliance prior to costs being charged to federal awards. The procedures will be communicated to appropriate staff and incorporated into Homer Electric Association, Inc.’s grant administration practices. Management believes these corrective actions will strengthen internal controls over federal financial management and support continued responsible stewardship of grant funds for the benefit of Homer Electric Association, Inc.’s members.

Corrective Action Plan

Description of Finding: Management should develop written procedures as required by 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7) Management Response: Management of Homer Electric Association concurs with the auditors’ finding regarding the absence of written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(7). Corrective Action: While the Association applies applicable federal cost principles when administering grant-funded activities and no unallowable costs were identified, these practices were not formally documented in written procedures during the audit period. Management acknowledges that written procedures are required to ensure consistency, continuity, and clear guidance for personnel involved in federal grant administration. To address this matter, management will develop and implement written procedures for determining the allowability of costs charged to federal programs. These procedures will reference applicable Uniform Guidance cost principles and outline review and approval responsibilities to ensure compliance prior to costs being charged to federal awards. The procedures will be communicated to appropriate staff and incorporated into the Association’s grant administration practices. Management believes these corrective actions will strengthen internal controls over federal financial management and support continued responsible stewardship of grant funds for the benefit of the Association’s members. Projected Completion: A Federal Awards Management Policy has been drafted for executive review with formal adoption anticipated prior to June 1, 2026 Responsible Official(s): Chief Financial Officer

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.