City of Anacortes

EIN: 916001227

UEI: ZBKYCTZ3QPK5

Data as of August 22, 2026

City of Anacortes6 audit years2 findings
6
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 4, 2026 (73 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2024-001 The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: A22AV01053, HLP-PB(010) - STPUS-6239 (002), HLP-PB(010) - STPUS-6239 (002) LA-9913, TAPUS-0030 (014) LA10744, CRPUS-6239 (003) LA10807 Pass-through Entity Name: WA State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Highway Planning and Construction program is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. During fiscal year 2024, the City spent $4,005,201 in program funds. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain effective internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract, and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays $25,000 or more, our audit found the City did not follow this process and did not verify one of three contractors we tested was not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition When the City initially procured the contractor, it did not intend to pay them with federal funds. However, when the City decided to pay the contractor using federal funds, it did not check if the contractor was suspended or debarred. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractor it paid $XX,XXX using federal funds was not suspended or debarred before contracting with them. Without adequate internal controls, the City increases its risk of awarding funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. The City subsequently verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. City’s Response Auditor’s Remarks Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: A22AV01053, HLP-PB(010) - STPUS-6239 (002), HLP-PB(010) - STPUS-6239 (002) LA-9913, TAPUS-0030 (014) LA10744, CRPUS-6239 (003) LA10807 Pass-through Entity Name: WA State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Highway Planning and Construction program is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. During fiscal year 2024, the City spent $4,005,201 in program funds. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain effective internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract, and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays $25,000 or more, our audit found the City did not follow this process and did not verify one of three contractors we tested was not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition When the City initially procured the contractor, it did not intend to pay them with federal funds. However, when the City decided to pay the contractor using federal funds, it did not check if the contractor was suspended or debarred. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractor it paid $XX,XXX using federal funds was not suspended or debarred before contracting with them. Without adequate internal controls, the City increases its risk of awarding funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. The City subsequently verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. City’s Response Auditor’s Remarks Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The violation of Suspension and Debarment came from the hiring of a contract service provider in relation to a grant funded project, but was not specifically a Public Works contract. The City of Anacortes' past practice has been to verify Suspension and Debarment for all public works projects, regardless of funding source. The City of Anacortes is committed to ensuring compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, and therefore has made the organizational change to centralize grant management with contract management, to heighten awareness of those grant requirements relative to let contracts. Additionally, the City has made the commitment to expand the Suspension and Debarment check to all contracts, not just public works, to ensure future compliance can be illustrated.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2022 — management decision was due May 21, 2023.

2021-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

City of Anacortes January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 2021-002 The City?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal requirements for suspension and debarment. CFDA Number and Title: 21.027 ? COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: STL-8119 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic?s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2021, the City spent $1,315,880 in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit award recipients from contracting with parties that have been suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever a government contracts for goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that the contractor is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The City may accomplish this verification by collecting a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must perform this verification before entering into the contract or paying the contractor $25,000 or more, and it must keep documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition The City?s controls were ineffective for ensuring that contracted parties paid more than $25,000, all or in part with program funds, were not suspended or debarred. Our audit found the City did not obtain written certification, include a clause in the contract, or retain documentation that it had checked SAM.gov to verify that a contractor was not suspended or debarred. We consider these deficiencies in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. The issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition While staff are aware of suspension and debarment rules, the City did not intend to pay the contractor with federal funding when procuring the services. As a result, staff did not verify the contractor?s status before entering into an agreement or after the City determined it would use program funds to pay the contractor. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract, or check SAM.gov to verify a contractor that was paid $1,315,880 with federal funds was not suspended or debarred. Without this verification, the City increases its risk of providing federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. We verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning these costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls by adequately reviewing expenditures paid with federal funds to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. City?s Response At the time of grant award, the City identified the use of the funds for a project that would be conducted with a contractor known and used by the City for prior projects. The City determined to ensure compliance with the ARP grant requirements, and did a debarment check as part of that effort, however that check was done at the State level, and was not performed at the federal level. The lack of verifying federal suspension and debarment was an isolated occurrence, and this oversight will be corrected on future grants by ensuring a close working relationship between Finance and the Contracting department to verify all areas of compliance are effectively communicated and monitored to ensure all compliance requirements are identified, addressed, and mitigated. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the City?s commitment to resolving the issue noted above and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

City of Anacortes January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 2021-002 The City?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal requirements for suspension and debarment. CFDA Number and Title: 21.027 ? COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: STL-8119 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic?s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2021, the City spent $1,315,880 in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit award recipients from contracting with parties that have been suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever a government contracts for goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that the contractor is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The City may accomplish this verification by collecting a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must perform this verification before entering into the contract or paying the contractor $25,000 or more, and it must keep documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition The City?s controls were ineffective for ensuring that contracted parties paid more than $25,000, all or in part with program funds, were not suspended or debarred. Our audit found the City did not obtain written certification, include a clause in the contract, or retain documentation that it had checked SAM.gov to verify that a contractor was not suspended or debarred. We consider these deficiencies in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. The issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition While staff are aware of suspension and debarment rules, the City did not intend to pay the contractor with federal funding when procuring the services. As a result, staff did not verify the contractor?s status before entering into an agreement or after the City determined it would use program funds to pay the contractor. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract, or check SAM.gov to verify a contractor that was paid $1,315,880 with federal funds was not suspended or debarred. Without this verification, the City increases its risk of providing federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. We verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning these costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls by adequately reviewing expenditures paid with federal funds to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. City?s Response At the time of grant award, the City identified the use of the funds for a project that would be conducted with a contractor known and used by the City for prior projects. The City determined to ensure compliance with the ARP grant requirements, and did a debarment check as part of that effort, however that check was done at the State level, and was not performed at the federal level. The lack of verifying federal suspension and debarment was an isolated occurrence, and this oversight will be corrected on future grants by ensuring a close working relationship between Finance and the Contracting department to verify all areas of compliance are effectively communicated and monitored to ensure all compliance requirements are identified, addressed, and mitigated. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the City?s commitment to resolving the issue noted above and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding ref number: 2021-002 Finding caption: The City did not have adequate internal controls over financial statement preparation to ensure accurate financial reporting. Name, address, and telephone of the City's contact person: Steve Hoglund, Finance Director 904 6th St Anacortes, WA 98221-054 7 360-293-1906 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: {If the auditee does not concur with the finding, the auditee must list the reasons for disagreement). At the time of grant award, the City identified the use of the funds for a project that would be conducted with a contractor known and used by the City for prior projects. The City determined to ensure compliance with the ARP grant requirements, and did a debarment check as part of that effort, however that check was done at the State level, and was not performed at the Federal level. The lack of verifying federal suspension and debarment was an isolated occurrence, and this oversight will be corrected on future grants by ensuring a close working relationship between Finance and the Contracting department to verify all areas of compliance are effectively communicated and monitored to ensure all compliance requirements are identified, addressed, and mitigated. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: 11/4/22

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.