Island County Public Transportation Benefit Area

EIN: 911381367

UEI: P6LJYEN316D7

Data as of August 23, 2026

Island County Public Transportation Benefit Area7 audit years2 findings
7
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2020-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 24, 2022 (1429 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Island Transit January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 2020-001 The Transit?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. CFDA Number and Title: 20.509 ? Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 ? COVID-19 ? Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Federal Grantor Name: Federal Transit Administration Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: FTA 5311 Questioned Cost Amount: N/A Background The Transit received $7,496,062 in grant funds from the Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program during fiscal year 2020. The objective of this program is to initiate, improve, or continue public transportation service in rural areas by providing financial assistance for operating, planning, administrative expenses, and the acquisition, construction, and improvement of facilities and equipment. Additionally, the program provides support for rural intercity bus service and additional funding for training, technical assistance, research and related support services for rural transit service. Federal regulations require federal award recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods or services, governments must apply the more restrictive of federal requirements, state law or local policies by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the purchase amount. Transit policy and federal law are most restrictive and require a formal bid process for purchases of goods and services of $250,000 or more. Additionally, state and federal requirements allow local entities to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an agreement or cooperative. To comply with piggybacking law, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from the other entity?s bid contract. If the Transit uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the Transit when selecting the contractor. Description of Condition The Transit has controls in place over procurement, but they were ineffective for ensuring compliance with all applicable requirements. The Transit did not perform competitive procurement procedures or establish an interlocal agreement to piggyback on another entity?s contract before purchasing three hybrid buses for approximately $2.4 million. Therefore, the Transit did not comply with all of the applicable federal procurement requirements. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Transit has historically received federal funding to purchase buses, and management has been intentional about having controls in place over procurement to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements. The state agency contract from which the Transit historically purchases buses did not procure a contract in 2020. As a result, the Transit purchased buses from another entity?s contract, and Transit employees were not aware they needed to establish an interlocal agreement with that entity before purchasing, as state law requires. Effect of Condition Without effective internal controls over procurement and piggybacking procedures, the Transit cannot demonstrate it complied with applicable federal procurement requirements and received the best price for the buses. However, since the purchases were allowable under the federal program, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the Transit strengthen its internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services. Transit Authority?s Response Thank you for this recommendation. Island Transit has updated its Procurement Policy to include completing an interlocal agreement when purchasing from a cooperative purchasing schedule in another state. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the Transit?s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the Transit for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303 Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 318, General procurement standards, allows governments to foster great economy and efficiency by entering into state and local agreements for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services, provided governments maintain documentation demonstrating competition requirements are met. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, describes each allowable procurement method.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Island Transit January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 2020-001 The Transit?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. CFDA Number and Title: 20.509 ? Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 ? COVID-19 ? Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Federal Grantor Name: Federal Transit Administration Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: FTA 5311 Questioned Cost Amount: N/A Background The Transit received $7,496,062 in grant funds from the Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program during fiscal year 2020. The objective of this program is to initiate, improve, or continue public transportation service in rural areas by providing financial assistance for operating, planning, administrative expenses, and the acquisition, construction, and improvement of facilities and equipment. Additionally, the program provides support for rural intercity bus service and additional funding for training, technical assistance, research and related support services for rural transit service. Federal regulations require federal award recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods or services, governments must apply the more restrictive of federal requirements, state law or local policies by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the purchase amount. Transit policy and federal law are most restrictive and require a formal bid process for purchases of goods and services of $250,000 or more. Additionally, state and federal requirements allow local entities to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an agreement or cooperative. To comply with piggybacking law, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from the other entity?s bid contract. If the Transit uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the Transit when selecting the contractor. Description of Condition The Transit has controls in place over procurement, but they were ineffective for ensuring compliance with all applicable requirements. The Transit did not perform competitive procurement procedures or establish an interlocal agreement to piggyback on another entity?s contract before purchasing three hybrid buses for approximately $2.4 million. Therefore, the Transit did not comply with all of the applicable federal procurement requirements. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The Transit has historically received federal funding to purchase buses, and management has been intentional about having controls in place over procurement to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements. The state agency contract from which the Transit historically purchases buses did not procure a contract in 2020. As a result, the Transit purchased buses from another entity?s contract, and Transit employees were not aware they needed to establish an interlocal agreement with that entity before purchasing, as state law requires. Effect of Condition Without effective internal controls over procurement and piggybacking procedures, the Transit cannot demonstrate it complied with applicable federal procurement requirements and received the best price for the buses. However, since the purchases were allowable under the federal program, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the Transit strengthen its internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services. Transit Authority?s Response Thank you for this recommendation. Island Transit has updated its Procurement Policy to include completing an interlocal agreement when purchasing from a cooperative purchasing schedule in another state. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the Transit?s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the Transit for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303 Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 318, General procurement standards, allows governments to foster great economy and efficiency by entering into state and local agreements for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services, provided governments maintain documentation demonstrating competition requirements are met. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, describes each allowable procurement method.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FINDINGS REPORTED UNDER UNIFORM GUIDANCE Island Transit January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by the Transit for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Finding ref number: 2020-001 Finding caption: The Transit did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Name, address, and telephone of Transit contact person: Financial Manager Paul Arand 19758 SR 20 Coupeville, WA 98239 (360) 678-9510 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: (If the auditee does not concur with the finding, the auditee must list the reasons for non-concurrence). Island Transit will update its Procurement Policy to include completing an Interlocal Agreement when purchasing from a cooperative purchasing schedule in another state. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: May 6, 2022

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2019 — management decision was due March 22, 2020.

2018-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.