EIN: 911157127
UEI: PD3VNAABZJL7
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 18, 2025 (249 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding 2024-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance related to reporting for the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Title: USAID Malaria Vaccine Assistance Listing Number: 98.AID-7200AA20C00017 Award Number: 7200AA20C00017 Award Period: 06/18/2020 through 06/17/2026 Criteria Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109‐282) (FFATA) that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 170 ‐ Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information. The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA sub‐award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub‐grant in total greater than or equal to $30,000. The report must be filed in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition/Context The Organization has an established a process by which to perform FFATA reporting. Among the 10 sub-awards we tested, we found that documentation supporting the FFATA filing indicates late submissions for 2 of the selections. Both were existing sub-awards that were amended during the year. Transactions tested 10, Sub-Award Not Reported 0, Reported Not Timely 2, Sub-Award Amount Incorrect N/A, Sub-Award Missing Key Elements N/A Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions $11,068,072, Sub-Award Not Reported $-, Reported Not Timely $204,097, Sub-Aard Amount Incorrect N/A, Sub-Award Missing Key Elements N/A Cause The late submissions were due to the Organization’s periodic review process not effectively identifying and resolving delinquent FFATA filings. Effect The Organization did not comply with the FFATA sub-award reporting requirements that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding Elements of this finding are a repeat of some of the matters noted in Finding 2023-002. Recommendations We recommend management review the timing and frequency of its review process over FFATA filings to ensure all filings are submitted in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance related to reporting for the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Title: USAID Malaria Vaccine Assistance Listing Number: 98.AID-7200AA20C00017 Award Number: 7200AA20C00017 Award Period: 06/18/2020 through 06/17/2026 Criteria Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109‐282) (FFATA) that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 170 ‐ Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information. The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA sub‐award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub‐grant in total greater than or equal to $30,000. The report must be filed in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition/Context The Organization has an established a process by which to perform FFATA reporting. Among the 10 sub-awards we tested, we found that documentation supporting the FFATA filing indicates late submissions for 2 of the selections. Both were existing sub-awards that were amended during the year. Transactions tested 10, Sub-Award Not Reported 0, Reported Not Timely 2, Sub-Award Amount Incorrect N/A, Sub-Award Missing Key Elements N/A Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions $11,068,072, Sub-Award Not Reported $-, Reported Not Timely $204,097, Sub-Aard Amount Incorrect N/A, Sub-Award Missing Key Elements N/A Cause The late submissions were due to the Organization’s periodic review process not effectively identifying and resolving delinquent FFATA filings. Effect The Organization did not comply with the FFATA sub-award reporting requirements that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding Elements of this finding are a repeat of some of the matters noted in Finding 2023-002. Recommendations We recommend management review the timing and frequency of its review process over FFATA filings to ensure all filings are submitted in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001 PATH’s Response and Corrective Action Plan PATH has an established process for completing FFATA reporting in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109‐282) (FFATA) that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 170 ‐ Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information. Although PATH complied with all other FFATA reporting requirements, reports for two subawards were not filed by the end of the month following the month in which PATH awarded these sub‐grants greater than or equal to $30,000. For the FFATA filings that were submitted late, the cause was that an employee new to PATH that year who assumed FFATA reporting did not realize her entries were not saving in the system correctly. This issue was discovered as part of a routine management review of PATH’s FFATA reporting. When the issue was discovered, management repeated the training on the Office of Grants and Contract’s (OGC) business process for FFATA reporting with that staff member and assigned another member of the team to review entries in the last week of each month, preventing future late filings. In 2025, OGC Management will add the following actions to the FFATA reporting business process strengthen to ensure all filings are submitted in a timely manner. Action Responsible staff member Due date Repeat training on OGC’s business process for FFATA reporting with the two OGC staff members responsible for FFATA reporting for PATH OGC Management June 30, 2025 Provide monthly report to OGC management by the last day of each month confirming timely reporting OGC Staff responsible for FFATA reporting Throughout 2025
2023-002
FAC accepted this audit on June 5, 2024 — management decision was due December 5, 2024.
Finding 2023-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Award Numbers: 7200AA20CA00017, AID-OAA-A-16-00084 Award Periods: 7/27/2020 through 7/26/2025, 09/27/2016 through 09/26/2026 Criteria Procurement standards contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326, require that a non‐Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. PATH’s procurement policy requires that single source procurements are documented on the contractor justification form and must address the basis on which cost reasonableness was determined. The policy also requires competitive procurements to include documentation of the solicitation documents, proposals, contractor justification form, procurement review and approval form and cost analysis. Condition/Context In our sample of 60 procurement transactions, we identified issues with three specific procurements; Two instances involved the noncompetitive procurement method that did not contain adequate records sufficient to detail the history of procurement in that a contractor justification was missing. Additionally, we identified a competitive procurement under a master service agreement signed in 2015, that did not have the necessary documentation to evidence the initial and subsequent procurement evaluations to ensure PATH continues to receive reasonable value. The total value of these three procurement transactions amounted to $38,922. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including contractor justification forms was not followed in these instances. Effect Records sufficient to detail the history of procurements were not maintained, thus resulting to noncompliance with the Organization’s procurement policy. Questioned Costs $38,922 Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Organization provide training and reminders to the applicable staff involved with these procurements to ensure procurement procedures are followed in future procurements and records are maintained with sufficient detail to evidence the history of procurement including fully completing and retaining the contractor justification form. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Award Numbers: 7200AA20CA00017, AID-OAA-A-16-00084 Award Periods: 7/27/2020 through 7/26/2025, 09/27/2016 through 09/26/2026 Criteria Procurement standards contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326, require that a non‐Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. PATH’s procurement policy requires that single source procurements are documented on the contractor justification form and must address the basis on which cost reasonableness was determined. The policy also requires competitive procurements to include documentation of the solicitation documents, proposals, contractor justification form, procurement review and approval form and cost analysis. Condition/Context In our sample of 60 procurement transactions, we identified issues with three specific procurements; Two instances involved the noncompetitive procurement method that did not contain adequate records sufficient to detail the history of procurement in that a contractor justification was missing. Additionally, we identified a competitive procurement under a master service agreement signed in 2015, that did not have the necessary documentation to evidence the initial and subsequent procurement evaluations to ensure PATH continues to receive reasonable value. The total value of these three procurement transactions amounted to $38,922. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including contractor justification forms was not followed in these instances. Effect Records sufficient to detail the history of procurements were not maintained, thus resulting to noncompliance with the Organization’s procurement policy. Questioned Costs $38,922 Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Organization provide training and reminders to the applicable staff involved with these procurements to ensure procurement procedures are followed in future procurements and records are maintained with sufficient detail to evidence the history of procurement including fully completing and retaining the contractor justification form. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-001 PATH’s Response and Corrective Action Plan Auditor’s recommendation is that PATH provide training and reminders to the applicable staff to ensure procurement procedures are followed in future procurements and records are maintained with sufficient detail to evidence the history of procurement including fully completing and retaining the contractor justification form, with which PATH’s management agrees. Following is a timeline documenting planned implementation of the corrective action plan. Action Responsible staff member Due date Training - standardization of required documentation for every procurement request/ execution. Global Procurement Manager Q4 2024 Reminder communication of the documentation requirement to all PADMs and Buyer rights individuals Global Procurement Manager Q3 2024 Country and project office support by the Global Procurement Team on procurement processes and documentation requirements Global Procurement Manager Q3 2024 PATH will examine executed Master Services Agreements to confirm that PATH continues to receive reasonable value Global Procurement Manager Q4 2024
Finding 2023-002 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance related to reporting for the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Title: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Award Number: 72068522CA00005, AID-OAA-A-16-00084 Award Period: 7/11/2022 through 7/9/2027, 09/27/2016 through 09/26/2026 Criteria Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109‐282) (FFATA) that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 170 ‐ Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information. The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA sub‐award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub‐grant in total greater than or equal to $30,000. The report must be filed in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition/Context The Organization had established a process by which to perform FFATA reporting. Among the 13 sub-awards we tested, we found that documentation supporting the FFATA filing indicates late submissions for 2 of the selections. Both were existing sub-awards that were amended during the year. Sub-AwardSub-AwardTransactionsSub-AwardReportedAmountMissingTestedNot ReportedNot TimelyIncorrectKey Elements1302N/AN/A Dollar AmountSub-AwardSub-Awardof TestedSub-AwardReportedAmountMissingTransactionsNot ReportedNot TimelyIncorrectKey Elements17,112,678$ -$ 1,061,634$ N/AN/A Cause The late submissions of FFATA reports were attributed to a reporting error that incorrectly excluded close-out awards in 2023. The Organization’s staff identified and corrected this issue with the report’s parameters in January 2024 to prevent future late filings. Effect The Organization did not comply with the FFATA sub-award reporting requirements that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations We recommend the Organization continue to monitor sub-awards amended during the year and ensure the reporting is made on time. We note that the Organization resolved the issue with the report parameters in January 2024. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-002 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance related to reporting for the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Title: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Award Number: 72068522CA00005, AID-OAA-A-16-00084 Award Period: 7/11/2022 through 7/9/2027, 09/27/2016 through 09/26/2026 Criteria Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109‐282) (FFATA) that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 170 ‐ Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information. The prime awardee is required to file a FFATA sub‐award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub‐grant in total greater than or equal to $30,000. The report must be filed in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition/Context The Organization had established a process by which to perform FFATA reporting. Among the 13 sub-awards we tested, we found that documentation supporting the FFATA filing indicates late submissions for 2 of the selections. Both were existing sub-awards that were amended during the year. Sub-AwardSub-AwardTransactionsSub-AwardReportedAmountMissingTestedNot ReportedNot TimelyIncorrectKey Elements1302N/AN/A Dollar AmountSub-AwardSub-Awardof TestedSub-AwardReportedAmountMissingTransactionsNot ReportedNot TimelyIncorrectKey Elements17,112,678$ -$ 1,061,634$ N/AN/A Cause The late submissions of FFATA reports were attributed to a reporting error that incorrectly excluded close-out awards in 2023. The Organization’s staff identified and corrected this issue with the report’s parameters in January 2024 to prevent future late filings. Effect The Organization did not comply with the FFATA sub-award reporting requirements that are codified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations We recommend the Organization continue to monitor sub-awards amended during the year and ensure the reporting is made on time. We note that the Organization resolved the issue with the report parameters in January 2024. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-002 PATH’s Response and Corrective Action Plan Auditor’s recommendation is that PATH update our internal system parameters to ensure awards in closeout status are part of FFATA submissions going forward, with which PATH’s management agrees and has implemented. Following is a timeline documenting implementation of the corrective action plan. Action Responsible staff member Due date PATH has updated internal system parameters to include awards in closeout status. Global Grants and Contracts Manager Completed (Q1 2024)
FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2020 — management decision was due December 12, 2020.
Finding 2019-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with allowable cost principles. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development CFDA Number: 98.001 Program Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Award Numbers: AID-660-A-17-00001, award period March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2022 Criteria Compensation-personal services requirements contained in Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles, Section 200.430 - Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, and 22 CFR 226, Administration of Assistance Awards to U.S. Non-Governmental Organizations, requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context/Questioned Costs The Organization?s internal control over salaries costs charged to a Federal awards requires that only allowable time be charged and also requires that timesheets be completed by each employee and reviewed and approved by the appropriate supervisor for accuracy; changes to timesheets after the original approval is made must be documented and approved in writing. During our audit we tested 60 salaries costs. Of the salaries costs tested we noted four instances where employees in the Organization?s offices in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) appeared to have more salary charged to the Federal award than the time sheet indicated by $71.47 in the aggregate. Upon further analysis by the Organization it was identified that employees in DRC did not record any hours on their timesheet for national holidays. The Organization has an automated system that takes the approved timesheet and applies the percentage worked to the employees authorized salary to allocate salary costs to projects. As the holiday hours were not recorded on the timesheet, the projects the employees worked on in a month with a holiday were overcharged. The Organization performed an analysis and identified the Federal Program was overcharged by $48,378.21. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over review and approval of hours reported on timesheets lead to overcharges to Federal awards. Effect The effect is that salary costs were overcharged to the Federal award. Repeat Finding Not applicable, as Finding 2019-001 is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend management correct the salary costs incorrectly charged to the Federal award. We also recommend management provide training to enforce its time sheet procedures to ensure accurate salary charges to the Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-001 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with allowable cost principles. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development CFDA Number: 98.001 Program Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Award Numbers: AID-660-A-17-00001, award period March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2022 Criteria Compensation-personal services requirements contained in Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles, Section 200.430 - Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, and 22 CFR 226, Administration of Assistance Awards to U.S. Non-Governmental Organizations, requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context/Questioned Costs The Organization?s internal control over salaries costs charged to a Federal awards requires that only allowable time be charged and also requires that timesheets be completed by each employee and reviewed and approved by the appropriate supervisor for accuracy; changes to timesheets after the original approval is made must be documented and approved in writing. During our audit we tested 60 salaries costs. Of the salaries costs tested we noted four instances where employees in the Organization?s offices in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) appeared to have more salary charged to the Federal award than the time sheet indicated by $71.47 in the aggregate. Upon further analysis by the Organization it was identified that employees in DRC did not record any hours on their timesheet for national holidays. The Organization has an automated system that takes the approved timesheet and applies the percentage worked to the employees authorized salary to allocate salary costs to projects. As the holiday hours were not recorded on the timesheet, the projects the employees worked on in a month with a holiday were overcharged. The Organization performed an analysis and identified the Federal Program was overcharged by $48,378.21. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over review and approval of hours reported on timesheets lead to overcharges to Federal awards. Effect The effect is that salary costs were overcharged to the Federal award. Repeat Finding Not applicable, as Finding 2019-001 is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend management correct the salary costs incorrectly charged to the Federal award. We also recommend management provide training to enforce its time sheet procedures to ensure accurate salary charges to the Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2019-001 PATH?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: PATH?s internal control over salaries costs charged to a Federal award requires that only allowable time be charged to Federal award or leave cost pools. Internal control also requires that timesheets be completed by each employee and reviewed and approved by appropriate supervisor for accuracy and proper allocation. As result of the finding, PATH will implement additional controls over the timecard review process to ensure holidays are correctly captured in the leave cost pool. PATH will also reinforce the timecard policy and provide training, as needed, to staff on the appropriateness and accuracy for recording holiday hours in their timecards. PATH plans to fully mitigate this finding in 2020. Following is a timeline documenting planned implementation of the corrective action plan. See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table
Finding 2019-002 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development CFDA Number: 98.001 Program Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Award Numbers: AID-OAA-A-14-00028 award period March 17, 2014 through November 30, 2019, and AID-OAA-A-17-00015 award period August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2021 Criteria Requirements for pass-through entities contained in Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ? Post-Award Requirements, Section 200.331(a)(xii) states all pass-through entities must ensure subawards include identification of whether the award is R&D. Condition/Context/Questioned Costs The Organization?s internal control over subrecipient monitoring include a template for issuing subaward agreements. The template includes a section to identify if the award is R&D. This field is input by staff in the Office of Grants and Contract and/or Legal departments of the Organization. During our audit we tested 25 subrecipient agreements for CFDA 98.001 and found three of the agreements identified the agreement as R&D in error. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over the R&D classification did not properly detect the incorrect indentification being included. Effect The effect is that three subawards were improperly identified as R&D awards by the Organization. Repeat Finding Not applicable, as Finding 2019-002 is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend management update the template and related procedures for subaward agreements to clarify that the designation as an R&D subaward is based on the designation in the related prime award received by PATH. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-002 Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development CFDA Number: 98.001 Program Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Award Numbers: AID-OAA-A-14-00028 award period March 17, 2014 through November 30, 2019, and AID-OAA-A-17-00015 award period August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2021 Criteria Requirements for pass-through entities contained in Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ? Post-Award Requirements, Section 200.331(a)(xii) states all pass-through entities must ensure subawards include identification of whether the award is R&D. Condition/Context/Questioned Costs The Organization?s internal control over subrecipient monitoring include a template for issuing subaward agreements. The template includes a section to identify if the award is R&D. This field is input by staff in the Office of Grants and Contract and/or Legal departments of the Organization. During our audit we tested 25 subrecipient agreements for CFDA 98.001 and found three of the agreements identified the agreement as R&D in error. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over the R&D classification did not properly detect the incorrect indentification being included. Effect The effect is that three subawards were improperly identified as R&D awards by the Organization. Repeat Finding Not applicable, as Finding 2019-002 is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend management update the template and related procedures for subaward agreements to clarify that the designation as an R&D subaward is based on the designation in the related prime award received by PATH. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2019-002 PATH?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: PATH currently has a process to review all incoming awards and amendments to determine whether the incoming award is R&D, and subsequently flow down the provisions to subrecipients. Per 2CFR200.331 - requirements for pass-through entities, PATH is required to include in the subaward document the characteristics of the Federal award it is issued under so that the subrecipient is aware of the funding requirements and can fully comply. One of those requirements, 200.331(a)(xxi), is whether the award is R&D ? this is a classification that is assigned by the awarding agency and should not be modified as the funding is passed to other organizations. Although all other aspects of 2CFR200.331 were followed, for these three subawards were identified as R&D in error, as noted by the three exceptions. PATH plans to fully mitigate this finding in 2020. Following is a timeline documenting planned implementation of the corrective action plan. See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table
FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2019 — management decision was due January 6, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on June 6, 2018 — management decision was due December 6, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
FAC accepted this audit on June 1, 2017 — management decision was due December 1, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.