TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

EIN: 910434830

UEI: GCDAWM2K9R94

Data as of August 24, 2026

TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE4 audit years5 findings2 repeat
4
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2026 (127 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Other

2025-001 Preparation of Schedule of Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards ("SEFA") Criteria The SEFA is required to be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to reflect expenditures of federal awards. Condition The original SEFA presented to the audit firm was overstated by $35,921 due to inclusion of nonfederal award expenditures. Context The SEFA included revenue amounts that the Chamber had received through revenue streams other than a federal award. Effect The SEFA did not properly reflect the amount of federal awards as required by Uniform Guidance and had the potential to have an incorrect major program selected. Cause The Chamber's internal control over the preparation of the SEFA was not effective to verify the proper amount of federal expenditures. Auditor's Recommendations We recommend implementation of procedures to provide oversight that ensures the completion of an accurate SEFA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-001 Preparation of Schedule of Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards ("SEFA") Criteria The SEFA is required to be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to reflect expenditures of federal awards. Condition The original SEFA presented to the audit firm was overstated by $35,921 due to inclusion of nonfederal award expenditures. Context The SEFA included revenue amounts that the Chamber had received through revenue streams other than a federal award. Effect The SEFA did not properly reflect the amount of federal awards as required by Uniform Guidance and had the potential to have an incorrect major program selected. Cause The Chamber's internal control over the preparation of the SEFA was not effective to verify the proper amount of federal expenditures. Auditor's Recommendations We recommend implementation of procedures to provide oversight that ensures the completion of an accurate SEFA.

Corrective Action Plan

All grants are to be labeled as federal and non-federal when entered into the Chamber’s general ledger (Emily), and when grant documents are saved internally (Chamber Staff).  Expenses associated with federal grants are to be coded and classed to those grants for accurate entry on the SEFA (Emily).  The Executive Director (Tom) will be involved in the preparation of the SEFA to ensure only federal grant expenses are included, and that no expenses are omitted.

About Other →
2025-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

2025-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Over Noncompliance and Noncompliance over Major Programs Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should support the wages billed to the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1), "charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" and "be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated." Condition Internal control and adherence to compliance were not followed with regards to records that accurately reflect the work performed. Questioned costs Total questioned cost of $1,277 based on the payroll transactions tested for one employee that were not accurately supported with records that reflected the work performed. Context During our payroll testing, of the ten payroll transactions we tested, one employee had two payroll transactions that indicated the wages billed to the federal award were not accurately supported by the employee's timesheet. We expanded our payroll testing and sampled four additional transactions for this employee. Of the six total payroll transactions tested for this employee, none of them were accurately supported by their timesheet for hours worked on the federal award. Cause The error was caused by not applying adequate number of controls necessary for billing wage expenses to the federal award. Effect The Federal award was incorrectly charged with unreasonable wages. Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendations We recommend that Chamber implement stronger internal controls over billing wage expenses to the federal award.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Over Noncompliance and Noncompliance over Major Programs Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should support the wages billed to the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1), "charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" and "be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated." Condition Internal control and adherence to compliance were not followed with regards to records that accurately reflect the work performed. Questioned costs Total questioned cost of $1,277 based on the payroll transactions tested for one employee that were not accurately supported with records that reflected the work performed. Context During our payroll testing, of the ten payroll transactions we tested, one employee had two payroll transactions that indicated the wages billed to the federal award were not accurately supported by the employee's timesheet. We expanded our payroll testing and sampled four additional transactions for this employee. Of the six total payroll transactions tested for this employee, none of them were accurately supported by their timesheet for hours worked on the federal award. Cause The error was caused by not applying adequate number of controls necessary for billing wage expenses to the federal award. Effect The Federal award was incorrectly charged with unreasonable wages. Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendations We recommend that Chamber implement stronger internal controls over billing wage expenses to the federal award.

Corrective Action Plan

Moving forward, the Chamber will use an employee’s timesheet to bill wages to federal awards. When preparing reimbursement requests, the staff will calculate the wage amount that is equal to the number of hours each employee self-attested to working to the federal grant by coding the hours on their timesheet for the applicable pay periods.  If a true-up of wage expenses is done at any time during the cycle of the federal grant, the Chamber will maintain adequate documentation (the employee timesheets) to indicate how the true-up was calculated.  The calculation provided by the staff will be reviewed by the Executive Director prior to the reimbursement request being submitted to the granting agency.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2025 — management decision was due November 30, 2025.

2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEATQUESTIONED COSTS

2024-001 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Federal Program Information Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Chamber has a procurement policy in place; however, the Chamber neglected to verify if vendors had been suspended or debarred, in accordance with stated regulations. The Chamber also did not maintain sufficient records to document the rationale for the procurement method used for a transaction exceeding the small purchase threshold. Questioned Costs $25,000 Context A sample of 3 vendors was made from a population of 3 vendors whose expenses exceeded the covered transaction threshold that were charged to the major program. Of the 3 sampled vendors, the Chamber neglected to check the suspension or debarment status of 1 vendor prior to entering a covered transaction of $25,000. A sample of 3 vendors was made from a population of 3 vendors whose total transactions exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 3 sampled vendors, the Chamber did not maintain sufficient records to document the rationale of using a noncompetitive procurement method for a small purchase transaction. Cause The Chamber claimed that they had been conducting business transactions with this vendor prior to having a procurement policy in place and did not implement the procurement policy on already developed business relationships. The Chamber also did not consider documenting its rationale for continuing to use the vendor for services that exceeded the small purchase threshold that were charged to the major program. Effect Purchases may have occurred that do not follow the policy, and contracts with vendors that had been suspended or debarred could have been awarded and not detected. The Chamber also did not conduct procurement transaction "in a manner that provides full and open competition," as defined in 2 CFR 200.319(a). Repeat Finding Yes - reference 2023-001. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in all contracts transacted in conjunction with using funds originating from a federal award grant, with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Chamber staff should also perform an independent status check of vendors in sam.gov prior to entering into an agreement and retain the search results. The Chamber should also evaluate its current method of procurement and educate staff that if using funds from a federal award to enter into a transaction exceeding the small purchase threshold, that full and open competition must be facilitated, despite any prior relationships with vendors.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Federal Program Information Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Chamber has a procurement policy in place; however, the Chamber neglected to verify if vendors had been suspended or debarred, in accordance with stated regulations. The Chamber also did not maintain sufficient records to document the rationale for the procurement method used for a transaction exceeding the small purchase threshold. Questioned Costs $25,000 Context A sample of 3 vendors was made from a population of 3 vendors whose expenses exceeded the covered transaction threshold that were charged to the major program. Of the 3 sampled vendors, the Chamber neglected to check the suspension or debarment status of 1 vendor prior to entering a covered transaction of $25,000. A sample of 3 vendors was made from a population of 3 vendors whose total transactions exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 3 sampled vendors, the Chamber did not maintain sufficient records to document the rationale of using a noncompetitive procurement method for a small purchase transaction. Cause The Chamber claimed that they had been conducting business transactions with this vendor prior to having a procurement policy in place and did not implement the procurement policy on already developed business relationships. The Chamber also did not consider documenting its rationale for continuing to use the vendor for services that exceeded the small purchase threshold that were charged to the major program. Effect Purchases may have occurred that do not follow the policy, and contracts with vendors that had been suspended or debarred could have been awarded and not detected. The Chamber also did not conduct procurement transaction "in a manner that provides full and open competition," as defined in 2 CFR 200.319(a). Repeat Finding Yes - reference 2023-001. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in all contracts transacted in conjunction with using funds originating from a federal award grant, with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Chamber staff should also perform an independent status check of vendors in sam.gov prior to entering into an agreement and retain the search results. The Chamber should also evaluate its current method of procurement and educate staff that if using funds from a federal award to enter into a transaction exceeding the small purchase threshold, that full and open competition must be facilitated, despite any prior relationships with vendors.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan for Annual Audit 2024 Finding One: 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor’s Recommendations: Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should conduct research and keep records for procurements not secured using a competitive process. Corrective Action: TPCC Staff will continue to use a competitive procurement process for vendors when possible, per TPCC procurement policy. CEO, Andrea Reay, will amend the current procurement policy to include a process for when competitive procurement is not possible due to unique needs/benefits. This will include a process documenting research conducted that demonstrates the unique benefits to the program/participants for any vendor that is not secured using a competitive process. Documentation includes dates discussed, names of individuals involved in the discussion and decisions made. The debarment check with sam.gov will be included in the documentation packet. Timing of remediation completion: CEO, Andrea Reay, will complete by May 31, 2025.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on July 25, 2024 — management decision was due January 25, 2025.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
REPEAT

Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per OMB guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Condition The Chamber has a procurement policy in place; however, the Chamber neglected to verify if vendors had been suspended or debarred, in accordance with stated regulations. Context Per our review of vendors over the applicable threshold, there was no documentation of having been reviewed for suspension or debarment. Cause Staff claimed that they had been conducting business transactions with these vendors prior to having a procurement policy in place and did not implement the procurement policy on already developed business relationships. Effect Purchases may have occurred that do not follow the policy, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could have been awarded and not detected. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in all contracts transacted in conjunction with using funds originating from a federal award grant, with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per OMB guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Condition The Chamber has a procurement policy in place; however, the Chamber neglected to verify if vendors had been suspended or debarred, in accordance with stated regulations. Context Per our review of vendors over the applicable threshold, there was no documentation of having been reviewed for suspension or debarment. Cause Staff claimed that they had been conducting business transactions with these vendors prior to having a procurement policy in place and did not implement the procurement policy on already developed business relationships. Effect Purchases may have occurred that do not follow the policy, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could have been awarded and not detected. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in all contracts transacted in conjunction with using funds originating from a federal award grant, with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan for Annual Audit 2023 Finding One: 2023-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor’s Recommendations: Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in all contracts transacted in conjunction with using funds originating from a federal award grant, with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Corrective Action: CEO, Andrea Reay, will develop a process for checking and documenting vendor suspension and debarment status as required in the established procurement policy. CEO will be responsible for verifying that all vendors being paid using Federal Funds, will have been checked for suspension and debarment prior to disbursing future Federal funding and document the search process. The Chamber employees who authorize the use of Federal funds will: Read and sign a document stating that they are aware of the Federal provisions requiring concerning Suspension and Debarment Confirm with the CEO, or appropriate delegee that the vendor has been checked prior to fund distribution using the SAM.gov registration. Timing of remediation completion: CEO, Andrea Reay, will complete by May 31, 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2023 — management decision was due December 12, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment

2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per OMB guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred. The guidance also requires the entities to follow documented procurement procedures. Condition There is no policy in place for procurement procedures to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. Context Per our review of vendors over the applicable threshold, there was no documentation of having been reviewed for procurement, suspension or debarment. Cause Staff were not aware of the specific compliance requirements and procedures for procurement, suspension and debarment status. Effect Purchases may occur that do not follow the policy, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in contracts with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information Funding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per OMB guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred. The guidance also requires the entities to follow documented procurement procedures. Condition There is no policy in place for procurement procedures to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. Context Per our review of vendors over the applicable threshold, there was no documentation of having been reviewed for procurement, suspension or debarment. Cause Staff were not aware of the specific compliance requirements and procedures for procurement, suspension and debarment status. Effect Purchases may occur that do not follow the policy, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Auditor's Recommendations Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should include a provision in contracts with respect to suspension and debarment, communicate all requirements for procurement to staff and establish procedures to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding One: 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor?s Recommendations: The Organization should adopt Procurement Policy including a section concerning Federal Awards which will include a section regarding the verification of the status of each potential vendor before disbursement of Federal funds. CEO, Andrea Reay, will review and approve this policy and the Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce (the ?Chamber?) Board of Directors will approve this policy. Response: CEO, Andrea Reay, will update the Chamber?s policies with a Procurement Policy, including a section concerning Federal Awards. Vendors will be verified before disbursement of Federal funds. The new PP will include the following language. The Chamber employees who authorize the use of Federal funds will: -Read and sign a document stating that they are aware of the Federal provisions requiring concerning Suspension and Debarment -Confirm with the CEO, or appropriate delegee that the vendor has been checked prior to fund distribution using the SAM.gov registration. CEO, or appropriate delegee, will develop a process for checking vendor debarment status and include language outlining the process in the procurement policy. CEO, or appropriate delegee, will be responsible for verifying that all vendors being paid using Federal funds, will have been checked for debarment prior to disbursing future Federal funding. Timing of remediation completion: CEO, Andrea Reay, will complete by March 1, 2023.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.