EIN: 880435559
UEI: HPNBC4TCERS3
Data as of August 25, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2026 (26 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Eligibility: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Finding 2025-001 for included table) Criteria – In accordance with 34 CFR 690.63, Pell Grant Scheduled Awards are based on information provided on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form, the presence of a valid Student Aid Index (SAI) on the student’s FAFSA Submission Summary or Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR), the academic year structure, and the Pell Grant cost of attendance (COA) for a full-time student for a full academic year. For term-based programs, awards for part-time students are adjusted based on a student’s enrollment intensity. Condition/Context – A sample of 6 students were selected out of a population of 214 students who received Pell grants during the year ended June 30, 2025. The students’ disbursement records were compared to underlying student eligibility supporting documentation, including but not limited to FAFSA records, student transcripts, and University approved cost of attendance budgets. Effect – One of the six students was identified as having received an incorrect Pell grant in the amount of $128 due to an incorrect calculation of the student’s enrollment intensity percentage. Cause – Due to a change in the student’s enrollment status, the incorrect number of units was used in calculating the Pell award. The difference was not identified in subsequent reconciliations of enrollment. Repeat Finding – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend the University establish a procedure to determine whether a Pell awarded student has begun attendance in all scheduled classes for purposes of confirming the accuracy of the enrollment intensity calculated in the packaging process. If a student does not begin attendance in all scheduled classes for a payment period, resulting in a change in the student’s enrollment intensity, the University must recalculate the student’s award for that payment period based on the lower enrollment intensity. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding. A corrective action plan has been created by management and is included in the following section.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Eligibility: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Finding 2025-001 for included table) Criteria – In accordance with 34 CFR 690.63, Pell Grant Scheduled Awards are based on information provided on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form, the presence of a valid Student Aid Index (SAI) on the student’s FAFSA Submission Summary or Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR), the academic year structure, and the Pell Grant cost of attendance (COA) for a full-time student for a full academic year. For term-based programs, awards for part-time students are adjusted based on a student’s enrollment intensity. Condition/Context – A sample of 6 students were selected out of a population of 214 students who received Pell grants during the year ended June 30, 2025. The students’ disbursement records were compared to underlying student eligibility supporting documentation, including but not limited to FAFSA records, student transcripts, and University approved cost of attendance budgets. Effect – One of the six students was identified as having received an incorrect Pell grant in the amount of $128 due to an incorrect calculation of the student’s enrollment intensity percentage. Cause – Due to a change in the student’s enrollment status, the incorrect number of units was used in calculating the Pell award. The difference was not identified in subsequent reconciliations of enrollment. Repeat Finding – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend the University establish a procedure to determine whether a Pell awarded student has begun attendance in all scheduled classes for purposes of confirming the accuracy of the enrollment intensity calculated in the packaging process. If a student does not begin attendance in all scheduled classes for a payment period, resulting in a change in the student’s enrollment intensity, the University must recalculate the student’s award for that payment period based on the lower enrollment intensity. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding. A corrective action plan has been created by management and is included in the following section.
Finding: 2025-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Eligibility – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Corrective Action Plan – The University conducted a review of affected students and identified 19 additional students with enrollment intensity that was incorrectly calculated. The University has returned a total of $2,448 to the Pell Grant program and has written off the corresponding balances on the affected students’ ledgers. In January 2025, the University fully implemented a new, integrated Student Information and Financial Aid System that automates enrollment intensity calculations based on real-time data from the Registrar’s Office. This eliminates manual entry and ensures Pell Grant disbursements are automatically and accurately calculated. There is no option to manually change the Pell enrollment intensity or award amount in the new system. The Financial Aid staff involved in Pell packaging and processing have been retrained on enrollment intensity calculations and system functionality. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Sally Mickelson, Director of Financial Aid Completion Date: November 13,2025
FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2022 — management decision was due May 30, 2023.
FINDING 2022-001 ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University or graduated from the University during the year ended June 30, 2022. Our sample consisted of 12 students out of a population of approximately 92 that were identified as withdrawn during the year and a sample of 28 students out of a population of approximately 205 that were identified as graduates. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted exceptions with one student enrolled in the College of Nursing who had withdrawn and whose status change was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Enrollment status is utilized by students, ED, the Direct Loan program, lenders, and other institutions to determine in-school status. NSLDS also uses the newly submitted enrollment data to recalculate a student?s 150% limit for direct subsidized loans to determine if loss or protection of the subsidy should occur. Therefore, enrollment reporting could result in incorrect future eligibility for undergraduate aid, as well as impact future subsidy loss or protection related to the 150% limit. Cause: There was a delay in communication from the College of Nursing to the department responsible for updating enrollment statuses to NSLDS which resulted in an aggregate delay of 25 days. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional communication protocols when a student is determined to have withdrawn to ensure that communication is made timely to NSLDS. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the recommendation and has developed a corrective action plan to use Microsoft Forms to notify service units of withdrawals. The Dean (or designee) of each program will update the report and indicate the effective date which will notify the financial aid department and allow them to timely update reporting enrollment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2022-001 ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University or graduated from the University during the year ended June 30, 2022. Our sample consisted of 12 students out of a population of approximately 92 that were identified as withdrawn during the year and a sample of 28 students out of a population of approximately 205 that were identified as graduates. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted exceptions with one student enrolled in the College of Nursing who had withdrawn and whose status change was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Enrollment status is utilized by students, ED, the Direct Loan program, lenders, and other institutions to determine in-school status. NSLDS also uses the newly submitted enrollment data to recalculate a student?s 150% limit for direct subsidized loans to determine if loss or protection of the subsidy should occur. Therefore, enrollment reporting could result in incorrect future eligibility for undergraduate aid, as well as impact future subsidy loss or protection related to the 150% limit. Cause: There was a delay in communication from the College of Nursing to the department responsible for updating enrollment statuses to NSLDS which resulted in an aggregate delay of 25 days. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional communication protocols when a student is determined to have withdrawn to ensure that communication is made timely to NSLDS. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the recommendation and has developed a corrective action plan to use Microsoft Forms to notify service units of withdrawals. The Dean (or designee) of each program will update the report and indicate the effective date which will notify the financial aid department and allow them to timely update reporting enrollment.
Corrective Action Plan - Finding: 2022-001: Special Tests and Provisions - Enrollment Reporting - Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Corrective Action Plan: The University uses Microsoft Forms reporting to notify service units of withdrawals. The Dean (or designee) of each program must manually update the Microsoft Office report of a withdrawal ad indicate the effective date, which triggers automated emails to the appropriate units. In the one instance of late reporting, the student was required to withdraw due to a no pass of a class, but he was allowed to complete a clinical/experiential course before being withdrawn. The Dean failed to enter the student's information after the student completed the clinical/experiential course, causing the delay in reporting. The Dean has since begun using reminders on his calendar to withdraw students in this situation. In addition, our Director of Institutional Assessment is in the process of developing and programming logic in the Micrsoft Forms report that allows the Dean to enter a future withdrawal date but delays the reporting of the withdrawal to the service units until that date, allowing the Dean to enter the information into the form immediately after a no pass that requires withdrawal. This will prevent the need to manual reminders to enter the date and prevent late withdrawal notifications. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Sally Mickelson, Director of Financial Aid. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
One eligible student with exceptional financial need was not awarded FSEOG prior to students who had higher expected family contributions. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 676.10(a)(1) In selecting among eligible students for FSEOG awards in each award year, an institution shall select those students with the lowest expected family contributions who will also receive Federal Pell Grants in that year. (2) If the institution has FSEOG funds remaining after giving FSEOG awards to all the Federal Pell Grant recipients at the institution, the institution shall award the remaining FSEOG funds to those eligible students with the lowest expected family contributions who will not receive Federal Pell Grants. Cause: The report used to determine students with exceptional financial need did not include students who were eligible for the Federal Pell Grant, but not awarded due to reaching their lifetime eligibility used. These students were still eligible for FSEOG. Effect: Student was not properly awarded. Context: One of 40 students tested was not awarded properly. Questioned costs: Based on the University?s awarding policy, $250 of FSEOG funds awarded to each eligible student annually. As such, questioned cost total $250 under award. Recommendation: The Student Financial Aid office should review its process for tracking students eligible for FSEOG who have reached their Federal Pell Grant lifetime eligibility used. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-002 U.S. Department of Education Program Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (CFDA 84.007) Federal Award Year: 2018-2019 Finding: A student with exceptional financial need was not awarded the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG). Condition: One eligible student with exceptional financial need was not awarded FSEOG prior to students who had higher expected family contributions. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 676.10(a)(1) In selecting among eligible students for FSEOG awards in each award year, an institution shall select those students with the lowest expected family contributions who will also receive Federal Pell Grants in that year. (2) If the institution has FSEOG funds remaining after giving FSEOG awards to all the Federal Pell Grant recipients at the institution, the institution shall award the remaining FSEOG funds to those eligible students with the lowest expected family contributions who will not receive Federal Pell Grants. Cause: The report used to determine students with exceptional financial need did not include students who were eligible for the Federal Pell Grant, but not awarded due to reaching their lifetime eligibility used. These students were still eligible for FSEOG. Effect: Student was not properly awarded. Context: One of 40 students tested was not awarded properly. Questioned costs: Based on the University?s awarding policy, $250 of FSEOG funds awarded to each eligible student annually. As such, questioned cost total $250 under award. Recommendation: The Student Financial Aid office should review its process for tracking students eligible for FSEOG who have reached their Federal Pell Grant lifetime eligibility used. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2019-002 Finding: A student with exceptional financial need was not awarded the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG). Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: We agree with this finding. The student was manually packaged in 2018-2019, which was a cross-over period for the student. Our system does not allow for automated packaging for our borrower-based academic years and during the manual packaging process, the Financial Aid Specialist did not award FSEOG funds. Immediately upon identification of this issue, we were able to create a query in our Financial Aid Management System (FAMS) to identify any student with a Pell grant greater than $0 but no FSEOG awards. That query has been assigned to our Technical Processor to review each time she creates Pell disbursement rosters for a cohort to ensure those students have also been awarded an FSEOG award. Contact Person: Sally Mickelson, Director of Financial Aid Completion Date: October 24, 2019
One student was over awarded unsubsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans which resulted in the student not receiving the maximum amount of subsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans based on the student?s year in school and financial need. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 685.200 (a), a student may not receive a Direct Unsubsidized Loan unless the student has received a Direct Subsidized Loan for the maximum amount for which the student is eligible. Cause: For a student whose award year crossed over year-end, the University awarded the student the same amount of subsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans that was awarded in the previous award year. As a result, the University did not properly award the student their maximum subsidized loan and over awarded their unsubsidized loans. Effect: Student was improperly awarded. Context: One of 40 students tested. Questioned costs: Student was under awarded subsidized loans and over awarded unsubsidized loans by $1,309. Recommendation: The Student Financial Aid office should review its process for packaging students whose award year crosses year-end and repackage as necessary to ensure students receive the appropriate aid. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-003 U.S. Department of Education Program Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster Federal Direct Stafford Student Loan (CFDA 84.268) Federal Award Year: 2018-2019 Finding: A student was awarded an incorrect amount of subsidized and unsubsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans. Condition: One student was over awarded unsubsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans which resulted in the student not receiving the maximum amount of subsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans based on the student?s year in school and financial need. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 685.200 (a), a student may not receive a Direct Unsubsidized Loan unless the student has received a Direct Subsidized Loan for the maximum amount for which the student is eligible. Cause: For a student whose award year crossed over year-end, the University awarded the student the same amount of subsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans that was awarded in the previous award year. As a result, the University did not properly award the student their maximum subsidized loan and over awarded their unsubsidized loans. Effect: Student was improperly awarded. Context: One of 40 students tested. Questioned costs: Student was under awarded subsidized loans and over awarded unsubsidized loans by $1,309. Recommendation: The Student Financial Aid office should review its process for packaging students whose award year crosses year-end and repackage as necessary to ensure students receive the appropriate aid. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2019-003 Finding: A student was awarded an incorrect amount of subsidized and unsubsidized Federal Direct Stafford loans. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: We agree with this finding. As with the student in the previous finding, this student was manually packaged for her second BBAY. Our system does not allow for automated packaging for our borrower-based academic years and during the manual packaging process, the Financial Aid Specialist did not use the student?s appropriate EFC for the months in the new BBAY; instead she used the EFC for the first BBAY, which resulted in an award of subsidized loan funds that she was not eligible for. We have created a query in our system to identify the students with an EFC greater than allowed for the next BBAY. The Financial Aid Specialists that package these cohorts have been assigned these queries for their appropriate student cohorts. In addition, we are in the process of adding field ?EFC Months? to our student record for repackaging as a secondary failsafe to prevent this in the future. Contact Person: Sally Mickelson, Director of Financial Aid Completion Date: October 24, 2019
One student?s enrollment status was not reported within the required time period to NSLDS. This is a repeat finding of 2018-003. Criteria: Per 685.309(b) Enrollment reporting process. (1) Upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the report and return to the report to the Secretary (i) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) Within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary; and (2) Unless it expects to submit its next enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, notify the Secretary within 30 days if it discovers that (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Cause: The registrar did not timely communicate the withdrawal of a student from the University to the Student Financial Aid office; therefore, the student was not reported to NSLDS within 60 days as required. Effect: A student may not be placed into repayment status on a timely basis. Context: One of 25 students tested was not reported timely or accurately to NSLDS. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: The University should improve communication of all withdrawals between departments on a timely basis and verify reporting is done timely. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-004 U.S. Department of Education Program Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster Federal Direct Stafford Student Loan (CFDA 84.268) Federal Award Year: 2018-2019 Finding: The University did not timely report enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Condition: One student?s enrollment status was not reported within the required time period to NSLDS. This is a repeat finding of 2018-003. Criteria: Per 685.309(b) Enrollment reporting process. (1) Upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the report and return to the report to the Secretary (i) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) Within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary; and (2) Unless it expects to submit its next enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, notify the Secretary within 30 days if it discovers that (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Cause: The registrar did not timely communicate the withdrawal of a student from the University to the Student Financial Aid office; therefore, the student was not reported to NSLDS within 60 days as required. Effect: A student may not be placed into repayment status on a timely basis. Context: One of 25 students tested was not reported timely or accurately to NSLDS. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: The University should improve communication of all withdrawals between departments on a timely basis and verify reporting is done timely. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2019-004 Finding: The University did not timely report enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: We agree with this finding and concur that it is a repeat finding. The one student affected by this late reporting was due to two issues: 1) we updated our internal withdrawal form in late 2018 to include a new email address for notification to our Institutional Research team that is responsible for generating the monthly Clearinghouse file. That form was never updated on our intranet and the previous version (with the old Institutional Research email address) was used to notify us of this students withdrawal; and 2) the Registrar did not process their version of the form in our student information system until 4/3/19 due to an extended absence and human error (withdrawal date was 2/8/19) so that date was not sent to the Clearinghouse until our file on 4/5/19, which wasn?t processed until 4/16/19. We have reviewed all withdrawals from the 2018-2019 academic year to ensure no other students were reported late. In addition, we have moved the overall responsibility of Clearinghouse and enrollment reporting to the Director of Financial Aid effective 9/7/19. The Director of Financial Aid has 26 years of experience in financial aid and has managed enrollment reporting functions for much of those years at various institutions and has implemented and managed the Clearinghouse process at multiple institutions. She will also have a dedicated person within the Registrar?s Office who will be have first-level responsibility for processing student withdrawal changes to the student information system. Contact Person: Sally Mickelson, Director of Financial Aid Completion Date: October 24, 2019
2018-003
Federal funds were incorrectly drawn from the Federal Direct Stafford loan program and excess cash was not returned timely to the Department of Education. This is a repeat finding of 2018-002. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 668.162(b)(3), an institution must disburse the funds requested as soon as administratively feasible, but no later than three business days by the institution. Per 34 CFR 668.166(a) and (b), an excess cash balance tolerance is allowed if that balance is less than 1% of its prior year drawdowns and is eliminated within the next seven calendar days. Per 2018-2019 Federal Student Financial Aid Handbook, Volume 4, funds are school, award year, and program specific, and should not be used for another school, award year, or program. Cause: The Business Office inadvertently drew funds from the Federal Direct Stafford loan program for a Federal Pell Grant student disbursement. The Business Office identified the incorrect funds drawn down during the reconciliation process and returned the funds, but it was outside of the seven-day excess cash tolerance. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements. Context: One of 130 drawdowns. Questioned costs: $6,071 in Federal Direct Stafford loans were in excess of federal expenditures for more than seven business days. Recommendation: The University should improve its review process that occurs prior to drawing down funds and monitor excess cash to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-005 U.S. Department of Education Program Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster Federal Direct Stafford Student Loan (CFDA 84.268) Federal Award Year: 2018-2019 Finding: The University drew down funds from the wrong federal program and did not return excess Federal Direct Stafford loan funds to the Department of Education within the required timeframe. Condition: Federal funds were incorrectly drawn from the Federal Direct Stafford loan program and excess cash was not returned timely to the Department of Education. This is a repeat finding of 2018-002. Criteria: Per 34 CFR 668.162(b)(3), an institution must disburse the funds requested as soon as administratively feasible, but no later than three business days by the institution. Per 34 CFR 668.166(a) and (b), an excess cash balance tolerance is allowed if that balance is less than 1% of its prior year drawdowns and is eliminated within the next seven calendar days. Per 2018-2019 Federal Student Financial Aid Handbook, Volume 4, funds are school, award year, and program specific, and should not be used for another school, award year, or program. Cause: The Business Office inadvertently drew funds from the Federal Direct Stafford loan program for a Federal Pell Grant student disbursement. The Business Office identified the incorrect funds drawn down during the reconciliation process and returned the funds, but it was outside of the seven-day excess cash tolerance. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements. Context: One of 130 drawdowns. Questioned costs: $6,071 in Federal Direct Stafford loans were in excess of federal expenditures for more than seven business days. Recommendation: The University should improve its review process that occurs prior to drawing down funds and monitor excess cash to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Please see corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2019-005 Finding: The University drew down funds from the wrong federal program and did not return excess Federal Direct Stafford loan funds to the Department within the required timeframe. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: We agree with this finding. The Bursar Office is adding an extra control process by reviewing and verifying the confirmation e-mail of funds drawn with the G5 records and the Financial Aid roster. The Business and Finance unit of the University has created an internal threshold in determining the amount to hold back from the draw request to allow for adjustments to the financial aid roster. Contact Person: Linda Newill, Director of Student Accounts/Bursar Completion Date: October 24, 2019
2018-002
FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2018 — management decision was due May 29, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2017 — management decision was due May 14, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2016 — management decision was due May 30, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.