EIN: 860596516
UEI: M5VJZN2SMSN5
Data as of August 22, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 15, 2024 (706 days ago).
What is a management decision? →During our testing, we noted the City did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the City was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The contract was signed prior to the City's decision to use federal funds for the project, thus there was no verification that the contractor was not suspended or debarred at contract inception. Effect: The auditor noted no instanced of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lact of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: None Recommendation: We recommend the City design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted the City did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the City was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The contract was signed prior to the City's decision to use federal funds for the project, thus there was no verification that the contractor was not suspended or debarred at contract inception. Effect: The auditor noted no instanced of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lact of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: None Recommendation: We recommend the City design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Since this finding occurred, the City has been in development of a centralized procurement program and has hired a Procurement Officer who will perform the suspension and debarment check prior to all federal funding expenditures to resolve the issue and prevent future findings in this area.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.