EIN: 856000441
UEI: NC35L53BFU86
Data as of August 22, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2024 (693 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Assistance Listings number and name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Award numbers and year: 22-GN-11030400-027, January 14, 2022 through January 14, 2027 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance requirements: Reporting Questioned costs: None Condition—Contrary to federal regulations and the County’s federal award terms, the Flood Control Department (Department) failed to submit the required annual financial and performance reports for calendar year 2022 that were due on January 30, 2023. Effect—The Department not submitting the required financial and performance reports could potentially affect future federal funding and put the federal grantor at risk of not being able to carry out its oversight responsibilities and effectively evaluate the program’s success, and prevent and detect fraud. Cause—County management reported that the Department was aware of the program’s reporting requirements but had forgotten to complete them because the Department was focused on handling several natural disasters that were governor-declared emergencies. Further, the Department did not track its submission of reports so it was unaware that it had not submitted the missing reports. Criteria—Federal regulations and the County’s federal award terms require it to submit annual federal financial and performance reports to the U.S. Department of Agriculture no later than 30 days after calendar year-end that contain accurate, current, and complete information (2 CFR §§200.301 and 200.302). Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Require the Department to complete and submit all missing financial and performance reports to the federal agency as soon as possible. 2. Develop and implement revisions to its federal grant policies and procedures that require its departments to monitor and track when required reports are due and submitted to ensure they are completed and submitted on time. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listings number and name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Award numbers and year: 22-GN-11030400-027, January 14, 2022 through January 14, 2027 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance requirements: Reporting Questioned costs: None Condition—Contrary to federal regulations and the County’s federal award terms, the Flood Control Department (Department) failed to submit the required annual financial and performance reports for calendar year 2022 that were due on January 30, 2023. Effect—The Department not submitting the required financial and performance reports could potentially affect future federal funding and put the federal grantor at risk of not being able to carry out its oversight responsibilities and effectively evaluate the program’s success, and prevent and detect fraud. Cause—County management reported that the Department was aware of the program’s reporting requirements but had forgotten to complete them because the Department was focused on handling several natural disasters that were governor-declared emergencies. Further, the Department did not track its submission of reports so it was unaware that it had not submitted the missing reports. Criteria—Federal regulations and the County’s federal award terms require it to submit annual federal financial and performance reports to the U.S. Department of Agriculture no later than 30 days after calendar year-end that contain accurate, current, and complete information (2 CFR §§200.301 and 200.302). Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Require the Department to complete and submit all missing financial and performance reports to the federal agency as soon as possible. 2. Develop and implement revisions to its federal grant policies and procedures that require its departments to monitor and track when required reports are due and submitted to ensure they are completed and submitted on time. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Assistance Listings number and program name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Contact person: Lucinda Andreani, Deputy County Manager and Flood Control District Administrator Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2024 Concur. The Coconino County Flood Control District (FCD) acknowledges the annual financial and performance reports were not filed in accordance with the contract. The cash draw reports were completed for the award according to the contractual requirements. Therefore, the federal agency was aware of all expenditures made under the award. The FCD will submit all missing annual financial and performance reports. With assistance from the Finance Department, the FCD will develop procedures to ensure all reporting requirements are met. These procedures will include internal timelines, designated roles and responsibilities, and a tracking mechanism. Additionally, fiscal capacity will be created through the training of an additional staff member in reporting to serve as backup so contractual reporting requirements can be fulfilled when unforeseen challenges arise such as declared emergencies and flood events.
Assistance Listings number and name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Award numbers and year: 22-GN-11030400-027, January 14, 2022 through January 14, 2027 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance requirements: Procurement Questioned costs: Unknown Condition—Contrary to federal regulations and the County’s policies and procedures, the Flood Control Department (Department) failed to consider price as a selection factor when awarding a single vendor a construction services contract for which the County paid $5,896,715 during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which was 79.8 percent of the federal program’s expenditures. The Department evaluated the 2 bids it received but awarded the contract to the successful vendor based on its professional qualifications without considering price. Instead, the County negotiated the price of the services after the contract was awarded. Effect—There is an increased risk that the County may have overpaid for construction services, limiting the amount of federal program monies available to carry out other program objectives. Further, the Department was unable to demonstrate whether the County could have acquired these services at a lower cost. This finding could potentially affect other federal programs that the Department administers. Cause—County management reported that the Department’s program personnel misunderstood the County’s procurement policies and procedures for procuring services with federal monies, which require them to follow federal Uniform Guidance regulations and consider cost as a factor. They further explained that instead the Department followed Arizona Revised Statutes, which may be used for procuring construction contracts with State and local monies and does not use cost as a factor when selecting a vendor. Finally, the County did not have a designated person assigned to review all County procurements to verify compliance with federal regulations and the County’s policies. Criteria—Federal Uniform Guidance regulations require the County to establish and follow competitive purchasing policies and procedures that align with federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards when acquiring goods and services using federal awards (2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.327). Specifically, these regulations require that the County use a written, fixed-price contract award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder after considering factors such as discounts, transportation costs, and life cycle costs, and only architectural/engineering services can be procured without considering price as a selection factor (2 CFR §200.320). Further, the County’s policies and procedures require that the County follow Federal Uniform Guidance procurement procedures outlined in 2 CFR §§200 when making purchases with federal monies. Finally, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Monitor departments’ adherence to the County’s policies and procedures for purchasing goods and services using federal awards, including the departments' following Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§200 requirements to use cost as a selection factor for awarding a construction services contract. 2. Train County departments on federal Uniform Guidance requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures ensuring that they understand the policies and procedures to follow when acquiring goods and services using federal awards. 3. Designate an independent person who is knowledgeable about federal requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures to review and approve procurements involving federal awards. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listings number and name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Award numbers and year: 22-GN-11030400-027, January 14, 2022 through January 14, 2027 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance requirements: Procurement Questioned costs: Unknown Condition—Contrary to federal regulations and the County’s policies and procedures, the Flood Control Department (Department) failed to consider price as a selection factor when awarding a single vendor a construction services contract for which the County paid $5,896,715 during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which was 79.8 percent of the federal program’s expenditures. The Department evaluated the 2 bids it received but awarded the contract to the successful vendor based on its professional qualifications without considering price. Instead, the County negotiated the price of the services after the contract was awarded. Effect—There is an increased risk that the County may have overpaid for construction services, limiting the amount of federal program monies available to carry out other program objectives. Further, the Department was unable to demonstrate whether the County could have acquired these services at a lower cost. This finding could potentially affect other federal programs that the Department administers. Cause—County management reported that the Department’s program personnel misunderstood the County’s procurement policies and procedures for procuring services with federal monies, which require them to follow federal Uniform Guidance regulations and consider cost as a factor. They further explained that instead the Department followed Arizona Revised Statutes, which may be used for procuring construction contracts with State and local monies and does not use cost as a factor when selecting a vendor. Finally, the County did not have a designated person assigned to review all County procurements to verify compliance with federal regulations and the County’s policies. Criteria—Federal Uniform Guidance regulations require the County to establish and follow competitive purchasing policies and procedures that align with federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards when acquiring goods and services using federal awards (2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.327). Specifically, these regulations require that the County use a written, fixed-price contract award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder after considering factors such as discounts, transportation costs, and life cycle costs, and only architectural/engineering services can be procured without considering price as a selection factor (2 CFR §200.320). Further, the County’s policies and procedures require that the County follow Federal Uniform Guidance procurement procedures outlined in 2 CFR §§200 when making purchases with federal monies. Finally, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Monitor departments’ adherence to the County’s policies and procedures for purchasing goods and services using federal awards, including the departments' following Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§200 requirements to use cost as a selection factor for awarding a construction services contract. 2. Train County departments on federal Uniform Guidance requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures ensuring that they understand the policies and procedures to follow when acquiring goods and services using federal awards. 3. Designate an independent person who is knowledgeable about federal requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures to review and approve procurements involving federal awards. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Assistance Listings number and program name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Contact persons: Lucinda Andreani, Deputy County Manager and Flood Control District Administrator Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2025 Concur. The Coconino County Flood Control District (FCD) acknowledges price was not considered as a factor for contractor selection in the procurement of construction services for the Good Neighbor Authority program in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart D Procurement Standards. A procurement was completed for construction-manager at-risk (CMAR) services, authorized by A.R.S. 28-7366, because the FCD believed at that time that the method would also satisfy the federal standards. The CMAR method bases selection on qualification and competence, does not allow for pricing to be requested or considered before making the selection, and transfers the risk of budget overages to the contractor by agreement to a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). After selecting the contractor for Good Neighbor Authority construction projects, the FCD worked closely with the County’s contracted engineering firm to ensure that the GMP was reasonable and cost efficiencies were identified and implemented throughout all stages of the project. The County believes the prices paid as a result of the procurement are reasonable and no excess federal expenditures were made due to the non-federal procurement method that was used in error. FCD fiscal and management staff will receive formal training on 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, also known as the Uniform Guidance, to ensure its requirements are understood. Additionally, the FCD will implement written internal procurement procedures to be used for future procurements so that they are made in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations and policies. The County Finance Department has a designated grant accounting team specializing in compliance with Federal award requirements. The FCD will request technical assistance from this team prior to initiating any procurement with Federal funds to help make sure Federal regulations are considered and met. The Finance Department will provide training to all departments on Uniform Guidance requirements. Training will also be provided on the County’s procurement policies and procedures to help departments gain a complete understanding of the requirements for acquiring goods and services with federal funds. In line with the County’s decentralized finance model in which financial management staff are located within the departments, the responsibility to meet requirements specific to certain federal awards rests with the department that manages the award. The Finance Department will identify the source of funding for procurements requested by departments. Staff who are knowledgeable about Federal procurement requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures will review and approve the procurements involving federal awards.
Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Award number and year: DI21-002282, July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-through grantor: Arizona Department of Economic Security Compliance requirement: Earmarking Questioned costs: Unknown Condition—Contrary to federal regulation, the County Administration Department (Department) failed to ensure that it spent no less than the required 20 percent, or $93,701, of WIOA Youth Activities monies earmarked to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences for the grants award year, April 2021 through June 2023. Instead, the County spent only 15 percent, or $72,045, of the required 20 percent, and the remaining 5 percent, or $21,656, of its allocation remained unspent. Effect—County youth did not receive $21,656 of paid and unpaid work experience services that the federal program intended. Also, the Department may have received additional monies for the federal program that it was not entitled to. Cause—The Department used a tracking mechanism to accurately report its paid and unpaid work experiences spending throughout the fiscal year but did not properly monitor its WIOA Youth Activities spending to ensure the 20 percent earmarking requirement was met. In addition, the Department did not have policies and procedures to ensure it monitored its paid and unpaid work experience expenditures throughout the award period. Criteria—Federal regulation requires the County to earmark and spend no less than 20 percent of its WIOA Youth Activities monies to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences. Additionally, federal regulation also requires the Department to monitor such expenditures and report them to the pass-through grantor, the Arizona Department of Economic Security, monthly throughout the award period to ensure it is spending the monies in a timely manner to meet the earmarking requirement (20 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §681.590). Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The Department should: 1. Spend no less than the required 20 percent of its WIOA Youth Activities monies to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences. 2. Include a process in its WIOA Youth Activities program’s policies and procedures to: a. Fully implement new strategies to recruit and retain qualified in-school and out-of-school youth who will benefit from the paid and unpaid work experience the program provides. b. Monitor its paid and unpaid work experiences spending throughout the award period. c. Timely communicate to the Arizona Department of Economic Security if the Department cannot meet the earmarking requirement. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Award number and year: DI21-002282, July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-through grantor: Arizona Department of Economic Security Compliance requirement: Earmarking Questioned costs: Unknown Condition—Contrary to federal regulation, the County Administration Department (Department) failed to ensure that it spent no less than the required 20 percent, or $93,701, of WIOA Youth Activities monies earmarked to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences for the grants award year, April 2021 through June 2023. Instead, the County spent only 15 percent, or $72,045, of the required 20 percent, and the remaining 5 percent, or $21,656, of its allocation remained unspent. Effect—County youth did not receive $21,656 of paid and unpaid work experience services that the federal program intended. Also, the Department may have received additional monies for the federal program that it was not entitled to. Cause—The Department used a tracking mechanism to accurately report its paid and unpaid work experiences spending throughout the fiscal year but did not properly monitor its WIOA Youth Activities spending to ensure the 20 percent earmarking requirement was met. In addition, the Department did not have policies and procedures to ensure it monitored its paid and unpaid work experience expenditures throughout the award period. Criteria—Federal regulation requires the County to earmark and spend no less than 20 percent of its WIOA Youth Activities monies to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences. Additionally, federal regulation also requires the Department to monitor such expenditures and report them to the pass-through grantor, the Arizona Department of Economic Security, monthly throughout the award period to ensure it is spending the monies in a timely manner to meet the earmarking requirement (20 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §681.590). Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The Department should: 1. Spend no less than the required 20 percent of its WIOA Youth Activities monies to provide in-school and out-of-school youth with paid and unpaid work experiences. 2. Include a process in its WIOA Youth Activities program’s policies and procedures to: a. Fully implement new strategies to recruit and retain qualified in-school and out-of-school youth who will benefit from the paid and unpaid work experience the program provides. b. Monitor its paid and unpaid work experiences spending throughout the award period. c. Timely communicate to the Arizona Department of Economic Security if the Department cannot meet the earmarking requirement. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings number and program names: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Contact person: Billy Francis, Executive Director, Coconino Workforce Development Board, County Administration Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2024 Concur. The County Administration Department acknowledges the work experience (WEX) requirement was not met for the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Youth Program Year 2021 allocation. The Department has a tracking mechanism in the financial system and other records to account for the percentage of youth expenditures made on WEX activities. Due to an oversight, the percentage of WEX expenditures in relation to the total allocation was not monitored by staff. Additionally, the amount of WEX funding allocated to the Youth program service provider was insufficient to meet the requirement. The Department will write procedures for the monitoring of earmarking requirements, including WEX, to ensure the roles and responsibilities of staff and key stakeholders are clearly defined. The calculation of funds allocated to the service provider will factor in the level of WEX expenditures needed for the County to meet the requirement. The Department will work with the WIOA Youth program service provider to employ best practices and strategies to recruit eligible in-school and out-of-school youth in need of WEX activities to further their skills and job readiness. The Department will monitor WEX expenditures made by the service provider and provide technical assistance as needed. If the Department projects the County will not meet the threshold for a certain program year allocation, it will seek technical assistance from the Arizona Department of Economic Security.
Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Award number and year: DI21-002282, July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-through grantor: Arizona Department of Economic Security Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: N/A Condition—Contrary to the County’s federal award terms, the County Administrative Department (Department) failed to submit 10 of 12 monthly financial reports during the year for each of the County’s WIOA awards, for which the County reported federal award expenditures totaling $1,303,600 during the period July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. Effect—The Department not submitting the required financial reports puts them at risk of not being reimbursed for allowable expenditures for the federal program and could affect whether the County receives future federal funding. In addition, the Department could put the pass-through grantor, Arizona Department of Economic Security, at risk of not being able to carry out its oversight responsibilities and effectively evaluate the program’s success and prevent and detect fraud. Cause—County management reported that it was aware of the program’s reporting requirements, but the Department failed to complete the reports because staff lacked accounting knowledge required to complete the reports. Further, the Department did not track its federal report submissions to the Arizona Department of Economic Security, and as a result, the program supervisors were unaware that the reports were not submitted. Criteria—The County’s federal award terms require it to submit financial reports to its pass-through grantor for each award for which services were provided. These reports include program financial information and are used by the pass-through grantor to monitor the County’s performance and compliance for the program and reimburse the County for program expenditures it incurs. Further, the federal award terms state that the County’s failure to submit accurate and complete reports by the 30th day following the end of a month could result in the County’s federal program expenditures not being reimbursed. Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Follow the program’s federal award terms by: a. Requiring the Department to immediately complete and submit all missing federal financial reports to the Arizona Department of Economic Security. b. Requiring County departments to monitor and track when required reports are due and submitted to ensure they are completed accurately and submitted on time. 2. Provide training to Department staff responsible for administering the federal program on how to complete its required financial reports. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Award number and year: DI21-002282, July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-through grantor: Arizona Department of Economic Security Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: N/A Condition—Contrary to the County’s federal award terms, the County Administrative Department (Department) failed to submit 10 of 12 monthly financial reports during the year for each of the County’s WIOA awards, for which the County reported federal award expenditures totaling $1,303,600 during the period July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. Effect—The Department not submitting the required financial reports puts them at risk of not being reimbursed for allowable expenditures for the federal program and could affect whether the County receives future federal funding. In addition, the Department could put the pass-through grantor, Arizona Department of Economic Security, at risk of not being able to carry out its oversight responsibilities and effectively evaluate the program’s success and prevent and detect fraud. Cause—County management reported that it was aware of the program’s reporting requirements, but the Department failed to complete the reports because staff lacked accounting knowledge required to complete the reports. Further, the Department did not track its federal report submissions to the Arizona Department of Economic Security, and as a result, the program supervisors were unaware that the reports were not submitted. Criteria—The County’s federal award terms require it to submit financial reports to its pass-through grantor for each award for which services were provided. These reports include program financial information and are used by the pass-through grantor to monitor the County’s performance and compliance for the program and reimburse the County for program expenditures it incurs. Further, the federal award terms state that the County’s failure to submit accurate and complete reports by the 30th day following the end of a month could result in the County’s federal program expenditures not being reimbursed. Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Follow the program’s federal award terms by: a. Requiring the Department to immediately complete and submit all missing federal financial reports to the Arizona Department of Economic Security. b. Requiring County departments to monitor and track when required reports are due and submitted to ensure they are completed accurately and submitted on time. 2. Provide training to Department staff responsible for administering the federal program on how to complete its required financial reports. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Cluster name: WIOA Cluster Assistance Listings number and program name: 17.258 WIOA Adult Program 17.259 WIOA Youth Program 17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Contact person: Billy Francis, Executive Director, Coconino Workforce Development Board, County Administration Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2024 Concur. The County Administration department acknowledges the required financial reports were not all submitted during FY23. The Department did not have a tracking mechanism in place to ensure that all staff were aware of the status of report submission. Additionally, due to recent turnover, the Department did not have staff trained to complete the reports. The Department will complete and submit missing federal financial reports according to the direction provided by the Arizona Department of Economic Security. The County will ensure that the staff responsible for grant reporting have the knowledge and skills necessary to do so in compliance with federal requirements and grant accounting practices. The County has implemented a mechanism to monitor and track reporting due dates and oversee reports to ensure accuracy.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.