Silver Creek School Corporation

EIN: 851455065

UEI: SWF5G9RSFM44

Data as of August 20, 2026

3
Audit Years
13
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 6, 2026 (17 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Eligibility
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23/24, FY 24/25 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-002. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the eligibility determination of a child receiving meals and to the verification of free and reduced-price applications. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable program. In the case of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program, children belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at reduced price. Children who have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price school meals pay the full price, set by the School Food Authority, for their meals. Children attending SFSP meal service sites receive their meals at no charge. As a general rule, a child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a direct certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. The system parameters, including income guidelines, were entered by the software vendor without a documented review or oversight process by the School Corporation to ensure the parameters entered were accurate. In addition, the Food Service Director was responsible for generating and the IT Department was responsible for inputting the Direct Certification Reports into the School Corporation's software system (Infinite Campus). There was no evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process to ensure that the Direct Certification Reports were generated and input into the system correctly and periodically reviewed for updates. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed or documented an oversight or review process to ensure that income guidelines were properly entered into the software system and the direct certification report was properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to design or implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Noncompliance could result in students either receiving benefits they are not entitled to or not receiving benefits they would otherwise be entitled to. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place regarding the input of income guidelines and direct certifications into the software system. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-002 Finding Subject: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Josh Sinclair, Food Service Director and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer. Contact Phone Number 812-246-3375 Email Address: jsinclair@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Food Service Director will collaborate with the IT Department to verify the accuracy of income parameters and Direct Certification eligibility data within Infinite Campus. A representative sample of student records will be tested to confirm that the uploaded information was processed correctly and aligns with supporting documentation. Any discrepancies identified will be corrected promptly, and procedures will be reinforced to ensure ongoing accuracy and compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: January 2026

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Eligibility →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2025-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-008. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Reimbursement requests for the program were prepared by one employee and reviewed by another employee; however, the supporting documentation that was provided to the reviewer did not give a clear distinction as to what expenditures were included in the reimbursement. As the documentation provided was not adequate that accompanied the reimbursement request, and the reimbursement requests, as noted below, did not agree to the ledger, the reviewer could not have ensured expenses were allowed per the federal program and if the cost were in conformance with the allowable cost principles. In addition, while reviews of payroll and vendor claims took place prior to the reimbursement request being compiled, no reviewers had enough detailed information (i.e., fund being charged) or knowledge to determine if the expense was allowable from the federal award funds or was compliant with the cost principles. The lack of internal controls were systemic issues throughout the audit period for ESSER II and ESSER III. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Reimbursement requests for the program were prepared by one employee and reviewed by another employee; however, detailed supporting documentation was not provided to the reviewer to determine if the expense was allowable from the federal award funds or was compliant with the cost principles. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Cost/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Cost/Cost Principles compliance requirements and that sufficient detailed supporting documentation accompanies all reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-003 Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer. Contact Phone Number 812-246-3375 Email Address: avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Corporation will implement and consistently apply a standardized two-level review and approval process for all grant reimbursements to ensure proper accounting, documentation, and compliance. The grants administrator (or designee) will prepare and conduct the initial review of each grant reimbursement to verify that all expenses and receipts contain the correct accounting information, are properly documented, and are recorded in the appropriate accounts within the Financial Management System (FMS). The Corporation Treasurer (or designee) will perform an independent secondary review of all grant reimbursements, including a review of supporting documentation and account coding, and will provide final approval and signature as evidence of authorization. On a monthly basis, grant accounts will be reviewed by the grants administrator for accuracy and completeness, with the Corporation Treasurer (or designee) conducting a secondary monthly review to confirm accuracy and compliance. This two-level review process ensures adequate segregation of duties, strengthens internal controls, and provides documented oversight of all grant reimbursement activity. Anticipated Completion Date: The ESSER grant is finished. If we were to receive this grant in the future, Silver Creek School Corporation would apply the procedures in the corrective action plan.

Prior Finding References

2023-008

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2025-004
Cash Management
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2025-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID - 19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. Reimbursement requests for the program were prepared by one employee and reviewed by another employee; however, the supporting documentation that was provided to the reviewer did not give a clear distinction as to what expenditures were included in the reimbursement. As the documentation provided was not adequate that accompanied the reimbursement request, and the reimbursement requests, as noted below, did not agree to the ledger, the reviewer could not have ensured expenses were paid prior to requesting reimbursement. For 5 of 25 expenditures tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation traceable to the reimbursement request. There were 2 of those expenditures, totaling $1,715, that were for ESSER II's final reimbursement which requested the remainder of the grant award and expenses could not be traced to the documentation provided for the reimbursement amount. There were 3 of the expenditures, totaling $6,665, that were not traceable to an ESSER III reimbursement request. Therefore, as the expenditure could not be traced to a reimbursement request, it could not be determined if the School Corporation paid for the expense prior to requesting reimbursement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, 1 of 25 expenditures tested, for $154, was an expense that occurred after the School Corporation requested reimbursement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period for ESSER II and ESSER III. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.305(b) states in part: "For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. . . . (3) Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per § 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. The School Corporation had not developed any policies that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for audit related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-004 Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer. Contact Phone Number 812-246-3375 Email Address: avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Corporation will implement and consistently apply a standardized two-level review and approval process for all grant reimbursements to ensure proper accounting, documentation, and compliance. The grants administrator (or designee) will prepare and conduct the initial review of each grant reimbursement to verify that all expenses and receipts contain the correct accounting information, are properly documented, and are recorded in the appropriate accounts within the Financial Management System (FMS). The Corporation Treasurer (or designee) will perform an independent secondary review of all grant reimbursements, including a review of supporting documentation and account coding, and will provide final approval and signature as evidence of authorization. On a monthly basis, grant accounts will be reviewed by the grants administrator for accuracy and completeness, with the Corporation Treasurer (or designee) conducting a secondary monthly review to confirm accuracy and compliance. This two-level review process ensures adequate segregation of duties, strengthens internal controls, and provides documented oversight of all grant reimbursement activity. Anticipated Completion Date: The ESSER grant is finished. If we were to receive this grant in the future, Silver Creek School Corporation would apply the procedures in the corrective action plan.

Prior Finding References

2023-009

About Cash Management →

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2024, which was (692 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22/23, FY22/23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance with the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and the Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Eligibility The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the eligibility determination of a child receiving meals. The Account Specialist reviewed and issued the initial eligibility determination without a system of oversight or review to ensure the eligibility determination was correct. Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) (Applies to National School Lunch Program only) The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the verification of free and reduced price applications. The Account Specialist performed the verification of free and reduced price applications without a system of oversight or review to ensure the verification was correct. The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2022-2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-002 Finding Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) Summary of Finding: Eligibility The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would prevent or detect and correct noncompliance relating to the eligibility determination of a child receiving meals. There was no oversight or review to ensure the eligibility determination was correct. Special Tests and Provisions - Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications (NSLP) The Account Specialist performed the verification of free and reduced price applications. There was no documentation that an oversight, review, or approval process, or other compensating control, had been established to ensure the proper number of applications were verified for accuracy. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Josh Sinclair, Food Service Director and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer. Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 jsinclair@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will use the proposed USDA form that has two signatures required. Mr. Sinclair will ensure that all signatures are collected for proof of verification. Mr. Sinclair and Ms. Susan Westfall will be a second check on the eligibility determination. One will do paper applications and the other will do online applications. Then, they will check each other for accuracy. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-158-PN01, 20619-158-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member school corporations. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school corporation, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school corporation. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for all grant awards were not expended as required by the IDOE for the individual member school corporation. The Cooperative categorized each expenditure by location, and the total amount did not meet or exceed the required proportionate share as outlined on the award letter. The Cooperative was required to spend a total of $59,633 for 20611-158-PN01 and $35,470 for 20619-158-PN01. $32,798 was identified as being spent for 20611-158-PN01, which was less than the required proportionate share. The Cooperative was unable to provide documentation to identify the expenditures spent for 20619-158-PN01. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2021-2022 and the 20611-158-PN01 and the 20619-158-PN01 grant awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately document. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of the nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the total required Non-Public Proportionate Share was not spent for one grant and the expenditures for another grant could not be determined. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure Non-Public Proportionate Share amounts are spent as identified within the application and all documentation is retained to determine so that expenditures can be appropriately identified. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-003 Finding Subject:􀀃Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Summary of Finding: The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative) during fiscal year 2021-2022. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for all grant awards were not expended as required by IDOE for the individual member schools. The Cooperative categorized each expenditure by location and the total amount did not meet or exceed the required proportionate share as outlined on the award letter. The Cooperative was required to spend a total of $59,633 for 20611-158-PN01 and $35,470 for 20619-158- PN01. $32,798 was identified as being spent for 20611-158-PN01, which was less than the required proportionate share. The Cooperative was unable to provide documentation to identify the expenditures spent for 20619-158-PN01. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ashley Compton, Director of Special Education and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 alcompton@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Silver Creek School Corporation does not operate under the Special Education Coop any longer. The Special Education Director has a beginning of the year consultation with the private school principal to discuss and finalize the proportionate share budget. The Corporation Treasurer and Special Education Director will review and co-complete the semi-annual prop share workbook to ensure that private school funding is expended in a timely manner. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2023-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-158-PN01, 19619-158-PN01, 20611-158-PN01, 20619-158-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member school corporations. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school corporation, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The Cooperative did not have internal controls in place over payroll transactions to ensure expenditures were allowed and in conformance with the cost principles. The Treasurer reviewed a report which showed the total amount paid from each fund and account; however, a detailed payroll report was not reviewed which would have identified the employee being paid from the grant fund. For vendor disbursements, although the Deputy Treasurer matched the invoice to the purchase order and provided it to the Corporation Treasurer for review and signature of the Accounts Payable Voucher (claim) prior to payment, the internal control was not effective and did not detect or allow correction of errors. In the initial sample of 6 vendor disbursements, one claim was unable to be provided. As the error was isolated to vendor disbursements, the sample of vendor disbursements only was increased by 31. Within the new sample of 31 vendor disbursements, an additional claim was unable to be provided. As both vendor disbursements with missing documentation were travel expense reimbursements made to the same employee, the ledger was reviewed for additional travel disbursements to that individual. None were identified; thus, no further testing was determined to be necessary. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls over payroll disbursements was isolated to 2021-2022. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance over vendor disbursements were isolated to the two travel claims noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act - (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, appropriate documentation for two travel claims was not retained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-004 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Summary of Findings: The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative) during fiscal year 2021-2022. The Cooperative did not have internal controls in place over payroll transactions to ensure expenditures were allowable and in conformance with the cost principles. The Treasurer reviewed a report which showed the total amount paid from each fund and account; however, a detailed payroll report was not reviewed which would have identified the employee being paid from the grant fund. For vendor disbursements, although the Deputy Treasurer matched the invoice to the purchase order and provided it to the Corporation Treasurer for review and signature of the accounts payable voucher prior to payment, the control was not effective and did not detect or allow correction of errors. In the initial sample of 6 vendor disbursements, one claim was unable to be provided. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ashley Compton, Director of Special Education, Tamara Swarens, Director of Elementary Curriculum and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 alcompton@scsc.school tswarens@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Silver Creek School Corporation does not operate under the Special Education Coop any longer. The AP Specialist makes sure that there is an appropriate claim for each payment we make, there are two signatures on each claim and the claims are approved by the Treasurer. Check processing is completed by the Deputy Treasurer as the third check. The AP Specialist now scans each invoice to the FMS accounting system to ensure that we have all back up for the claims. With the new Directors of Curriculum and Special Education, we only reimburse for positions that are charged to the federal grant that have gone through a multi-step process to ensure that they get coded to the right place. The process is also reviewed at the time a request for reimbursement is made. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-005
Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-158-PN01, 19619-158-PN01, 20611-158-PN01, 20619-158-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member school corporations. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school corporation, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made from Special Education funds occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the special education programs were paid without a documented review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the IDOE were prepared by the Treasurer and approved by the Special Education Director, the School Corporation was unable to provide tangible audit evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. The lack of internal controls was isolated to 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place and are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-005 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Period of Performance Summary of Finding: The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative) during fiscal year 2021-2022. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made from Special Education funds occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the Special Education programs were paid without an appropriate level of review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the Indiana Department of Education were prepared by the Corporation Treasurer and approved by the Special Education Director, the School was unable to provide tangible audit evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ashley Compton, Director of Special Education and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 alcompton@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Silver Creek School Corporation is no longer part of the Special Education Cooperative. The Special Education Director and the Corporation Treasurer have a standing meeting once per month to review expenditures and receipts to prepare a reimbursement. At that time, the period of performance is also checked for accuracy. The Special education director will code initial expenditures to grant appropriation lines and submit to accounts payable specialist. Accounts payable specialist then confirms that the expenditure can be taken from that line in the working grant document for the corresponding grant. Oversight and review of grant allocations and approved totals with grant budgets are reviewed monthly at the time reimbursements are completed. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Period of Performance →
2023-006
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-158-PN01, 19619-158-PN01, 20611-158-PN01, 20619-158-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member school corporations. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school corporation, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were identified as exceeding the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Both vendors were selected for testing. For both vendors, only the quote that was utilized was retained and no other audit evidence could be provided to show that additional quotes as required were obtained. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not retained for audit for either purchase. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Auditor's Response The small purchase threshold is determined based on the aggregate of similar purchases from a single source. Although each individual purchase was below the procurement threshold for small purchases, both vendors included in the sample were used to purchase like-items, such as technology or furniture. When the aggregate of purchases exceeds the procurement threshold, that threshold must be used for purchases. The small purchase threshold was exceeded for both vendors; therefore, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Documentation supporting the history of the procurement must be retained and presented for audit. While the School Corporation may use IAESC as one method of procurement for small purchases, price or rate quotes must be obtained from more than one source. If the School Corporation chooses to use IAESC for their procurement processes, a formal agreement or contract should exist between both governmental entities detailing the procurement agreement.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-006 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement Summary of Finding: The School Corporation was a member of the Clark County Joint Services Program (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022. The School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the Procurement compliance requirement. Two vendors exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period and both vendors were selected for testing. For both vendors only the quote that was utilized was retained and no other audit evidence could be provided to show that additional quotes as required were obtained. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not retained for audit for either purchase. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ashley Compton, Director of Special Education and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 alcompton@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with the finding. Explanation and Reasons for Disagreement: The two instances cited in this finding were the results of a purchase made through the cooperative purchasing agency. Silver Creek chose this vendor that IAESC manages. IAESC serves as a governmental body in which SCSC is allowed to enter into an agreement to form a cooperative purchasing organization per IC 5-22-4-7. We can provide evidence that the cooperative purchasing agency has properly conducted an RFP for these two purchases. After reviewing the purchases for CDW Government and School Outfitters, SCSC does not recognize these as small purchases since these items were listed separately on the voucher and did not cross the threshold of $10,000.00.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-007 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Earmarking, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grant to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-168-PN01, 21619-168-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed; the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to activities allowed and conformance with the cost principles. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that only employees performing duties for the special education program were being paid out of the grant funds. The Corporation Treasurer was reviewing a total amount paid from each fund account; however, a detailed payroll report was not being reviewed that would have identified the employees being paid from the grant fund. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that proportionate share expenses were properly spent. The Special Education Director and Treasurer compiled and reviewed the proportionate share reports sent to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to track nonpublic school expenses; however, that internal control was not able to be verified as the reports were not retained. Period of Performance The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made from special education funds occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the special education programs were paid without an appropriate level of review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the IDOE were prepared by the Treasurer and approved by the Special Education Director, the School Corporation was unable to provide tangible audit evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. The lack of internal controls was isolated to 2022-2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place and are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-007 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Earmarking, Period of Performance Summary of Finding: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that only employees performing duties for the Special Education Program were being paid out of the grant funds. The Corporation Treasurer was reviewing a total amount paid from each fund account; however, a detailed payroll report was not being reviewed that would have identified the employees being paid from the grant fund. Earmarking The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that they were in compliance with the earmarking requirements. The Special Education Director and Corporation Treasurer compiled and reviewed the proportionate share reports that get sent to Indiana Department of Education to track non-public school expenses, however, that control was not able to be verified as the reports were not retained. Period of Performance The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made from Special Education funds occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the Special Education programs were paid without an appropriate level of review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the Indiana Department of Education were prepared by the Corporation Treasurer and approved by the Special Education Director, the School was unable to provide tangible audit evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ashley Compton, Director of Special Education and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 alcompton@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Special Education Director and the Corporation Treasurer have a standing meeting once per month to review expenditures and receipts to prepare a reimbursement. At that time, the period of performance is also checked for accuracy. During this meeting they will also review payroll (salary and benefits) to identify employees who are included in the grant. All reimbursements and proportionate share documents are reviewed, signed and filed in an individual grant binder, housed in the special education office. Special education director will code initial expenditures to grant appropriation lines and submit to payroll and corporation treasurer. Payroll then confirms that the expenditure can be taken from that line in the working grant document for the corresponding grant. Oversight and review of grant allocations and approved totals with grant budgets are reviewed monthly at the time reimbursements are completed. Anticipated Completion Date: April 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance →
2023-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-008 Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Reimbursement requests for the program were prepared by one employee and reviewed by another employee; however, no supporting documentation was provided to the reviewer. As documentation did not accompany the reimbursement requests the reviewer would not have been able to determine if the expenses were allowed per the federal program and if the costs were in conformance with the allowable cost principles. In addition, while reviews of payroll and vendor claims took place prior to the reimbursement request being compiled, no reviewers had enough detailed information (i.e., fund being charged) or knowledge to determine if the expense was allowable from the federal award funds or was compliant with the cost principles. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-008 Finding Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Summary of Finding: The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal control, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting noncompliance related to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Reimbursement requests for the programs were prepared by an employee and reviewed by another employee to ensure all costs are correct and allowable before giving their approval. While the School Corporation did have a process in place to review and approve reimbursement requests, not all reimbursement requests were traceable to the Schools Corporation’s fund ledger and no audit evidence was provided to indicate the reviewer verified disbursements to the School Corporation records. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The same process will be in place to review and approve grant reimbursements. The Deputy Treasurer will verify with the person preparing the reimbursement that the proper accounting information is on the receipt and that it is then receipted into the correct account in the FMS System and sign off. The Corporation Treasurer will review all receipts and be the second signature. Each month the accounts will be checked for accuracy by the grants person and the Corporation Treasurer will again be the second check for accuracy. The grant person will be checking for Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and verifying that they meet compliance. During the reimbursement process the grants person will also make sure all sections of the grant have been properly expended. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-009
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-009 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Reimbursement requests for the program were prepared by one employee and reviewed by another employee; however, no supporting documentation was provided to the reviewer. As documentation did not accompany the reimbursement request, and the reimbursement requests, as noted below, did not agree to the ledger, the reviewer could not have ensured expenses were paid prior to requesting reimbursement. Five reimbursement requests were submitted during the audit period. All five reimbursement requests were selected for testing. Of the five reimbursement requests tested, three were not traceable to the School Corporation's fund ledger. For those three reimbursement requests, the expenditures in the ledger exceeded the amount requested by $67,907, in total. However, as the expenditures could not be determined for each reimbursement requested, it could not be determined if the School Corporation paid for the expense prior to requesting reimbursement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period for ESSER I and ESSER II grant funds. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.305(b) states in part: "For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. . . . (3) Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per § 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if all expenditures were paid by the School Corporation prior to requesting reimbursement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place prior to filing the reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-009 Finding Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund – Cash Management Summary of Finding: The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal control, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting noncompliance related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. Reimbursement requests for the programs were prepared by an employee and reviewed by another employee. While the School Corporation did have a process in place to review and approve reimbursement requests, not all reimbursement requests were traceable to the fund ledger and no audit evidence was provided to indicate the reviewer verified disbursements to the School Corporation records. Three of five reimbursement requests filed during the audit period were not traceable to the Schools Corporation’s fund ledger. Due to the lack of supporting documentation it was not possible to determine if grant payments were reimbursements of expenditures or advance payment of grant funds. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to three of the five reimbursement requests filed during the audit period. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Todd Balmer, Assistant Superintendent/CFO and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 tbalmer@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The same process will be in place to review and approve grant reimbursements. The Deputy Treasurer will verify with the person preparing the reimbursement that the proper accounting information is on the receipt and that it is then receipted into the correct account in the FMS System and sign off. The Corporation Treasurer will review all receipts and be the second signature. Each month the accounts will be checked for accuracy by the grants person and the Corporation Treasurer will again be the second check for accuracy. The grant person will verify that the reimbursements of expenditures or advance payments are clearly marked and accounted for in the FMS System and sign off. The Corporation Treasurer will be the second signature. When reimbursements are prepared, these entries will also be reviewed. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024

About Cash Management →
2023-010
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2023-010 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted two ESSER I reports, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of six reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by one person without oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Additionally, all six reports were selected for testing. Of the six reports, five had errors as noted below: 1. The ESSER I, Year 2 report overstated expenditures for the reporting period, October 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, by $163,492. In addition, the key line item "Meeting Students' Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs (Excluding Mental Health Supports) - Property" chosen for review was incorrectly reported. 2. The ESSER I, Year 3 report did not report any expenditures for the reporting period, July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022; however, the ledger detail had expenditures of $120,855. As such, the key line items "Meeting Students' Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs (Excluding Mental Health Supports - Personnel Services - Salaries" and "Meeting Students' Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs (Excluding Mental Health Supports - Personnel Services - Benefits" chosen for review could not be verified. 3. The ESSER II, Year 1 report overstated expenditures for the reporting period, July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, by $227,740. In addition, the key line items "Addressing Physical Health and Safety - Personnel Services - Salaries" and "Operational Continuity and Other Allowed Uses - Purchased Professional and Technical Services" chosen for review were incorrectly reported. 4. The ESSER III, Year 1 report overstated expenditures for the reporting period, July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, by $30,643, as the report indicated expenditures of $30,643 but the ledger did not have any expenditures from ESSER III during that time period. In addition, the key line items "Addressing Physical Health and Safety (exclusive of amount expended toward required set-aside to address learning loss) - Personnel services - Salaries" and "Meeting Students' Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs (Excluding Mental Health Supports) (exclusive of amount expended toward required set-aside to address learning loss) - Personnel Services - Benefits" chosen for review were incorrectly reported. 5. The ESSER III, Year 2 report understated expenditures for the reporting period, July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, by $61,705. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, reports submitted to the IDOE were not supported by the School Corporation's underlying accounting records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 34 SILVER CREEK SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place prior to filing required reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-010 Finding Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Summary of Finding: The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. Additionally, the ESSER I, Year 2, ESSER I, Year 3, ESSER II, Year 1, ESSER III, Year 1, and ESSER III, Year 2 reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Todd Balmer, Assistant Superintendent/CFO and Allison Vanover, Corporation Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-246-3375 tbalmer@scsc.school avanover@scsc.school Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We are currently meeting with a Grants Management Consultant that will be working with us on how to properly complete the ESSER reports to ensure submission moving forward is accurate. Prior to submission, the grants person will review to ensure the report is complete and the information is correct. We will also send the reports to the consultant for review. Anticipated Completion Date: April 2024

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 22, 2022, which was (1337 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2021-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY20/21 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk exceeding $10,000 from an adequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. One of the three small purchase procurements tested did not comply. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. All of the contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joshua Sinclair, Food Service Director and Todd Balmer Contact Phone Number: 812.246.3375 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the findings. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Food Service Director will establish an internal control system to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement, the Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment compliance requirements. The CFO will review supporting documentation that ensures procurements were obtained properly and that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Once acknowledged that all is in order the CFO will initial to state approval. Anticipated Completion Date: Effective July 2022

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.