Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 18, 2024, which was (884 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Control Deficiency ? Suspension and Debarment (Repeated and Modified)Condition: During our testwork over Suspension and Debarment, we noted 1 of 6 covered transactions tested for which SFI did not confirm the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transaction. Criteria or specific requirement: According to ?200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non- Federal must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR Part 180.300 outlines the requirements to verify that covered individuals are not excluded or disqualified. Questioned costs: None Context: The prior year corrective action plan had a planned completion date of December 31, 2022, and this covered transaction originated in 2021. Management performed a check at the beginning of 2023, and noted the vendor was not suspended or debarred, but could not substantiate this check retroactively. Cause: Transitions in personnel/management oversight. Effect: Without appropriate controls in place the organization may entered into an agreement with a covered person or entity that is not eligible. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management follow internal processes to ensure that checks are performed to conform with 180.300 of the CFR prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has strengthened internal controls to meet the requirement. Management has discussed the requirements with all necessary parties and has instituted the new controls for setting up sub-contracts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.Actions planned in response to finding: Management has implemented additional controls to be performed by the Sponsored Research department and VP of Administration office to better monitor and track sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI. Additionally, a list of all vendors that needed Suspension and Debarment from the previous year will be reviewed in January of the following year as SFI utilizes vendors over multiple years due to limited availability of vendors to provide necessary services. Responsible party: Suzette A. Fronk, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2023 Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: In conjunction with the VP of Administration, Sponsored Research Office, and the Chief Financial Officer, SFI?s Finance Committee will monitor the completion of the corrective action plan.
Management has implemented additional controls to be performed by the Sponsored Research department and VP of Administration office to better monitor and track sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI. Additionally, a list of all vendors that needed Suspension and Debarment from the previous year will be reviewed in January of the following year as SFI utilizes vendors over multiple years due to limited availability of vendors to provide necessary services.Responsible party: Suzette A. Fronk, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2023 Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: In conjunction with the VP of Administration, Sponsored Research Office, and the Chief Financial Officer, SFI?s Finance Committee will monitor the completion of the corrective action plan.
2021-002
"Control Deficiency – Suspension and Debarment (Repeated and Modified)Condition: During our testwork over Suspension and Debarment, we noted 1 of 6 covered transactions tested for which SFI did not confirm the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transaction. Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non- Federal must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR Part 180.300 outlines the requirements to verify that covered individuals are not excluded or disqualified. Questioned costs: None Context: The prior year corrective action plan had a planned completion date of December 31, 2022, and this covered transaction originated in 2021. Management performed a check at the beginning of 2023, and noted the vendor was not suspended or debarred, but could not substantiate this check retroactively. Cause: Transitions in personnel/management oversight. Effect: Without appropriate controls in place the organization may entered into an agreement with a covered person or entity that is not eligible. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management follow internal processes to ensure that checks are performed to conform with 180.300 of the CFR prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has strengthened internal controls to meet the requirement. Management has discussed the requirements with all necessary parties and has instituted the new controls for setting up sub-contracts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.Actions planned in response to finding: Management has implemented additional controls to be performed by the Sponsored Research department and VP of Administration office to better monitor and track sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI. Additionally, a list of all vendors that needed Suspension and Debarment from the previous year will be reviewed in January of the following year as SFI utilizes vendors over multiple years due to limited availability of vendors to provide necessary services. Responsible party: Suzette A. Fronk, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2023 Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: In conjunction with the VP of Administration, Sponsored Research Office, and the Chief Financial Officer, SFI’s Finance Committee will monitor the completion of the corrective action plan. "
"Management has implemented additional controls to be performed by the Sponsored Research department and VP of Administration office to better monitor and track sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI. Additionally, a list of all vendors that needed Suspension and Debarment from the previous year will be reviewed in January of the following year as SFI utilizes vendors over multiple years due to limited availability of vendors to provide necessary services.Responsible party: Suzette A. Fronk, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2023
2021-002
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 28, 2023, which was (1240 days ago).
What is a management decision? →2021?002 ? Control Deficiency ? Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: National Science Foundation Federal program title: Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Number: 45.169 47.049, 47.070, 47.074, 47.075 Award Period: Various Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Compliance Condition: During our testwork over Suspension and Debarment we noted the following conditions: ? We noted one contractor for which SFI did not confirm that the covered entity was not suspended or debarred. ? We noted that four of the six tested subrecipients did not have a check performed prior to entering into subrecipient agreement during 2021. Criteria or specific requirement: According to ?200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-Federal must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR Part 180.300 outlines the requirements to verify that covered individuals are not excluded or disqualified. Questioned costs: None Context: SFI entered into five covered transactions that required applicable checks for suspension and debarment. The first was for a contractor that was initially intended to be an employee. No check was performed prior to approval of the contract. The four new subrecipients did not have documentation of a check being performed prior to executing the agreement within the files. The latter is a violation of SFI's own policy. Cause: Transitions in personnel/management oversight. Effect: Without appropriate controls in place the organization may entered into an agreement with a covered person or entity that is not eligible. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Auditor recommends management revise existing policies to ensure vendors are checked for suspension and debarment consistent with 200 CFR 180.300. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will strengthen internal controls to meet the requirement. Management will institute the new control prior to setting up sub-contracts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions planned in response to finding: Management will implement an additional control from the Sponsored Research department that better monitors and tracks sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI, instead of concurrently to their entry within the finance team?s accounting records. SFI is currently looking to procure a suspension/debarment software program that can be used in conjunction with the SAM debarment database. Responsible party: Matthew Bechtel, Director of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2022. Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: Santa Fe Institute?s Finance Committee will monitor the completion of the corrective action plan.
National Science Foundation Santa Fe Institute respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2021. Audit period: January 1, 2021 ? December 31, 2021. The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS?FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT 2021-001 FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS National Science Foundation 2021-002 Research and Development (R&D) Cluster ALN 45.169, 47.049, 47.070, 47.074, and 47.075. Recommendation: Auditor recommends management revise existing policies to ensure vendors are checked for suspension and debarment consistent with 200 CFR 180.300. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will implement an additional control from the Sponsored Research department that better monitors and tracks sub-contractor debarment status prior to their being brought onboard for work with SFI, instead of concurrently to their entry within the finance team?s accounting records. SFI is currently looking to procure a suspension/debarment software program that can be used in conjunction with the SAM debarment database. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Matthew Bechtel Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2022 If the National Science Foundation has questions regarding this plan, please call Matt Bechtel, Director of Finance at (505) 946-2790.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 19, 2022, which was (1614 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Federal agency: National Science Foundation Federal program title: Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Number: 47.075 Award Period: August 15, 2016 ? July 31, 2021 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: According to ?200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non- Federal must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our testing over cash management and indirect cost, we noted that SFI had an error in calculation of the direct cost base due to a footing error. This caused the amount of indirect cost charged per grant to be based on the incorrect direct expenditure, and therefore under draw indirect cost recovery. Additionally, noted during our testing over cash management and indirect cost, we noted one grant had been drawn down for reimbursement in excess of the amount expended. This was due to management incorrectly calculating the amount expended within the period. Questioned costs: $6,016 Context: During our testing, 1 of 14 drawdowns sampled for indirect cost testing were not based on correct direct cost base, and therefore were inappropriately included in request for reimbursement. During our testing, 1 of 28 drawdowns sampled for cash management testing were based on an excess of the expenses actually incurred, and therefore were over drawn as of fiscal year-end. Cause: Santa Fe Institute has a formal process for reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission to the agency, but there was a lack of managerial oversight in reviewing the calculations used to determine the drawdown. Effect: Federal drawdown requests did not match underlying general ledger support of direct and indirect expense. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Auditor recommends management incorporate a process to formally re-calculate amounts included in the drawdown request after preparation to ensure accuracy prior to submission to the agency. Views of responsible officials: Management strives to eliminate all errors in processing; however, restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 remote work environment did alter internal control review and approval processes in 2020. Going forward, the finance team has adopted more stringent drawdown control processes that will remain effective both within the office and outside the office in a remote working environment. Grant close-out and financial review procedures still remain secure and effective. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions planned in response to finding: Management will strengthen controls to ensure accuracy of the drawdown request prior to agency submission. All footing errors will be eliminated as the finance department creates a new `electronic drawdown request template? linking all general ledger grant detail to final calculation of indirect cost. The controller will then verify the calculations produced by the Grants Accounting Specialist. Once verified, the Grants Accounting Specialist will present the director of finance with the final reimbursement request for onward submission. Responsible party: Matthew Bechtel, Director of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2021 Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: Santa Fe Institute?s Finance Committee will monitor the completion of the corrective action plan.
Recommendation: Auditor recommends management incorporate a process to formally re-calculate amounts included in the drawdown request after preparation to ensure accuracy prior to submission to the agency. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will strengthen controls to ensure accuracy of the drawdown request prior to agency submission. All footing errors will be eliminated as the finance department creates a new `electronic drawdown request template? linking all general ledger grant detail to final calculation of indirect cost. The Controller will then verify the calculations produced by the Grants Accounting Specialist. Once verified, the Grants Accounting Specialist will present the Director of Finance with the final reimbursement request for onward submission. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Matthew Bechtel Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 09/30/21
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 12, 2020, which was (2351 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 12, 2018. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 12, 2019, which was (2745 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.